Core Viewpoint - Wi-Fi 8 is being defined to ensure reliable performance in complex environments, even under network congestion and interference, aiming to provide excellent connectivity [1][3]. Group 1: Wi-Fi 8 Features and Standards - Wi-Fi standards are developed by a global team of engineers and technical experts within the IEEE 802.11 framework, with multiple tech companies actively participating in the Wi-Fi 8 standardization process [3]. - The current Wi-Fi performance metrics can achieve multi-gigabit throughput, latency below 10 milliseconds, and a packet loss rate of less than 0.1%. Wi-Fi 8 aims to surpass Wi-Fi 7 and achieve quantifiable performance improvements in challenging scenarios [3][5]. - Wi-Fi 8 is expected to serve as a foundational connectivity base for a thriving ecosystem, introducing new features during the 802.11bn standardization process [5][7]. Group 2: Development Timeline and Future Impact - The 802.11bn standard is a collaborative effort within the 802.11 working group, which is making steady progress and has reached a high level of consensus on most new standard content. Wi-Fi Alliance certification is expected in January 2028, with final approval from the working group in March [11]. - The 802.11bn working group will continue to refine and finalize the foundational standards for the future Wi-Fi 8 generation, which is anticipated to be applied to billions of devices over the next decade [11].

以下文章来源于不会笑青年 ，作者不会笑青年 不会笑青年 . 全网唯二的程序员主题漫画公众号。 知乎看到一个典型的职场问题。 "跟领导反映工作量太大了忙不过来，领导反问我：你为啥不加班？" 果然还真是个"好办法"啊... 问题是这领导亲戚又啥也不会。 于是你和另一个同事每天爆肝干活，好不容易鼓起勇气给领导反映："领导，我们真的忙不过来， 得想想办法。" 结果领导一抬头： "你为啥不加班？" 先说说背景 简单说就是，部门一共三个人。 但说白了—— 就是三个人的饭，两个干饭的，一个蹭饭的。 那个"蹭饭"的还是领导的亲戚，不干活还拿高工资，最擅长的技能是： 嚼舌根、搞分裂、装不 懂。 你和领导说太忙，领导说："那你就分点活给她嘛。" 试试"有效沟通"？ 可以看得出，题主是个责任心很强的员工。 但这个问题，在这个只有三个人，还有一个是领导亲戚的小集体里，去"沟通"类似的诉求，基本 没有意义。 别说是你这样直说，你就是摆事实、列数据，讲策略，基本也都没有意义。 为啥？直白点说： 领导对每个人啥水平，谁干活谁划水，他亲戚是个什么档次， 他心里清清楚楚 ，只是他不想解 决。 他不是不知道你累—— 而是他招你之前，就是这么计划 ...

转自：喵大白话 一个施工类的大企业 某天半夜突然有个资深老工程师 发了一张高清无码的私密照在几百人的大群里...... 半小时过去了也没人敢说话 私密照也没有被撤回 于是 群里的中层领导们开始救火了 先后在群里刷屏公司新闻 试图盖过这个私密照事件 本以为到这就结束了 结果到了第二天 公司的前台妹妹在群里发了一条 "今天是老总生日" 于是新的一轮刷屏又开始了 老总深受感动 然后在群里回应： 谢谢 今天不是我生日 有一种超级荒诞的真实感 看完感觉生活里也没有什么是过不去的了 我上班就在这样： 初稿还没写 关注 一些分类 · 迪本自语 O 金鱼本人 开会我会装作在深思的样子 8034 07-11 上海 回复 2 公众号 · 作者赞过 就是哔哔啵 C 我开会的样子 6918 5天前 广东 回复 一个杨桃三块五 哈哈哈很形象了 5天前 广东 回复 公众号 · 喵大邱 同事说每次开会,我都这个表情往那一坐 不是你听我说 这是我开会发呆被老板点名发言的表情 就开始放空发呆 4天前 广西 回复 2 公众号· 喵本自通 07-11 上海 回复 2 公公号 · 英文自语 没事就吃溜溜梅女士 安排工作突然听到自己的名字60 4天前 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issue of expired files on WeChat, highlighting user frustrations and the misinformation surrounding methods to recover these files. It emphasizes that changing the phone's date does not affect the expiration status of files, and the official response from WeChat clarifies the actual mechanisms behind file expiration [5][10][24]. Summary by Sections User Frustration - Users often encounter issues with important files, images, and videos becoming "expired" on WeChat, leading to frustration over the inability to access them [1]. - The design of the expiration mechanism has been criticized by users, who feel that while files become inaccessible, they still occupy storage space [1]. Misinformation and Official Response - A claim circulated that changing the phone's date to within 7 days of receiving a file could allow users to view expired content, which was refuted by WeChat staff [2][5]. - WeChat clarified that the expiration period for files is actually 14 days, not 7, and that the expiration mechanism does not rely on the user's local time [7][8]. Recovery Methods - Users are advised to contact the sender for a resend if files are expired [13]. - Files may be retrievable from the computer version of WeChat if synchronization and backup features are enabled [14]. - The article suggests using WeChat's fault repair function, although it is primarily for issues caused by app crashes [16][18]. - Users can also check the storage space management feature in WeChat to attempt recovery, but this is only effective if the files have not been actively cleared [19][21]. - Third-party data recovery software is mentioned as a potential option, but it carries risks of data loss and privacy concerns [22]. Preventive Measures - To avoid issues with expired files, users are encouraged to download and save important files promptly, use the favorites feature for long-term storage, and regularly back up files to cloud services or external devices [23][24].

