Core Viewpoint - The significant drop of over 30% in the net value of Guotou Ruijin Silver LOF raises critical questions about the underlying design logic of the product, highlighting the challenges in implementing hedging strategies to mitigate losses [1][4]. Group 1: Product Design and Investor Expectations - Investors are suggesting that the fund company should temporarily break conventional rules to use derivatives for hedging, but industry insiders indicate that this is difficult due to product positioning, risk matching, and operational feasibility [1][5]. - The fund's design aims to track silver prices closely, with strict guidelines limiting the use of derivatives to maintain its passive tracking nature, which would be compromised by introducing hedging strategies [6][7]. Group 2: Risk and Suitability of Investors - The introduction of hedging strategies could misalign with the risk tolerance of current investors, as these strategies may introduce new risks that could exacerbate losses [7]. - The fund's current scale and risk profile are aligned with its existing investors, and any changes to the investment strategy could lead to a mismatch in risk tolerance [7]. Group 3: Operational Feasibility and Market Comparisons - Achieving perfect hedging through derivatives for a single asset like silver is unrealistic, and even similar products in overseas markets face challenges [8]. - The closest comparable product in the U.S. market, PowerShares DB Silver Fund, has faced significant issues, including a complete liquidation due to market volatility [8]. Group 4: International Product Insights - Internationally, physical silver ETFs and other investment vehicles are more prevalent, with physical silver ETFs offering a more viable model for addressing high entry barriers and storage costs in the domestic market [10][11]. - The design of physical silver ETFs could provide a framework that aligns with regulatory requirements and investor risk preferences, potentially filling gaps in the domestic silver investment landscape [11]. Group 5: Future Considerations and Industry Reflection - The recent valuation event of Guotou Ruijin Silver LOF has prompted a reevaluation of product designs within the public fund industry, emphasizing the need for improved risk management standards [17]. - The industry may need to adapt its product design philosophy and risk control measures in response to extreme market conditions, as current frameworks may not adequately address unforeseen market volatility [17].

Core Viewpoint - The significant drop of over 30% in the net value of Guotou Ruijin Silver LOF raises questions about the underlying design logic of the product, prompting investors to seek temporary measures to mitigate losses through derivative hedging, which faces substantial barriers in terms of product positioning, risk matching, and practical implementation [2][4][5]. Group 1: Product Design and Intent - The primary intent of the Guotou Ruijin Silver LOF is to track silver price movements, utilizing futures contracts due to their liquidity, while the physical silver market lacks sufficient depth for large capital movements [6]. - The product is designed to maintain a tracking deviation of no more than 0.5% daily and an annual tracking error of no more than 7%, indicating its nature as a passive tracking tool rather than an actively managed product [6]. Group 2: Investor Suitability and Risk - Introducing hedging mechanisms could misalign the product's risk profile with the existing investors' risk tolerance, as the current holders are matched to a medium-high risk level [7]. - The complexity of hedging strategies may introduce new risks, potentially exacerbating losses if the hedging fails, which could lead to a mismatch between the product's risk and the investors' capacity to bear it [7]. Group 3: Practical Implementation Challenges - Achieving perfect hedging through derivatives for a single asset like silver is unrealistic, and even similar products in overseas markets face challenges, such as the PowerShares DB Silver Fund, which has been affected by futures roll costs and market volatility [8]. - The historical limitations of product design mean that the current framework cannot adequately address extreme market conditions, highlighting the unpredictability of market behavior [9]. Group 4: International Product Comparisons - Internationally, the main silver investment products include physical silver ETFs, silver futures, and silver mining ETFs, with physical silver ETFs being particularly relevant for the Chinese market due to their ability to address high entry barriers and storage costs [11]. - The design of physical silver ETFs, which combines physical backing with share issuance, could provide a model for domestic products, enhancing tracking accuracy and reducing costs [11]. Group 5: Future Product Development - The potential transition of Guotou Ruijin Silver LOF to a QDII-FOF model faces fundamental challenges, particularly regarding the underlying assets, as investing in futures would not fundamentally improve the current model [14]. - The inability to launch a silver ETF in China due to tax implications on physical silver investments presents a significant barrier to developing more effective investment products [14].

