开业五年多，广西首家仓储式会员制超市——阿尔特麦仓储超市华南城店计划在1月底正式停止营业。 不过，购物卡、会员卡内余额只能消费、不能退款的做法，却引起了争议。律师认为，商家规定是霸王 条款，侵犯了消费者的权益。 广西最大超市本月底正式停业 2020年9月22日，在南宁开业的阿尔特麦超市华南城店，以5万平方米的占地面积，相当于7个标准足球 场大小的规模，成为广西首家会员制仓储超市，也是当时最大的超市。 最近几天，到这家超市来购物的消费者发现，超市已经打出闭店公告称，"本店因经营调整，计划在 2026年1月30日正式停止营业。" 合新闻记者查询发现，其实，这并非是该超市首次宣布停业。 律师认为商家做法属于"霸王条款" 安徽大湖律师事务所律师汪俊表示，超市以公告这类未与消费者协商的公示方式，不合理免除自身法定 退款义务，同时限制消费者对卡内余额的自主处置权，强迫消费者在1月30日前消费，排除了消费者的 退款选择权，权利义务严重不对等。 "商家的做法属于霸王条款。"汪俊认为，经营者单方面制定的逃避法定义务、减免自身责任的不平等格 式合同、通知、声明和店堂告示或者行业惯例等，限制消费者权利，严重侵害消费者利益。消费者在 ...

近日 江苏丹阳一名业务员 凭借敏锐的防诈意识 与警方快速联动 为六旬老人止损38000元！ 2025年12月24日 再次见到仲先生 马婷婷长舒一口气 笑着对民警说 接到某网络零售平台丹阳市区 "我回到店里后 特意没有立刻充值激活购物卡 一直在等你们警察的电话确认 平时看过很多你们的反诈宣传 这回派上用场了" 12月24日15时许 丹阳市公安局导墅派出所 一门店业务员马婷婷报警 当日上午，她接到一陌生电话 并要求以个人名义购买 且不开发票 添加企业微信后 对方要求尽快送卡上门 对方表示需购买 马婷婷按流程 38张面值1000元的购物卡 询问客户身份信息 将38张卡送至客户仲先生 位于导墅镇的家中 交谈中，她注意到六旬的仲先生 对如何知晓自己的手机号码 支支吾吾 对大量购卡的用途 也闪烁其词 联想到反诈宣传中的典型案例 随即以闲聊的方式提醒风险 "现在诈骗手法很多 但仲先生坚称未被骗 购卡是为办事 马婷婷无奈离开 途中再次致电仲先生 询问其子女是否知情 得知老人子女均不知情后 她果断报警求助 导墅派出所值班民警钟寒 辅警贺佳宇接警后 火速赶往仲先生家 此时 您会不会是被骗了呀" 38张购物卡中已有29张被刮开 民 ...

男子一次性购买40张购物卡 近日 浙江嘉兴海盐武原街道 超市员工转身就报警 怎么回事？ 某超市员工周晓雪 迎来了一位大客户 男子称要一次性购买 40张面额1000元的购物卡 来了大单 周晓雪心头一喜 一边帮男子办理业务 一边和他闲聊起来 可男子对她的话避而不答 手指还在手机屏幕上不停操作 男子的反常举动 只是催促着"快点结账" 总价值4万元 让周晓雪突然想起 此前接触到的一些类似诈骗案例 她越想越不对劲儿 在男子匆匆付完钱离开后 赶紧将情况汇报给了经理 两人不敢耽搁 立马报了警 海盐武原派出所反诈队员 第一时间找到了男子杨先生 "购物卡是我和朋友一起买的……" 面对民警的询问 杨先生支支吾吾 得到杨先生的同意后 反诈队员查看了他的手机 发现了一个网络投资网址 眼看瞒不住了 杨先生这才说出了实情 原来 客服声称需线下购买购物卡充值 将卡号和卡密发过去才能提现 他这才跑到超市 一口气买下了40张购物卡 事后 超市及时冻结了这批购物卡 杨先生在网上参与投资 周晓雪捧着民警送来的证书 骄傲地说 警方提醒 杨先生的4万元一分不少 "派出所民警经常来给我们 进行反诈宣传 他急匆匆进来说要买这么多卡 我就觉得不对劲了 能帮 ...

近段时间，多位网友在社交平台发文称，在家门口收到盒马、朴朴或永辉等平台的免费试吃卡、试用卡 或购物卡，对此，盒马、朴朴及永辉的相关负责人均曾回应南都湾财社记者称，未开展此类活动，请消 费者务必提高警惕，切勿轻信此类信息。 12月2日，山东省淄博市公安局官方账号发文称，针对上述群众投诉出现免费试吃卡的情况，淄博警方 高度重视，成立专案组，全力侦查"试吃卡"来源，成功抓获7名犯罪嫌疑人。 （文章来源：南方都市报） 除了淄博外，济南公安局也发布了相关执法情况。南都湾财社记者注意到，11月26日，山东省济南市公 安局发文称，业务部门跟进处置后发现在天桥辖区多个居民小区内，两名男子在住户家门把手上悬挂了 伪造的"永辉超市"礼品卡和试吃卡，以此诱导群众扫码引流，天桥分局民警已于11月24日将还在分装假 卡的犯罪嫌疑人抓捕，当场缴获礼品卡2000余张。目前，案件正在进一步审理中。 经审讯，王某率等人自2025年11月初开始，在明知发放的"盒马试吃卡"等材料是为电诈引流的情况下， 仍驾车窜至淄博、临沂、潍坊、济南等地发放两万余份，非法获利11余万元。淄博公安表示，目前，七 名犯罪嫌疑人均被依法采取刑事强制措施，案件正在进一步 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses common misconceptions regarding corporate income tax loss carryforwards and provides clarifications on tax deduction eligibility based on specific scenarios and regulations [9]. Summary by Sections Corporate Income Tax Loss Carryforward Misconceptions - The article outlines four common misconceptions related to corporate income tax loss carryforwards, emphasizing the importance of understanding the regulations to avoid errors [9]. Tax Deduction Eligibility - It is clarified that expenditures incurred domestically that do not fall under taxable items can still be used as tax deduction vouchers if they comply with the regulations set by the tax authority [13]. - An example is provided where Company A purchases gift cards for employee benefits, totaling 100,000 yuan, and receives a non-taxable VAT invoice. This invoice can be used as a tax deduction voucher as long as the expenditure is genuine and related to business operations [14]. Invoice Compliance - The article stresses that invoices must meet specific criteria to be valid for tax deductions. For instance, invoices lacking the taxpayer identification number or full name of the payer are not acceptable for reimbursement [16][17]. - It is also noted that any changes to the product name or amount on the invoice are not permitted, and detailed addresses must be included for real estate rental invoices [17][18].

