证券研究报告 多元资产配置系列之二： 低利率时代的FOF多元配置趋势与应用实践 证券分析师 郭子睿 投资咨询资格编号：S1060520070003 任书康 投资咨询资格编号：S1060525050001 陈 瑶 投资咨询资格编号：S1060524120003 研究助理 胡心怡 一般从业资格编号：S1060124030069 2026年2月26日 高 越 一般从业资格编号：S1060124070014 请务必阅读正文后免责条款 投资要点 风险提示：历史业绩不代表未来表现；策略复杂性与成本风险；海外市场汇率风险；流动性风险。 1 发展背景与配置格局：（1）宏观背景：利率持续下行推动资产配置型产品需求抬升。存量产品来看，偏债型FOF通过债券打底、多资产增厚的策略，精准契合了当前市 场资金对于低波动、稳健收益的风险偏好，2025年偏债混合型FOF规模增长176%；增量产品来看，新发产品通过显性化的"多元"标签强化多元资产配置属性。（2）多 元配置格局：越来越多的FOF开始将黄金、商品、港股指数、全球股指纳入基准，香港市场为主的主动及被动基金、QDII权益/混合/债券基金、商品型基金、互认基金、 REITs、中性策略等 ...

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report The report focuses on the performance of the quantitative fund market, summarizing the performance of major indices and quantitative funds, the overall performance and distribution of different types of public - offering quantitative funds, and the better - performing quantitative funds from January 12 to January 16, 2026, for investors' reference [1]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Main Index and Quantitative Fund Performance - This week (January 12 - January 16), A - shares showed mixed performance, with small - cap growth stocks leading the rise and large - cap value stocks falling. Quantitative funds recorded positive returns, and the excess returns of index - enhanced funds were divergent. Active quantitative funds rose by an average of 1.21%. The excess returns of CSI 300 Index - enhanced, CSI 500 Index - enhanced, and CSI 1000 Index - enhanced funds were 0.63%, - 0.34%, and 0.34% respectively, and the average excess return of other index - enhanced funds was 0.25%. Market - neutral funds rose by 0.16% [2][4][6]. - The weekly returns of the CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 were - 0.57%, 2.18%, and 1.27% respectively [3][6]. 3.2 Performance of Different Types of Public - Offering Quantitative Funds - **CSI 300 Index - enhanced funds**: The weekly return was 0.06%, the excess return was 0.63%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.72%, the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.19%, and the excess return dispersion was 0.53% [14]. - **CSI 500 Index - enhanced funds**: The weekly return was 1.84%, the excess return was - 0.34%, the maximum drawdown was - 1.18%, the excess maximum drawdown was - 1.08%, and the excess return dispersion was 0.48% [14]. - **CSI 1000 Index - enhanced funds**: The weekly return was 1.61%, the excess return was 0.34%, the maximum drawdown was - 1.46%, the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.79%, and the excess return dispersion was 0.44% [15]. - **Other index - enhanced funds**: The weekly return was 1.23%, the excess return was 0.25%, the maximum drawdown was - 1.38%, the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.50%, and the excess return dispersion was 0.68% [15]. - **Active quantitative funds**: The weekly return was 1.21%, the maximum drawdown was - 1.16%, and the return dispersion was 1.61% [16]. - **Market - neutral funds**: The weekly return was 0.16%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.13%, and the return dispersion was 0.61% [16]. 3.3 Performance Distribution of Different Types of Public - Offering Quantitative Funds The report shows the performance trends of different types of public - offering quantitative funds in the past six months, as well as the performance distribution this week and in the past year. Index - enhanced funds show the performance of excess returns, but specific data is not further elaborated in the text [17]. 3.4 High - Performing Public - Offering Quantitative Funds - **CSI 300 Index - enhanced high - performing funds**: Such as E Fund CSI 300 Selected Enhanced (managed by Zhang Shengji, with a scale of 4024 million yuan, and a weekly excess return of 2.15%), and others [31]. - **CSI 500 Index - enhanced high - performing funds**: For example, Bosera CSI 500 Index - enhanced (managed by Yang Meng, with a scale of 2764 million yuan, and a weekly excess return of 0.31%) [32]. - **CSI 1000 Index - enhanced high - performing funds**: Like Huatai - Peregrine CSI 1000 Enhanced Strategy ETF (managed by Da Huang and Liu Jun, with a scale of 40 million yuan, and a weekly excess return of 1.12%) [33]. - **Other index - enhanced high - performing funds**: Such as E Fund SSE 50 Enhanced Strategy ETF (managed by Zhang Shengji, with a scale of 49 million yuan, and a weekly excess return of 2.04%) [34]. - **Active quantitative high - performing funds**: For instance, Huian Quantitative Selection (managed by Wang Minglu, with a scale of 3 million yuan, and a weekly return of 8.68%) [35]. - **Market - neutral high - performing funds**: Such as China Post Absolute Return Strategy (managed by Yao Yi and Xing Rufeng, with a scale of 48 million yuan, and a weekly return of 2.39%) [36].

