中非合作始终将实现发展权置于优先地位。例如，通过基建赋能，蒙内铁路将肯尼亚物流成本降低 40%，对该国国内生产总值贡献率超2%，创造超过7.4万个就业岗位；中国在卢旺达推广现代化农业技 术，通过卫星监测与智能灌溉，提升当地玉米产量；中国农业专家在坦桑尼亚试种的耐旱杂交水稻，推 动该国粮食自给率显著提高。 肯尼亚非洲政策研究所研究员阿明·穆罕默德说："这些项目没有空洞的口号。一个个项目让非洲母亲不 必为孩子挨饿而哭泣，让青年有机会通过技能培训改变命运——这就是实实在在的人权工程。" 由中国人权研究会、浙江师范大学、埃塞俄比亚政策研究所共同主办的首届中非人权研讨会22日在埃塞 俄比亚首都亚的斯亚贝巴举行。来自中国和40余个非洲国家的超过200名人权领域官员、专家学者及有 关社会组织、企业、智库、媒体代表等，围绕"构建中非命运共同体 携手实现发展权"主题展开讨论。 与会嘉宾高度赞扬中国在人权领域取得的成就，肯定中国为推动非洲人权事业发展和能力建设所作出的 贡献，期待中非携手同行，共同探索符合本国国情的人权道路，为共筑新时代全天候中非命运共同体书 写新篇章。 与会中非学者表示，脱离发展谈人权是"无根之木"，应当通过消 ...

由中国人权研究会、浙江师范大学、埃塞俄比亚政策研究所共同主办的首届中非人权研讨会22日在埃塞 俄比亚首都亚的斯亚贝巴举行。来自中国和40余个非洲国家的超过200名人权领域官员、专家学者及有 关社会组织、企业、智库、媒体代表等，围绕"构建中非命运共同体携手实现发展权"主题展开讨论。与 会嘉宾高度赞扬中国在人权领域取得的成就，肯定中国为推动非洲人权事业发展和能力建设所作出的贡 献，期待中非携手同行，共同探索符合本国国情的人权道路，为共筑新时代全天候中非命运共同体书写 新篇章。 与会中非学者表示，脱离发展谈人权是"无根之木"，应当通过消除贫困、保障粮食安全、确保生存权、 提升公共服务实现人权的实质性进步。"中非达累斯萨拉姆共识"强调发展道路的选择应立足本国国情和 本土文化特色，是中非双方共同意愿的展现。 近年来，非洲国家积极学习借鉴中国人权发展道路，并结合非洲当地实际创新人权发展模式。刚果 （金）卡萨武布大学国际关系系主任安东尼·龙刚表示："中国以发展促人权，通过实实在在的行动帮助 非洲改善民生、发展进步，助力保障非洲人民生存权、发展权。" 中非合作始终将实现发展权置于优先地位。例如，通过基建赋能，蒙内铁路将肯尼亚 ...

当地时间8月22日，首届中非人权研讨会在埃塞俄比亚首都亚的斯亚贝巴召开，来自中国和非洲44个国家的200余名代表，围绕"构建中非命运共同体，携手 实现发展权"展开热烈讨论，达成并发布《中非发展权亚的斯亚贝巴共识》。 《中非发展权亚的斯亚贝巴共识》包括如下核心条款： 发展是解决一切人权问题的关键，发展权是一项不可剥夺的人权：强调发展权作为首要基本人权的重要性，指出消除贫困、饥饿、战乱、歧视等是保障人权 的基础； 坚持以人民为中心的发展理念：尊重各国人民主体地位，保障发展成果更多更公平惠及各国人民； 坚持可持续高质量发展：强化《联合国宪章》《2030年可持续发展议程》在发展权实现中的作用，推动平等的发展权利； 尊重各国主权、安全和发展利益：支持各国自主选择人权发展道路，反对将人权问题政治化、工具化； △蒙内铁路安全运营3000天 △南苏丹智库战略与政策研究所执行主任梅尔哈接受总台记者采访 从宣言到行动，中国从来不是"说说而已"，而是切切实实地落到实处。比如，中国通过"中非高校20+20合作计划"等举措，帮助非洲培养了大批专业人才， 并提供了大量政府奖学金名额，邀请非洲学生来华留学深造，从人才机制与储备上帮助非洲国 ...

