转自：喵大白话 打破人在公交车被带鱼咬0记录 下一步公交车管理规定 3小时前 ·辽宁 · 00 公分用0 喵大 明 回复 "刚才坐公交被带鱼咬了" "你没睡醒吧" 昨天22:33 ·海南 回复 8 23 经易万 喵大 用后 c r：d y @ 小 小 浩 牙 带鱼好吃喵爱吃 它那把嘴也是够锋利了 但是换个角度想 人类倒霉起来 真没个下限啊哈哈哈哈 你最近有遇到什么奇葩的倒霉事吗？ 让喵来替你分忧一下 转身即可就地取材真方便哈哈哈 ll Be CHENGER 以 屯 之 名 招 呼 俺 c r：d y @ 一 口 神 探 这 有 根 线 头 帮 你 用 火 机 撩 一 下 欸 ？ 怎 么 成 爆 款 了！ c r：d y @ 通 童 桶 痛 妹 妹，需 要 我 出 手 了 吗 ？ 这下饺子也有甜咸口了 大零馅 沙糖桔馅 甘蔗馅他妈昨吃? ♡ 3957 © 昨天08:57 · 河北 回复 嚼嚼嚼,喝儿胚,胚胚胚,忒,嚼嚼嚼 .... 0 公交间71 喵大 中 昨天09:09 · 广东 回复 cr：dy@Shylie.婉 一棒唤醒了农耕基因 死虫式卷腹预备备 c r：d y @ 小 小 现 在 人 也 要 开 始 ...

Core Viewpoint - Google is strategically reclaiming its position in the AI sector by re-hiring former employees, with approximately 20% of new AI software engineers in 2025 being ex-employees, a significant increase compared to previous years [1][4]. Group 1: Employee Rehiring Strategy - The trend of re-hiring former employees at Google is not coincidental, as the company faced significant layoffs in early 2023, with about 12,000 employees cut, representing 6% of its total workforce [4]. - Google has maintained connections with former employees, creating a potential talent pool that can be reactivated, especially as competition in generative AI intensifies [4]. - The return of former employees is driven by the availability of substantial computing resources and competitive compensation, which are critical for AI development [5][6]. Group 2: Cultural and Structural Changes - Google has undergone notable changes in its internal culture and organizational structure, including taking more risks, accelerating product release schedules, and reducing management layers by over one-third [8]. - The company has also adopted unconventional recruitment practices, such as re-hiring former employees and involving co-founder Sergey Brin in recruiting key AI talent [8]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape and Market Response - Initially, Google struggled in the generative AI space, lagging behind competitors like OpenAI and Meta, which rapidly gained market share [11][12]. - However, starting in 2024, Google shifted its strategy by increasing investments in AI infrastructure and stabilizing its product line with the Gemini series models, including the recent release of Gemini 3 [12]. - The market has responded positively, with Alphabet's stock price increasing by over 60% in 2025, outperforming other tech giants [13].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant cyber attack on Kuaishou's live streaming feature, which occurred on December 22, 2025, leading to the dissemination of inappropriate content and raising concerns about the platform's security measures and response capabilities [1][10][12]. Incident Overview - Kuaishou's live streaming function was attacked around 22:00 on December 22, 2025, resulting in a temporary disruption of services, although other functionalities remained unaffected [1]. - The attack involved the posting of a large amount of pornographic content in multiple live streams, with one stream reportedly reaching an audience of 100,000 viewers before being shut down [4][5]. Response and Investigation - Kuaishou has initiated an emergency response plan, reported the incident to law enforcement, and is taking legal measures to protect its interests and those of its shareholders [1]. - Experts suggest that the attack was likely organized and may have exploited vulnerabilities in Kuaishou's system, particularly in the live streaming interface [10][12]. - The incident has been classified as a P0-level accident, indicating a severe impact on core business functions, necessitating immediate and high-level intervention [11]. Security Implications - The attack highlights the shift towards automated attacks by cybercriminals, which can overwhelm traditional manual content moderation systems [12]. - Experts emphasize the need for Kuaishou to enhance its security protocols, including the establishment of automated response mechanisms to quickly identify and mitigate such threats [11][12]. Financial Context - Kuaishou reported a revenue increase of 14.2% year-on-year to 35.6 billion yuan in Q3, with significant growth in operating profit and adjusted net profit [14]. - Following the incident, there was a notable reaction in the A-share cybersecurity sector, with several stocks experiencing gains [14].

