Core Insights - OpenAI launched its advanced video generation model Sora 2 and the accompanying Sora App, which quickly became popular, topping the App Store in the U.S. and surpassing competitors like ChatGPT and Gemini [2][3][11] - The Sora App allows users to create immersive short videos by simply uploading a photo or entering a text prompt, marking a significant advancement in AI video generation technology [6][11] - The app's "Cameo" feature has led to a surge in user-generated content (UGC), with a reported 1200% increase in related content within 24 hours of its launch [11] Company Overview - OpenAI's valuation has reached $500 billion, and the company reported $4.3 billion in revenue for the first half of the year, exceeding its total revenue from the previous year, although it also faced a net loss of $13.5 billion [11] - The company is considering a potential IPO in the future and is currently facilitating a secondary sale of employee stock [11] Technology and Features - Sora 2 has made significant improvements over its predecessor, including synchronized audio and video generation, enhanced physical accuracy, and improved resolution and detail [6][11] - The app not only serves as an AI tool but also as a social entertainment platform where users can create and share video content [6][11] User Engagement - The introduction of the "Cameo" feature has made OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman a prominent figure on the internet, with users creatively incorporating his likeness into various scenarios [7][9] - Users in China are particularly active, creating localized content that features popular characters and trends [9] Legal and Copyright Concerns - The rapid rise of Sora has raised concerns about copyright infringement, as many videos generated using the app feature protected intellectual property (IP) without proper authorization [12][15] - OpenAI's "opt-out" policy for copyright content has been criticized for potentially increasing legal risks, as it allows users to generate content featuring copyrighted characters unless the rights holders request removal [15][16] - Legal experts warn that users could face multiple forms of infringement, including copyright and portrait rights, if they use the app to create videos featuring recognizable characters or individuals without permission [16][18]

但这场狂欢的背后，版权争议与深度伪造风险已如暗礁浮现。 律师警告，"尽管视频由 AI 生成，但其基于的原始 IP 形象本身受版权保护。若使用者以此类视频进行吸粉、营利等商 业行为，极易构成版权侵权。" 文｜《 BUG 》栏目 闫妍 国庆假期期间， Sora 2 引爆了整个 AI 圈子，甚至被网友称为" AI 版抖音"、"下一个超级 App "。 9 月 30 日， OpenAI 发布其迄今为止最先进的视频生成模型 Sora 2 ，并同步推出了一款 名为" Sora by OpenAI "的 iPhone 应用。短短几天后， Sora 就登顶了美国 App Store 的榜首，超越了 OpenAI 的 ChatGPT 和谷歌的 Gemini 。 此外，随着 Sora 的"客串"（ Cameo ）功能上线， OpenAI 首席执行官奥特曼也成为了 这两天互联网最忙的人。在网友们的创意驱动下，他或在厕所高歌，或在金字塔前热舞，或 现身制作预制菜，甚至能为蜜雪冰城代言。这些逼真到真假难辨的短视频在网络上病毒式刷 屏，被网友们直呼"玩坏了"。 随着 Sora 2 的迅速走红， AI DeepFake 再一次席卷了全网。 ...

【环球网报道 记者 张倩】据美国《新闻周刊》报道，美国国土安全部22日在社交平台X上以"把他们全抓到"为题发布一段视 频，将抓捕移民行动类比为系列动画作品《宝可梦》中"捕捉宝可梦"的活动。据了解，"把他们全抓到"是《宝可梦》的英文口 号，也是英语版动画第一季的原创主题曲。报道称，国土安全部此举引发了法律与伦理争议。 《新闻周刊》称，这段一分钟的视频融合了执法行动画面与《宝可梦》开场动画，甚至使用了动画主题曲和类似字体，最后以 《宝可梦》卡牌形式展示了被拘人员的大头照。 美国海关与边境保护局在回复这条帖文时，分享了一张皮卡丘的动图，配文称"（这是）边境巡逻队最新成员"。 《新闻周刊》称，国土安全部因发布这段视频在网上遭到强烈抵制，该视频既涉及伦理问题也存在法律争议。有批评者认为， 国土安全部使用《宝可梦》的口号、主题曲以及游戏卡牌的独特视觉风格，可能构成版权侵权。社交媒体用户质疑，美国联邦 机构能否合法挪用热门娱乐品牌用于自身宣传。 一名网友@了《宝可梦》游戏的发行公司任天堂，说，"喂，你们同意他们用你们的IP搞这事吗？" ↓ 另一名网友说，"求你告诉我，我的税金没有被用来雇平面设计师为移民与海关执法局（ICE ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) faced significant backlash after releasing a video that likened immigration enforcement actions to the Pokémon franchise, raising legal and ethical concerns regarding copyright infringement and the appropriateness of using popular entertainment for governmental promotion [1][4]. Group 1: Video Content and Public Reaction - The one-minute video combined footage of law enforcement actions with the opening animation of Pokémon, utilizing the theme song and similar typography, concluding with a display of detainees' photos in a Pokémon card format [4]. - The video sparked strong online resistance, with critics arguing that the DHS's use of Pokémon's slogan and visual style could constitute copyright infringement, questioning the legality of a federal agency appropriating a popular entertainment brand for its own promotion [4]. - Social media users expressed concerns about taxpayer money being used for such promotional materials, with one user directly questioning Nintendo's consent for the use of their intellectual property [4]. Group 2: Ethical and Legal Implications - The video raised ethical issues, particularly highlighted by a senior researcher from the American Immigration Council, who pointed out that the footage included a scene of a forcibly entered home where American citizens were handcuffed without a search warrant [4]. - The DHS's actions have been criticized for potentially exploiting a beloved children's franchise to promote immigration enforcement, leading to discussions about the appropriateness of such tactics [4]. - The Trump administration's hardline immigration policies, which have been in place since January, have already led to various legal disputes and controversies, further complicating the public's perception of the DHS's actions [5].

