Market Overview - The US 90-day exemption period is ending this week, leading to ongoing market focus on US tariff negotiations [1] - The Hang Seng Index closed down 0.12% at 23,887.83 points, with a total turnover of HKD 193.79 billion [1] - The Hang Seng Tech Index rose by 0.25% to 5,229.56 points, indicating mixed performance across indices [1] Blue Chip Performance - Sands China (01928) led blue-chip stocks, rising 3.85% to HKD 18.32, contributing 2.58 points to the Hang Seng Index [2] - Macau's June gaming revenue increased by 19% year-on-year to MOP 21.1 billion, exceeding market expectations [2] - Other notable blue-chip movements included China Resources Land (01109) up 3.45% and Ideal Automotive (02015) up 2.8% [2] Sector Highlights Stablecoin Sector - The stablecoin concept is gaining traction, with companies like Guotai Junan International (01788) rising 10.77% [3] - The Hong Kong Stablecoin Regulation is set to take effect on August 1, with limited licenses expected to be issued [3] Beverage Sector - Tea beverage stocks surged, with Cha Bai Dao (02555) up 11.04% amid a competitive delivery market [4] - The delivery battle between Alibaba and Meituan has significantly boosted tea beverage consumption [4] Real Estate Sector - The housing market is under scrutiny, with a focus on stabilizing expectations and activating demand [5] - Analysts suggest that the third quarter will be crucial for policy direction affecting the real estate market [5] Gaming Sector - Gaming stocks continued to rise, with MGM China (02282) up 2.38% and overall positive sentiment in the Macau gaming market [6] - Morgan Stanley forecasts a 10% year-on-year increase in Macau's July gaming revenue [6] Power Sector - Power stocks saw a general increase, driven by record electricity demand due to high temperatures [7] - The maximum national electricity load reached 14.65 billion kilowatts, marking a significant year-on-year increase [7] Gold Sector - Gold stocks faced pressure, with Shandong Gold (01787) down 5.96% as gold prices fell below USD 3,310 per ounce [7] - The decline in gold prices is attributed to reduced expectations for US interest rate cuts [7] Notable Stock Movements - H&H International Holdings (01112) issued a profit warning, falling 7.14% [8] - Jihong Co. (02603) saw a significant rise of 11.62%, with projected net profit growth of 97.25% to 108.21% for the first half of 2025 [9] - Lao Pu Gold (06181) reached a new high, reflecting strong growth potential compared to industry peers [10] - FWD Group (01828) debuted on the market, closing up 1.05% with a net fundraising of approximately HKD 29.53 billion [11]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the power industry [11] Core Insights - The performance outlook for thermal power remains positive despite a decline in electricity prices and generation in Q2, driven by a significant decrease in coal prices [2][6] - Hydropower generation faces pressure due to high base effects and reduced rainfall, but some companies may achieve stable growth through optimized reservoir management [7][28] - Nuclear power generation continues to grow, but performance may vary by region due to differing impacts from market electricity prices [7][29] - Renewable energy generation (wind and solar) shows steady growth, but performance disparities exist across regions, influenced by local utilization hours [8][33] Summary by Sections Thermal Power - Key factors affecting thermal power profitability include coal prices, electricity prices, and generation volume. In Q2, coal prices decreased significantly, with the Qinhuangdao Q5500 coal price averaging 631.61 yuan/ton, down 216.85 yuan/ton year-on-year [20][21] - The overall electricity price across regions has declined, but northern regions like Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang show relatively strong performance [6][17] - Despite a year-on-year decline in thermal power generation hours and prices, the significant drop in coal prices is expected to stabilize thermal power operations, particularly in northern and eastern regions [26][21] Hydropower - Hydropower generation saw a year-on-year decline of 11.02% in April-May due to high base effects and less rainfall [28][31] - Major hydropower companies with better asset quality may still achieve stable growth through effective water management strategies [28] Nuclear Power - Nuclear power generation increased by 9.57% year-on-year in April-May, supported by a larger installed capacity and fewer maintenance days [29][31] - The impact of market electricity price fluctuations varies, with companies like China Nuclear Power being less affected compared to others [29] Renewable Energy - Wind and solar generation increased by 11.87% and 11.68% year-on-year, respectively, but utilization hours have decreased [33][36] - Regional disparities in performance are evident, with eastern and central provinces showing improved wind utilization hours, while coastal provinces like Guangdong and Fujian experienced significant declines [33][39] Investment Recommendations - The report recommends focusing on quality thermal power operators such as Huadian International, Huaneng International, and China Power, as well as major hydropower companies like Yangtze Power and Guotou Power [9][44] - For renewable energy, companies with balanced national layouts like Longyuan Power and China Nuclear Power are expected to perform well [9][44]