Group 1 - The article discusses the experience of listening to a horror podcast on a high-speed train, highlighting the contrast between the narrator's enjoyment and the disruptive behavior of other passengers [3][4]. - The narrator reflects on the social dynamics in the train carriage, noting how their choice of audio content influenced the atmosphere, leading to a collective quiet among passengers [3][4]. - The piece emphasizes the theme of social behavior and etiquette in public spaces, suggesting that individual actions can significantly impact the group environment [3][4]. Group 2 - The article includes humorous anecdotes and comments from readers, showcasing a shared understanding of the challenges faced in public transport settings [5][9]. - It touches on the broader societal issues of personal space and noise levels in crowded environments, resonating with many readers who have had similar experiences [5][9]. - The narrative style combines personal storytelling with relatable humor, making it engaging for the audience [5][9].

Core Viewpoint - GitHub announced a pricing adjustment for self-hosted runners under GitHub Actions, introducing a fee of $0.002 per minute starting March 1, 2026, which sparked significant backlash from the developer community [1][2][10]. Summary by Sections GitHub Actions Overview - GitHub Actions, launched in October 2018, is an automation platform primarily used for CI/CD, allowing developers to automate tasks related to their code repositories [4][6]. - The "runner" is a program that executes tasks defined in workflows, and GitHub provides two types: self-hosted runners and GitHub-hosted runners [7][15]. Pricing Changes - The new pricing policy will charge $0.002 per minute for self-hosted runners executing tasks in private repositories, while public repository usage remains free [8][9]. - GitHub will reduce the pricing for GitHub-hosted runners by 20% to 39% starting January 1, 2026, as part of a "simplified pricing and improved user experience" initiative [8]. Developer Reactions - Many developers expressed strong dissatisfaction with the new fee structure, feeling it unfair to pay for using their own hardware [10][17]. - Some developers calculated that their monthly costs could increase significantly, with one user estimating an additional $3,500 per month [17]. GitHub's Justification - GitHub stated that the costs of maintaining and improving the infrastructure for self-hosted runners were previously subsidized by the pricing of GitHub-hosted runners [12]. - The company emphasized the need for a pricing model that aligns costs with actual usage and the value provided to users [12][13]. Response to Backlash - In response to the backlash, GitHub decided to postpone the implementation of the self-hosted runner fee, while still proceeding with the planned price reduction for GitHub-hosted runners [20][21]. - GitHub acknowledged a failure to gather community feedback before announcing the changes and committed to better engagement with the developer community moving forward [22].

Core Viewpoint - Molica AI offers a year-end promotion for a lifetime membership at a significantly reduced price, aggregating multiple advanced AI tools into one platform, making it accessible and cost-effective for users [2][70]. Group 1: Promotion Details - The year-end promotion offers a lifetime membership originally priced at 998 yuan for only 296 yuan, limited to the first 100 users [2][70]. - The promotion runs from December 24 to December 26, providing access to over 20 AI tools including ChatGPT5.2, Gemini3.0, and others [2][68]. Group 2: AI Tools Overview - Molica AI integrates leading AI models such as Gemini3.0 Pro, ChatGPT5.2, and Claude4.5, which excel in various tasks like reasoning, coding, and content generation [6][11]. - Nano Banana Pro, based on Gemini 3.0, enhances text rendering capabilities, especially in Chinese, and supports 4K output with customizable image dimensions [14][31]. - Sora2 and Veo3.1 are highlighted for their video generation capabilities, allowing users to create high-quality marketing content easily [35][40]. - Midjourney is recognized for its superior image quality and creativity in AI-generated art, maintaining a strong position in the AI art space [43][49]. - SUNO enables users to generate complete songs from simple prompts, democratizing music creation [52][56]. Group 3: Membership Benefits - Membership includes access to all integrated AI tools and features, providing a comprehensive solution for various creative and professional needs [68][69]. - Users can benefit from additional resources such as an AI monetization manual, which offers practical guidance on leveraging AI for side projects [60][61]. Group 4: Market Positioning - Molica AI positions itself as a cost-effective alternative to individual AI subscriptions, which can be significantly more expensive when purchased separately [67]. - The company emphasizes the importance of AI in modern work environments, suggesting that those who effectively utilize AI will have a competitive advantage [66].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the importance of securely handling old mobile phones before selling or recycling them, highlighting the risks of data recovery and the introduction of a new national standard for data deletion in electronic devices. Group 1: Data Recovery Risks - Many second-hand phone recycling stores can recover deleted data, posing risks of fraud and extortion [1][2] - Simply performing a factory reset only results in "logical deletion," leaving the actual data recoverable [3] Group 2: New National Standard - A new mandatory national standard titled "Data Security Technology Electronic Product Information Deletion Technical Requirements" will be implemented on January 1, 2027 [5] - The standard mandates irreversible data deletion methods, ensuring data cannot be recovered by any means [9] Group 3: Data Deletion Methods - The standard specifies two core methods for data deletion: digital overwriting and block erasure [9] - Digital overwriting involves writing meaningless data to storage units, requiring at least three overwrites for magnetic media [10] and one for semiconductor media [11] - Block erasure is a hardware-level method that clears all data in a storage block simultaneously, providing a faster and more thorough deletion [12] Group 4: Responsibilities of Manufacturers and Recyclers - Electronic product manufacturers must integrate a "one-click destruction" feature or provide free deletion tools/services [15][16] - Recyclers must inform users about data deletion, use compliant tools, and maintain records of deletion for three years [18][20] Group 5: Impact on Recycling Industry - The new regulations may increase operational costs for recycling companies, potentially leading to lower buyback prices for consumers [26] - However, the regulations aim to create a more transparent and secure recycling environment, reducing the prevalence of non-compliant recyclers [27]