Core Viewpoint - Midjourney, an AI image generation company, is facing a lawsuit from Warner Bros. Discovery for copyright infringement related to iconic characters such as Superman and Batman, highlighting ongoing legal challenges in the AI-generated content space [4][6][11]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Warner Bros. filed the lawsuit on September 4, claiming that Midjourney used copyrighted materials for training its AI models without authorization, leading to the generation of infringing images and videos [6][11]. - The lawsuit cites specific examples where users can generate images of characters like Batman by inputting simple text prompts, which Warner Bros. argues constitutes direct infringement [6][7]. - Warner Bros. seeks compensation for actual damages or statutory damages up to $150,000 per infringed work, along with an injunction to prevent further unauthorized use of its IP [11]. Group 2: Previous Legal Issues - This is not the first lawsuit against Midjourney; earlier in June, Disney and Universal Pictures also filed a joint lawsuit against the company for similar copyright violations [8][9]. - Disney's lawsuit emphasizes that Midjourney is a "copyright parasite" and that the use of AI does not mitigate the infringement of copyrighted images and videos [8][9]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The ongoing legal battles are seen as pivotal in shaping the future of copyright law as it pertains to AI-generated content, with potential implications for the entire industry [9][12]. - The concept of "fair use" is expected to be a critical aspect of the upcoming legal proceedings, as Midjourney argues that its training practices fall under this principle [11][12]. - The case raises concerns about the impact of AI on traditional copyright protections and the potential for confusion among consumers regarding the legitimacy of AI-generated content [7][9].

Group 1 - Apple has been sued by authors for using their copyrighted books without permission to train AI systems [2] - Anthropic has agreed to pay over $1.5 billion to settle a copyright lawsuit with authors, marking one of the largest copyright settlements reported [2] - Alibaba's Tongyi Qianwen launched Qwen3-Max-Preview, its largest model with over 1 trillion parameters, outperforming previous models [2] - Tencent's Hunyuan-MT-7B translation model topped the HuggingFace global model leaderboard, achieving first place in 30 out of 31 languages in a recent competition [2]

另一名博主"麦麦子"指出，茶颜悦色手账本中的一页，有一只狗攀附在几条彩色的带子上，这与其此前 在手帐本中的设计同样极为相似——其设计的是一只猫攀附在彩铅线胶带上。 对此，8月24日，茶颜悦色在官方微博发布说明称， 其手账本被指出与三名博主的作品以及MOODA App部分元素很像，团队快速了解后，发现确实存在部分未经授权的挪用。经过第一时间与创作团队了 解情况，发现团队在管理上存在审核疏忽，没能及时发现问题并制止，让设计稿件通过后投入生产。对 此，茶颜悦色希望致以诚恳的道歉。 茶颜悦色表示，产品刚上市时看到大家讨论、认可，团队小伙伴们都很开心，觉得"用心做好内容，真 的会被看见。"可转头就发现，这份"好内容"是建立在伤害别人版权的基础上，确实无地自容。 茶颜悦色进一步表示，这件事更大问题是暴露了其在管理和日常设计内容把关中存在的巨大漏洞，为妥 善解决此事并进一步加强管理。 团队后续计划：成立专门的调查小组，全面自查自纠，对目前推进中 的内容进行再次审核，发现问题及时整改；后期加强审核管理和人员培训，让流程上管理更加规范和严 谨，加强团队对内容辨别和把握的能力。 8月24日下午，就多名博主质疑手账本涉嫌抄袭一事， ...

