Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the dual nature of PowerPoint (PPT) in large organizations, highlighting its role as both a communication tool and a symbol of power, while also addressing the challenges and contradictions that arise from its use in corporate settings [2][6][36]. Group 1: The Love for PPT - PPT serves as a powerful tool for visual communication, enhancing the perception of order and professionalism within hierarchical organizations [9][10]. - It fulfills three key needs: ensuring safety in communication, providing a formal record for organizational memory, and serving as a politically correct means of presentation [12][14]. - The reliance on PPT reflects a broader organizational culture where standardized information output is crucial for decision-making [11][14]. Group 2: The Hate for PPT - The overemphasis on PPT can lead to a distortion where form overshadows content, resulting in a focus on presentation rather than substance [18][19]. - This phenomenon is linked to the "audit society" theory, where organizations prioritize quantifiable metrics over genuine content improvement [18][19]. - The push for "de-PPT" initiatives often fails to address the underlying need for visual information, potentially leading to new forms of administrative burden [20][21]. Group 3: The Paradox of "No PPT" - The directive to eliminate PPT can create anxiety among middle managers, as they struggle to meet expectations without a clear alternative structure for communication [26][27]. - This situation exemplifies a "performance dilemma," where employees feel caught between conflicting demands from leadership [27][32]. - The cancellation of PPT may inadvertently reinforce a culture of "upward identification," where employees prioritize pleasing superiors over presenting logical arguments [32][33]. Group 4: The Organizational Context - The article emphasizes that the issue lies not with PPT itself but with the organizational context in which it is used [36][38]. - A supportive environment that encourages honest communication and tolerates content divergence is essential for effective expression [36][38]. - The real challenge is to shift the focus from mere compliance with formal structures to fostering genuine dialogue and problem-solving within organizations [36][38].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by recent graduates entering the workforce and highlights the role of AI tools, specifically "扣子空间," in alleviating these challenges and enhancing productivity in the workplace [2][4][43]. Group 1: Challenges Faced by Graduates - Recent graduates experience significant anxiety and pressure as they transition from academic life to professional roles, often feeling unprepared and isolated in their new environments [4][7]. - Many graduates report feeling overwhelmed by the expectations of their roles, particularly when working alongside more experienced colleagues, leading to feelings of inadequacy and confusion [7][11]. Group 2: Role of AI Tools - "扣子空间" is introduced as a versatile AI tool that assists graduates in various tasks, such as creating presentations, conducting research, and generating reports, thereby reducing the burden of initial job responsibilities [12][16][24]. - The AI tool can generate comprehensive reports and presentations in a short time, allowing users to focus on other aspects of their work and improving overall efficiency [16][41]. Group 3: Enhancing Workplace Integration - The AI tool provides guidance on workplace integration, helping users navigate social dynamics and improve communication with colleagues, which is crucial for new employees [32][35]. - By offering support in tasks like report writing and project management, "扣子空间" acts as a mentor, enabling graduates to adapt more quickly to their roles and build confidence in their abilities [35][43].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the pervasive use of PowerPoint (PPT) in corporate settings, highlighting the frustrations of employees who are burdened by the necessity to create and present PPTs, often leading to inefficiencies and a culture of superficiality in communication [3][4][5]. Group 1: The Role of PPT in Corporate Culture - PPT has dominated the presentation software market for nearly 40 years, with around 500 million users conducting approximately 35 million presentations daily [3]. - The use of PPT has become a cultural norm in various organizations, with employees required to create presentations for a multitude of meetings, regardless of their actual necessity [4][5]. - Many employees express their disdain for PPT, viewing it as a source of stress and inefficiency in their work lives [5][6]. Group 2: Inefficiencies and Misuse of PPT - A significant portion of PPTs (78%) are modified versions of existing presentations, leading to time wasted on formatting rather than content creation [11]. - Employees reportedly spend about 40% of their time (approximately 8 hours monthly) on formatting tasks rather than focusing on optimizing content [13]. - The design and aesthetic preferences of leaders often dictate the quality of PPTs, which can detract from the actual content being presented [10][19]. Group 3: Communication Challenges - The use of PPT can lead to a focus on the slides rather than the speaker's verbal communication, resulting in lower retention of the spoken information [19][20]. - The original purpose of PPT as a supportive tool for oral presentations has shifted, with slides often becoming the primary source of information, undermining the speaker's role [20][22]. - The article suggests that the issues with PPT usage stem from broader organizational communication and decision-making problems rather than the tool itself [22].