（数据来源：WIND资讯） 以上内容与数据，与有连云立场无关，不构成投资建议。据此操作，风险自担。 相关机构指出，如今上证3900，明确看多债市，对股市则开始谨慎。万物皆周期，能在牛市保存胜利果实的才是强者。越往后债市可能越 乐观，债市已重回基本面资金面定价。上证十年新高全A历史新高后，本周至关重要，股市已进入无人区，波动可能大升。从已披露中报 的来看，全A盈利增速较一季度有所回落。下半年经济下行压力可能小幅上升。持续看下半年10Y国债1.6-1.8，当前全力看多，因1）央行 持续宽松，大幅正carry；2）调整后的债券对银行自营有配置价值；3）经济下行压力上升。最近一直建议要分外珍惜收益率2%以上的5Y资 本债及30Y国债。倘若后续股市大幅调整，近期从债市流入股市的万亿机构资金可能重新进入债市，10Y国债将挑战1.6。收益率越下抄底 的可能越多，收益率上升久期2Y嫌长，收益率下行久期6Y都嫌短。 本周继续关注本轮债市调整以来平安公司债ETF（511030）回撤控制排名第一，近一周场内成交贴水最少，净值相对稳健且回撤可控，可 参考下表（本轮债市调整自2025年8月8日起算）： | 代码 | 间序 | 场内简称 ...

本周继续关注本轮债市调整以来平安公司债ETF（511030）回撤控制排名第一，近一周场内成交贴水最少，净值相对稳健且回撤可控，可 参考下表（本轮债市调整自2025年8月8日起算）： | 代码 | 间序 | 场内简称 | 托管人 | 规模(亿) | | 近1周均贴 近1周涨跌 | 今年以来 | 质押率 | 本轮调整 | 近1年 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | 水率 | ਵ | TID (9) | | 最大回搬 | Calmar # | | 511030.SH | 平安中债-中高等级公司债利差因子ETF | 公司债ETF | 平安银行股份有限公司 | 223.53 | -0.06% | -0.119% | 0.84 | 63.00 | -0.1925 | 3.6503 | | 511220.SH | 海富通上证城投债ETF | 城投 | 中国银行股份有限公司 | 245.11 | -0.19% | -0.407% | 1.05 | 0.00 | -0.2907 | 2.1636 | ...

本轮债市调整以来平安公司债ETF（511030）回撤控制排名第一，近一周场内成交贴水最少，净值相对稳健且回撤可控，可参考下表（本 轮债市调整自2025年8月8日起算）： 以上内容与数据，与有连云立场无关，不构成投资建议。据此操作，风险自担。 | 代码 | 同家 | 场内简称 | 托管人 | 規模(亿) | 近1周均贴 | 近1周济跌 | 今年以来 | 质押率 | 本轮调整 | 近1年 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | 水率 | ਵ | FID (8) | | 最大回搬 | Calmar H | | 511030.SH | 平安中债-中高等级公司债利差因子ETF | 公司债ETF | 十女最行股份有限公司 | 223.53 | -0.06% | -0.119% | 0.84 | 63.00 | -0.1925 | 3.6503 | | 511220.SH | 海富通上证城投债ETF | 城投 | 中国银行股份有限公司 | 245.11 | -0.19% | -0.407% | 1.0 ...

（数据来源：WIND资讯） 以上内容与数据，与有连云立场无关，不构成投资建议。据此操作，风险自担。 | 代码 | 同家 | 场内简称 | 托管人 | 規模(亿) | 近1周均贴 | 近1周济跌 | 今年以来 | 质押率 | 本轮调整 | 近1年 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | 水率 | 国 | FID (8) | | 最大回覆 | Calmar D | | 511030.SH | 平安中债-中高等级公司债利差因子ETF | 公司债ETF | 十安银行股份有限公司 | 223.53 | -0.06% | -0.119% | 0.84 | 63.00 | -0.1925 | 3.6503 | | 511220.SH | 海富通上证城投债ETF | 城投债ETF | 中国银行股份有限公司 | 245.11 | -0.19% | -0.407% | 1.05 | 0.00 | -0.2907 | 2.1636 | | 511070.SH | 南方上证基准做市公司债ETF | 上证公司侦E ...

