经济观察网 聚石化学（股票代码：688669）近期有以下值得关注的事件，基于公开信息整理： 监管情况 针对此前的信披违规和内控问题，公司已成立专项整改小组，修订《收入确认政策》等制度，并加强内 部审计。投资者关注这些措施能否有效执行。 公司状况 公司计划聚焦主业，优化子公司布局，但液化石油气业务受国际油价波动影响显著，且精细化工项目仍 处于产能爬坡阶段，未来经营稳定性面临考验。 以上内容基于公开资料整理，不构成投资建议。 公司于2025年11月21日收到中国证监会下发的《立案告知书》，因涉嫌信息披露违法违规被立案调查。 目前调查仍在进行中，公司表示将积极配合相关工作。 业绩经营情况 公司于2026年1月29日发布2025年业绩预告，预计全年归母净利润亏损9000万元至1.2亿元，主要受液化 石油气业务亏损和精细化工项目投入期影响。正式年度报告尚未发布，后续需关注其审计结果和详细财 务数据。 公司结构与治理 ...

Core Insights - The technology and internet sectors are experiencing rapid changes in 2025, with companies aggressively competing in computing power and large model applications, while e-commerce is reshaping its foundations amidst regulatory pressures [2][3] - The era of easy financing through simple presentations is over; companies must demonstrate technological, commercial, and ecological advantages to survive in the TMT industry [3] Industry Dynamics - The smart hardware industry is characterized by a collective confidence among manufacturers, leading to innovations such as multifunctional cleaning robots and cross-industry expansions by companies like DJI and others [4][6] - The underlying logic for the explosive growth in the smart hardware sector is the urgent need for AI to find physical world applications, prompting a re-evaluation of all product categories in the AI era [5][6] Strategic Shifts - Major hardware companies are increasingly diversifying their product lines, with firms like DJI and others venturing into new markets, including automotive and robotics, reflecting a trend of "not sticking to one's main business" [6][7] - The competitive landscape is marked by a rush to establish ecosystems, with companies striving to integrate their core technologies into various electronic devices [6][7] Investment Trends - The influx of capital into the smart hardware sector is driven by a belief that hardware is essential for AI applications, leading to a surge in investments from various funding sources [8][9] - Startups emerging from established companies are attracting significant investment, with former employees of leading firms being particularly sought after for their experience and potential [8][9] Competitive Environment - The competition in the smart hardware industry has intensified, with companies employing unconventional strategies, including aggressive marketing tactics and patent disputes [10][11] - The market for smart rings and AI glasses has become saturated, leading to fierce price wars and diminishing profit margins, with some products seeing prices drop significantly [11]

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 为完成控股股东新疆中泰（集团）有限责任公司下达的营业收入目标，中泰化学及其控制的新疆蓝天石 油化学物流有限责任公司等子公司通过将不具有控制权或实为代理人的业务按照总额法核算，2022年合 计虚增收入4，248，474，643.06元、虚增成本4，248，474，643.06元，分别占《2022年年度报告》中 披露的营业总收入及营业总成本的7.60%及7.75%。 许峰律师认为，综合以上违法事实，根据证券法规定，在2023年8月29日到2025年11月22日之间买入聚 石化学股票，并在2025年11月22日后卖出或继续持有股票的投资者，目前已可发起索赔。（聚石化学维 权入口） 除了聚石化学投资者索赔案启动，2月10日，许峰律师代理的中泰化学（维权）（002092）投资者索赔 案再次获得乌鲁木齐市中级人民法院立案。 中泰化学投资者索赔案此前部分案件已首次开庭，目前正在等待法院的下一步安排，律师团队同步还在 继续推进后续案件的立案工作，还在继续接受其他投资者的索赔委托。 2024年5月17日晚，中泰化学公告公司及相关责任人收到新疆证监局《行政处罚决定书》，经查明，当 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我们！ 2026年2月4日，聚石化学（维权）（688669）公告收到证监会广东监管局下发的《行政处罚决定书》， 上海久诚律师事务所股票索赔律师许峰提示，如果投资者因为聚石化学虚假陈述受损，目前已可发起索 赔。（许峰律师专栏） 上述《行政处罚决定书》公告信息显示，经查明，聚石化学存在以下违法事实： 聚石化学及其子公司通过开展虚假贸易业务虚增收入、成本和利润，具体包括：一是聚石化学原子公司 广东冠臻科技有限公司（以下简称冠臻科技）实际控制佛山市亨诺德贸易有限公司、佛山市富倍奇贸易 有限公司、佛山市汉科达贸易有限公司、佛山市君利道贸易有限公司等4家公司，与上述公司开展无实 际货物存在的虚假贸易业务，对应虚增收入86，550，865.69元，虚增成本88，238，071.82元，虚减利 润1，687，206.13元。二是聚石化学介入到第三方公司已开展的聚丙烯等贸易 ...

