文/梧桐兄弟 近期，锦州港股份有限公司（"锦州港"，代码：600190）又一次收到中国证券监督管理委员会《行政处罚及市场禁入事先告知书》。 据公告， 2022 年至 2024 年，锦州港通过虚假贸易业务及跨期确认港口包干作业费收入等方式虚增利润， 《2022 年年度报告》《2023 年年度报告》《2024 年第一 季度报告》存在虚假记载。2022 年虚增利润 3,610.45 万元，占当期报告披露利润总额的 22.46%； 2023 年虚增利润 6,808.78 万元， 占当期报告披露利润总额的 65.96%； 2024 年第一季度虚增利润 1,537.75 万元，占当期报告披露利润总额的62.05%。 值得注意的是，2024年11月，锦州港刚收过一份《行政处罚决定书》， 锦州港为了做大收入和利润、满足银行贷款需求， 与大连和境贸易有限公司、上海银鸿国际 贸易有限公司、宁波朗逸能源有限公司、宁波百荣能源有限公司、重庆岳城川聚贸易有限公司、上海盛辙国际贸易有限公司、舟山丰聚益尚能源有限公司 等七家公 司开展无商业实质的贸易业务。 结果， 2018 年 虚增营业收入2,120,276,859.08元，虚增营业成本 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the recent trends in the domestic merger and acquisition (M&A) market, particularly after the introduction of new policies like the "Six Guidelines for M&A" which have driven the market's high activity levels [1] - It highlights that 31 listed companies engaged in cross-industry acquisitions, with a requirement that acquirers must be "operationally compliant" and not classified as ST or *ST [1] - The majority of the target companies in these acquisitions are profitable, with only a few exceptions, indicating a trend towards acquiring financially stable entities [3][4] Group 2 - Among the 31 cross-industry acquisitions, 11 involved assets injected by controlling shareholders, which suggests higher negotiation efficiency and lower integration difficulty [2] - A significant portion of the target companies are in the technology sector, particularly in areas like semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and high-end manufacturing [6] - The article notes that 12 companies involved in acquisitions reported negative net profits, with notable losses from companies like Guangxi Broadcasting (-698 million) and Nanjing Chemical Fiber (-185 million) [5] Group 3 - The article provides specific examples of acquisitions, such as Songfa Co. acquiring Hengli Heavy Industry for 8 billion, with a profit commitment of 4.8 billion over three years [8] - It mentions that several acquisitions have been terminated, including those by Cixing Co. and Huasi Co., indicating potential challenges in the M&A landscape [8] - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the operational logic and key steps in M&A transactions, suggesting that further education on this topic is available through a course on M&A practices [10][12]

2025年A股并购市场热度高涨，开年以来已有超20家上市公司披露控制权变更计划，涉及新能源、半导 体等不同领域。但面对复杂的股权结构和监管环境， 收购方如何快速锁定控制权？不同场景下又该如 何选择交易工具？ 我们来给大家分享几个 主流的收购方式 ： 一、协议转让 1 基基基本本本含含含义义义 协议转让是指交易各方共同签署协议，约定收购方直接受让出售方所持上市公司一定数量的股份。 2 使使使用用用场场场景景景 标的股份不存在转让限制 （即不属于限售股或存在其他无法解除的权利限制，如司法冻结、司法 标记或处于质押状态尚无法解除等）。 3 典典典型型型案案案例例例 2024年11月， 苏州步步高以15元/股协议受让大千生态18.09%股份 ，总价3.68亿元，不触及要约 收购，轻松拿下控股权。 二、协议转让+表决权委托或放弃 1 基基基本本本含含含义义义 表决权委托或放弃通常为上市公司大股东通过无对价的方式将除收益权之外的其他权利委托给收购 方，或者放弃表决权的行为。 2 使使使用用用场场场景景景 在策划收购方案时，引入表决权委托或放弃的安排，主要是为了强化收购方对上市公司的控制地 位。这一策略旨在使 收购方成为持 ...

