Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significance of the integration of Marxism with Chinese reality and traditional culture, highlighting the efforts of early Chinese communists in spreading Marxist literature during critical historical moments [2][3][4][5][6]. Group 1: Historical Context - The article reflects on the challenges faced by early communists like Li Dazhao and Chen Duxiu in promoting Marxism in China, particularly during the May Fourth Movement [2][3]. - It details the formation of various Marxist study groups and the early organization of the Communist Party in China, emphasizing the role of these groups in disseminating Marxist ideas [3][4]. Group 2: Key Figures and Contributions - Li Dazhao and Chen Duxiu are highlighted as pivotal figures in the establishment of Marxist thought in China, with their clandestine meetings aimed at discussing Marxist literature and party-building efforts [3][4]. - The article recounts the story of Guo Dali and Wang Yanan, who undertook the translation of Marx's "Capital" under dire circumstances, ultimately achieving the first complete Chinese edition during wartime [4][5]. Group 3: Translation Efforts - The article emphasizes the extensive translation efforts of Cheng Fangwu, who translated "The Communist Manifesto" multiple times across different historical periods, reflecting the evolving understanding of Marxist texts in China [5][6]. - It notes the challenges faced in translation due to limited resources and the dedication of translators who contributed to the dissemination of Marxist literature in China [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The emphasis on improving writing style is crucial for aligning with the Party's nature and mission, as highlighted by Xi Jinping, who states that leadership is key to this change [1] Group 1: Critique of Poor Writing Style - Marx and Engels criticized various forms of poor writing, arguing that they obscure genuine thought and fail to reflect the real needs of the people [1][2] - They highlighted the importance of clarity and accessibility in writing, aiming for a style that is simple and understandable for the working class [2][3] Group 2: Characteristics of Good Writing Style - A good writing style must be grounded in reality and respond to actual conditions, avoiding empty rhetoric and focusing on concrete facts [3] - Marx and Engels' works, such as "Capital," are closely tied to the realities of capitalist society, emphasizing the need for empirical evidence and direct engagement with the subject matter [3] Group 3: Integration of Literary Techniques - Marx and Engels often incorporated literary techniques and references to enhance the emotional impact of their theoretical arguments, using classical literature and mythological allusions [4][5] - This approach not only enriched their writing but also made their ideas more relatable and compelling to the audience [5] Group 4: Party's Emphasis on Writing Style - The Chinese Communist Party has historically stressed the importance of a writing style that is practical and resonates with the masses, with leaders like Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping advocating for a focus on improving writing style as part of party conduct [5][6] - Since the 18th National Congress, the central leadership has prioritized the improvement of writing style, promoting a "short, practical, and new" approach that reflects the Party's ethos [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolution of economic thought through paradigm shifts and integrations, emphasizing that each theoretical change in economics occurs through these two stages, which is distinct from the natural sciences [19]. Group 1: Paradigm Shifts in Economic Thought - The first paradigm shift in economics occurred in the 1770s, marked by the publication of Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" in 1776, which transitioned the focus from "wealth management" to "wealth production" [20]. - The second paradigm shift took place in the 1870s with the rise of the marginal utility school, which challenged the classical economics' labor theory of value and introduced the "subjective value" paradigm [43]. Group 2: Paradigm Integrations in Economic Thought - The first paradigm integration occurred in the 1840s with John Stuart Mill's "Principles of Political Economy," which combined the "wealth management" and "wealth production" paradigms into a complementary theoretical framework [32]. - The second paradigm integration happened in the late 19th century with Alfred Marshall's "Principles of Economics," which synthesized classical economics' "objective value" and the marginal utility school's "subjective value" into what is known as "neoclassical economics" [51][52].

Core Viewpoint - The Changjiang Bookstore, a historical site significant to the Chinese Communist Party, has been renovated and reopened as a "Red Culture Complex" to promote revolutionary culture and historical memory [1]. Group 1: Historical Significance - The Changjiang Bookstore was established in November 1926 as the first bookstore in Wuhan to promote Marxist literature and revolutionary ideas [1]. - It published over 50 revolutionary books and was a key site for disseminating progressive knowledge during the revolutionary period [1]. - The bookstore was popular from its inception, with books transported from Shanghai and Guangzhou selling out within three days, indicating a strong public demand for revolutionary thought [1]. Group 2: Renovation and Features - In 2022, the Jianghan District decided to renovate the original site of the Changjiang Bookstore to preserve red culture and awaken historical memories [1]. - The newly reopened bookstore features a multi-functional space that includes red culture exhibitions, book sales, and cultural creativity [1]. - The bookstore includes various sections such as a display area for Mao Zedong's research, a humanities and social sciences library, and a cultural exchange space with unique quiet reading areas [3].

Group 1 - The core idea emphasizes the importance of adapting Marx and Engels' principles to contemporary historical conditions, highlighting the need for scientific theories to align with specific situations [1] - Marx and Engels' early influences stemmed from German classical philosophy, British classical political economy, and French utopian socialism, which they critically inherited and developed [2] - The concept of dialectical materialism was created by Marx as a response to the limitations of previous philosophies, aiming to achieve the goal of "changing the world" [2] Group 2 - Marx and Engels believed that history progresses through a combination of maintaining established principles and innovating, as seen in their works that reflect the necessity of adapting to changing conditions [3] - The inherent unity of maintaining and innovating is evident in Marx's writings, where he critiques capitalism and argues for the inevitable victory of communism based on historical trends [4] - The realization of any theory depends on its relevance to a country's specific needs and cultural context, which has been a guiding principle for the party's development of Marxism over the past century [5] Group 3 - The essence of Marxism is its capacity for continuous development and self-improvement, as it is not a static doctrine but an evolving theoretical framework [6] - The commitment to both maintaining core principles and pursuing innovation is crucial for guiding new practices and achieving breakthroughs in various fields [6]