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding NetEase's game account deletion policy has sparked significant backlash from players, who feel that the automatic deletion of accounts after one year of inactivity is unfair and constitutes a violation of their rights [1][2][3]. Group 1: Account Deletion Policy - NetEase's service agreement states that if a user does not log in for 365 consecutive days, the platform reserves the right to delete the account and all associated game data [2]. - This clause was first introduced in the updated agreement in November 2022 [2]. - Many players reported not receiving any notification regarding the deletion, and customer service responses were vague, further aggravating player dissatisfaction [3]. Group 2: Player Sentiment - Players expressed strong emotional responses, highlighting that their accounts contain years of memories and real monetary investments, equating the deletion to losing personal property without notice [4]. - Some players argued that even if they stop playing, it does not mean they relinquish their rights to their accounts [4]. Group 3: Legal Perspectives - Legal experts suggest that if game companies fail to provide reasonable notification or set unreasonable deletion timelines, such clauses could be deemed invalid and infringe on users' property rights [5]. - Courts have recognized game accounts as "virtual property," which includes not only usage rights but also certain ownership and disposal rights, especially concerning monetary investments made by players [5][6]. Group 4: Industry Comparisons - NetEase maintains that users do not own their accounts but have "limited usage rights," allowing the platform to enforce the deletion policy [6]. - In contrast, other major gaming platforms like Steam and Epic do not delete accounts or purchased content due to inactivity, indicating a different approach to user rights [6]. Group 5: Regulatory Context - Starting January 2025, California's digital goods protection law AB 2426 will require platforms to clarify that users receive "licenses" rather than ownership, aiming to prevent consumer deception [9]. - Despite this, the law does not authorize platforms to revoke user content without notification [9]. Group 6: Emotional and Ethical Considerations - Players desire to retain their accounts even if they are not actively playing, emphasizing the emotional and financial investments involved [10]. - There are calls for platforms to provide notifications, grace periods, and data backup mechanisms before account deletion, highlighting the need for more humane and transparent communication from companies [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing difficulty in distinguishing between real and AI-generated content, exemplified by a viral video of rabbits "partying" that fooled millions on TikTok, raising concerns about the future of media authenticity [1][12][23]. Group 1: AI-Generated Content - A viral video featuring rabbits was created using AI technology, deceiving a large audience who believed it to be real [4][12]. - The video's success in misleading viewers is attributed to the low-quality, blurry nature of surveillance footage, which obscures typical indicators of AI generation [8][12]. - The static background of the video helped it avoid common pitfalls of AI-generated content, making it appear more realistic [8]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Implications - The incident has led to a broader realization among viewers, including younger generations, that they too can be deceived by AI-generated media [12][15]. - The video garnered significant attention, with over 500 million views on TikTok, highlighting a global concern about the inability to differentiate between reality and AI fabrication [23]. - The article raises questions about the future of media consumption and the potential consequences of believing in fabricated content, suggesting a need for societal adaptation to a world where "seeing is not necessarily believing" [23][24].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses workplace dynamics, particularly focusing on the issue of employees not being productive during work hours while still being present in the office, leading to unnecessary overtime and inefficiency [2][3][5]. Group 1: Workplace Efficiency - The article emphasizes the importance of completing daily tasks efficiently to avoid unnecessary overtime, suggesting that employees should manage their time better and not waste resources like electricity and air conditioning [3][5]. - It highlights a specific incident where an employee was seen shopping online during work hours, raising concerns about their productivity and commitment to work [3][5]. - The narrative suggests that some employees may pretend to work hard by staying late, while their actual productivity is low, which is a common issue in many workplaces [4][5]. Group 2: Employee Accountability - The article calls for employees to improve their work efficiency and complete their tasks on time, implying that those who do not may be wasting company resources [5]. - It points out the contradiction of employees who are not visible during the day but are present late at night, questioning their actual work ethic [4][5]. - The discussion includes a suggestion for employees to communicate urgent matters before leaving work, reinforcing the idea that responsibilities should be managed during working hours [3][5].