上证10年新高，全A历史新高，成交量有点回落。港股近期没涨，资金驱动的A股牛市还能走多远不好说。随着券商自营及 债基久期快速降久期，后续股市对债市的影响预计明显减弱，终将回归基本面。我们持续看下半年10Y国债1.6-1.8，当前全 力看多，因1）央行宽松，正carry；2）调整后对银行有配置价值；3）经济下行压力上升。要珍惜收益率2%以上的5Y资本 债及30Y国债。 以上内容与数据，与有连云立场无关，不构成投资建议。据此操作，风险自担。 本周继续关注本轮债市调整以来平安公司债ETF（511030）回撤控制排名第一，净值相对稳健且回撤可控，可参考下表 （本轮债市调整自2025年2月10日起算）： 机构认为，盯着股市做债，导致债市阶段性受股市的影响很大。资金驱动的股票牛市没有债熊，经济复苏驱动的股票牛市 才会带来债熊。2014年四季度股债双牛，当时债基规模非常小，债券投资主要靠银行自营及理财。 | 代码 | 簡易 | 易内简称 | 托管人 | 规模(亿) | 近1周豢 | 近1周均贴 | 近1周涨跌 | 貞押宰 | 本轮词整 | 近1年 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- ...

据了解，南方上证基准做市公司债ETF成立于2025年1月，基金规模216.43亿元，成立来累计收益率 0.92%。从持有人结构来看，截至2025-01-15，南方上证基准做市公司债ETF的基金机构持有0.27亿份， 占总份额的90.90%，个人投资者持有0.03亿份，占总份额的9.10%。 8月15日，南方上证基准做市公司债ETF（511070）下跌0.02%，最新净值100.92元，连续5个交易日下 跌，区间累计跌幅0.18%。 截止2025年6月30日，南方上证基准做市公司债ETF前五持仓占比合计9.61%，分别为：24宝武K1 （2.54%）、沪国投K1（2.00%）、24中化12（1.76%）、24中化16（1.73%）、24中化04（1.58%）。 来源：金融界 公开信息显示，现任基金经理董浩先生:中国国籍,南开大学金融学硕士,具有基金从业资格。2010年7月 加入南方基金,历任交易管理部债券交易员、固定收益部货币理财类研究员;2014年3月31日至2015年9月 11日,任南方现金通基金经理助理;2015年9月11日至2016年8月17日,任南方50债基金经理;2015年9月11日 至2018年7 ...

Core Insights - The recent inclusion of credit bond ETFs in the pledged repo trading has significantly boosted trading activity, with two benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs exceeding transaction volumes of 10 billion yuan on June 11 [1][2] - The rapid influx of capital has led to four credit bond ETFs, established for less than six months, joining the "100 billion club" [1][2] Trading Activity - On June 11, the Southern CSI Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF recorded a transaction volume exceeding 15.5 billion yuan, marking an increase of over 7 billion yuan from the previous trading day and setting a new single-day transaction record [2] - Other ETFs, such as the E Fund CSI Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF, also saw significant trading volumes, with over 9 billion yuan, while several others surpassed 6 billion yuan [2] Fund Inflows - In the past month, four major credit bond ETFs have seen net inflows exceeding 5 billion yuan, with the E Fund and Southern ETFs leading the way [3] - The inclusion of credit bond ETFs in the pledged repo has enhanced liquidity and provided a tool for liquidity management, allowing investors to use these ETFs for financing during tight liquidity periods [3] Investment Strategies - The inclusion of credit bond ETFs in pledged repo trading is viewed as a key measure to address developmental shortcomings, significantly enhancing their investment appeal [4] - Investors can utilize a "buy ETF - pledge financing - reinvest" leverage strategy to increase returns, improving overall capital efficiency for institutional investors [4] - Various investment strategies, including pure bond strategies, multi-asset strategies, and structured investment strategies, can benefit from leveraging credit bond ETFs [4]

Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index fell 0.33% to 3593.66 points, the Shenzhen Component Index declined 0.22% to 11168.14 points, and the ChiNext Index dropped 0.23% to 2340.06 points. The total trading volume of A-shares in the two markets was 1815.8 billion yuan. The top-performing sectors were electronics (1.37%), computer (1.26%), and real estate (0.63%), while the bottom-performing sectors were building decoration (-2.06%), building materials (-1.69%), and food and beverage (-1.65%) [2][6]. Stock ETFs - The top-traded stock ETFs were Huaxia SSE STAR 50 ETF (up 2.12% with a discount rate of 2.06%), Huaxia CSI A500 ETF (down 0.39% with a discount rate of -0.51%), and Southern CSI A500 ETF (down 0.28% with a discount rate of -0.24%) [3][7]. - The top ten stock ETFs by trading volume and their details are presented in Chart 1, including price, daily change, tracking index, IOPV, discount rate, trading volume, and latest share reference [8]. Bond ETFs - The top-traded bond ETFs were Haifutong CSI Short-term Financing Bond ETF (up 0.01% with a discount rate of -0.00%), Southern SSE Benchmark Market-making Corporate Bond ETF (down 0.00% with a discount rate of -0.26%), and Pengyang CCDC 30-year Treasury Bond ETF (down 0.32% with a discount rate of 0.10%) [4][9]. - The top five bond ETFs by trading volume and their details are presented in Chart 2, including price, daily change, discount rate, and trading volume [10]. Gold ETFs - Gold AU9999 fell 0.15% and Shanghai Gold declined 0.20%. The top-traded gold ETFs were Huaan Gold ETF (down 0.20% with a discount rate of -0.28%), E Fund Gold ETF (down 0.20% with a discount rate of -0.29%), and Bosera Gold ETF (down 0.22% with a discount rate of -0.29%) [12]. - The top five gold ETFs by trading volume and their details are presented in Chart 3, including price, daily change, trading volume, IOPV, and discount rate [13]. Commodity Futures ETFs - The top-traded commodity futures ETFs were CCB Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF (up 1.99% with a discount rate of 2.90%), Huaxia Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF (down 0.31% with a discount rate of -0.82%), and Dacheng Non-ferrous Metals Futures ETF (down 0.58% with a discount rate of -0.49%) [15]. - The details of commodity futures ETFs, including trading volume, tracking index, and its daily change, are presented in Chart 4 [16]. Cross-border ETFs - The previous trading day saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average fall 0.70%, the Nasdaq rise 0.18%, the S&P 500 rise 0.07%, and the German DAX rise 0.23%. Today, the Hang Seng Index fell 1.09% and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index dropped 1.16%. The top-traded cross-border ETFs were E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF (down 0.48% with a discount rate of 0.19%), GF CSI Hong Kong Innovative Drugs ETF (up 0.07% with a discount rate of -0.44%), and Huaxia Hang Seng Tech ETF (down 1.29% with a discount rate of -0.82%) [17]. - The top five cross-border ETFs by trading volume and their details are presented in Chart 5 [18]. Money Market ETFs - The top-traded money market ETFs were Yin Hua Day Profit ETF, Hua Bao Add Benefit ETF, and CCB Add Benefit Money Market ETF [19]. - The top three money market ETFs by trading volume and their details are presented in Chart 6 [20].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the significant growth of bond ETFs in China, with the total scale surpassing 500 billion yuan, nearly doubling from the end of last year [1][2] - The first batch of 10 sci-tech bond ETFs has seen explosive sales, with a total issuance scale of 28.988 billion yuan, and within just five trading days, their total scale exceeded 100 billion yuan, accounting for approximately 20% of the entire bond ETF market [1] - The newly launched benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs have also contributed to the expansion, with the first batch of 8 products raising over 21 billion yuan and their latest combined scale reaching 134.44 billion yuan [1] Group 2 - From a funding inflow perspective, the overall ETF market has seen a net inflow of 371.597 billion yuan this year, with bond ETFs attracting 272.357 billion yuan, leading among various ETF categories [2] - Notably, the Hai Fu Tong Zhong Zheng Short-term Bond ETF has gained over 23 billion yuan in net inflow this year, while several other bond ETFs have attracted more than 10 billion yuan each [2] - The total number of bond ETFs in the market has expanded to 39, with a combined scale of 508.621 billion yuan, marking a historical high and accounting for 11.04% of the total ETF scale, reflecting a growth of nearly 192.26% from the end of last year [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates that China's bond market has been stable this year, with a significant growth in bond ETFs, which have surpassed 400 billion yuan in scale [1][2] - In the first half of 2025, the issuance of various bonds in China's bond market reached 44.3 trillion yuan, marking a 16% year-on-year increase, while net financing from bonds was 8.8 trillion yuan, accounting for 38.6% of the increase in social financing scale [1] - The bond ETF market has seen rapid expansion, with nearly 200 billion yuan in net inflows this year, bringing the total size of bond ETFs to approximately 431.18 billion yuan, which represents about 10% of the total ETF market [1] Group 2 - Analysts suggest that the third quarter will see an increase in the success rate of bullish positions in the bond market due to factors such as declining funding rates and potential liquidity support from the central bank [2] - The demand for credit bonds remains supported by the growth of wealth management products and strong demand for credit bond ETFs, with expectations for credit spreads to remain low [2] - The introduction of the first batch of Sci-Tech Innovation Board bond ETFs is anticipated to generate additional demand for credit bonds in the short term [2]