文/梧桐数据中心 2024年末，证券行业登记从业人员数量36.68万人，相较于2023年末的38.17万人，同比减少1.49万人。已上市的42家券商中，有32家人员收缩，共减少6784人，其中 国信证券一年减员1289人。33家上市券商扣非归母净利润同比增长，其中，中信证券的营业收入、扣非归母净利润双双稳居第一，2024年营业收入为637.89亿元， 扣非归母净利润为215.66亿元；9家出现扣非归母净利润负增长，其中，天风证券的扣非归母净利润从2023年的2.44亿元降至2024年的0.14亿元，同比下降94.37%。 一、1.5万人离开证券行业 根据中国证券业协会披露的数据显示，截至2024年末，证券行业登记从业人员数量为36.68万人，相较于2023年末的38.17万人，同比减少1.49万人。 二、32家上市券商人员收缩，国信证券一年减员1289人 通过查阅已上市的42家券商披露的2024年年报，2023年至2024年这一年时间里，这42家上市券商的员工总数从289766人降至282982人，共减少6784人。 有32家券商2024年员工数量同比减少。其中国信证券人员收缩最为明显，2023年员工总数为1 ...

文/梧桐兄弟 4月25日，北交所公布对西安博达软件股份有限公司IPO终止审核的决定，直接原因是公司撤回申报。公司北交所IPO早在2024年2月5日过会，此前在2023年11月29 日曾被暂缓审议。公司过会后14个月一直未能提交注册，直到被终止审核。 （ 延展阅读： 罕见！为了IPO二次上会，2023年年报未出，2024年盈利预测已出 ） 2025年4月29日，博达软件披露了2024年年度报告，结果2024年净利润仅为2,143万，同比下滑42.4%，与此前预测的3,910万相差甚远。业绩下滑，或许是IPO撤回的 原因。 一、2023年、2024年前三季度均亏损，第四季营收占比逾7成 公司是全媒体数字内容智能服务提供商，主要面向教育行业，并拓展到政府、企业、健康等行业，提供软件及软件实施、平台运维等技术服务。 值得注意的是，2024年1月期间，博达软件在2023年年报未出的情况下，编制了2024年盈利预测报告。公司预测2024年度营业收入和净利润分别为21,350.87万元和 3,910.72万元，扣除非经常性损益后的净利润3,910.72万元，较上年同期分别增长22.05%、5.14%、25.98%。 202 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant changes in tax administration following the full implementation of the Golden Tax Phase IV, highlighting enhanced tax compliance requirements and the establishment of a comprehensive monitoring network by tax authorities [1]. Group 1: Tax Administration Changes - The tax authorities have built a multi-dimensional monitoring network through electronic invoices, tax risk models, and inter-departmental data connectivity, significantly improving tax risk identification capabilities [1]. - The new tax administration law has reinforced compliance requirements for enterprises, imposing stricter regulations on tax declarations, cost ticket management, and individual income tax and social security contributions related to shareholder dividends [1]. Group 2: Training Program Details - A training program titled "Smart Finance + New Tax Administration Law Dual Perspective: 80+ High-Frequency Tax-Enterprise Dispute Practical Cases Disassembled" will be held on May 23-24, 2025, in Shenzhen [1]. - The training aims to help enterprises establish a comprehensive management system for "data compliance, risk warning, and precise planning" by analyzing the underlying logic of tax regulation and policy dynamics [1]. Group 3: Course Structure - The course will cover various topics, including the causes and coordination logic of tax-enterprise disputes, communication strategies, and high-frequency dispute case analyses related to value-added tax, corporate income tax, and personal income tax [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. - Specific case studies will address common disputes such as the treatment of government subsidies, tax implications of compensation payments, and the handling of invoices and tax deductions [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Group 4: Course Benefits - Participants will gain insights into the underlying logic of tax-enterprise disputes, learn eight key strategies for dispute resolution, and enhance their communication skills with tax authorities [17]. - The course will also focus on the latest legislative changes in value-added tax and tax administration law, equipping participants with the knowledge to navigate complex tax issues effectively [17].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the regulatory actions taken by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange against Diga Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. and its associated parties due to various violations during the IPO application process, leading to the termination of their IPO review. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange issued three written warning letters and three public criticism decisions on April 30, 2025, against Diga Pharmaceutical and related parties [2][3] - The IPO application for Diga Pharmaceutical was accepted on June 16, 2023, but was terminated on June 12, 2024, due to the withdrawal of the application by the issuer and the sponsor [27] Group 2: Violations Identified - Diga Pharmaceutical and its key executives failed to fully disclose independence flaws and rectification measures, as well as internal control deficiencies related to sales, procurement, and inventory management [4][8] - The sponsor, Minsheng Securities, did not adequately scrutinize the issuer's independence issues and internal control irregularities, leading to inaccurate verification opinions [5][17] - The law firm, Shanghai Zechang, and the accounting firm, Tianjian, also failed to conduct thorough checks on the issuer's independence and internal control issues, resulting in regulatory warnings [19][21] Group 3: Specific Issues - The issuer prioritized purchasing from suppliers controlled by the actual controller, which raised concerns about independence and internal control [8][19] - There were discrepancies in the accounting treatment of returns, with the issuer misclassifying a return as a post-balance sheet adjustment, which should have been reflected in 2020 instead of 2019 [10][24] - The issuer's internal controls were found to be inadequate, with missing documentation and improper handling of sales and inventory management [9][15]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights a significant increase in merger and acquisition (M&A) activities in the A-share market, with a 68% rise in major restructuring proposals for 2024 and over 30% of listed companies engaging in "curve-saving" strategies to bypass traditional shell acquisition regulations [1] - The article notes that the M&A activity is driven by supportive policies such as the "Six M&A Guidelines" and the "New National Nine Articles," which are expected to sustain the momentum of "class shell" transactions into 2025 [1] Group 2 - The article discusses four classic methods of "class shell" transactions, including scenarios where the actual controller does not change, acquisitions after 36 months, asset purchases from third parties, and acquisitions of less than 100% [5][15][25] - Specific case studies are provided, such as the acquisition of Keke Electronics by Silin Jie, which showcases a transaction where the actual controller remains unchanged, and the acquisition of Xian Dao Electric Science by Guangzhi Technology, which involves a 36-month post-acquisition strategy [5][9] - Financial data from these transactions illustrate the significant revenue and profit figures, indicating the potential for growth and strategic alignment in the M&A landscape [14][17][21][29]