央广网北京8月23日消息 据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻和报纸摘要》报道，由中国中央广播 电视总台和首尔中国文化中心、韩国国立大韩民国临时政府纪念馆联合主办的"和平的回响"人文交流活 动韩国专场21日在首尔举行。活动现场特别设置了《南京照相馆》《东极岛》《里斯本丸沉没》等中国 抗战题材影片精彩片段放映环节。展映了《紫日》《风声》等中韩抗日主题影片。 同一天，阿联酋专场在阿布扎比举行。中东地区学界及媒体界60余名嘉宾围绕维护战后国际秩序、 加强南南合作等议题进行对话交流，共同观看了纪录片电影《里斯本丸沉没》以及中俄合拍纪录片《伟 大的胜利——苏联摄影师镜头里的中国抗战》宣传片。总台抗战主题精品影视作品同时展映。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The concept of "Green Mountains and Clear Waters are as Valuable as Mountains of Gold and Silver" has significantly influenced China's ecological civilization and development, showcasing successful practices in ecological restoration and green technology advancements [1][2]. Group 1: Green Development Practices - Cities like Shenzhen have achieved multiple benefits through greening initiatives, including improved air quality and enhanced biodiversity [2]. - The sponge city construction in Hangzhou has increased flood resilience while enhancing urban aesthetics and public health [2]. - The implementation of returning farmland to forest projects has led to ecological restoration and poverty alleviation, demonstrating a win-win scenario [2]. Group 2: Sustainable Development and International Cooperation - The "Two Mountains" concept aligns with Sri Lanka's development strategy, emphasizing the synergy between ecological protection and economic prosperity [2]. - China actively promotes South-South cooperation in areas such as desertification prevention and wetland restoration, positioning itself as a leader in global green development [2]. - Sri Lanka seeks to deepen collaboration with China in green development knowledge exchange, carbon trading mechanisms, and climate resilience projects [2].

Group 1 - The Chinese Embassy in New Zealand emphasizes China's commitment to the Pacific Islands Forum and its role in regional cooperation, highlighting the importance of dialogue and support for the development of Pacific island countries [2] - China has participated in every dialogue meeting since the establishment of the dialogue mechanism and expresses a desire to continue discussions with all parties involved [2] - Climate change is identified as the greatest survival challenge for Pacific island nations, and China expresses its willingness to assist these nations in addressing this issue and achieving sustainable development [2] Group 2 - The article asserts that Taiwan is a province of China and has never been a country, reinforcing the principle of sovereignty as a cornerstone of the UN Charter [3] - It is stated that Taiwan has no qualifications or rights to participate in the Forum as a dialogue partner or observer, which aligns with the consensus of the majority of Forum members [3] - China opposes any attempts by individual countries to create issues regarding Taiwan and urges adherence to the One China commitment to focus on cooperation within the Forum [3]

Core Viewpoint - The recent imposition of tariffs by the U.S. on certain Brazilian exports, reaching up to 50%, is seen as a politically motivated challenge to international multilateral trade rules, prompting calls for enhanced coordination among BRICS nations to stabilize trade and diversify trade settlement currencies [1][2]. Group 1: Impact on Trade Relations - The U.S. tariffs represent an unprecedented strain in U.S.-Brazil relations, highlighting the urgency for BRICS to strengthen internal coordination mechanisms and the importance of de-dollarization for member countries to conduct autonomous trade and mitigate risks [1][2]. - The tariffs are perceived as a departure from conventional trade logic, indicating an increase in protectionism and geopolitical risks [1][2]. Group 2: Financial Mechanism Reforms - BRICS nations are accelerating reforms in financial and settlement mechanisms in response to trade disruptions, with Russia notably shifting to alternative currencies after being excluded from the SWIFT system [2]. - The growing role of currencies like the yuan and ruble in bilateral and multilateral trade reflects a strategic move towards greater autonomy and resilience against unilateral trade pressures [2]. Group 3: Strategic Recommendations for Brazil - Brazil is advised to focus more on BRICS mechanisms and South-South cooperation, particularly in manufacturing and high-tech industries, to identify new trade growth points [2]. - Brazilian companies, such as Embraer, are encouraged to diversify their market presence and adapt products to better integrate into emerging markets, especially in light of the complexities involved in developing alternative markets for high-tech products [2]. Group 4: Long-term Economic Implications - The long-term effects of the U.S. tariffs are expected to undermine the multilateral trading system centered around the WTO, leading to instability and increased protectionist sentiments globally [3][4]. - The tariffs are likely to raise costs for U.S. consumers, creating pressure from domestic industries on the government to reassess these tariff practices due to their inflationary impact and potential to hinder the U.S. economy [4].