Core Viewpoint - The significant drop of over 30% in the net value of Guotou Ruijin Silver LOF has raised questions about the underlying design logic of the product, prompting investors to suggest temporary measures such as using derivatives for hedging to mitigate losses, which industry insiders deem difficult due to product positioning, risk matching, and operational feasibility [1][2]. Group 1: Product Design and Intent - The primary intent of the Guotou Ruijin Silver LOF is to track silver price movements, utilizing futures contracts due to their liquidity, while the spot market lacks sufficient depth for large transactions [3]. - The product is designed to maintain a tracking deviation of no more than 0.5% daily and an annual tracking error of no more than 7%, indicating its nature as a passive tracking tool rather than an actively managed product [3]. Group 2: Investor Suitability and Risk - Introducing hedging mechanisms could misalign the risk profile of the fund with the existing investors' risk tolerance, as the current fund holders are matched to a medium-high risk level [4]. - The complexity of hedging strategies may introduce new risks, potentially exacerbating losses rather than mitigating them, which raises concerns about the appropriateness of such strategies for current investors [4]. Group 3: Operational Feasibility and Market Comparison - Achieving perfect hedging through derivatives for a single asset like silver is unrealistic, and even in international markets, similar products that effectively manage such risks are scarce [5]. - The closest international counterpart, the PowerShares DB Silver Fund, faced challenges due to futures contract roll costs and market volatility, leading to its liquidation in March 2023 [5]. Group 4: Alternative Investment Structures - Internationally, physical silver ETFs and silver mining ETFs are more prevalent, with physical silver ETFs offering a more accessible investment structure that could address high entry barriers and storage costs in the domestic market [8]. - The design of physical silver ETFs, which combines physical backing with share issuance, could enhance tracking accuracy and reduce costs, making it suitable for domestic investors [8]. Group 5: Future Considerations for Product Design - The current situation highlights the historical limitations of product design, which did not anticipate extreme market conditions, suggesting a need for a thorough review of product categories and risk management standards in the industry [14]. - Future product designs may need to adapt based on lessons learned from this incident, potentially leading to changes in risk control measures and investment strategies [14].

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided. 2. Core View of the Report The report presents the market performance of A - shares and various ETFs on January 28, 2026, including the performance of the Shanghai Composite Index, Shenzhen Component Index, and ChiNext Index, as well as the price changes and trading volumes of different types of ETFs [2][3][4]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.27% to close at 4151.24 points, the Shenzhen Component Index rose 0.09% to close at 14342.89 points, and the ChiNext Index fell 0.57% to close at 3323.56 points. The trading volume of A - shares in the two markets was 29919 billion yuan. The top - performing industries were non - ferrous metals (5.92%), petroleum and petrochemical (3.54%), and coal (3.42%), while the bottom - performing industries were comprehensive (-2.53%), media (-1.77%), and national defense and military industry (-1.68%) [2][6]. Stock ETF - The top - trading - volume stock ETFs included: Huatai - Peregrine CSI 300 ETF, up 0.32% with a discount rate of 0.24%; E Fund CSI 300 ETF, up 0.29% with a discount rate of 0.19%; and China AMC CSI 300 ETF, up 0.27% with a discount rate of 0.18% [3][7]. - The report also provided a table of the top ten stock ETFs by trading volume, showing details such as code, fund name, price, change rate, tracking index, and discount rate [8]. Bond ETF - The top - trading - volume bond ETFs were: Haifutong CSI Short - term Financing Bond ETF, down 0.00% with a discount rate of 0.00%; China AMC Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market - making Treasury Bond ETF, up 0.04% with a discount rate of 0.03%; and Bosera CSI Convertible and Exchangeable Bond ETF, up 0.99% with a discount rate of 1.22% [4][9]. - A table of the top five