Core Viewpoint - The private equity industry is experiencing a resurgence in overseas expansion, with many firms obtaining Hong Kong's Type 9 license and attracting foreign institutional funds to invest in the A-share market [1][2]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The number of private equity firms holding the Type 9 license has reached 87 as of July 21, 2023, including 58 subjective and 20 quantitative firms [2]. - International investors are increasingly interested in Chinese asset managers, with funds from regions like the Middle East and Europe being directed towards the Chinese market [2][3]. - The Chinese market's investment appeal is bolstered by supportive macroeconomic policies and emerging growth sectors such as advanced manufacturing and green technology [3][7]. Group 2: Role of Securities Firms - Chinese and foreign securities firms are actively competing in the private equity overseas business, providing services such as license applications, fundraising, and trading [1][4]. - Securities firms play a crucial role in the entire process of private equity overseas expansion, from recommending intermediaries for license applications to providing compliance and legal support [5][6]. - The demand for services related to private equity overseas expansion has significantly increased, leading to a noticeable uptick in business for securities firms [4][5]. Group 3: Opportunities and Challenges - The private equity industry faces both opportunities and challenges in overseas markets, including the need for international experience and the high operational costs associated with overseas expansion [7]. - While overseas markets offer lower interest rates and abundant financing resources, challenges such as obtaining licenses and higher operational costs remain significant hurdles [7]. - Understanding international investors' needs and clearly articulating investment strategies are essential for success in the overseas market [7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the resurgence of private equity firms venturing overseas, driven by a recovering market and increasing interest from international investors in the Chinese market [1][2] - Several private equity firms have obtained the Hong Kong Type 9 license, with a total of 87 firms holding this license as of July 21 this year, including 58 subjective and 20 quantitative private equity firms [2] - International investors are showing significant demand for access to the Chinese stock market, prompting private equity firms to develop products tailored to these investors [3] Group 2 - Chinese private equity firms are expanding their global presence to diversify revenue sources and enhance their investment capabilities, with a focus on A-share investments [2][5] - Domestic and foreign brokerages are actively supporting private equity firms in their overseas endeavors, providing services such as license applications, fundraising, and compliance support [4][5] - The integration of overseas trading systems is crucial for quantitative private equity firms, which rely on high-quality market data and efficient trading infrastructure [6] Group 3 - The current environment presents both opportunities and challenges for private equity firms, including the need for international experience and the high operational costs associated with overseas markets [7] - The interest from high-net-worth individuals in China for diversified investments is increasing, while international investors are also keen on the Chinese market, creating a "dual outbound" dynamic [7] - Understanding international investors' needs and clearly articulating investment strategies are essential for private equity firms to succeed in the global market [7]

Core Viewpoint - The private equity industry in China is experiencing a resurgence in overseas expansion, with many firms obtaining Hong Kong's Type 9 license and attracting foreign institutional funds to invest in the A-share market [2][4]. Group 1: Private Equity Overseas Expansion - Several quantitative private equity firms, such as Blackwing Asset, Qianhai Bopu Asset, and Pansong Asset, have obtained the Hong Kong Type 9 license, with a total of 87 firms holding this license as of July 21 this year [4]. - The current overseas fundraising by private equity is primarily directed towards the domestic A-share market, with most firms issuing overseas funds that mirror their A-share strategies [4]. - The interest of international investors in the Chinese market is increasing, leading to a "dual outbound" trend where both domestic and foreign investors seek opportunities [11]. Group 2: Product Development and Market Demand - Private equity firms are launching products tailored to international investors, such as long-only Cayman funds and market-neutral funds, to meet the demand for access to the Chinese stock market [5]. - Blackwing Asset is introducing quantitative CTA and index enhancement strategy products aimed at the Chinese market to fulfill global allocation needs [5]. - The attractiveness of the Chinese market is supported by favorable macroeconomic policies and the emergence of new growth engines in advanced manufacturing, green technology, and artificial intelligence [5]. Group 3: Role of Securities Firms - Chinese securities firms, including CITIC, CICC, Huatai, and GF Securities, are actively involved in supporting private equity firms in their overseas endeavors by providing services such as license applications, fundraising, and trading [7]. - The demand for services related to private equity's overseas expansion has significantly increased, with securities firms reporting a noticeable uptick in business activity compared to the previous year [7]. - Securities firms play a crucial role in the entire process of private equity's overseas expansion, from facilitating license applications to providing compliance and legal support [7][8]. Group 4: Opportunities and Challenges - The current environment presents good opportunities for private equity firms to expand overseas, driven by the diverse investment needs of high-net-worth individuals and increasing interest from foreign investors [11]. - However, challenges remain, including the scarcity of experienced investment and compliance personnel, high operational costs, and competitive pressures in international markets [11]. - Understanding international investors' needs and clearly articulating investment strategies are essential for private equity firms to succeed in the global market [11].

