江南时报讯 今年以来，南通农商银行紧扣"信贷业务提升年"目标，以提升审计监督质效为切入点，将 审计监督深度融入信贷业务全流程，着力构建集中统一、全面覆盖、权威高效的审计监督体系，为全行 高质量发展提供坚实保障。 精准聚焦，筑牢风险屏障。围绕联合银行开展的押品专项审计，严格对标监管要求，从准入、监测到处 置全流程排查管理漏洞，有效防控抵质押业务风险。在支行全面审计中，从业务合规、风险管控、内部 管理等多维度入手，开展穿透式审查。通过审计模型跑批、信贷档案调阅等方式，摸清运营现状，深挖 潜在风险，助力支行合规经营。对审计发现问题，内部审计部门及时反馈，推动业务部门自查自纠，最 大化发挥审计价值。 创新驱动，激活团队动能。以"全员能力提升"为核心，构建理论培训与项目实践相结合的能力培养体 系。定期组织专题研讨，聚焦信贷管理、员工行为、财务监督等重点领域，解析审计思路与风险要点； 积极参与外部培训，借鉴他行先进经验，持续优化审计方案。在项目实战中，实行新老搭配、以老带 新，由资深成员担任组长，全程指导实战技巧，确保团队每完成一个项目、能力实现一次提升。通 过"业务痛点梳理+模型逻辑拆解+创新思路碰撞"，共同探索模型构 ...

与北京城建集团有限责任公司签署战略合作协议。双方将在信贷业务、咨询服务、贸易融资、资金业务 等方面丰富合作场景、深挖合作潜力，实现多领域共赢发展。 10月29日，2025年金融街论坛年会举办期间，中国进出口银行联合中国银河证券共同举办"融资融智融 商，共促'一带一路'高质量发展"主题平行论坛。北京市副市长孙硕、中国进出口银行董事长陈怀宇出 席并致辞，新开发银行行长迪尔玛·罗塞芙出席并发表主旨演讲。在当天举行的论坛上，中国进出口银 行签署多项合作协议，携手各方共促"一带一路"高质量发展。 与乌兹别克斯坦国家对外经济活动银行签署合作协议。根据协议，双方将构建起更加稳固的同业合作渠 道，共同助力高质量共建"一带一路"。 与哈萨克斯坦开发银行签署20亿元人民币贷款主要融资条件协议。本次协议的签署，是两行首次开展人 民币流动资金贷款业务合作，对扎实推进人民币国际化具有积极意义。双方将进一步打造更多示范性、 引领性的合作成果，推动中哈经贸合作蓬勃发展。 与波黑塞族共和国高速公路公司签署波萨维纳高速公路项目合作备忘录。项目落地后将便利民众出行， 提高运输效率，促进中东欧国家间的互联互通，为波黑经济社会发展注入更多动力。 中 ...

对比三个季度的罚单情况来看，一季度处罚力度不小，二季度金额有所回落，三季度处罚力度再次大 增。今年7月至9月，国家金融监督管理总局开出的罚单金额高达5.38亿元，相较二季度明显上升，成为 截至目前的年内处罚金额"高峰季"。 第三季度处罚金额明显提高的主要原因是多张"天价罚单"的出现。而这些"天价罚单"集中于股份制银 行，导致从被处罚银行类型来看，股份制银行超越农商行，一改以往农商行稳居罚单金额首位的局面。 2025年，金融监管依然严字当头。《金融时报》记者梳理同花顺（300033）iFinD数据发现，在刚刚过 去的第三季度，金融机构共收到金融管理部门开出2133张罚单，罚没金额达10.24亿元，分别环比大增 36.12%、190.91%。其中，银行机构在第三季度收到罚单1448张，同比增长18.3%；罚没金额8.29亿元， 同比大增84.63%。 从被罚原因来看，信贷业务违规依然是"重灾区"，贷前尽职调查不到位、贷中审查不审慎、贷后资金被 挪用、违规发放流动资金贷款等问题尤为突出。值得关注的是，贷后资金被挪用的违规行为表现出一些 新特点，以往贷款挪用多指向房地产，而第三季度部分银行被查出贷款被挪用于归还他行不 ...