bond ETFs by trading volume was presented, including code, fund name, price, change rate, discount rate, and trading volume [10]. Gold ETF - Gold AU9999 rose 3.57% and Shanghai Gold rose 3.27%. The top - trading - volume gold ETFs were: Huaan Gold ETF, up 3.16% with a discount rate of 3.23%; E Fund Gold ETF, up 3.19% with a discount rate of 3.22%; and Bosera Gold ETF, up 3.20% with a discount rate of 3.20% [10]. - A table of the gold ETFs showed details such as code, fund name, price, change rate, trading volume, IOPV, and discount rate [11]. Commodity Futures ETF - Dacheng Non - ferrous Metals Futures ETF rose 0.74% with a discount rate of 0.98%; Jianxin Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF rose 1.53% with a discount rate of 1.27%; and China AMC Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF rose 0.76% with a discount rate of 3.92% [11]. - A table provided information on the commodity futures ETFs, including code, fund name, price, change rate, trading volume, IOPV, discount rate, tracking index, and tracking index change rate [12]. Cross - border ETF - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.83%, the Nasdaq rose 0.91%, the S&P 500 rose 0.41%, and the German DAX fell 0.15%. On this day, the Hang Seng Index rose 2.58% and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index rose 2.89%. The top - trading - volume cross - border ETFs were: E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF, up 0.62% with a discount rate of - 0.43%; Huatai - Peregrine Hang Seng Technology ETF, up 1.88% with a discount rate of 1.56%; and Huatai - Peregrine CSI KRX China - South Korea Semiconductor ETF, up 7.43% with a discount rate of 17.96% [14]. - A table of the top five cross - border ETFs by trading volume was shown [15]. Money ETF - The top - trading - volume money ETFs were: Yin Hua Ri Li ETF, Hua Bao Tian Yi ETF, and Money ETF Jianxin [16]. - A table presented the top three money ETFs by trading volume [17].

Report Overview - The report provides an overview of the A-share market, ETFs, and other financial instruments on January 23, 2026 [2][6]. Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.33% to 4136.16 points, the Shenzhen Component Index rose 0.79% to 14439.66 points, and the ChiNext Index rose 0.63% to 3349.50 points [2][6]. - The total trading volume of A-shares was 31184 billion yuan [2][6]. - The top-performing sectors were power equipment (3.50%), non-ferrous metals (2.73%), and national defense and military industry (2.65%), while the worst-performing sectors were communication (-1.52%), banking (-0.90%), and coal (-0.76%) [2][6]. Stock ETF - The top-traded stock ETFs were Huatai-PineBridge CSI 300 ETF (-0.49%, discount rate -0.56%), E Fund CSI 300 ETF (-0.46%, discount rate -0.59%), and ChinaAMC CSI 300 ETF (-0.49%, discount rate -0.59%) [3][7]. Bond ETF - The top-traded bond ETFs were Haifutong CSI Short-term Financing Bond ETF (0.02%, discount rate 0.00%), ChinaAMC Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-making Treasury Bond ETF (0.09%, discount rate 0.13%), and Bosera CSI Convertible and Exchangeable Bond ETF (1.28%, discount rate 1.26%) [4][9]. Gold ETF - Gold AU9999 rose 2.46%, and Shanghai Gold rose 2.55%. The top-traded gold ETFs were HuaAn Gold ETF (2.67%, discount rate 2.57%), E Fund Gold ETF (2.73%, discount rate 2.59%), and Bosera Gold ETF (2.67%, discount rate 2.59%) [12]. Commodity Futures ETF - Dacheng Non-ferrous Metals Futures ETF rose 1.61% with a discount rate of 1.56%, China Construction Bank Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF rose 2.54% with a discount rate of 3.68%, and ChinaAMC Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF fell 0.30% with a discount rate of 3.57% [13]. Cross-border ETF - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.63%, the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.91%, the S&P 500 rose 0.55%, and the German DAX rose 1.20%. On January 23, the Hang Seng Index rose 0.45%, and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index rose 0.51%. The top-traded cross-border ETFs were E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF (-0.58%, discount rate -1.29%), GF CSI Hong Kong Innovative Drug ETF (1.30%, discount rate 0.79%), and Huatai-PineBridge Hang Seng Technology ETF (0.67%, discount rate -0.21%) [16]. Money Market ETF - The top-traded money market ETFs were Silver HuaRui Daily Interest ETF, Huabao Tianyi ETF, and China Construction Bank Money Market ETF [18].