转自：吐槽星君 相亲对象劝我放弃丁克？ （vi a .@不认识你家哥哥很正常 ） 1111111111111 不太了解我,对我存在误解 星期四 23:08 你撤回了一条消息 星期四 23:09 入奶茶留给你自己喝吧 我们不合适 你别再给我发消息了 121年号:2281297 不多相互了解怎么知道不合适, 我认为我们还是缺乏沟通了 可能没告诉你我是丁克 ℃ 评论区姐妹支的招，说是丁克能有效劝退 你家的爵位没人继承可不行 日 HOTT 90.10 生 H L L . 40 不要小孩啊?但是我认为没有孩 子的爱情关系是不稳定的,我接 受不了 c 组建家庭难道不是为了 下一代吗? 星期四 23:57 随着年龄的增长,这些思想都会 变的,你也说不准的。还有,我 妈喜欢家里人多热闹,孩子交给 我妈就行,不用担心这些事 昨天 11:53 上中午好,有没有按时吃饭 昨天 13:38 说实话你的态度挺让人寒心的, 连一个让人沟通的机会都不给 我说我是丁克 你家孩子飞不出来 昨天 13:49 现在是你才工作没多久,不知道 有一个精神寄托的重要性 昨天 13:57 那我们可以先不说这个属 【的】【不】一 . 208190732 好 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government is actively promoting consumption through a series of financial measures, including the issuance of special bonds to support the "old for new" consumption policy, aiming to boost retail sales and overall economic activity [1]. Group 1: Financial Measures - The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced that the third batch of 690 billion yuan in special long-term bonds for supporting the "old for new" consumption initiative has been fully allocated, with a fourth batch of the same amount planned for October, completing the annual target of 3000 billion yuan [1]. - The NDRC will collaborate with the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Commerce to ensure local governments fulfill their funding responsibilities and detail the usage plans for these funds [1]. Group 2: Market Impact - In the first half of the year, the "old for new" consumption initiative has shown positive results, with sales of automobiles, home appliances, home decoration, and mobile phones reaching 1.6 trillion yuan [1]. - Retail sales of major household appliances and audio-visual equipment, cultural and office supplies, communication equipment, and furniture have seen year-on-year growth rates of 30.7%, 25.4%, 24.1%, and 22.9% respectively, contributing to a 5% year-on-year increase in total retail sales of consumer goods, which is 1.5 percentage points higher than the previous year's total [1].

Core Viewpoint - The incident at Sketch.dev highlights the hidden risks associated with AI-generated code, where seemingly correct code can introduce significant bugs due to subtle changes during code refactoring [4][5][16]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Sketch.dev experienced a series of mini outages starting on July 15, attributed to CPU spikes and slow system responses [6][7]. - The initial investigation revealed that the outages coincided with the CEO logging into the system, leading to the temporary suspension of the CEO's account [3][9]. - Further analysis traced the root cause to a logic error introduced during a large-scale code refactoring, which involved AI-generated code [13][16]. Group 2: Technical Analysis - The problematic code was a result of moving code from one file to another, where a critical change from "break" to "continue" led to an infinite loop [15][16]. - The incident exposed the inadequacies of current tools in detecting minor code changes, particularly when large modifications obscure small but significant errors [16][18]. - AI-generated code is more prone to such errors due to its method of rewriting rather than directly copying and pasting, which increases the likelihood of transcription mistakes [18][22]. Group 3: Preventive Measures - To mitigate future risks, Sketch.dev has implemented a "clipboard" feature that allows the AI to copy and paste code, aiming to preserve the original logic [23]. - The team plans to integrate more advanced code formatting tools to ensure proper indentation and structure when pasting code [23][24]. - There is a call for Git to enhance its capabilities in detecting cross-file changes, which would significantly improve error detection in AI-generated code [24]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The incident at Sketch.dev is not isolated, as other developers have reported similar issues with AI tools leading to significant operational failures [25][28]. - A recent survey indicated that 66% of developers frequently encounter AI-generated code that is almost correct, leading to increased debugging time [35][36]. - Trust in AI tools remains low, with only 3% of developers expressing high confidence in their reliability, while 46% explicitly distrust them [37][39].