Core Viewpoint - Guangdong Jushi Chemical Co., Ltd. (stock code: 688669) has been penalized by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for violations related to information disclosure, specifically for inflating revenue, costs, and profits through fictitious trade activities [2][6]. Group 1: Violations and Penalties - The CSRC found that Jushi Chemical and its subsidiaries engaged in fictitious trade activities, including controlling companies that conducted trades without actual goods, resulting in inflated revenue of approximately 156.81 million yuan, inflated costs of about 158.47 million yuan, and a reduced profit of around 1.66 million yuan, which represented 8.32%, 8.51%, and 6.81% of total revenue, costs, and profit respectively for the first half of 2023 [2][6]. - The CSRC has ordered Jushi Chemical and its responsible personnel to rectify the situation, issued warnings, and imposed fines [2][6]. Group 2: Legal Implications for Investors - Investors who suffered losses due to Jushi Chemical's actions can seek civil compensation, which includes investment differences, commissions, and stamp duties, as per the Civil Code and Securities Law [3][7]. - A lawyer has initiated a campaign to collect claims from investors who purchased Jushi Chemical's securities between August 29, 2023, and November 21, 2025, and either sold or continued to hold them after November 22, 2025 [8][7]. Group 3: Claim Registration Requirements - Investors wishing to register claims must provide specific documents, including a copy of their ID, original securities account confirmation, and transaction records stamped by their brokerage [9].

Regulatory Environment - The capital market is experiencing a wave of intensive and strict regulatory actions, establishing a rapid response chain from investigation to punishment [1][16] - As of February 5, 2026, at least six listed companies or key individuals have been investigated, averaging one case every six days, with 13 companies receiving administrative penalty notices, averaging less than three days between each [1][10] Investigation and Penalties - Companies such as Qingyue Technology and Yuandao Communication have had their accounts frozen due to suspected information disclosure violations, with Qingyue's frozen accounts totaling approximately 134 million yuan and Yuandao's around 9.04 million yuan [2][17] - The investigation into these companies is ongoing, with significant risks of forced delisting if found guilty of major violations [5][19] Financial Performance - Qingyue Technology anticipates a net loss of between 74 million and 110 million yuan for the year 2025, attributed to intensified competition and price pressures in the electronic paper module market [3][18] - Yuandao Communication expects a substantial decline in net profit for 2025, projected to drop by 64.59% to 76.39% year-on-year [4][19] Types of Violations - The reasons for recent investigations have diversified beyond typical information disclosure violations, including market manipulation and misleading statements [6][21] - Specific cases highlight the regulatory focus on misleading statements and significant omissions, indicating a more granular approach to enforcement [8][23] Frequency of Penalties - Since the beginning of 2026, 10 listed or delisted companies have received administrative penalties, with an additional three receiving notices of intended penalties, indicating a high frequency of enforcement actions [10][24] - The issues identified among these companies include systemic financial fraud and misuse of company funds, which have been a focus of regulatory scrutiny [11][25] Long-term Regulatory Mechanisms - The regulatory framework aims to establish a long-term mechanism that discourages violations through comprehensive accountability and technological empowerment [13][28] - The integration of big data and AI in regulatory practices enhances the precision and effectiveness of oversight, targeting deeper issues within corporate governance [14][28]

Core Viewpoint - The recent regulatory actions in the capital market indicate a "zero tolerance" approach, establishing a new normal for comprehensive supervision that aims to enhance the quality of listed companies and purify the market ecosystem [1][15]. Regulatory Actions - Since the beginning of 2026, at least six listed companies or key individuals have been investigated, averaging one case every six days, with 13 companies receiving administrative penalty notices or prior notifications, averaging less than three days between each [1][11]. - The regulatory focus has shifted from merely punishing companies to targeting the entire ecosystem involved in fraudulent activities, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive response chain from investigation to punishment [1][14]. Types of Violations - The reasons for investigations have diversified, including market manipulation, information disclosure violations, misleading statements, and significant omissions [8][9]. - Specific cases highlight the increasing granularity of regulatory scrutiny, with investigations targeting misleading statements and significant omissions in disclosures [9]. Financial Penalties - As of February 5, 2026, ten listed companies or delisted companies have received administrative penalties, with three others receiving prior notifications, indicating a high frequency of enforcement actions [11]. - Serious cases of systemic financial fraud, such as *ST Changyao, have led to severe penalties, including forced delisting and substantial fines [11]. Impact on Companies - Companies like Qingyue Technology and Yuandao Communication face significant operational pressures alongside regulatory scrutiny, with projected losses and substantial declines in net profits [4][5][6]. - The regulatory environment has prompted a reduction in the misuse of company funds, with many previously problematic shareholders returning misappropriated funds [12]. Long-term Mechanism - The regulatory framework aims to establish a long-term mechanism that discourages violations through strict enforcement and technological empowerment, ensuring that companies adhere to compliance standards [13][15]. - The integration of advanced technologies like big data and AI into regulatory practices enhances the precision and effectiveness of oversight, targeting deeper and more complex fraudulent behaviors [14].