Overview - The report focuses on the cybersecurity of power industrial control systems in China, detailing the current state, challenges, and future opportunities in the industry [2][3][4]. Industry Concepts - Cybersecurity is defined with its essential attributes and boundaries, emphasizing the protection framework necessary for industrial control systems [3]. - The report outlines the basic concepts of industrial control systems and their specific characteristics within the power sector [3][4]. Regulatory Framework - The report discusses the regulatory standards relevant to the cybersecurity of power industrial control systems, including national and industry-specific guidelines [3][4]. - It highlights the existing regulatory framework and the roles of various supervisory bodies in China [4][5]. Current Industry Status - An analysis of the current development status of China's cybersecurity industry reveals significant growth, with a focus on the distribution of clients across different sectors [4][5]. - The report identifies key cybersecurity risks faced by power industrial control systems, citing notable cyberattack cases as examples [4][5]. Market Demand and Supply - The demand for cybersecurity products in the power sector is increasing, driven by the rising number of vulnerabilities in industrial control systems [5][6]. - The report provides insights into the competitive landscape, including the market concentration and the bargaining power of suppliers and consumers [5][6]. Future Opportunities - Future opportunities in the cybersecurity sector are identified, including advancements in ICT infrastructure and the need for enhanced security measures in energy networks [6][7]. - The report suggests that the integration of cloud security and proactive defense technologies will be crucial for addressing cybersecurity challenges [6][7]. Competitive Landscape - The competitive dynamics of the cybersecurity market for power industrial control systems are analyzed, including strategic comparisons among key players [5][6]. - The report discusses the market positioning of various companies and their respective product offerings [6][7]. Investment Insights - The report outlines potential investment opportunities within the cybersecurity sector, focusing on weak links in the industry chain and specific market segments [10][11]. - It emphasizes the importance of understanding market entry and exit barriers for effective investment strategies [10][11].

Core Insights - The data indicates significant trading volume increases for various companies, suggesting heightened investor interest and potential market movements [1][2][3][4][5] Group 1: Companies with Notable Volume Increases - 阳光能源 (00757) reported a volume ratio of 2.35, indicating strong trading activity [2] - 长城汽车 (02333) had a volume ratio of 2.21, reflecting increased investor engagement [2] - 郑煤机 (00564) showed a volume ratio of 1.92, suggesting a notable rise in trading [2] Group 2: Additional Companies with Increased Trading Activity - 万国数据-SW (09698) recorded a volume ratio of 1.83, indicating significant market interest [2] - 映恩生物-B (09606) had a volume ratio of 1.78, reflecting heightened trading activity [2] - 超盈国际控股 (02111) reported a volume ratio of 1.71, suggesting increased investor focus [2] Group 3: Companies with Moderate Volume Ratios - 中国能源建设 (03996) had a volume ratio of 1.70, indicating a solid level of trading activity [2] - 亚信科技 (01675) reported a volume ratio of 1.60, reflecting moderate investor interest [2] - 金宝通 (00320) showed a volume ratio of 1.53, suggesting a rise in trading volume [2] Group 4: Companies with Lower Volume Ratios - 中国水务 (00855) had a volume ratio of 1.52, indicating stable trading activity [2] - 广汽集团 (02238) reported a volume ratio of 1.52, reflecting consistent investor engagement [2] - 凯莱英 (06821) showed a volume ratio of 1.52, suggesting steady trading interest [2]