Group 1: Core Trends in Credit and Banking - The digitalization and AI integration of traditional banks is an inevitable trend, as credit remains the cornerstone of the modern financial system, efficiently converting societal savings into investments and consumption [1] - The rise of large tech companies like Ant Group and WeBank, along with fintech innovators like Upstart, is challenging the traditional banking dominance by leveraging data and technology advantages in the credit sector [1] Group 2: Information Asymmetry in Credit - The core obstacle in credit is information asymmetry, where borrowers typically have a better understanding of their financial situation than lenders, leading to risks such as adverse selection and moral hazard [2] - To mitigate these risks, lenders must invest significant time and resources in gathering and verifying borrower information, which creates transaction costs [2] Group 3: Failures of P2P Lending - The P2P lending boom around 2015, which aimed to innovate finance by connecting borrowers and lenders directly, ultimately failed due to its inability to address the core issue of information asymmetry [3] - P2P platforms relied on self-reported borrower information and lacked ongoing monitoring, leading to a concentration of risk when financial strains occurred [3] Group 4: The Role of Big Data and AI - The emergence of big data and AI is reshaping the information processing capabilities in credit, breaking the monopoly of traditional banks [4] - Big data allows for more efficient information collection, reducing reliance on offline channels and enabling the continuous updating of data [4][5] - AI enhances information analysis by identifying complex patterns and relationships in vast datasets, improving risk identification and credit assessment [6] Group 5: Regulatory Challenges - Banks face strict regulatory requirements due to their role in systemic risk, necessitating the use of explainable and traceable technologies in credit operations [7] - In contrast, tech companies enjoy more lenient regulatory environments, allowing them to experiment with AI-driven models in real-world scenarios [8] Group 6: Future of Credit Competition - The future of credit competition will focus on who can achieve more efficient information processing at lower costs, leveraging comprehensive data and advanced AI capabilities [9] - Tech companies are expected to gain a larger market share in credit due to their robust platform ecosystems and superior algorithmic capabilities, while traditional banks will also need to embrace digitalization and AI [9]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is the implementation of credit integrity management measures in Heze City to enhance the financial credit environment and address challenges in credit issuance [1][2] - In June 2025, Heze City government issued the "Heze City Enterprise Credit Integrity Management Measures (Trial)" and "Heze City Banking Institutions Credit Integrity Management Measures (Trial)" to improve credit integrity awareness [1] - A special working group was established in July-August 2025 by the Heze City Financial Bureau and other institutions to evaluate the credit integrity behaviors of banks and enterprises [1] Group 2 - The evaluation results indicated that the Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Heze Branch ranked first among joint-stock banks and city commercial banks, with no negative evaluations from the 24 participating enterprises [2] - This achievement reflects the bank's commitment to integrity in credit operations and serves as a positive example for the healthy development of the financial credit environment in Heze City [2]

Core Insights - The regulatory environment for the banking industry in 2025 remains stringent, with a "zero tolerance" approach leading to a significant number of penalties issued [1][3] - In the first three quarters of 2025, a total of 997 penalties were imposed on various banking institutions, amounting to approximately 981 million yuan [3][4] - The focus of regulatory scrutiny is primarily on credit business violations, which account for nearly 60% of total penalties, highlighting the need for improved internal controls and compliance mechanisms within banks [6][9] Regulatory Overview - The National Financial Supervision Administration and its branches issued 997 penalties in the first nine months of 2025, with a total fine amounting to 981 million yuan [3][4] - The regulatory body itself issued 14 penalties totaling approximately 314.67 million yuan, indicating a high average penalty per case [3] - The first quarter saw the highest number of penalties at 394, while the third quarter experienced a surge in penalties to 372, reflecting an intensified regulatory environment [4] Credit Business Violations - Credit business remains a significant area of concern, with various violations leading to substantial penalties, including cases of improper loan management and misuse of funds [6][7] - Notable penalties include 16.8 million yuan for Zhejiang Merchants Bank and 8.725 million yuan for Huaxia Bank, both related to credit business violations [7][8] - The prevalence of violations in the credit sector is attributed to the high stakes involved, as it directly impacts financial security and order [9][10] Compliance Challenges - Other areas of compliance, such as wealth management and credit card operations, also exhibit significant vulnerabilities, necessitating a comprehensive upgrade in internal control systems [11][12] - Banks are encouraged to shift their focus from aggressive business expansion to robust risk management and compliance practices [13] - The need for a cultural shift within banks to prioritize compliance as a core aspect of operations is emphasized, aiming to build a more resilient financial environment [13]