Core Points - The Chinese ambassador emphasized that the agreements signed with the Cook Islands focus on economic partnership and are not related to military or security agendas [1][3][4] - The Cook Islands Prime Minister stated that the agreements do not undermine the sovereignty of the Cook Islands and expressed a commitment to maintaining close ties with New Zealand [3][4] - The Chinese government reiterated that the cooperation with the Cook Islands is not aimed at any third party and should not be interfered with by other nations [3][4] Summary by Sections - **Economic Partnership Focus** - The cooperation between China and the Cook Islands is primarily centered on economic development, as highlighted by the Chinese ambassador [1][3] - The signed documents, including the "China-Cook Islands Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Action Plan (2025-2030)," were made public, reinforcing the transparency of the partnership [3] - **Political Context** - New Zealand has expressed dissatisfaction over the lack of consultation regarding the agreements between China and the Cook Islands, leading to a suspension of financial aid [3] - The Cook Islands government maintains that their agreements with China do not compromise their sovereignty and aims to strengthen relations with New Zealand [3][4] - **Long-standing Relations** - China and the Cook Islands have maintained a strong relationship for 28 years, with China providing support in areas such as infrastructure and education [4] - The Chinese ambassador indicated a willingness to collaborate with other partners, including New Zealand and Australia, to support the Cook Islands and other Pacific island nations [4]

Group 1 - The core argument of the articles highlights the contrasting approaches of the United States and China towards African countries, with the U.S. imposing tariffs while China offers zero tariffs, thereby enhancing its influence in the region [1][6][14] - The U.S. tariffs, which escalated from 10% to 41% on 69 countries, are characterized as a form of global coercion rather than mere trade disputes, reflecting a unilateral decision by the U.S. [3][4] - China's implementation of a 100% zero-tariff policy for 53 African nations is seen as a strategic move to foster deeper economic ties and cooperation, contrasting with the U.S. approach [6][8] Group 2 - The article discusses the shift in African countries' export strategies in response to U.S. tariffs, with nations like Lesotho and South Africa redirecting their trade towards China [11][13] - The trade dynamics between China and Africa are projected to grow significantly, with estimates suggesting a 12.4% increase in trade volume by 2025, while U.S.-Africa trade is expected to decline [9][14] - The narrative emphasizes a broader strategic shift in Africa towards seeking partnerships that align with their development goals, moving away from dependency on the U.S. [11][13]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the contrasting trade policies between the United States and China, with the U.S. imposing high tariffs on African countries while China offers zero tariffs to 53 African nations [1][3][5] - The U.S. has implemented a unilateral tariff policy affecting 67 countries, with some tariffs reaching as high as 41%, which has led to widespread discontent among African nations [1][3] - In response to the U.S. tariffs, China has positioned itself as a reliable partner for African countries, promoting trade and investment opportunities, which is expected to strengthen Sino-African relations [5][6] Group 2 - The U.S. tariffs have particularly impacted economically vulnerable African nations, such as Lesotho, where the textile industry is crucial for employment, leading to potential job losses and economic hardship [3][5] - African countries are increasingly recognizing the benefits of cooperation with China, with projections indicating that intra-African trade could reach $520 billion by 2030 and Sino-African trade could exceed $300 billion by 2025 [5][6] - The shift in economic partnerships is evident, as more African nations express a preference for collaboration with China over the U.S., signaling a potential decline in U.S. global influence [6]