Group 1 - The company has its own brand business primarily focused on self-research and promotion of acoustic brands [2] - Guangzhou Weifa is a significant subsidiary of the company, owning brands such as Vifa, Ailang, Zhujiang, and Aiwei, covering various acoustic product categories [2] - The Vifa SOUND solution encompasses a wide range of fields including speakers, monitors, mobile phones, tablets, smart wearables, home theaters, and automotive tuning [2]

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Zhidu Co., Ltd. announced a change in the registered address of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Beijing Zhanghui Tianxia Technology Co., Ltd., due to business development needs [1] - The relevant industrial and commercial change registration procedures have been completed recently, and a new business license has been issued by the Market Supervision Administration of Xicheng District, Beijing [1]

智度科技股份有限公司 关于全资子公司变更注册地址暨完成工商变更登记的公告 证券代码：000676 证券简称：智度股份 公告编号：2025-018 智度科技股份有限公司 关于全资子公司变更注册地址暨完成工商变更登记的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 智度科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）的全资子公司北京掌汇天下科 技有限公司（以下简称"掌汇天下"）因业务发展需要，对其注册地址进行了变 更，相关工商变更登记手续已于近日办理完毕，并取得北京市西城区市场监督管 理局换发的《营业执照》。现将具体内容公告如下： 一、本次变更事项 | 变更事项 | 变更前 | | | | | 变更后 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 注册地址 | 北京市海淀区中关村大街 | | | 18 号 | 北京市西城区百万庄大街 | | 16 | 号 2 | | | 14 | 层 | 1621-3 | | 号楼 4 层 | 2418 | 室 | | 二、变更后的工商登记信息 名称：北 ...

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the collision test video of the Li Auto i8 and the Dongfeng Liuqi truck has sparked significant public debate regarding vehicle safety and marketing ethics [2][9]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On July 29, Li Auto showcased a video during the i8 launch, depicting a collision with a truck, which raised questions about the safety of the truck model involved [2][6]. - The truck shown in the video was identified as a medium truck with a total weight of 8 tons, contrary to Li Auto's claim of it being a heavy truck [6][7]. - The video demonstrated a dramatic collision where the truck's cabin detached, leading to public skepticism about the physics of the scenario [7][8]. Group 2: Responses from Companies - Dongfeng Liuqi, the parent company of the truck brand, issued a statement on July 31, accusing Li Auto of unauthorized use and distortion of the test video, claiming it misrepresents the safety of their vehicles [5][9]. - Li Auto responded by stating that the collision test was conducted by a third-party testing agency and expressed willingness for a live retest, further escalating the conflict [11]. - On August 1, Dongfeng Liuqi released a counter-advertisement emphasizing the safety features of their trucks, highlighting the use of high-strength steel and robust design [5][13]. Group 3: Public Reaction and Marketing Implications - The public reaction has been mixed, with some supporting Li Auto's claims while others criticized the validity of the test, suggesting that the truck may have been empty during the test [8][9]. - The incident has ignited discussions about the boundaries of marketing in the automotive industry, particularly regarding the ethical implications of exaggerated claims [13].

其中，智度股份CFO刘韡年薪125.81万元，高于广告营销行业平均薪酬29.27；同比大幅增长121.77%， 涨幅行业登顶，约是第二名江苏有线CFO王展薪酬涨幅的2倍。 专题：专题|2024年度A股CFO数据报告：美的集团钟铮年薪946万，比亚迪周亚琳896万 作为上市公司核心管理层关键成员，财务总监CFO的地位与作用至关重要。新浪财经《2024年度A股 CFO数据报告》显示，2024年A股上市公司财务总监CFO群体薪酬规模合计达42.70亿元，平均年薪为 81.48万元。 分行业来看，传媒行业（游戏及影视院线不做讨论）上市公司中，60%营收同比下滑，75%净利润同比 下滑，46.67%营收及净利润双下滑。营收及净利润双下滑的上市公司，接近一半的CFO（讨论薪酬同 比变动情况时截止2023年末任期不满1年的不参与统计，下同）薪酬同比增长，表明部分上市公司CFO 薪酬与公司经营业绩脱钩。 整体来看，传媒行业CFO薪酬总额5338.81万元，平均薪酬88.98万元，同比增长7.36%。细分至二级行 业，广告营销行业CFO平均薪酬96.54万元，同比增长10.59%；出版行业CFO平均薪酬78.98万元，同比 增 ...