近日，多位博主发帖称，茶颜悦色与上海彩虹室内合唱团的联名手账本抄袭其作品。其中，博主"废画三千"称目前涉及抄袭的作品共有三张。 8月24日，茶颜悦色发文致歉称，本周上新的产品"多功能手账本/活在爱里面系列"中部分设计被指出和@废画三千、@麦麦子、@有没有梦游、@YANI以 及MOODA app的作品很像。团队快速了解后，发现确实存在部分未经授权的挪用。 近日，茶颜悦色与上海彩虹室内合唱团联名的手账本，陷入抄袭风波。8月24日，茶颜悦色发文致歉称，正在与原创作者沟通，争取授权，后续将成立专门 的调查小组，全面自查自纠。南都N视频记者注意到，目前，手账本在茶颜悦色小程序处于"下架"状态。 博主"废画三千"称被茶颜悦色抄袭。 其表示，收到上述情况后，第一时间与创作团队了解情况，发现团队在管理上存在审核疏忽，没能及时发现问题并制止，让设计稿件通过后投入生产。"我 们已第一时间和原创作者取得联系，诚恳说明情况、认错道歉。通过积极沟通，我们与@废画三千、@麦麦子、@有没有梦游达成一致，同意授权我们继 续使用相关设计。目前还在等待@YANI、MOODA app的回复，我们会持续积极沟通。" 其称，产品刚上市时看到大家讨论、 ...

北京商报讯（记者 张天元）8月24日，茶饮品牌茶颜悦色就联名账本设计问题致歉。其中提到，茶颜悦 色本周上新的产品"多功能手账本/活在爱里面系列"中部分设计被指出与多位博主的作品很像。对此， 团队快速了解后，发现确实存在部分未经授权的挪用，品牌第一时间与创作团队了解情况，团队在管理 上存在审核疏忽，没能及时发现问题并制止,让设计稿件通过后投入生产。 继续使用相天歧计。目削延仕寺侍@YANI、MOODA app的回复,我们会持续积极沟通,拿出最大的诚意去 解决。 特别对不起我们的合作伙伴@上海彩虹室内合唱团。 这次合作,大家筹备许久,也付出了很多心血,本来是 想一起做点美好有趣的东西,结果因为我们的问题,给 合作伙伴带来了困扰,实属无妄之灾。过程中彩虹室内 合唱团的小伙伴也关注到此事,给我们提供了建议和 支持。我们也想尽全力减少对合作伙伴的影响。 最后,更要向所有关注、喜欢这个手账本的朋友们道 歉,让大家失望了。产品刚上市时看到大家讨论、认可, 团队小伙伴们都很开心,觉得"用心做好内容,真的会 被看见。"可转头就发现,这份"好内容"是建立在伤害 别人版权的基础上时,确实无地自容。 事实证明,好内容确实会被认可,但 ...

Core Viewpoint - Meta is facing serious copyright allegations from Strike 3 Holdings, which claims that Meta has been using adult films to train its AI models without authorization, potentially infringing on the copyrights of 2396 films and engaging in over 100,000 unauthorized distribution transactions [2][17]. Group 1: Allegations Against Meta - Strike 3 Holdings accuses Meta of systematically using BitTorrent technology to illegally stream and share its adult films since 2018 for AI training purposes [2][12]. - The lawsuit claims that Meta not only downloaded these films but also continued to "seed" them for months, indicating active participation in the BitTorrent network [3][5]. - Evidence presented by Strike 3 Holdings shows that 47 IP addresses linked to the seeding activities are registered under Meta's name, suggesting a corporate-level involvement in the copyright infringement [4][5]. Group 2: Implications of the Allegations - The use of adult films for AI training may allow Meta to create highly realistic virtual adult content at minimal cost, raising ethical concerns about the company's practices [15][16]. - The lawsuit highlights that this strategy could expose minors to adult content by bypassing age verification mechanisms, as the films were originally paid content [14]. - Strike 3 Holdings demands that Meta cease its infringing activities, delete all unauthorized content used for AI training, and pay potential damages amounting to $359 million, with $150,000 per film [18][23]. Group 3: Meta's Response - Meta has stated that it is reviewing the lawsuit but believes the allegations from Strike 3 Holdings are inaccurate [22]. - Despite being informed of the alleged infringement, Meta's BitTorrent activities reportedly continued, raising questions about the company's compliance with copyright laws [20][21].