Report Summary 1. Market Overview - On December 9, 2025, the Shanghai Composite Index fell 0.37% to close at 3909.52 points, the Shenzhen Component Index fell 0.39% to close at 13277.36 points, and the ChiNext Index rose 0.61% to close at 3209.60 points. The trading volume of A-shares in the two markets was 1917.9 billion yuan. The top-performing sectors were comprehensive (3.45%), communication (2.23%), and electronics (0.78%), while the worst-performing sectors were non-ferrous metals (-3.03%), steel (-2.47%), and real estate (-2.10%) [2][6] 2. Stock ETFs - The top-trading-volume stock ETFs on this day were Huatai-PineBridge CSI A500 ETF, which fell 0.56% with a premium rate of -0.56%; China AMC CSI A500 ETF, which fell 0.26% with a premium rate of -0.34%; and Southern CSI A500 ETF, which fell 0.57% with a premium rate of -0.43% [3][7] 3. Bond ETFs - The top-trading-volume bond ETFs were Haifutong CSI Short-term Financing Bond ETF, which rose 0.01% with a premium rate of -0.00%; Southern Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-making Corporate Bond ETF, which rose 0.06% with a premium rate of -0.28%; and GF Shanghai Stock Exchange AAA Science and Technology Innovation Corporate Bond ETF, which rose 0.01% with a premium rate of -0.27% [4][9] 4. Gold ETFs - Gold AU9999 fell 0.73% and Shanghai Gold fell 0.67%. The top-trading-volume gold ETFs were Huaan Gold ETF, which fell 0.70% with a premium rate of -0.82%; E Fund Gold ETF, which fell 0.72% with a premium rate of -0.79%; and Bosera Gold ETF, which fell 0.73% with a premium rate of -0.81% [12] 5. Commodity Futures ETFs - Dacheng Non-ferrous Metals Futures ETF fell 2.19% with a premium rate of -1.41%; China AMC Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF fell 0.46% with a premium rate of 0.77%; and CCB E Fund Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF fell 1.40% with a premium rate of -1.33% [13] 6. Cross-border ETFs - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.45%, the Nasdaq Index fell 0.14%, the S&P 500 fell 0.35%, and the German DAX rose 0.07%. On this day, the Hang Seng Index fell 1.29% and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index fell 1.62%. The top-trading-volume cross-border ETFs were E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF, which fell 2.14% with a premium rate of -2.13%; Huatai-PineBridge CSI KRX China-South Korea Semiconductor ETF, which fell 0.86% with a premium rate of 4.19%; and GF CSI Hong Kong Innovative Drugs ETF, which fell 1.44% with a premium rate of -1.37% [15] 7. Money Market ETFs - The top-trading-volume money market ETFs were Yin Hua Day Profit ETF, Hua Bao Tian Yi ETF, and CCB Tian Yi Money Market ETF [17]

Market Overview - On December 10, 2025, the Shanghai Composite Index declined by 0.23% to close at 3900.50 points, the Shenzhen Component Index rose by 0.29% to 13316.42 points, and the ChiNext Index fell by 0.02% to 3209.00 points. The total trading volume of A-shares in the two markets was 1791.8 billion yuan. The top-performing sectors were real estate (2.53%), commerce and retail (1.97%), and social services (1.22%), while the worst-performing sectors were banking (-1.58%), power equipment (-0.87%), and computer (-0.63%) [2][6] Stock ETF - The top-traded stock ETFs on this day were Huatai-PineBridge CSI A500 ETF (up 0.16% with a discount rate of 0.17%), ChinaAMC CSI A500 ETF (down 0.17% with a discount rate of 0.05%), and Southern CSI A500 ETF (down 0.08% with a discount rate of 0.04%) [3][7] Bond ETF - The top-traded bond ETFs were Haifutong CSI Short-term Bond ETF (up 0.00% with a discount rate of -0.00%), ChinaAMC Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-making Treasury Bond ETF (up 0.03% with a discount rate of 0.03%), and Southern Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-making Corporate Bond ETF (up 0.06% with a discount rate of -0.21%) [4][9] Gold ETF - Gold AU9999 rose by 0.40% and Shanghai Gold rose by 0.46%. The top-traded gold ETFs were Huaan Gold ETF (up 0.54% with a discount rate of 0.46%), E Fund Gold ETF (up 0.48% with a discount rate of 0.42%), and Bosera Gold ETF (up 0.50% with