证券之星消息，7月31日广告营销板块较上一交易日上涨0.6%，易点天下领涨。当日上证指数报收于 3573.21，下跌1.18%。深证成指报收于11009.77，下跌1.73%。广告营销板块个股涨跌见下表： | 代码 | 名称 | 收盘价 | 涨跌幅 | 成交量(手) | 成交额(元) | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 301171 | 易点天下 | 33.54 | 20.00% | 116.13万 | | 36.93亿 | | 300058 | 蓝色光标 | 6.95 | 4.20% | 492.59万 | | 34.42亿 | | 002264 | 新华都 | 6.85 | 3.95% | 68.62万 | | 4.65亿 | | 300781 | 因赛集团 | 47.49 | 3.69% | 1 29.45万 | | 13.85 Z | | 300612 | 宣亚国际 | 15.76 | 2.34% | 19.43万 | | 3.10亿 | | 002291 | 遥望科技 | 6.83 | 2.25% | 133.38万 | | 9.21亿 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Composite Index rose by 0.48% on July 10, with 18 out of 28 sectors experiencing gains, particularly in real estate and oil & petrochemicals, which increased by 3.19% and 1.54% respectively. The media sector saw a decline of 0.54% with significant capital outflow [1]. Media Industry Summary - The media sector experienced a net capital outflow of 2.536 billion yuan, with 130 stocks in the sector. Among these, 49 stocks rose, 2 hit the daily limit up, while 72 stocks fell, and 2 hit the daily limit down [1]. - The top three stocks with the highest net capital inflow were Huamei Holdings (1.371 billion yuan), Shenguang Group (1.300 billion yuan), and Zhidu Co. (61.013 million yuan) [1]. - The stocks with the highest net capital outflow included ST Huatuo (710 million yuan), Sanqi Interactive Entertainment (250 million yuan), and Light Media (178 million yuan) [1][2]. Capital Flow in Media Sector - The media sector's capital inflow leaderboard includes: - Huamei Holdings: +10.09%, turnover rate 7.05%, net inflow 137.08 million yuan - Shenguang Group: +4.53%, turnover rate 12.22%, net inflow 130.08 million yuan - Zhidu Co.: +1.67%, turnover rate 5.84%, net inflow 61.01 million yuan [1]. - The media sector's capital outflow leaderboard includes: - ST Huatuo: -5.03%, turnover rate 3.50%, net outflow 709.71 million yuan - Sanqi Interactive Entertainment: -1.06%, turnover rate 5.97%, net outflow 250.28 million yuan - Light Media: -1.02%, turnover rate 2.05%, net outflow 178.49 million yuan [2].

Group 1 - Kuaishou concept stocks fell by 2.99%, ranking among the top declines in the concept sector, with stocks like Yuanlong Yatu and ST Kevin hitting the limit down [1] - The concept sector saw a net outflow of 1.61 billion yuan, with 42 stocks experiencing net outflows, and 11 stocks seeing outflows exceeding 50 million yuan [2] - The top net outflow stock was Zhongwen Online, with a net outflow of 421 million yuan, followed by Tom Cat and Blue Focus with outflows of 116 million yuan and 88.59 million yuan respectively [2] Group 2 - The top gainers in the Kuaishou concept included Global Printing, Good Idea, and Wanrun Technology, which rose by 2.67%, 0.52%, and 0.43% respectively [1][3] - The overall market sentiment was negative, with several concept sectors like Combustible Ice and Brain-Computer Interface experiencing significant declines of -4.14% and -3.34% respectively [2] - The trading volume for Kuaishou concept stocks was notably high, with some stocks like Yuanlong Yatu showing a turnover rate of 22.32% [3]

智度科技股份有限公司 关于全资子公司变更经营范围暨完成工商变更登记的公告 证券代码：000676 证券简称：智度股份 公告编号：2025-017 智度科技股份有限公司 关于全资子公司变更经营范围暨完成工商变更登记的公告 智度科技股份有限公司 关于全资子公司变更经营范围暨完成工商变更登记的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 智度科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）的全资子公司北京掌汇天下科 技有限公司（以下简称"掌汇天下"）因业务发展需要，对其经营范围进行了变 更，相关工商变更登记手续已于近日办理完毕，并取得北京市海淀区市场监督管 理局换发的《营业执照》。现将具体内容公告如下： | 变更事项 | 变更前 | 变更后 | | --- | --- | --- | | 经营范围 | 一般项目：技术服务、技术开发、技 | 一般项目：技术服务、技术开发、技 | | | 术咨询、技术交流、技术转让、技术 | 术咨询、技术交流、技术转让、技术 | | | 推广；人工智能基础软件开发；人工 | 推广；人工智能应用软件开发；人工 | | | 智能应用软件开发； ...

Group 1 - The legal opinion letter confirms that the procedures for convening and holding the 2024 annual general meeting of Zhidu Technology Co., Ltd. comply with relevant laws and regulations [2][5]. - The meeting was convened on May 20, 2025, at 14:30 in Beijing, and the time, location, and agenda were consistent with the notice sent to shareholders [2][3]. - The total number of shares with voting rights represented at the meeting was 324,504,829 shares, accounting for 25.9022% of the total voting shares [3][4]. Group 2 - A total of 2 shareholders and their proxies attended the meeting in person, representing 292,054,911 shares, which is 23.3120% of the voting shares [3][4]. - Online voting was conducted through the Shenzhen Stock Exchange system, with 654 participants representing 32,449,918 shares, or 2.5902% of the voting shares [4]. - The legal opinion confirms that the qualifications of attendees and the convenor of the meeting are valid under the Company Law and relevant regulations [4][5]. Group 3 - The meeting adopted a combination of on-site and online voting methods, with results from both methods being combined for the final tally [5]. - All resolutions presented at the meeting were consistent with those listed in the notice sent to shareholders, and the voting process adhered to legal and regulatory requirements [5]. - The legal opinion concludes that the meeting's procedures, attendee qualifications, and voting results are all legally valid and effective [5].