Group 1 - The Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) is committed to implementing the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) directives and advancing the "Science and Technology Innovation Board" (STAR Market) reforms, including the new policies and business rules [2][3] - The newly established "Science and Technology Growth Layer" aims to support technology companies that are in the pre-profit stage but have significant technological breakthroughs and commercial potential [3][4] - The SSE has introduced a pre-review mechanism for Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) to enhance the quality and efficiency of the review process for high-quality technology enterprises [4][5] Group 2 - The "Science and Technology Growth Layer" will not impose additional listing thresholds for unprofitable companies, allowing existing unprofitable firms to transition into this layer immediately upon the guideline's implementation [3][4] - The new guidelines specify that the exit conditions for existing companies remain unchanged, while new unprofitable companies will have stricter exit criteria based on profitability and revenue metrics [3][4] - The SSE has implemented a special identifier "U" for stocks in the Science and Technology Growth Layer to help investors distinguish between existing and newly registered stocks [4][6] Group 3 - The "Senior Professional Institutional Investor" guidelines have been released, which detail the criteria for institutional investors participating in the STAR Market, emphasizing their professional judgment capabilities [7][8] - Institutional investors must maintain a significant stake in the issuing company for at least 24 months prior to the IPO application, ensuring they do not engage in sudden investments [7][8] - The introduction of senior professional institutional investors is expected to enhance the accountability and credibility of investments in technology firms, aiding regulatory bodies in identifying companies with genuine growth potential [8]

Group 1: Core Views - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has officially released new business rules aimed at enhancing the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, addressing the challenges faced by technology companies in the listing process, and adapting to the needs of China's technological innovation and growth [1] - Experts and industry leaders have positively evaluated the new rules, emphasizing their role in improving the inclusivity and adaptability of the capital market for technology innovation and new productive forces [1] Group 2: Expert Opinions - Zhang Zongxin, a finance professor, highlighted that the establishment of the Sci-Tech Growth Layer provides a more suitable capital market platform for early-stage technology companies, which often face long paths to profitability [2] - Yao Yawei noted that introducing seasoned professional institutional investors can enhance the identification of quality technology companies and improve resource allocation efficiency in the capital market [3][4] - Industry leaders from various companies expressed that the new policies accelerate core technology development and commercialization processes, benefiting companies with strong competitive advantages in hard technology [5][6][7][8] Group 3: Investment and Market Dynamics - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Growth Layer is seen as a critical step in supporting early-stage innovative companies, providing them with financing channels and enhancing China's competitive advantage in global industry development [9] - The introduction of seasoned professional institutional investors is viewed as a mechanism to improve risk identification for investors and enhance the overall investment environment for technology companies [10][11] - The reforms are expected to attract long-term and patient capital to the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, further solidifying the market's support for technology innovation [12][13]

"与境外市场不同的是，科创板此次改革引入资深专业机构投资者制度仅针对第五套标准企业开展小范围试 点，资深专业机构投资者入股情况只作为审核注册的参考，不构成新的上市条件，并非上市'门槛'，不影响科 技型企业适用第五套上市标准申报科创板。"姚亚伟说。 科创板"1+6"配套业务规则落地。 7月13日，上交所正式发布了《科创板上市公司自律监管指引第5号——科创成长层》《发行上市审核规则适用 指引第7号——预先审阅》《发行上市审核规则适用指引第8号——资深专业机构投资者》等配套业务规则。在 配套业务规则公布后，专家学者、科创板公司董事长、券商投行负责人、创投机构投资人等纷纷发声，对配套 业务规则给予了积极正面评价，认为此次深化科创板改革着力解决科技型企业发行上市痛点难点问题，主动适 应了我国科技创新发展需要和科技型企业的成长需求，进一步增强了科创板对科技创新和新质生产力发展的制 度包容性、适应性。 专家学者：科创成长层提供适配的资本市场平台 复旦大学金融研究院金融学教授、博士生导师，美国斯坦福大学访问学者张宗新表示，从全球实践看，科技型 企业往往经营业绩不确定性大、转盈利周期长，资本市场服务能否有效覆盖优质未盈利科技型 ...

科创板重磅改革落地。 7月13日，针对科创板第五套上市标准企业，上交所正式试点引入资深专业机构投资者制度。 在业内人士看来，该制度作为科创板"1+6"改革政策的重要措施之一，旨在依托专业机构投资者的专业研判能 力，为审核注入"市场智慧"。此举既提升了科创板制度包容性，又通过"小切口探索"平衡风险防控，引导长期 资本聚焦"投早、投小、投硬科技"，助力科技创新与资本市场形成良性循环。 《指引》此次明确了资深专业机构投资者的硬性门槛，比如在已投资的科技型企业中，近5年有5家以上已在科 创板上市或者10家以上已在境内外主要交易所上市。同时，《指引》对持股及独立性提出要求，需在IPO申报 前24个月即入股，且各自持续持有发行人3%以上的股份或不低于5亿元的投资金额。 明确"资深专业机构投资者"门槛 距离证监会在6月18日发布《关于在科创板设置科创成长层增强制度包容性适应性的意见》不足一个月，7月13 日上交所出台《上海证券交易所发行上市审核规则适用指引第8号——资深专业机构投资者》（以下简称《指 引》）。 据了解，此前证监会表示，对于适用科创板第五套上市标准的企业，试点引入资深专业机构投资者制度，希望 借助这些机构投资 ...

