Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on February 20, 2026, that tariffs imposed by the Trump administration under the IEEPA are illegal, including the equal tariffs and fentanyl tariffs, leading to potential changes in the tariff landscape [1][7][47]. Group 1: Supreme Court Tariff Ruling - The Supreme Court's ruling deemed IEEPA tariffs illegal due to violations of the principles of clear authorization and significant issues, affecting fentanyl tariffs (20% for China, 25% for Canada and Mexico) and global equal tariffs (10% base tariff) [1][7][47]. - The actual execution of the ruling may be delayed until late March to early April, with the ruling's effective date being February 20, 2026 [1][7][47]. - The probability of full refunds for IEEPA tariffs is low, but partial refunds are more likely, depending on how lower courts handle the relief scope [1][9][48]. Group 2: Trump's Response Strategy - Trump may seek to maintain the current tariff framework to avoid losing tariff gains, but significant upgrades may not occur due to electoral pressures [3][10][49]. - Following the ruling, Trump announced a global tariff increase from 10% to 15%, exempting key products, which may serve as a transitional measure for future tariffs [3][10][14][49]. - A potential gap in tariffs may arise in July, with the expiration of the 122 tariffs, leading to possible adjustments in existing 301 tariffs [3][10][15][49]. Group 3: Future Tariff Landscape - The invalidation of IEEPA tariffs could increase the federal deficit rate by 0.5-0.6 percentage points, with IEEPA tariffs accounting for 47.8% of U.S. tariff revenue in FY2025 [4][17][50]. - Without alternative measures, the effective U.S. tariff rate could decrease by approximately 7 percentage points, with the rate for China dropping from 31% to 15.4% [4][29][50]. - The tariff landscape may evolve into a new phase characterized by increased uncertainty, a gradual exit from universal tariffs, and a shift towards more targeted measures [6][42][51].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court has halted Trump's global tariffs implemented under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), leading to a significant shift in U.S. trade policy and increasing global trade uncertainty [1][5]. Group 1: Legal and Political Implications - The Supreme Court's ruling is seen as a major limitation on Trump's powers and a setback for his economic agenda for a second term [1]. - Legal scholars suggest that the ruling marks a critical moment in the legal battle over Trump's tariffs, emphasizing the need to define the boundaries of presidential power [5]. - Trump's immediate response includes plans to impose a new 10% global tariff for 150 days, which he later increased to 15% [1][10]. Group 2: Market Reactions - Following the Supreme Court's decision, U.S. stock markets experienced a temporary relief rally, with the Dow Jones rising by 0.47% and the S&P 500 by 0.69% [6]. - Investors' risk appetite improved, overshadowing concerns about economic slowdown and persistent inflation [6]. Group 3: Economic Impact and Future Projections - The long-term economic impact of the ruling remains uncertain, with the U.S. Commerce Department reporting a core inflation rate of 3% as of December [7]. - Market expectations for interest rate cuts have slightly shifted, with traders now anticipating a potential cut in July rather than June [7]. - The ruling is viewed as a policy adjustment rather than a turning point in the economic cycle, with asset prices still influenced by growth, inflation, and fiscal constraints [7]. Group 4: Refund and Legal Challenges - A significant issue arising from the ruling is whether previously paid tariffs will be refunded, with over $130 billion collected in tariffs to date [8]. - Numerous companies, including Costco, have filed lawsuits seeking refunds for tariffs paid under the now-invalidated policy [8][9]. - The political discourse around potential refunds has intensified, with calls for direct payments to American families to offset the costs of illegal tariffs [9]. Group 5: International Responses - Multiple countries are assessing their responses to the new tariffs, with France and Germany indicating they are in discussions regarding the implications of Trump's global tariffs [15][16]. - Canada welcomed the Supreme Court's ruling but noted that challenges remain due to existing tariffs under the Trade Expansion Act [15]. - Mexico is taking a cautious approach, evaluating the legal scope of the ruling and its actual impact on its trade relations with the U.S. [16].

Core Points - The U.S. President Trump signed an executive order to implement the U.S.-Japan trade agreement, which includes a reduction of tariffs on Japanese cars and parts from 27.5% to 15% [1] - The executive order defines "reciprocal" tariffs and addresses previous disputes regarding cross-border tariffs [1] - Japan has agreed to invest $550 billion in the U.S., with investments to be selected by the U.S. government [2] Group 1 - The executive order officially implements the U.S.-Japan trade agreement [1] - Tariffs on Japanese cars and parts will be reduced to 15%, requiring an administrative process to be completed within seven days of publication in the Federal Register [1] - The order specifies that for Japanese products with existing tariffs below 15%, the total tax rate will be 15%, while products with existing tariffs of at least 15% will have reciprocal tariffs set to zero [1] Group 2 - The measure will apply to Japanese products entering the U.S. market on or after August 7 at 12:01 AM Washington time [1] - The order authorizes the U.S. Secretary of Commerce to modify the reciprocal tariff rates to zero for specific Japanese products, including natural resources and generic drugs [1] - Japan's commitment to invest $550 billion in the U.S. is part of the trade agreement, with the U.S. government having the authority to select the investments [2]

Group 1 - The first batch of tariff measures has been in effect for six months, leading to a significant increase in the actual tariff rate in the U.S. from approximately 2.5% to nearly 20% [2] - Seven countries and regions are currently negotiating trade arrangements with the U.S., accounting for over a quarter of U.S. imports, with tariff rates fluctuating between 15% and 20% [2] - The U.S. has agreed to differentiated tariff reductions based on Section 232 reviews, with the U.K. receiving special treatment in the steel and aluminum sectors, maintaining a 25% tariff while others face 50% [2] Group 2 - The EU has announced a 15% tariff on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, which is expected to be lower than the final tariff levels for these industries [3] - The EU's adjustments are significant as it is projected to account for 62% of U.S. imports in the pharmaceutical sector by 2024 [3] - The trade agreements with the U.S. involve over a trillion dollars in investment intentions across various sectors, although specific details remain unclear [3] Group 3 - The silver T+D market showed a fluctuating upward trend, closing at 9183 yuan/kg, with a daily high of 9224 yuan/kg and a low of 9124 yuan/kg [1][4] - Resistance levels for silver T+D are noted at 9224-9300, while support levels are identified at 9000-9124 [4]