2025年8月14日，中共中央政治局委员、外交部长王毅在云南安宁会见来华出席澜湄合作第十次外长会 的越南副总理兼外长裴青山。王毅说，中越经贸联系密切，双方要共同反对单边主义、保护主义，维护 自由贸易规则和国际贸易体制。中方支持越南建设独立自主的经济体系，鼓励中国企业赴越投资兴业， 愿同越方拓展人工智能、数字经济、商用飞机等新兴领域合作，为越南农产品输华和在华设立贸易促进 机构提供便利，希望越方为中国企业提供良好营商环境。双方要继续办好建交75周年暨"中越人文交流 年"系列活动和越南青年来华"红色研学之旅"，让中越友好真正深入人心。（外交部网站） ...

Core Viewpoint - The phone call between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Brazilian President Lula highlights the strengthening of China-Brazil relations, emphasizing mutual cooperation and the importance of multilateralism in addressing global challenges [1] Group 1: China-Brazil Relations - Xi Jinping stated that China-Brazil relations are at their historical best, with successful progress in building a community of shared destiny and aligning development strategies [1] - Both leaders expressed a commitment to enhancing cooperation and achieving more mutually beneficial outcomes, aiming to set an example of solidarity among major developing countries [1] Group 2: Multilateralism and Global Challenges - Lula praised China's commitment to multilateralism and its responsible role in international affairs, expressing Brazil's desire to strengthen communication within BRICS and oppose unilateral actions [1] - Xi Jinping reiterated support for Brazil in defending its sovereignty and emphasized the need for countries to unite against unilateralism and protectionism [1] - The BRICS mechanism is highlighted as an important platform for consolidating the consensus of global South countries, with a focus on maintaining international fairness and justice [1]

【纠错】 【责任编辑:吴京泽】 中方重申，贸易战没有赢家，保护主义没有出路。施压和威胁不是同中方打交道的正确方式。中方 敦促美方立即纠正错误做法，取消所有对华单边关税措施，停止对华经贸打压，与中方在相互尊重的基 础上，通过平等对话妥善解决分歧。 中方注意到，美东时间4月7日，美方威胁进一步对华加征50%关税，中方对此坚决反对。如果美方 升级关税措施落地，中方将坚决采取反制措施维护自身权益。 美方对华加征所谓"对等关税"毫无根据，是典型的单边霸凌做法，中方已经采取的反制措施是为了 维护自身主权安全发展利益，维护正常的国际贸易秩序，完全是正当之举。美方威胁升级对华关税，是 错上加错，再次暴露了美方的讹诈本质，中方对此绝不接受。如果美方一意孤行，中方必将奉陪到底。 ...

Core Points - The relationship between China and Brazil is at its historical best, with positive progress in building a community of shared destiny and aligning development strategies [1] - Both countries aim to strengthen cooperation and create more mutually beneficial outcomes, setting an example for solidarity among global South countries [1] - Brazil emphasizes the importance of its relationship with China and seeks to deepen strategic alignment and cooperation [1] Summary by Sections - **China-Brazil Relations** - Xi Jinping highlighted the current peak in China-Brazil relations and the successful start of their community of shared destiny [1] - Both nations are committed to seizing opportunities for enhanced cooperation and mutual benefits [1] - **Brazil's Position** - Lula expressed Brazil's high regard for its relationship with China and the desire to strengthen cooperation [1] - He also discussed Brazil's relationship with the United States and reaffirmed Brazil's commitment to maintaining its sovereignty [1] - **Multilateral Cooperation** - Both leaders agreed on the importance of multilateralism and the need to oppose unilateralism and protectionism [1] - They emphasized the role of the BRICS mechanism in fostering consensus among global South countries [1] - **Global Challenges** - China and Brazil aim to jointly address global challenges, including ensuring the success of the UN climate change conference and promoting political solutions to the Ukraine crisis [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that the ultimate winner of the tariff war is China, despite the U.S. government's claims of success in generating revenue through tariffs [3][15]. Group 1: Economic Impact on the U.S. - The high tariffs imposed by the Trump administration have led to skyrocketing prices for raw materials like steel and semiconductors, forcing U.S. factories to cut production and resulting in a decline in product quality [7]. - U.S. allies are shifting their trade partnerships towards China, with Brazil signing a multi-billion dollar soybean deal with China and India accelerating trade with Russia [7]. - Retail giants like Walmart and Best Buy are facing increased costs, contributing to a rise in inflation to 2.9%, which is straining consumers' finances [7]. Group 2: China's Economic Resilience - China's total import and export volume reached 25.7 trillion yuan in the first seven months of 2025, marking a 3.5% increase, with exports to Belt and Road Initiative countries soaring by 8.7% [11]. - Many U.S. companies are relocating their production lines to China to avoid tariffs, benefiting from China's robust textile industry infrastructure [11]. - Chinese e-commerce platforms like Taobao and Dunhuang.com are gaining international traction as affected businesses and consumers turn to them [11]. Group 3: Global Reactions and Trends - India and Brazil have strongly opposed Trump's tariff policies, with India's government prioritizing farmers' interests and Brazil filing a complaint with the WTO [13]. - The U.S. manufacturing PMI has dropped to 48%, while China's remains above 50%, indicating a stark contrast in economic health [15]. - The article concludes that unilateralism and protectionism will backfire in the changing global economic landscape, with China emerging as the biggest winner due to its flexible economic strategies and strong industrial chain [15].