Core Insights - The regulatory environment for the banking sector in 2025 remains stringent, with a "zero tolerance" approach leading to a significant number of penalties issued [1][2] - In the first three quarters of 2025, a total of 997 penalties were imposed on various banking institutions, amounting to approximately 981 million yuan [2][3] - The majority of penalties are related to credit business violations, highlighting the need for banks to enhance internal control mechanisms and compliance [1][5] Regulatory Overview - The National Financial Supervision Administration and its branches issued 997 penalties, with a total fine of 981 million yuan in the first nine months of 2025 [2] - The central administration issued 14 penalties totaling approximately 314.67 million yuan, while local regulatory bodies issued 306 and 677 penalties, respectively, with fines of 294.39 million yuan and 371.52 million yuan [2] - The first quarter saw the highest number of penalties, with 394 issued, while the second quarter experienced a decline, followed by a surge in the third quarter with 372 penalties and fines reaching 538 million yuan [3] Credit Business Violations - Credit business violations account for nearly 60% of total penalties, with diverse violations leading to substantial fines [5][6] - Notable cases include Zhejiang Merchants Bank and Shanghai Huari Bank, which faced significant penalties for various credit-related violations [5][6] - The trend of high penalties in the credit sector is attributed to the core nature of credit business in banking and the associated risks of fund mismanagement and regulatory non-compliance [7][8] Compliance Challenges - Compliance issues are not limited to credit business; other areas such as wealth management and credit card operations also exhibit significant regulatory gaps [9][10] - Banks often prioritize business expansion over compliance, leading to inadequate risk management practices [8][10] - The need for banks to upgrade their internal control governance is emphasized, focusing on a comprehensive approach to compliance and risk management [9][10]

Core Viewpoint - In 2025, the financial regulatory environment remains stringent, with a "zero tolerance" approach towards banks and financial institutions, leading to a significant number of penalties issued for various compliance violations [1][3]. Regulatory Overview - In the first three quarters of 2025, a total of 997 penalties were issued to various banking institutions, amounting to approximately 981 million yuan [3][4]. - The National Financial Supervision Administration issued 14 penalties with a total fine of approximately 314.67 million yuan, indicating a strong regulatory signal [3]. - The number of penalties and total fines in 2025 has decreased compared to the same period in 2024, where 1,533 penalties totaling about 1.18 billion yuan were issued [4][5]. Penalty Distribution - The first quarter of 2025 saw the highest number of penalties, with 394 issued and fines totaling around 299 million yuan [4]. - The second quarter experienced a decline in both the number of penalties and fines, with 231 penalties totaling about 143 million yuan [4]. - The third quarter saw a resurgence, with 372 penalties and fines soaring to 538 million yuan, marking it as the peak period for regulatory actions [4]. Focus on Credit Violations - Credit-related violations accounted for nearly 60% of total penalties, highlighting the sector as a primary focus for regulatory scrutiny [6]. - Notable penalties include Zhejiang Merchants Bank's Shanghai branch fined 16.8 million yuan for multiple credit-related violations [6]. - In September, several banks, including Huaxia Bank and Guangfa Bank, received significant fines for credit violations, with amounts reaching up to 87.25 million yuan [7]. Reasons for High Violation Rates - Credit business is critical for banks but also poses high risks due to potential misuse of funds and regulatory evasion [8]. - Increased scrutiny on non-performing loans and the exposure of hidden risks in real estate and local government financing have intensified regulatory actions [8][9]. - The competitive landscape has led some banks to relax risk management standards, resulting in frequent violations [9]. Internal Control and Compliance Issues - Beyond credit violations, other areas such as wealth management and credit card operations also exhibit significant compliance gaps [10][11]. - Banks are urged to enhance their internal control systems and shift their focus from short-term growth to long-term compliance and risk management [10][11]. - A comprehensive upgrade in internal governance is necessary, emphasizing a culture of compliance across all business units [11].