a discount rate of 0.42%) [12] Commodity Futures ETF - Dacheng Nonferrous Metals Futures ETF rose by 0.80% with a discount rate of -0.05%, ChinaAMC Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF rose by 0.36% with a discount rate of 1.92%, and Jianxin Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF fell by 0.42% with a discount rate of -0.88% [13] Cross-border ETF - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 0.38%, the Nasdaq rose by 0.13%, the S&P 500 fell by 0.09%, and the German DAX rose by 0.49%. On this day, the Hang Seng Index rose by 0.42% and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index rose by 0.20%. The top-traded cross-border ETFs were E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF (down 0.58% with a discount rate of -0.83%), Huatai-PineBridge Hang Seng Tech ETF (unchanged with a discount rate of 0.08%), and ChinaAMC Hang Seng Tech ETF (up 0.13% with a discount rate of 0.32%) [15] Money Market ETF - The top-traded money market ETFs were Silver Hua Dayli ETF, Huabao Tianyi ETF, and Jianxin Tianyi Money Market ETF [17]

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core Viewpoints - On December 1, 2025, the A-share market showed an upward trend, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising 0.65%, the Shenzhen Component Index rising 1.25%, and the ChiNext Index rising 1.31%. The trading volume of the two markets reached 1889.5 billion yuan. The top-performing industries were non-ferrous metals, communication, and electronics, while the bottom-performing industries were agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery, environmental protection, and real estate [2][6]. Summary by Directory Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3914.01, up 0.65%; the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13146.72, up 1.25%; the ChiNext Index closed at 3092.50, up 1.31%. The trading volume of the two A-share markets was 1889.5 billion yuan. The top-performing industries were non-ferrous metals (2.85%), communication (2.81%), and electronics (1.58%), while the bottom-performing industries were agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery (-0.43%), environmental protection (-0.23%), and real estate (-0.06%) [2][6]. Stock ETF - The top-trading-volume stock ETFs were Huaxia CSI A500 ETF (up 1.23%, discount rate 1.18%), Huatai-PineBridge CSI A500 ETF (up 1.32%, discount rate 1.14%), and Guotai CSI A500 ETF (up 1.13%, discount rate 1.16%) [3][7]. Bond ETF - The top-trading-volume bond ETFs were Haifutong CSI Short-term Financing ETF (up 0.00%, discount rate 0.00%), Huaxia Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-making Treasury Bond ETF (up 0.10%, discount rate 0.13%), and Guotai CSI AAA Scientific and Technological Innovation Corporate Bond ETF (up 0.04%, discount rate 0.00%) [4][9]. Gold ETF - Gold AU9999 rose 1.09%, and Shanghai Gold rose 1.02%. The top-trading-volume gold ETFs were Huaan Gold ETF (up 1.04%, discount rate 1.06%), Boshi Gold ETF (up 1.02%, discount rate 1.08%), and E Fund Gold ETF (up 1.03%, discount rate 1.07%) [12]. Commodity Futures ETF - Huaxia Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF fell 2.52%, with a discount rate of 0.63%; Dacheng Non-ferrous Metals Futures ETF rose 1.48%, with a discount rate of 1.76%; Jianxin Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF rose 0.65%, with a discount rate of 0.99% [15]. Cross-border ETF - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.61%, the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.65%, the S&P 500 rose 0.54%, and the German DAX rose 0.29%. On December 1, the Hang Seng Index rose 0.67%, and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index rose 0.47%. The top-trading-volume cross-border ETFs were E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF (up 0.20%, discount rate -0.07%), Huatai-PineBridge Hang Seng Technology ETF (up 0.54%, discount rate 0.60%), and Huaxia Hang Seng Technology ETF (up 0.53%, discount rate 0.75%) [17]. Money ETF - The top-trading-volume money ETFs were Yin Hua Ri Li ETF, Hua Bao Tian Yi ETF, and Money ETF Jian Xin Tian Yi [19].

