期内溢利减少主要由于集团媒体业务的出版及广告及贷款业务收入下跌及为应收贷款及利息预期信贷亏 损作出亏损拨备等因素所致。 东方企控集团(00018)发布截至2025年9月30日止6个月业绩，收入2.39亿港元，同比下降14.7%;公司拥有 人应占溢利128.3万港元，同比下降94.9%;每股基本盈利0.05港仙。 ...

Core Points - Penske Media Corporation has filed a lawsuit against Google, claiming that the AI Overviews feature in search results reduces user clicks on original articles, thereby harming website traffic and illegally utilizing journalistic work [1][2] - Since 2025, Penske has reported a significant decline in traffic from Google searches, with affiliate advertising revenue dropping by over one-third year-on-year, attributing this decline to the AI Overviews feature [1] - Google argues that AI Overviews enhance the usefulness of search results and have increased user engagement [1] Group 1 - Penske Media Corporation is the first major U.S. media company to sue Google over the AI Overviews feature [1] - The lawsuit highlights the challenges faced by the publishing industry, as banning Google from indexing their content would eliminate their visibility in search results, while continuing to allow indexing would provide training data for AI models [2] - Other companies, including Chegg and several European independent publishers, have previously filed similar lawsuits against Google, with criticism from the U.S. News/Media Alliance labeling the feature as "the definition of theft" [2]

Core Viewpoint - The "True Village" platform in Guangdong is now open for free registration, aiming to empower rural tourism operators with significant traffic and exposure opportunities [9][11]. Group 1: Platform Overview - The "True Village" platform was officially launched on September 28, 2024, featuring a unique service system that includes "one platform and three carriers" [13]. - The platform focuses on showcasing Guangdong's rural natural scenery, cultural heritage, and unique products, serving as a digital guide for exploring rural tourism [14][15]. Group 2: Benefits for Participants - Participants can gain exposure to a provincial media audience with millions of views, access to 500,000 targeted users, and promotional support through official recommendations [11]. - The platform currently has 500,000 registered users and nearly 1 million interactions, indicating a strong engagement level [15]. Group 3: Eligibility for Registration - Eligible participants include boutique homestays/hotels with legal operating qualifications, beautiful environments, complete facilities, and quality services, which will be featured on the "Must-Sleep Homestays" page [17][18]. - Farmers' restaurants must offer local ingredients and authentic dishes to be included in the "True Village Must-Eat List" [19][20]. - Unique rural tourism destinations and camping sites will be incorporated into themed travel routes [21][22]. - Health, research, and experiential projects that can conduct activities like picking, fishing, and handicrafts will be tailored for family-oriented travel routes [24][25].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the commercialization and questionable credibility of prestigious youth awards like Forbes' "30 Under 30" and the Forbes Global Alliance, highlighting how these accolades have become accessible through financial means rather than merit alone [4][6][30]. Group 1: Forbes "30 Under 30" and Its Implications - The "30 Under 30" list has expanded beyond its original intent, with many individuals claiming to be part of the list without meeting the actual criteria, leading to a dilution of its prestige [8][15]. - The selection process for the Forbes U30 list involves a nomination system that lacks stringent criteria, allowing for a wide range of individuals to be included, often based on social media presence rather than substantial achievements [18][20]. - There are claims that financial contributions can significantly increase the chances of being nominated, with some individuals reportedly paying for media coverage to enhance their visibility [20][22]. Group 2: Commercialization of Awards - The article reveals that the Forbes Global Alliance requires a membership fee of 88,000 yuan for entry, which raises questions about the integrity of such memberships being labeled as prestigious [30][31]. - The rise of intermediaries offering services to secure spots on these lists for a fee indicates a shift towards a pay-to-play model, undermining the original purpose of recognizing genuine talent [23][25]. - The commercialization of these awards has led to a perception that they are more about financial capability than actual accomplishments, with some individuals using these accolades as marketing tools [40][41]. Group 3: Broader Cultural Context - The phenomenon of young individuals achieving recognition through awards like Forbes U30 reflects a societal pressure to succeed at a young age, often leading to shortcuts and unethical practices [40][42]. - The article contrasts the aspirations of ordinary individuals with the seemingly unattainable achievements of those on these lists, highlighting a growing disconnect between societal expectations and reality [43].