Core Points - The case of Wang Zhu, former head of the Administrative Penalty Bureau of the National Financial Supervision Administration, has concluded with a sentencing for bribery amounting to 33.77 million yuan over a span of more than 20 years in financial regulation [1][12] - Wang utilized his regulatory positions across banking and insurance sectors to amass illegal wealth, receiving bribes in various forms including cash, stocks, and property benefits [3][9] Summary by Sections Background - Wang Zhu, born in January 1969, has a long career in financial regulation, having held various positions in the People's Bank of China and the former China Insurance Regulatory Commission [3] - His roles included leadership positions in multiple regulatory bodies, culminating in his role as head of the Heilongjiang Regulatory Bureau [3] Bribery Details - The total amount of illegal gains was 33,768,244 yuan, with 24 specific instances of bribery documented [4][12] - Notable instances include receiving 17.98 million yuan worth of stocks in exchange for facilitating loan approvals for a company facing financial difficulties [5][12] - Wang's methods included direct cash payments, stock transfers, and other forms of compensation such as shopping cards and property benefits [9][12] Legal Proceedings - Wang was sentenced to 12 years and 6 months in prison, along with a fine of 2 million yuan, and ordered to return the illegal gains [12] - The court emphasized the severity of his actions, highlighting the significant amount involved and the abuse of his regulatory power [12][13] Implications for the Financial Sector - The case underscores the ongoing anti-corruption efforts within China's financial regulatory framework, signaling that no individual, regardless of their position, is above the law [13] - The National Financial Supervision Administration has been actively pursuing corruption cases, with several high-profile officials being investigated and penalized [13]

Core Points - Wang Zhu, former head of the Administrative Penalty Bureau of the Financial Regulatory Administration, was sentenced to 12 years and 6 months in prison for bribery, involving over 33.76 million yuan [1][2][3] Group 1: Background and Context - Wang Zhu has over 20 years of experience in financial regulation, having held positions in various regulatory bodies across multiple provinces [1] - He was investigated for serious violations of discipline and law, including accepting gifts and engaging in activities that compromised his official duties [1][2] Group 2: Details of the Bribery Case - From 2002 to 2023, Wang utilized his position to facilitate benefits for individuals and entities in areas such as loan financing and business operations, receiving various forms of bribes including stocks and cash [2][3] - The total amount of bribes received by Wang was approximately 33.76 million yuan, with the largest single bribe being 17.98 million yuan in the form of stocks from a company in 2020 [3] - Wang also received 757.97 million yuan through profit-sharing arrangements involving a relative, leveraging his regulatory authority to benefit that relative [4]

Core Points - The news highlights multiple cases of corruption within the healthcare sector, specifically involving hospital leaders who accepted high-end gifts during holiday periods [1][2] Group 1: Corruption Cases - The former deputy secretary and president of Xi'an Central Hospital, Hu Wei, was reported for accepting gifts and cash from management and service objects multiple times from 2015 to 2024, particularly during the Mid-Autumn and Spring Festival holidays [1] - Wu Changfu, the former party secretary and president of Jinzhou Beizhen People's Hospital, accepted invitations and gifts that could influence his official duties from 2015 to 2024, including cash and shopping cards during personal and holiday events [2] - Ma Xiaobin, the former party committee member and president of Gansu Medical College Affiliated Hospital, was reported for accepting gifts and participating in potentially biased banquets and tourism activities from 2013 to 2024, including high-end food and drinks [2]

Core Points - A new type of scam has emerged where fraudsters lure individuals into acting as "runners" to purchase high-value gift cards, using the promise of high fees as bait [1][2] - The scam involves the fraudster asking the runner to buy multiple gift cards and provide the card numbers, effectively using them as a tool for money laundering [1][2] Summary by Sections Scam Mechanism - Fraudsters contact individuals who post "runner" services on second-hand trading platforms, offering to pay a high fee for purchasing gift cards [1] - The scam typically involves the fraudster claiming that the runner needs to change their bank account due to "transfer limits," which is a tactic to manipulate the situation [1][2] Victim Experience - One victim, referred to as Xiao Mu, nearly fell victim to the scam but avoided significant loss due to a limitation on their bank card [1][2] - The victim shared their experience on social media, discovering that many others had encountered similar scams, indicating a widespread issue [1] Warning and Advice - Experts advise individuals to be cautious of high-commission runner orders, especially those involving large gift cards or virtual goods [2] - Victims are encouraged to retain evidence and report suspicious activities to the platform or authorities [2]