Report Summary 1. Market Overview - On November 21, 2025, the Shanghai Composite Index dropped 2.45% to 3834.89 points, the Shenzhen Component Index fell 3.41% to 12538.07 points, and the ChiNext Index declined 4.02% to 2920.08 points. The total trading volume of A-shares in the two markets was 19839 billion yuan. The top sectors with the largest declines were Comprehensive (-5.50%), Non-ferrous Metals (-5.26%), and Power Equipment (-5.17%) [2][6]. 2. Stock ETFs - The top trading volume stock ETFs on that day were E Fund ChiNext ETF (down 4.03%, premium rate -3.93%), Huatai-PineBridge CSI 300 ETF (down 2.40%, premium rate -2.41%), and China AMC CSI A500 ETF (down 2.78%, premium rate -2.77%) [3][7]. - The top ten trading volume stock ETFs are presented in detail in Chart 1, including their codes, names, prices, price changes, tracking indices, premium rates, trading volumes, and latest share references [8]. 3. Bond ETFs - The top trading volume bond ETFs were HFT CSI Short-term Financing Bond ETF (down 0.00%, premium rate 0.00%), Bosera CSI Convertible and Exchangeable Bond ETF (down 0.77%, premium rate -0.88%), and BOC Shanghai Stock Exchange AAA Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETF (up 0.02%, premium rate -0.21%) [4][9]. - Details of the top five trading volume bond ETFs, including codes, names, prices, price changes, premium rates, and trading volumes, are shown in Chart 2 [10]. 4. Gold ETFs - Gold AU9999 dropped 0.59% and Shanghai Gold fell 0.88% on that day. The top trading volume gold ETFs were HuaAn Gold ETF (down 0.84%, premium rate -0.72%), Bosera Gold ETF (down 0.79%, premium rate -0.68%), and E Fund Gold ETF (down 0.75%, premium rate -0.66%) [12]. - The top five trading volume gold ETFs are presented in Chart 3, including their codes, names, prices, price changes, trading volumes, IOPV, and premium rates [13]. 5. Commodity Futures ETFs - On that day, China AMC Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF dropped 0.25% with a premium rate of 2.10%, CCB Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF fell 0.75% with a premium rate of -0.76%, and Dacheng Non-ferrous Metals Futures ETF declined 0.61% with a premium rate of -0.93% [13]. - Details of commodity futures ETFs, including codes, names, prices, price changes, trading volumes, IOPV, premium rates, tracking indices, and tracking index price changes, are shown in Chart 4 [14]. 6. Cross-border ETFs - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.84%, the Nasdaq Composite fell 2.15%, and the S&P 500 declined 1.56%, while the German DAX rose 0.50%. On November 21, the Hang Seng Index dropped 2.38% and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index fell 2.45%. The top trading volume cross-border ETFs were Huatai-PineBridge Hang Seng Tech ETF (down 1.91%, premium rate -2.39%), E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF (down 3.74%, premium rate -3.60%), and China AMC Hang Seng Tech ETF (down 1.87%, premium rate -2.12%) [15]. - The top five trading volume cross-border ETFs are presented in Chart 5, including their codes, names, trading volumes, price changes, and premium rates [16]. 7. Money Market ETFs - The top trading volume money market ETFs on that day were Silver HuaRiLi ETF, HuaBaoTianYi ETF, and CCB TianYi Money Market ETF [17]. - The top three trading volume money market ETFs are shown in Chart 6, including their codes, names, and trading volumes [19]. Core View The report provides a comprehensive overview of the performance of different types of ETFs on November 21, 2025, including stock, bond, gold, commodity futures, cross-border, and money market ETFs, along with the overall market situation of A-shares. Report Industry Investment Rating No industry investment rating information is provided in the report.