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information about the industry investment rating in the report. 2. Core View of the Report The report focuses on the performance of the quantitative fund market, summarizing the performance of major indices and quantitative funds in the past week, the overall performance and distribution of different types of public - offering quantitative funds, and the top - performing quantitative funds in the week from August 4th to August 8th, 2025, for investors' reference. During this period, the A - share market rose, and quantitative funds showed good performance [1][2]. 3. Summary by Directory I. Performance of Major Indices and Quantitative Funds in the Past Week - A - shares continued to rise, with the weekly returns of the CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 being 2.51%, 1.78%, and 1.23% respectively [3][6]. - Quantitative funds performed well. Active quantitative funds rose 1.88%, market - neutral funds rose 0.29%, and all types of index - enhanced funds recorded positive returns. In terms of excess returns, CSI 300 index - enhanced, CSI 500 index - enhanced, and other index - enhanced funds achieved positive excess returns of 0.20%, 0.04%, and 0.07% respectively, while CSI 1000 index - enhanced funds underperformed the index [4][9]. II. Performance of Different Types of Public - Offering Quantitative Funds - **CSI 300 Index - Enhanced Funds**: The weekly return was 1.44%, the excess return was 0.20%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.15%, and the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.13% [14]. - **CSI 500 Index - Enhanced Funds**: The weekly return was 1.81%, the excess return was 0.04%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.37%, and the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.29% [14]. - **CSI 1000 Index - Enhanced Funds**: The weekly return was 2.36%, the excess return was - 0.15%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.39%, and the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.47% [15]. - **Other Index - Enhanced Funds**: The weekly return was 1.49%, the excess return was 0.07%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.59%, and the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.26% [15]. - **Active Quantitative Funds**: The weekly return was 1.88%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.37%, and the return dispersion was 1.09% [16]. - **Market - Neutral Funds**: The weekly return was 0.29%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.11%, and the return dispersion was 0.45% [16]. III. Performance Distribution of Different Types of Public - Offering Quantitative Funds The report presents the performance trends of different types of public - offering quantitative funds in the past six months, as well as the performance distribution in the past week and the past year. Index - enhanced funds show the performance of excess returns [17]. IV. Top - Performing Public - Offering Quantitative Funds - **CSI 300 Index - Enhanced**: Funds such as Anxin Quantitative Selection CSI 300 Index Enhancement and Zhongou CSI 300 Quantitative Index Enhancement performed well in the past week [30]. - **CSI 500 Index - Enhanced**: Funds like Guotai CSI 500 Index Enhancement and Huian CSI 500 Enhancement had good performance [31]. - **CSI 1000 Index - Enhanced**: Funds including Guolianan CSI 1000 Index Enhancement and Penghua CSI 1000 Enhanced Strategy ETF showed good results [32]. - **Other Index - Enhanced**: Funds such as Great Wall GEM Index Enhancement and Fuguocheng GEM Enhanced Strategy ETF performed well [33]. - **Active Quantitative**: Funds like Changxin National Defense and Military Industry and Huian Quantitative Pioneer had high returns [34]. - **Market - Neutral**: Funds such as Zhongyou Absolute Return Strategy and Southern Absolute Return Strategy performed well [35].

- The report focuses on the performance of quantitative funds in the A-share market during the week of June 3 to June 6, 2025, highlighting that quantitative funds outperformed other fund categories during this period [1][2][8] - Among the major indices, the CSI 1000, CSI 500, and CSI 300 recorded weekly returns of 2.10%, 1.60%, and 0.88%, respectively, indicating a positive market trend [3][8] - Quantitative fund categories showed varied performance: active quantitative funds gained 1.60%, market-neutral funds rose by 0.17%, and index-enhanced funds linked to the CSI 1000 and other indices achieved excess returns of 0.22% and 0.21%, respectively, while CSI 500 index-enhanced funds recorded negative excess returns [4][11][14] - The performance of index-enhanced funds was analyzed based on excess returns and maximum drawdowns relative to their benchmark indices. For example, CSI 300 index-enhanced funds achieved a weekly excess return of 0.06% with a maximum drawdown of -0.03%, while CSI 1000 index-enhanced funds achieved a weekly excess return of 0.22% with a maximum drawdown of -0.04% [16][18][20] - Active quantitative funds demonstrated a weekly return of 1.60% with a maximum drawdown of -0.21%, while market-neutral funds achieved a weekly return of 0.17% with a maximum drawdown of -0.11% [24][25] - The report also highlights the top-performing funds within each quantitative category, such as the CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 index-enhanced funds, as well as active and market-neutral funds. For instance, the Bosera CSI 500 Enhanced Strategy ETF achieved a weekly excess return of 0.80%, while the Bosera CSI 1000 Enhanced Strategy ETF achieved a weekly excess return of 0.79% [37][39][41][43][45]