公司发布的半年报数据显示，上半年公司共实现营业收入2.88亿元，同比增长20.63%，实现净利润 2517.99万元，同比增长138.99%，基本每股收益为0.0714元，加权平均净资产收益率1.91%。（数据 宝） 注：本文系新闻报道，不构成投资建议，股市有风险，投资需谨慎。 光力科技9月18日披露，截至9月10日公司股东户数为25000户，较上期（8月31日）减少3000户，环比降 幅为10.71%。 证券时报·数据宝统计，截至发稿，光力科技收盘价为16.09元，下跌1.83%，本期筹码集中以来股价累 计下跌13.26%。具体到各交易日，7次上涨，7次下跌。 （文章来源：证券时报网） ...

于公司<2024 年限制性股票激励计划（草案）>及其摘要的议案》 《关于公司<2024 年限制性股票激励计划实施考核管理办法>的议案》《关于提请股东大会授权董 事会办理公司 2024 年限制性股票激励计划有关事项的议案》。 同日，公司召开第三届监事会第三次会议，审议通过了《关于公司<2024 年 限制性股票激励计划（草案）>及其摘要的议案》《关于公司<2024 年限制性股 票激励计划实施考核管理办法>的议案》《关于核实公司<2024 年限制性股票激 励计划首次授予激励对象名单>的议案》，公司监事会对本次激励计划的相关事 项进行核实并出具了相关核查意见。 证券代码：688628 证券简称：优利德 公告编号：2025-043 优利德科技（中国）股份有限公司 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈 述或重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 优利德科技（中国）股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2025 年 8 月 了《关于作废处理部分限制性股票的议案》。现将有关事项说明如下： 一、公司 2024 年限制性股票激励计划（以下简称"本次激励计划"）已履 行的决策程序和 ...

Financial Performance - Company reported total revenue of 2.345 billion yuan for the first half of 2025, a year-on-year increase of 27.35% [1] - Net profit attributable to shareholders reached 480 million yuan, up 24.29% year-on-year [1] - In Q2 2025, total revenue was 1.252 billion yuan, reflecting a 27.91% increase compared to the same quarter last year [1] - The gross margin was 54.42%, down 3.35% year-on-year, while the net margin was 19.38%, a decrease of 0.85% [1] - Accounts receivable increased by 45.8% year-on-year, raising concerns about cash flow management [1][3] Business Model and Strategy - Company relies heavily on research and marketing for its performance, indicating a need for thorough analysis of these driving factors [3] - The company has established over 20 subsidiaries globally, enhancing its local market presence and customer service capabilities [6] - The company has implemented a proactive strategy to mitigate the impact of tariff policies, maintaining a strong market position [6] Market Position and Investment Interest - The company is held by prominent fund managers, including Chen Hao from E Fund, who has recently increased his stake [4] - The most significant fund holding the company is the Bosera Sci-Tech Innovation AI ETF, with a scale of 4.245 billion yuan [5] - Analysts expect the company's performance in 2025 to reach 818 million yuan, with an average earnings per share of 1.22 yuan [3] Supply Chain and Pricing Strategy - The company has established production bases in Shenzhen, Vietnam, and North Carolina, USA, to optimize its supply chain [7] - A price increase of 7% to 10% for digital energy products in the US has been announced to offset the 10% tariff [7] - The company has achieved significant breakthroughs in various global markets, anticipating continued growth in regions outside the US [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Shenzhen Beiliang Technology Co., Ltd. has established a system for accountability regarding significant errors in annual report information disclosure to enhance the quality and transparency of its disclosures [1][2]. Group 1: General Principles - The system aims to improve the authenticity, accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of annual report disclosures, aligning with various laws and regulations [1]. - The accountability system applies to directors, senior management, department heads, subsidiaries, and other personnel involved in the annual report disclosure process [2]. - The principles of the accountability system include objectivity, fairness, and the correlation between responsibility and rights [2]. Group 2: Responsibilities of Personnel - Senior management, including the general manager and financial officer, is responsible for organizing the preparation of the annual report draft and ensuring timely reporting of necessary information [3]. - Directors and senior management are accountable for the truthfulness and accuracy of the annual report disclosures and must bear the consequences of any errors [3]. Group 3: Accountability for Significant Errors - The company will hold responsible parties accountable for significant errors in annual report disclosures, distinguishing between direct responsibility and leadership responsibility [3][4]. - Significant errors include major accounting mistakes, substantial omissions, and discrepancies in performance forecasts or reports [5]. Group 4: Standards for Discrepancies - Criteria for identifying significant discrepancies in performance forecasts include inconsistencies in expected versus actual performance and variations exceeding 20% [4][5]. - Discrepancies in performance reports are recognized if financial data differs by more than 10% from actual reports [4]. Group 5: Penalties and Corrections - The system outlines conditions for heavier penalties, such as severe consequences due to personal factors, and lighter penalties for proactive corrective actions [6][7]. - The results of accountability measures will be included in the annual performance evaluations of relevant departments and personnel [8]. Group 6: Implementation and Amendments - The accountability system will take effect upon approval by the company's board of directors and will be subject to future amendments as necessary [9].