Investment Rating - The report assigns an "Overweight" (OW) rating to Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) and several Chinese power equipment players, indicating a positive outlook for these entities within the ASEAN Power Grid initiative [4]. Core Insights - The ASEAN Power Grid (APG) initiative is expected to gain momentum over the next 5-10 years, primarily driven by Singapore's goal to import approximately 6GW of electricity by 2035, positioning TNB as a key beneficiary [2][6]. - The report anticipates that annual grid capital expenditures (capex) will double from around $10 billion to $20 billion in the coming years, with projections of over $43 billion by 2050 [6][28]. - The APG aims to enhance energy security and efficiency across ASEAN countries by facilitating cross-border electricity trade and optimizing energy resource utilization [18][19]. Summary by Sections Investment Ratings for Thematic Stocks - TNB MK: OW, Price Target (PT) 16, Upside 12% - SG Gencos: SCI SP: OW, PT 7.6, Upside 11%; YTLP MK: UW, PT 3.0, Downside 23%; MER PM: OW, PT 620, Upside 16% - ASEAN Renewables: ADRO IJ: UW, PT 2000, Upside 12% - China Power Equipment: Sieyuan: OW, PT 86, Upside 19%; Huaming Equipment: OW, PT 19, Upside 14%; Orient Cables: OW, PT 68, Upside 35% [4]. Current Status and Future Projections - Currently, only about 3GW of the identified 25GW regional interconnections are operational, but pilot projects indicate renewed momentum for the APG [6][20]. - The report outlines that the APG could require a minimum investment of $100 billion in transmission lines by 2045 to fully integrate the power grids of Southeast Asian countries [19]. Country-Specific Grid Investment Targets - Malaysia: $9.5 billion capex from 2025-2027, with an annual grid capex of $3.2 billion [30]. - Thailand: $11.4 billion capex from 2024-2030, with an annual grid capex of $1.6 billion [30]. - Vietnam: $18.1 billion capex from 2026-2030, with an annual grid capex of $3.6 billion [30]. - Indonesia: $36 billion capex from 2025-2034, with an annual grid capex of $3.6 billion [30]. - Philippines: $19.3 billion capex from 2025-2034, with an annual grid capex of $1.9 billion [30]. Key Drivers for APG Development - Singapore's electricity import demand is a significant driver for the APG, with the country aiming to import low-carbon electricity despite high transmission costs [6][36]. - The report highlights that the APG could facilitate a transition to renewable energy sources, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and potentially lowering electricity costs [60]. Challenges to APG Implementation - The report identifies differing regulatory frameworks and market structures across ASEAN countries as major hurdles to the APG's success [73][80]. - Lack of grid infrastructure standardization and harmonization is also noted as a challenge, necessitating consistent investment in grid infrastructure to facilitate seamless cross-border power trading [80].

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性或完整性亦 不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不就因本公告全部或任何部份內容而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任 何損失承擔任何責任。 中 國 電 力 國 際 發 展 有 限 公 司 China Power International Development Limited （在香港註冊成立的有限責任公司） （股份代號：2380） 二零二五年五月售電量 | 主要聯營公司或 | | | 售電量（兆瓦時） | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 合營公司的發電廠 | 2025 年 | 2024 年 | 同比變化 | 2025 年 | 2024 年 | 同比變化 | | | 5 月 | 5 月 | | 首五個月 | | | | 風力發電(1) | 138,576 | 111,846 | 23.90% | 791,794 | 1,419,284 | -44.21% | | 光伏發電 | 23,867 | 24,205 | -1.40% | 107,637 | 79,775 | ...

中 國 電 力 國 際 發 展 有 限 公 司 China Power International Development Limited （在香港註冊成立的有限責任公司） （股份代號：2380） 香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性或完整性 亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不就因本公告全部或任何部份內容而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致 的任何損失承擔任何責任。 二零二五年六月二十四日舉行的股東大會投票表決結果 資產重組建議 二零二五年六月二十四日，中國電力國際發展有限公司（「本公司」）以虛擬會議方 式舉行股東大會（「股東大會」）。股東大會主席要求就日期為二零二五年五月二十日 的股東大會通告所載的提呈決議案，按股數投票方式表決。 於股東大會當日，本公司已發行股份總數為 12,370,150,983 股。中國電力發展有限公 司、中國電力國際有限公司、中國電力（新能源）控股有限公司、國家電投香港財資 管理有限公司及國家電投集團創新投資有限公司（「國家電投聯繫人」）於股東大會 當日合共持有本公司 8,076,833,175 股股份。鑒於國家電投聯繫人須於本公司日期為 二零二 ...

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性或完 整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不就因本公告全部或任何部份內容而產生或因倚賴該等內 容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 中 國 電 力 國 際 發 展 有 限 公 司 China Power International Development Limited （在香港註冊成立的有限責任公司） （股份代號：2380） 自願性公告 有關資產重組建議之 須予披露及關連交易 茲提述中國電力國際發展有限公司（「本公司」）日期為二零二五年四月十 六日的公告及本公司日期為二零二五年五月二十日的通函（「該通函」）， 內容有關資產重組建議。除文義另有所指外，本公告所使用的全部詞彙與該 通函所賦予者具有相同涵義。 二零二五年六月二十一日，遠達環保公佈其於二零二五年六月二十日舉行股 東大會的投票結果，所有與資產重組建議相關的決議均已於該股東大會上獲 其股東投票贊成及通過。 本公司亦謹此澄清，本公司日期為二零二五年六月九日的補充公告所披露目 標公司的參考性財務資料，乃根據遠達環保所刊發目標公司截至二零二四年 十二月三十一日止年度的參考性財務報表 ...