百度百科显示：王建军，四川阆中人，1991年7月参加工作，1994年10月入党，中国人民大学工业经济专业毕业，研究生学历，经济学硕士学位。 根据证监会网站披露：王建军同志，男，汉族，1968年3月出生，经济学硕士，中共党员。现任中国证券监督管理委员会副主席、党委委员。 文/梧桐小编 4月30日20点，中央纪委国家监委网站公布一条重磅消息：中国证券监督管理委员会党委委员、副主席王建军接受中央纪委国家监委纪律审查和监察调查。正文内 容也很简短：中国证券监督管理委员会党委委员、副主席王建军涉嫌严重违纪违法，目前正接受中央纪委国家监委纪律审查和监察调查。 ...

领取方式 扫码添加梧桐小师弟 免费领资料 《涉案企业合规典型案例汇编》 (20例) 案例 1: 张家港市 L 公司、张某甲等人污染环境案 1 案例 2: 上海市 A 公司、B 公司、关某某虚开增值税专用发票案 4 案例 4: 新泰市 J 公司等建筑企业串通投标系列案件 7 案例5: 上海J公司、朱某某假冒注册商标案 -- 依托长三角一体化协作平 台,对涉案企业异地适用第三方监督评估机制 10 案例 6: 张家港 S 公司、睢某某销售假冒注册商标的商品案 -- 介入侦查 认定"挂案"性质,积极引导涉案小微企业开展合规建设 16 案例 7:山东沂南县 Y 公司、姚某明等人串通投标案 -- 异地协作开展第 三方监督评估,对第三方组织开展"飞行监管",促进当地招投标领域行业治理 22 案例 8: 随州市 Z 公司康某某等人重大责任事故案 -- 在涉企危害生产安 全犯罪案件中适用企业合规推动当地企业强化安全生产意识:张家港市 L 公 企业合规超重要，一不注意就踩坑！这里整理了最高检发布的20个典型案例，包括虚开增值税、 数据合规、串通投标、金融诈骗这些问题，分享给大家： 司、张某甲等人污染环境案 案例 9: 深圳×公司 ...