Group 1 - The article does not contain any relevant content related to companies or industries. [1][2][4][6][7][8][9][11][12][13][15][16][18][20][21][22][24][25][27][29][31][32][34][35][36][37][39][40][41][42][44][45][47][48][53][54][56][57][60][62][63][64][67][69][70][72][73][75][77][79][82][84][85][87][88][89][90][92][94][97]

Core Viewpoint - The recent power outage in San Francisco highlighted the vulnerabilities of autonomous driving systems, particularly Waymo's, as their vehicles became immobilized and caused traffic chaos, contrasting with Tesla's unaffected Robotaxi service during the same incident [1][13][47]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A significant power outage in San Francisco disrupted the entire city's public transportation system and traffic signals, affecting up to 130,000 users during a peak shopping season [15]. - Waymo's autonomous vehicles became stranded at intersections and main roads, unable to move, effectively turning into "roadblocks" [4][6][7]. - The incident sparked widespread discussion on social media, showcasing the limitations of AI-driven systems in unexpected situations [8][12]. Group 2: Waymo's Response and Technology - Waymo temporarily suspended its ride-hailing service in the Bay Area and stated it was working closely with city officials to monitor infrastructure conditions [10]. - The power outage exposed a critical weakness in Waymo's reliance on a multi-sensor fusion system, which includes lidar, radar, cameras, and high-definition maps, as it struggled to operate without functioning traffic signals [22][24]. - The incident raised questions about the system's ability to handle chaotic urban environments, where predictable behavior is disrupted [33][35]. Group 3: Comparison with Tesla - In stark contrast, Tesla's vehicles, which rely primarily on cameras and AI, continued to operate without interruption during the outage, highlighting a fundamental difference in their technological approaches [48][49]. - While Waymo's system opted for a conservative risk management strategy by halting operations, Tesla's approach emphasizes adaptability in unpredictable conditions [51][52]. - The event underscored the ongoing debate about the reliability of autonomous driving technologies and the need for better solutions to handle sudden urban disruptions [55][56].

Group 1 - The article discusses a situation where a gift of skincare products is questioned for its authenticity and value, highlighting the complexities of gift-giving and personal preferences in relationships [1][3][5] - The conversation reveals a disparity in perceptions of value, with one party feeling that a high-priced item should be of high quality, while the other is skeptical about the product's legitimacy due to its price [6][10][12] - The dialogue emphasizes the emotional aspect of gift-giving, where the recipient's feelings about the gift can overshadow its monetary value [8][11][18] Group 2 - The article illustrates a common scenario in relationships where gifts are scrutinized, leading to misunderstandings and potential conflicts [4][7][9] - It reflects on societal expectations regarding expensive gifts, suggesting that individuals may feel pressured to justify the cost of their presents [10][13][14] - The discussion also touches on the idea of "智商税" (intelligence tax), implying that consumers may overpay for products based on perceived value rather than actual quality [10][12][13]