Core Points - The Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) has officially released the "Guidelines for Self-Regulatory Supervision of Listed Companies in the Sci-Tech Innovation Board - Sci-Tech Growth Tier" to implement the "Opinions on Setting Up a Sci-Tech Growth Tier" by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) [1][4] - A total of 32 unprofitable companies will enter the Sci-Tech Growth Tier immediately upon the implementation of the new guidelines, with no additional listing thresholds set for unprofitable enterprises [4][5] - The new guidelines maintain existing conditions for delisting existing companies while introducing stricter conditions for new unprofitable companies to encourage technological development [5][6] Group 1: Sci-Tech Growth Tier - The SSE has introduced the Sci-Tech Growth Tier to better serve technological innovation and new productive forces development, with a focus on protecting investors' rights [4][5] - The existing 32 unprofitable companies will be included in the Sci-Tech Growth Tier, with the largest projected loss for 2024 being approximately 4.978 billion for BeiGene [4][5] - New unprofitable companies will enter the tier upon listing, while existing companies must achieve profitability to avoid delisting [5] Group 2: IPO Pre-Review Mechanism - The SSE has established a pre-review mechanism for companies applying for IPOs on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, particularly for those engaged in key technology development [6][7] - The pre-review process aims to enhance the quality and efficiency of formal IPO applications, with strict adherence to the established rules [7][8] - Companies must provide a justification for the necessity of the pre-review, and the SSE will ensure that the process aligns with existing IPO review mechanisms [6][7] Group 3: Professional Investor Standards - The SSE has released guidelines for identifying "senior professional institutional investors," encouraging companies to self-identify and disclose such investors [9][10] - The criteria for recognition include investment experience, holding period, compliance, and independence, with specific thresholds for investment amounts and duration [9][10] - The guidelines aim to enhance the quality of investment in the Sci-Tech Growth Tier by ensuring that recognized investors meet stringent standards [9][10]

Group 1 - The establishment of the "Science and Technology Growth Layer" on the STAR Market is aimed at providing a resilient pathway for high-quality companies in the core technology breakthrough or early industrialization phase, allowing capital to have more patience with potential stocks that may not be profitable in the short term [2][3] - The reform measures, including the reactivation of the fifth set of listing standards, are seen as a significant milestone that supports hard technology companies in listing and financing, thereby accelerating technological research and innovation product commercialization [2][3] - The "1+6" policy not only provides investors with a window to share in technological dividends but also guides capital towards national strategic needs, promoting a virtuous cycle of "technology-industry-finance" [3][4] Group 2 - The new regulations require individual investors participating in the growth layer to meet existing suitability requirements, enhancing information disclosure and risk warning for growth layer companies, thus protecting the rights of small investors [4][5] - The reforms are expected to continuously promote high-quality development in the technology finance market, effectively facilitating the formation of innovative capital and supporting the rapid growth of quality unprofitable technology companies [4][5] - The introduction of seasoned professional institutional investors and pre-IPO review mechanisms optimizes resource allocation efficiency and strengthens risk prevention, balancing support for hard technology with investor protection [5][6] Group 3 - The current scale of private equity investment funds in China has reached 10.96 trillion yuan, with venture capital funds at 3.41 trillion yuan, providing funding support for technology companies at various stages [7] - The "1+6" policy is viewed as a major upgrade of the STAR Market system, significantly enhancing the market's inclusivity for long-cycle, high-investment fields such as artificial intelligence and innovative pharmaceuticals [7][8] - The reforms are expected to enhance the STAR Market's attractiveness to quality companies and patient capital, providing a more precise and powerful funding support and resource allocation platform for technology innovation enterprises [8]

记者7月13日从上海证券交易所获悉，为落实中国证监会《关于在科创板设置科创成长层增强制度包容性适应性的意见》，进一步深化科 创板改革，上交所于13日发布多项配套业务规则。上交所相关负责人就业务规则制定修订情况答记者问。 上交所本次共发布了新制定的《科创板上市公司自律监管指引第5号——科创成长层》《发行上市审核规则适用指引第7号——预先审阅》 《发行上市审核规则适用指引第8号——资深专业机构投资者》等3项业务指引，以及修订的《会员管理业务指南第2号——风险揭示书必备条 款》和《证券交易业务指南第6号——证券特殊标识》等2项业务指南。 根据预先审阅指引等规定，发行人申请预先审阅时，需要充分说明申请的必要性；上交所将严格按照规则规定，对发行人的申请进行把 关。同时，发行人应参照相关规定，高质量准备和提交预先审阅申请文件，确保真实、准确、完整。 围绕试点引入资深专业机构投资者制度，上交所相关负责人表示，上交所制定资深专业机构投资者指引，是为进一步健全市场化精准识别 优质科技型企业的制度机制。指引发布后，适用科创板第五套上市标准的新申报企业即可适用。 根据资深专业机构投资者指引，发行人适用科创板第五套上市标准申请发行上 ...

