中国经济网北京10月10日讯（记者 何潇）今年9月份，全市场8627只（各类份额分开计算，下同）有可 比业绩的混合型基金中，有7058只基金净值上涨，占比81.81%；有1549只基金净值下跌，其余20只基 金净值持平。 9月份共计14只混合型基金涨幅超过25%（含25%），其中嘉实新优选混合、东方新能源汽车主题混 合、鹏华新能源汽车混合A、鹏华新能源汽车混合C、中欧碳中和混合发起A、中欧碳中和混合发起C分 别以30.17%、28.86%、27.74%、27.69%、27.11%、27.03%的收益率领涨。 以涨幅第一的嘉实新优选混合为例，该基金成立于2016年4月8日，截至2025年9月30日，其今年来收益 率为54.33%，成立来收益率为46.56%，累计净值为1.4440元。 据悉，14只单月涨幅超过25%（含25%）的混合型基金中，截至今年上半年规模在10亿元之上的有东方 新能源汽车主题混合、鹏华新能源汽车混合A、泉果旭源三年持有期混合A、泉果旭源三年持有期混合 C、申万菱信新能源汽车主题灵活配置混合A、前海开源金银珠宝混合C。 以规模最大的泉果旭源三年持有期混合A为例，该基金单月涨幅26.02%，成 ...

写在文章前的声明：在本文之前的说明：本文中所列的投资信息，只是一个对基金资产净值进行排行的客观描述，并无主观倾向性，也不是投资建议，纯属 娱乐性质。 | 排名 | 代码 | 基金简称 | 2025-09-29 | | 2025-09-26 | | FALL = 4 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | 单位净值3 | 累计净值8 | 单位净值3 | 累计净值3 | | | 1 | 513090 | 易方达中证香港证券投资主题ETF | 2.3164 | 2.3164 | 2.1379 | 2.1379 | 0.17 | | 2 | 013490 | 同泰金融精选股票A | 1.2474 | 1.2474 | 1.1705 | 1.1705 | 0.07 | | 3 | 013491 | 同泰金融精选股票C | 1.2281 | 1.2281 | 1.1524 | 1.1524 | 0.07 | | 4 | 005327 | 景顺长城景泰稳利定期开放债券A | 1.1135 | 1.3732 | 1.0501 | 1.3098 | ...

9月26日，天际股份涨5.53%，截至发稿，报15.64元/股，成交6.63亿元，换手率8.78%，总市值78.42亿 元。 资料显示，天际新能源科技股份有限公司位于广东省汕头市潮汕路金园工业城12-12片区，成立日期 1996年3月30日，上市日期2015年5月28日，公司主营业务涉及将现代科学技术与传统陶瓷烹饪相结合的 陶瓷烹饪家电、电热水壶的研发、生产和销售。研发、生产、销售六氟磷酸锂。主营业务收入构成为： 六氟磷酸锂67.27%，次磷酸钠12.80%，小家电产品7.86%，四羟甲基磷化物4.69%，其他化工产品 4.21%，氟硼酸钾2.52%，双磷酸0.63%。 东方新能源汽车主题混合（400015）成立日期2011年12月28日，最新规模78.58亿。今年以来收益 48.65%，同类排名1300/8171；近一年收益83.59%，同类排名1033/8004；成立以来收益284.84%。 东方新能源汽车主题混合（400015）基金经理为李瑞。 从天际股份十大流通股东角度 数据显示，东方基金旗下1只基金位居天际股份十大流通股东。东方新能源汽车主题混合（400015）二 季度持有股数301.36万股，持股 ...