Report Summary 1. Market Overview - On November 19, 2025, the Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.18% to 3946.74 points, the Shenzhen Component Index fell 0.00% to 13080.09 points, and the ChiNext Index rose 0.25% to 3076.85 points. The total trading volume of A-shares in the two markets was 1742.8 billion yuan. The top-performing sectors were non-ferrous metals (2.39%), petroleum and petrochemicals (1.67%), and national defense and military industry (1.11%), while the worst-performing sectors were comprehensive (-3.08%), real estate (-2.09%), and media (-1.72%) [2][6]. 2. Stock ETFs - The top trading volume stock ETFs were Huaxia CSI A500 ETF (up 0.17%, premium rate 0.24%), Huatai-PineBridge CSI A500 ETF (up 0.16%, premium rate 0.29%), and Guotai CSI A500 ETF (up 0.17%, premium rate 0.31%) [3][7]. - The table shows detailed information of the top ten trading volume stock ETFs, including code, fund name, price, change rate, tracking index, IOPV, premium rate, trading volume, and latest share [8]. 3. Bond ETFs - The top trading volume bond ETFs were Haifutong CSI Short-term Financing Bond ETF (up 0.01%, premium rate 0.00%), Huaxia Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-making Treasury Bond ETF (down 0.06%, premium rate -0.01%), and E Fund CSI AAA Science and Technology Innovation Corporate Bond ETF (up 0.02%, premium rate -0.25%) [4][9]. - The table presents information of the top five trading volume bond ETFs, including code, fund name, price, change rate, premium rate, and trading volume [10]. 4. Gold ETFs - Gold AU9999 rose 2.00% and Shanghai Gold rose 2.02%. The top trading volume gold ETFs were Huaan Gold ETF (up 2.02%, premium rate 2.12%), Bosera Gold ETF (up 2.02%, premium rate 2.13%), and E Fund Gold ETF (up 2.00%, premium rate 2.14%) [12]. - The table provides details of the top five trading volume gold ETFs, including code, fund name, price, change rate, trading volume, IOPV, and premium rate [13]. 5. Commodity Futures ETFs - Huaxia Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF fell 1.59% with a premium rate of 0.99%, Dacheng Non-ferrous Metals Futures ETF rose 0.73% with a premium rate of 0.42%, and Jianxin Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF had a change rate of 0.00% with a premium rate of -0.01% [15]. - The table shows information of commodity futures ETFs, including code, fund name, price, change rate, trading volume, IOPV, premium rate, tracking index, and tracking index change rate [16]. 6. Cross-border ETFs - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.07%, the Nasdaq Composite fell 1.21%, the S&P 500 fell 0.83%, and the German DAX fell 1.77%. On November 19, the Hang Seng Index fell 0.38% and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index fell 0.26%. The top trading volume cross-border ETFs were E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF (down 0.19%, premium rate -0.11%), GF CSI Hong Kong Innovative Drugs ETF (down 0.52%, premium rate -0.29%), and Huatai-PineBridge Hang Seng Technology ETF (down 0.54%, premium rate -0.44%) [17]. - The table shows details of the top five trading volume cross-border ETFs, including code, fund name, trading volume, change rate, and premium rate [18]. 7. Money Market ETFs - The top trading volume money market ETFs were Yin Hua Day Profit ETF, Hua Bao Tian Yi ETF, and Jian Xin Tian Yi Money Market ETF [19]. - The table presents information of the top three trading volume money market ETFs, including code, fund name, and trading volume [21].