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen has taken action to enhance financial consumer rights by publicly disclosing the list of third-party cooperation institutions involved in credit business among eight major banks during the "Shenzhen 2025 Financial Education Promotion Week" [2][3]. Group 1: Third-Party Cooperation Institutions - Eight banks, including Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Agricultural Bank of China, have announced their third-party cooperation institutions, focusing on marketing, guarantee enhancement, and collection services [2][3]. - For example, Shenzhen's Bank of China has nearly 80 third-party cooperation institutions, with over 70% involved in credit card auto installment and home decoration installment services [3]. - The list includes 49 auto installment companies, 9 home decoration installment companies, and 9 personal housing loan institutions, indicating a significant reliance on third-party services for credit management [3]. Group 2: Consumer Rights Protection - The Shenzhen Banking Association stated that the public disclosure of third-party cooperation institutions is a positive step towards protecting financial consumer rights and regulating banking practices [3]. - This initiative aims to combat illegal loan intermediaries and promote fair competition within the financial sector [3][4]. Group 3: Issues with Illegal Loan Intermediaries - Illegal loan intermediaries have been a persistent issue, prompting banks in Shenzhen to issue "anti-intermediary" statements against a specific consulting service named Xin Xin Hui Lin [4]. - These intermediaries often mislead consumers with false claims of partnerships with banks and charge excessive fees, leading to significant consumer rights violations [4][5]. - Regulatory authorities have highlighted various deceptive tactics used by these intermediaries, such as posing as bank employees and promoting unrealistic loan conditions [5].

Group 1 - The financial company is a national non-bank financial institution established in June 1992, regulated by the National Financial Supervision Administration [1][2] - The ownership structure includes China Baowu Steel Group Co., Ltd. holding 24.32%, with other significant shareholders being Maanshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. and Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. [1] - The financial company is not a defaulter and has good creditworthiness and performance capabilities [2] Group 2 - The internal control system is based on a sound governance structure and advanced internal control culture, ensuring compliance with national regulations and operational efficiency [3][5] - The internal control principles include comprehensiveness, prudence, effectiveness, and checks and balances, covering all departments and processes [3][5] - The governance structure consists of a shareholders' meeting, board of directors, supervisory board, and management team, with clear responsibilities and procedures [5][6] Group 3 - The financial company has established a risk management system that includes a "four-in-one" risk control concept, integrating compliance, business continuity management, risk management, and internal control [7] - The company has implemented a quarterly asset allocation and credit strategy review mechanism to adjust risk management strategies regularly [7] - Major risks identified include credit risk, liquidity risk, information technology risk, market risk, money laundering risk, operational risk, compliance risk, and legal risk [7] Group 4 - As of June 30, 2025, the financial company reported total assets of 68.813 billion, total liabilities of 58.504 billion, and total equity of 10.309 billion, with operating income of 0.771 billion and total profit of 0.4 billion [15] - All regulatory indicators meet the requirements set forth in the "Enterprise Group Financial Company Management Measures" [15] - The financial company has established a three-tier reserve system for liquidity risk management, ensuring funds are available for operational needs [16] Group 5 - The financial company has developed a comprehensive internal control system that effectively executes financial accounting behaviors, enhances accounting information quality, and strengthens operational management [14][18] - The internal control system is deemed complete and reasonable, with effective execution and no significant defects identified [14][18] - The financial company has a robust emergency management plan to address potential operational disruptions, ensuring business continuity [13][19]