Group 1 - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has officially released the "Guidelines for Self-Regulatory Supervision of Listed Companies on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board No. 5 - Sci-Tech Growth Tier" to deepen the reform of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [1] - The reform does not impose additional listing thresholds for unprofitable companies entering the Sci-Tech Growth Tier, allowing 32 existing unprofitable companies to enter immediately upon the implementation of the guidelines [1] - New unprofitable companies will enter the Sci-Tech Growth Tier from the date of their listing, while the delisting conditions for existing companies remain unchanged, requiring the first profit after listing [1] Group 2 - The stock abbreviation for the Sci-Tech Growth Tier will now include a special identifier "U" to help investors distinguish between existing and newly registered stocks [2] - The guidelines emphasize risk-oriented information disclosure, requiring companies to disclose risks related to unprofitability and technology development in their annual reports and interim announcements [2] - There are no new trading thresholds for individual investors, maintaining the existing requirement of "500,000 yuan in assets + 2 years of experience" [2] Group 3 - The IPO pre-review mechanism for high-quality technology companies is an important innovation aimed at improving the quality of application documents and the overall efficiency of the stock issuance and listing review process [3] - The Shanghai Stock Exchange will focus on accurately grasping applicable scenarios, improving application document quality, standardizing pre-review procedures, and enhancing information disclosure management [3]

Core Points - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is focusing on enhancing the inclusiveness and adaptability of the system, aiming to deepen reforms in the Sci-Tech Innovation Board and the Growth Enterprise Market [1] - The CSRC has issued guidelines for establishing a Sci-Tech Growth Tier to better support high-quality, unprofitable technology companies, allowing 32 existing unprofitable firms to enter this tier [1][2] - The reform does not impose additional listing thresholds for unprofitable companies, facilitating their access to capital markets [1][2] Group 1 - The Sci-Tech Growth Tier aims to support technology companies at different development stages, providing them with early access to capital markets [3] - The pre-review mechanism is a significant innovation, allowing companies to apply for pre-review under specific conditions to protect sensitive business information [3][4] - The Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) will conduct reviews based on formal procedures, ensuring transparency and market supervision during the pre-review phase [4] Group 2 - The SSE has established guidelines for identifying qualified institutional investors, encouraging companies to disclose information about these investors voluntarily [5] - The criteria for recognizing qualified institutional investors have been refined, focusing on their governance structure, asset management scale, and investment experience [5][6] - The introduction of qualified institutional investors is expected to create a binding effect, helping regulators and the market identify genuinely high-potential companies [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) has officially released the "Guidelines for the Growth Layer of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board" and related business rules to enhance the inclusiveness and adaptability of the system, further deepening the reform of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [2] Group 1: New Guidelines and Rules - The SSE has introduced three new business guidelines: "Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Sci-Tech Innovation Board Listed Companies No. 5 - Growth Layer," "Issuance and Listing Review Rules Application Guidelines No. 7 - Pre-Review," and "Issuance and Listing Review Rules Application Guidelines No. 8 - Senior Professional Institutional Investors" [2] - Two existing business guidelines have been revised: "Member Management Business Guidelines No. 2 - Essential Clauses of Risk Disclosure" and "Securities Trading Business Guidelines No. 6 - Special Securities Identification" [2] Group 2: Pre-Review Mechanism - The "Pre-Review Guidelines" introduce a pre-review mechanism for IPOs on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board to reduce the adverse impact of early disclosure of business technology information and listing plans on companies [4] - The pre-review mechanism applies to companies engaged in key core technology development or other specific circumstances, requiring issuers to justify the necessity of the pre-review [4] - The SSE will conduct the pre-review process strictly according to formal review procedures, providing feedback to issuers and sponsors, but this does not constitute a pre-confirmation of compliance with listing conditions [5] Group 3: Growth Layer Implementation - The SSE will focus on maintaining the positioning of the Growth Layer, implementing "new and old separation" for delisting conditions, enhancing risk-oriented information disclosure, and strengthening investor suitability management [7] - There are no additional listing thresholds for unprofitable companies to enter the Growth Layer; existing unprofitable companies will automatically enter upon the implementation of the new guidelines [7] - New registered unprofitable companies will enter the Growth Layer upon listing, and stocks in this layer will have a special identifier "U" to help investors distinguish between existing and new registered stocks [7] Group 4: Investor Participation - There are no new trading thresholds for individual investors participating in the Growth Layer; the existing requirement remains at "500,000 yuan in assets + 2 years of experience" [8] - Investors must sign a specific risk disclosure document before investing in newly registered unprofitable technology companies in the Growth Layer [8] Group 5: Senior Professional Institutional Investors - The SSE has established the "Senior Professional Institutional Investors Guidelines" to enhance the identification mechanism for quality technology companies [10] - The guidelines specify the criteria for recognizing senior professional institutional investors, including governance structure, asset management scale, and investment experience [12] - The recognition of senior professional institutional investors will serve as a reference for assessing whether issuers meet market recognition and growth requirements, without affecting the review standards or speed [13]