IT之家 9 月 15 日消息，科技媒体 The Verge 今天（9 月 15 日）发布博文，报道称《滚石》杂志母公司 Penske Media Corporation 起诉谷歌，指控其搜索结 果顶部的 AI 摘要（AI Overviews）减少用户点击原文，侵蚀网站流量并非法利用记者成果。 IT之家注：Penske Media Corporation 是《滚石》（Rolling Stone）、《好莱坞报道》（The Hollywood Reporter）等知名媒体的出版方，该公司近日向法院 提起诉讼，成为首家起诉谷歌 AI 摘要功能的美国大型媒体。 Penske 指控谷歌在搜索结果顶部展示的 AI Overviews，直接提供关键信息，减少用户点击原始报道，从而削弱其流量和广告收入。 事实上，Penske 并非第一家对谷歌提起类似诉讼。在线教育公司 Chegg 以及多个欧洲独立出版商今年 2 月都曾起诉谷歌，美国新闻 / 媒体联盟也批评该功 能是"盗窃的定义"，并推动司法部采取行动。 Penske 在诉状中称，自 2025 年以来，来自谷歌搜索的访问量明显下降，联盟广告收入同比减少超过三分之一，公司认为罪 ...

Core Viewpoint - The "True Village" platform in Guangdong is now open for free registration, aiming to empower rural tourism operators with significant traffic and exposure opportunities [9][11]. Group 1: Platform Overview - The "True Village" platform was officially launched on September 28, 2024, featuring a unique service system that includes "one platform and three carriers" [13]. - The platform focuses on showcasing Guangdong's rural natural scenery, cultural heritage, and unique products, serving as a digital guide for exploring rural tourism [14][15]. Group 2: Benefits for Participants - Participants can gain exposure to a provincial media audience with millions of views, access to 500,000 targeted users, and promotional support through official recommendations [11]. - The platform currently has 500,000 registered users and nearly 1 million interactions, indicating a strong engagement level [15]. Group 3: Eligibility for Registration - Eligible participants include boutique homestays/hotels with legal operating qualifications, beautiful environments, complete facilities, and quality services, which will be featured on the "Must-Sleep Homestays" page [17][18]. - Farmers' restaurants must offer local ingredients and authentic dishes to be included in the "True Village Must-Eat List" [19][20]. - Unique rural tourism destinations and camping sites will be incorporated into themed travel routes [21][22]. - Health, research, and experiential projects that can conduct activities like picking, fishing, and handicrafts will be tailored for family-oriented travel routes [24][25].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the commercialization and questionable credibility of prestigious youth awards like Forbes' "30 Under 30" and the Forbes Global Alliance, highlighting how these accolades have become accessible through financial means rather than merit alone [4][6][30]. Group 1: Forbes "30 Under 30" and Its Implications - The "30 Under 30" list has expanded beyond its original intent, with many individuals claiming to be part of the list without meeting the actual criteria, leading to a dilution of its prestige [8][15]. - The selection process for the Forbes U30 list involves a nomination system that lacks stringent criteria, allowing for a wide range of individuals to be included, often based on social media presence rather than substantial achievements [18][20]. - There are claims that financial contributions can significantly increase the chances of being nominated, with some individuals reportedly paying for media coverage to enhance their visibility [20][22]. Group 2: Commercialization of Awards - The article reveals that the Forbes Global Alliance requires a membership fee of 88,000 yuan for entry, which raises questions about the integrity of such memberships being labeled as prestigious [30][31]. - The rise of intermediaries offering services to secure spots on these lists for a fee indicates a shift towards a pay-to-play model, undermining the original purpose of recognizing genuine talent [23][25]. - The commercialization of these awards has led to a perception that they are more about financial capability than actual accomplishments, with some individuals using these accolades as marketing tools [40][41]. Group 3: Broader Cultural Context - The phenomenon of young individuals achieving recognition through awards like Forbes U30 reflects a societal pressure to succeed at a young age, often leading to shortcuts and unethical practices [40][42]. - The article contrasts the aspirations of ordinary individuals with the seemingly unattainable achievements of those on these lists, highlighting a growing disconnect between societal expectations and reality [43].