Core Viewpoint - The power industry plays a crucial role in the global energy system, with significant impacts on climate change, energy transition, and environmental quality. Major Chinese power companies have released their 2024 ESG reports, highlighting their greenhouse gas emissions and sustainability efforts [1]. Group 1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Three companies disclosed their total greenhouse gas emissions, with China Guodian Power leading at 31,463.27 thousand tons of CO2 equivalent, showing an 11.7% decrease from the previous year [2][3]. - Datang Power reported total emissions of 21,092.55 thousand tons of CO2 equivalent, a 7% increase year-on-year, primarily due to a rise in Scope 1 emissions [5]. - China Power's total emissions were the lowest at 5,030.2 thousand tons of CO2 equivalent, reflecting a 2.4% increase, with a significant 43% rise in Scope 2 emissions attributed to increased electricity purchases [3][5]. Group 2: Clean Energy Capacity - China Power has the highest clean energy capacity ratio at 80.12%, while Datang Power, Huaneng International, and Guodian Power have ratios of 40.37%, 35.82%, and 33.19% respectively [7][8]. - Huaneng International's total installed capacity is 14,512.5 million kW, followed by Guodian Power at 11,170 million kW, Datang Power at 7,911 million kW, and China Power at 4,939 million kW [8]. Group 3: Environmental Investments - Huaneng International invested the most in environmental protection at 1.78 billion yuan, followed by Huaneng International at 1.087 billion yuan, Datang Power at 747.9 million yuan, and Guodian Power at 730 million yuan [10]. - China Power had the lowest investment in environmental protection at 594 million yuan [10]. Group 4: Research and Development Investments - Datang Power led in R&D investments with 2.436 billion yuan, followed by Huaneng International at 2.389 billion yuan, and Guodian Power at 977 million yuan [12]. Group 5: Waste Management - China Power reported the highest hazardous waste generation at 128,000 tons, while Guodian Power significantly reduced its hazardous waste to 860 tons from 551,700 tons the previous year [14]. - Huaneng International reported hazardous waste generation of 610 tons, while Datang Power did not disclose this data [14]. Group 6: Green Power Trading - China Power sold 13.6119 million green certificates and participated in green electricity trading generating 5.198 billion kWh, resulting in revenue of 325 million yuan [15]. - Guodian Power achieved a historical high in green electricity trading volume at 3.51 billion kWh, with over 2.91 million green certificates obtained [15]. - Datang Power's new renewable energy project is expected to produce over 4.1 billion kWh of green electricity annually, significantly reducing CO2 emissions [15].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is the competitive landscape of the Chinese power industry, highlighting the tiered structure of major companies based on installed capacity [1][12]. - The Chinese power industry can be divided into three competitive tiers: the first tier includes companies with installed capacity over 200,000 MW, such as Huaneng Group and State Power Investment; the second tier includes companies with capacity between 100,000-200,000 MW, like China Datang; and the third tier includes companies with capacity below 100,000 MW, such as State Power and China General Nuclear Power [1][12]. - In 2024, the total power generation in China reached 10,086.88 billion kWh, a year-on-year increase of 6.7%, with the top ten listed companies accounting for only 22.5% of the total generation [6][12]. Group 2 - In 2024, Huaneng International generated 479.864 billion kWh, making it the largest power generation company in the industry, followed by Guodian Power with 459.452 billion kWh and Yangtze Power with 295.904 billion kWh [3][12]. - The market concentration in the Chinese power industry is relatively low, with the top three companies only accounting for 12.2% of the total power generation [6][12]. - The majority of listed companies in the power sector have a revenue share from power generation that exceeds 90%, with some being part of diversified energy groups while others focus on clean energy like hydropower or nuclear power [9][12]. Group 3 - The competitive state of the Chinese power industry is characterized by intense internal competition, with domestic companies facing threats from foreign giants that leverage financial and technological advantages [12]. - The bargaining power of buyers in the power industry is weak, while suppliers have some bargaining power due to the essential nature of electricity for economic development [13][12]. - The article employs Porter's Five Forces model to analyze the competitive environment of the Chinese power industry, indicating a trend towards oligopoly as barriers to entry increase [12][13].