Core Viewpoint - The Guangdong Securities Regulatory Commission has uncovered multiple financial fraud activities by 聚石化学, including inaccurate revenue accounting, undisclosed related party transactions, and inadequate internal controls [2][4]. Group 1: Financial Misconduct - 聚石化学 engaged in false trade activities through its subsidiary, 广东冠臻科技, resulting in inflated revenues of 86,550,865.69 yuan and inflated costs of 88,238,071.82 yuan, leading to a profit reduction of 1,687,206.13 yuan [2][3]. - Another fraudulent trade involved the company participating in a third-party trade chain, inflating both revenue and costs by 52,236,440.86 yuan, without any actual commercial substance [3]. - The company also reported inflated revenue of 18,020,070.80 yuan and costs of 17,995,752.21 yuan from sales of isooctane, which did not involve actual goods being shipped [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions and Penalties - The Guangdong Securities Regulatory Commission has mandated corrective actions, issued warnings, and imposed a fine of 2.4 million yuan on 聚石化学, along with penalties totaling 4.3 million yuan on four executives involved [3][4]. - The company has been ordered to improve its internal controls and enhance the quality of information disclosure to prevent future misconduct [4]. Group 3: Impact on Business and Future Outlook - 聚石化学's acquisition of 冠臻科技 has turned out to be unsuccessful, with the latter's performance deteriorating significantly post-acquisition, leading to substantial losses for 聚石化学 [5][6]. - The company anticipates a net loss of between 90 million to 120 million yuan for 2025, a stark contrast to a profit of 23,614.68 million yuan in the previous year, primarily due to the impact of the international oil market and operational challenges [6][7]. - Despite divesting 冠臻科技, 聚石化学 continues to face difficulties in returning to pre-IPO performance levels, with ongoing challenges in its diversified business operations [7].

Group 1 - Guangdong Jushi Chemical Co., Ltd. won a procurement project from CNOOC Energy Development Co., Ltd. with a bid amount of 1.165 million yuan [1][2] - In 2024, the company's operating revenue is projected to be 4.08 billion yuan, with a growth rate of 10.72% [1][2] - The company's net profit attributable to the parent company for 2024 is expected to be -236 million yuan, reflecting a significant decline of 926.31% [1][2] Group 2 - In the first half of 2025, the company's operating revenue was 1.977 billion yuan, showing a decrease of 10.05% [1][2] - The net profit attributable to the parent company for the first half of 2025 was 3 million yuan, with a growth rate of 82.48% [1][2] - The company operates in the materials industry, with its main product types including catalysts and chemical additives [1][2] Group 3 - The main composition of the company's 2024 revenue includes modified plastic products (36.58%), modified plastic particles (25.62%), and liquefied petroleum gas additives (24.57%) [1][2] - Other business segments include flame retardants (5.03%), phosphorus chemicals (5%), raw material trading (1.76%), and coatings (0.13%) [1][2]

Core Viewpoint - Guangdong Jushi Chemical Co., Ltd. has been warned by the Shanghai Stock Exchange for violations in information disclosure, including inaccurate revenue accounting and failure to disclose related party transactions [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Revenue Accounting Issues - The company engaged in circular trading through its subsidiary, Guangdong Guanzhen Technology Co., Ltd., leading to inaccurate revenue recognition [1][4]. - The subsidiary Anhui Jurun Trading Co., Ltd. sold isooctane to third parties without actual delivery, resulting in inflated revenue [1][4]. - The total inflated revenue for the first half of 2023 amounted to 156.81 million yuan, representing 8.32% of total revenue [5][7]. Group 2: Related Party Transactions - The company failed to disclose transactions with Guangzhou Kaishi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., which is controlled by the actual controller Chen Gang, constituting a related party transaction [1][2]. Group 3: Internal Control and Governance - The company exhibited poor internal control, including inadequate management of trade operations and financial processes, leading to discrepancies in revenue recognition [2][6]. - Key executives, including Chen Gang (Chairman), Zhou Kan (General Manager), and Wu Yang (CFO), were found responsible for these governance failures [3][6]. Group 4: Regulatory Actions - The Shanghai Stock Exchange issued a public reprimand against the company and its executives for the violations, including fines totaling 2.4 million yuan for the company and individual fines for the executives [8][7]. - The company has been ordered to correct its practices and has received a warning from the Guangdong Securities Regulatory Bureau [8].