Core Points - The company announced an adjustment to the maximum repurchase price of its shares following the 2024 annual equity distribution, reducing it from RMB 373.74 per share to RMB 266.23 per share [1] - The repurchase plan involves using between RMB 50 million and RMB 100 million of the company's own funds to buy back shares within 12 months from the board's approval date [1] - The adjustment in the repurchase price is due to the implementation of a cash dividend of RMB 1.06964 per share and a capital reserve increase of 73,907,541 shares, which will dilute the share value [1] Repurchase Plan Details - The repurchase price adjustment will take effect on June 24, 2025, coinciding with the ex-dividend date for the 2024 annual equity distribution [1] - The total number of shares to be repurchased is estimated at approximately 375,615 shares, which would represent about 0.0726% of the company's total share capital post-distribution [1] - The repurchase will be conducted in accordance with relevant regulations and the company's repurchase plan, with timely disclosures to investors regarding the progress [1]

Group 1 - The company approved a profit distribution plan for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024, which includes a cash dividend of 0.5 RMB per 10 shares, totaling 56,833,917.05 RMB (including tax) [1][2] - The total number of shares eligible for the dividend is 1,136,678,341 shares after deducting repurchased shares [1][2] - The dividend distribution will not include stock dividends or capital reserve transfers to increase share capital [1] Group 2 - The equity registration date for the dividend distribution is set for June 30, 2025, and the ex-dividend date is July 1, 2025 [2] - The distribution applies to all shareholders registered with the China Securities Depository and Clearing Corporation Limited Shenzhen Branch as of the registration date [2] - The actual cash dividend amount is calculated based on the number of shares participating in the distribution multiplied by the distribution ratio [2][3] Group 3 - The adjusted cash dividend per 10 shares, based on the total share capital, is approximately 0.485842 RMB [2] - The ex-dividend price will be adjusted based on the previous day's closing price minus the dividend amount per share [3]

Core Viewpoint - Despite the market turbulence caused by Trump's tariff policies, global stock markets experienced a surprising "V-shaped" rebound in April, largely due to measures taken by the Trump administration to soften trade policies, which reassured investors about potential government intervention if economic data worsened [1][19][20]. Market Performance - In April, the S&P 500 index fell by only 0.8%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped by 3.2%, and the Nasdaq index actually rose by 0.9%. The Nasdaq experienced a maximum drawdown of 16% in the first week but rebounded by approximately 18% in the following weeks [4][9]. - The Dow and S&P 500 indices have seen seven consecutive days of gains, with the S&P 500's increase over this period being the largest since November 2020 [3][2]. Economic Indicators - The U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of the year, yet the stock market showed strong rebounds, with the Dow Jones up by 0.3% and the S&P 500 up by 0.1% on the day of the contraction announcement [2]. - The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield experienced a wide fluctuation of 50 basis points in April, closing at 4.173%, slightly down from 4.245% a month prior [7]. Asset Class Performance - The U.S. dollar fell over 4% in April, marking its largest monthly decline since November 2022 and the second-largest since September 2010 [10]. - Gold prices increased by nearly 6%, marking the fourth consecutive month of gains, while Bitcoin surged by 14%, achieving its best monthly performance since the election-driven rally in November [11]. - Conversely, WTI crude oil had its worst monthly performance since November 2021, closing at its lowest level since February 2021 [12]. Market Divergence - There is a notable divergence in U.S. economic data, with strong "hard data" contrasting with collapsing "soft data," leading to investor confusion regarding the impact of tariffs on the economy [13][15]. - Institutional investors remain cautious despite the S&P 500's 14% rise since April 7, while retail investors are aggressively increasing their positions, particularly in the Nasdaq market, reflecting a more optimistic sentiment [16][17]. Market Logic Behind Rebound - The market's recovery is attributed to the Trump administration's measures to soften trade policies, including a 90-day tariff suspension and exemptions for tech products, which have made investors believe that further government action will be taken if economic conditions deteriorate [19][20]. - Weak economic data has fueled expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, reviving the "bad news is good news" market logic [23]. Historical Context - The April market rebound presents both good and bad news for investors. Historically, major monthly drawdowns have often led to subsequent gains, with 9 out of 10 instances showing positive performance in the following months. However, the exception in December 1973 during the "Nixon Shock" raises concerns about potential stagnation [25][26][27].