Core Viewpoint - The performance of key fund managers at Dongfang Fund, particularly Wang Ran and Li Rui, has raised concerns in the market due to their poor investment returns, leading to a potential trust crisis for the company [2][3]. Group 1: Fund Performance - Dongfang Fund currently manages a total of 123.4 billion yuan across 123 funds, but the active equity investment capabilities are under scrutiny due to negative returns [3]. - Wang Ran's three managed funds have all reported negative returns, with the best performance being -8.94% over her tenure [3]. - The Dongfang Quality Consumption One-Year Holding A/C classes have seen returns of -57.93% and -58.31%, with net values dropping to 0.424 yuan and 0.417 yuan respectively [3]. - The Dongfang Urban Consumption Theme Mixed Fund has also underperformed, with returns of 16.53%, -15.83%, and -28.70% over the past one, two, and three years, respectively [4]. Group 2: High Turnover Rates - Wang Ran's Dongfang Emerging Growth Fund has a turnover rate exceeding 600%, reaching 750% in Q2 2024, but this high turnover has not translated into improved returns, with a three-year loss of 38.71% [4][5]. - High turnover rates are indicative of unstable investment strategies, which contradict the advocated principles of value and long-term investing [5]. - Frequent trading increases transaction costs, which can further erode fund performance and negatively impact investor experience [5][7]. Group 3: Li Rui's Fund Performance - Li Rui's flagship fund, the Dongfang New Energy Vehicle Theme Mixed Fund, has seen a drastic decline in performance since 2022, with returns of -31.69%, -32.02%, and -2.11% in the following years, ranking at the bottom among peers [6]. - The fund's management scale has decreased significantly from 224.41 billion yuan at the end of 2021 to 78.58 billion yuan by mid-2024 [6]. - Another fund managed by Li Rui, the Dongfang Automotive Industry Trend Mixed A, has also seen its scale shrink from 1.4 billion yuan to 0.52 billion yuan over three years [6].

Group 1 - The article provides a ranking of open-end funds based on their net asset value growth as of August 11, 2025, highlighting the top 10 funds with significant increases [2][4]. - The top-performing fund is "Guoshou Anbao New Materials Stock Initiation A," with a net value of 1.6123, showing an increase from 1.5382 on August 8, 2025, representing a growth of 0.07 [2]. - The bottom-performing fund is "Southern CSI Hong Kong Gold Industry Stock Index Initiation C," which decreased from 1.3488 to 1.3088, reflecting a decline of 0.04 [4]. Group 2 - The overall market performance indicates a rebound, with the Shanghai Composite Index showing a small upward trend and the ChiNext Index experiencing a more significant rise, with a trading volume of 1.85 trillion [6]. - Leading sectors include components, software services, and advertising packaging, all showing gains of over 2%, while the shipping industry faced a decline of over 2% [6]. - The fund "Guoshou Anbao New Materials Stock Initiation A" is noted for its rapid net value growth, outperforming the market [6].

Core Insights - The ESG investment funds are gaining significant attention in the financial market, with approximately 1200 funds and a total scale exceeding 820 billion yuan as of June 6 [3][4] - Various types of ESG funds are emerging, including pure ESG theme funds, ESG strategy funds, and environmental protection theme funds, reflecting a growing recognition of sustainable investment [3][4] Fund Performance - Among the ESG funds, 84 funds have achieved over 10% returns this year, with 20 funds exceeding 20% and 8 funds surpassing 50% [4][5] - Notable performers include the Bank of China Hong Kong Stock Connect Medical A/C with over 60% returns and the Huatai-PineBridge Health Living One-Year Holding A/C with over 55% returns [5] Market Trends - The increasing number of ESG funds indicates a rising investor interest in corporate social responsibility and sustainable development [4][7] - Fund companies are strategically positioning themselves to attract a broader client base, particularly younger generations and institutional investors who prefer investments aligned with their values [4][7] Regulatory Environment - Since 2020, there has been a growing emphasis on ESG regulations, with various policies being introduced to guide enterprises in ESG practices [7][8] - Central and local governments are actively promoting ESG development, with initiatives aimed at enhancing the quality of state-owned enterprises and fostering sustainable urban development [7][8]