商务部发言人指出，美方做法"违反国际经贸规则，沦为世界经济史上的笑话"；外交部发言人强调"关税战由美方挑起， 中方不愿打但绝不退缩"。国务院关税税则委员会公告，自4月10日同步将原产于美国的进口商品关税税率从84%上调至 125%，实现严格对等反制。公告特别说明：鉴于当前税率下美商品已无对华出口可行性，若美方继续加码，中方将不予 跟进税率竞赛——既展现强硬底线，亦为谈判预留理性空间。 据智通财经报道2025年4月10日，美国政府宣布将对中国输美商品的"对等关税"税率从84%大幅提高至125%，叠加此前已 生效的20%芬太尼相关附加关税，部分商品实际税负率突破145%历史峰值。美方声称此举旨在"纠正贸易失衡"，但此举 背离WTO规则、脱离市场逻辑，本质是将关税异化为政治胁迫工具。 智库测算显示，若3000亿美元中国商品关税全面实施，美国将流失超200万就业岗位（农业、零售、制造业首当其冲）。 中西部农场主担忧农产品对华出口中断；大型零售商警告终端消费者将承担超125%税负转嫁成本。耶鲁实验室研究表 明，他国反制情境下，美方关税推高美国个人消费支出价格指数（PCE）涨幅扩大2.1%，加剧通胀失控风险。彼得森研 究 ...

Group 1 - Trump's recent tariff policy has led to significant pressure on traditional allies like Japan, South Korea, and the EU, forcing them to comply with energy procurement contracts from the U.S. [1] - The new tariff rates, which can reach up to 41%, represent the highest import duties in nearly a century, with a minimum of 10% imposed on countries with trade surpluses with the U.S. [3] - The U.S. labor market showed signs of weakness, with a sharp decline in non-farm employment and an increase in the unemployment rate, indicating economic fragility [5] Group 2 - Trump's accusations against the Labor Department's data, labeling it as fabricated, reflect his frustration with the economic situation and his attempts to shift blame to the Biden administration [7] - The resignation of Federal Reserve Governor Kugler led to volatility in the bond market, with a drop in short-term Treasury yields, adding to market uncertainty [9] - A recent poll indicated Trump's approval rating has fallen to 40%, the lowest since his return to the political scene, highlighting increasing partisan divisions in the U.S. [10] Group 3 - Despite claims of attracting significant energy orders and manufacturing investments, global markets remain skeptical of Trump's protectionist policies, which may hinder the stability of the U.S. unemployment rate [11] - The U.S. economy is on the brink of recession, with the Federal Reserve's rate cuts failing to reverse the downward trend [12] - The U.S. has been overly critical of China's manufacturing sector, while major investment banks express optimism about China's capacity reduction policies, contrasting with the uncertain economic outlook for the U.S. [13] Group 4 - The increase in tariffs has raised production costs without enhancing product competitiveness, leading to a capital shortage in the U.S. market [14] - Although tariffs have temporarily filled the U.S. treasury, they are unlikely to change the long-term trend of economic decline [14] - The challenge remains for the U.S. manufacturing sector to regain its former glory amidst a landscape of dwindling investments [16]

Core Viewpoint - The recent implementation of new tariffs by the U.S. on multiple trade partners has raised the overall tariff level to its highest point since 1935, leading to increased operational costs for American businesses and rising inflation, ultimately affecting consumers negatively [1] Group 1: Tariff Impact - The new tariffs range from 10% to 50%, significantly increasing the operational costs for U.S. companies [1] - The overall tariff level in the U.S. has reached its highest since 1935, indicating a substantial shift in trade policy [1] Group 2: Economic Consequences - The trade war is causing inflation to rise, resulting in higher prices for goods faced by American consumers [1] - The unilateral approach of the U.S. government is perceived as a sacrifice of other countries' interests for short-term advantages [1] Group 3: Global Trade Dynamics - The U.S. strategy reflects a clear unilateralism and economic hegemony mindset, undermining the stability of the multilateral trade system [1] - The actions taken by the U.S. are seen as a form of economic colonialism disguised as protectionism, aiming to create a trade system that serves U.S. interests [1] Group 4: International Relations - The tariffs are exacerbating distrust and opposition within the international community, damaging global supply chain cooperation [1] - The long-term consequences of these policies may ultimately backfire on the U.S. itself, undermining international cooperation and trust [1]

Core Viewpoint - The full closure operation of Hainan Free Trade Port is a starting point for a higher level of openness, not an endpoint, marking a new phase in its development [4][5]. Group 1: Achievements and Progress - Hainan Free Trade Port has seen significant progress since the implementation of the overall plan, with a steady increase in foreign investment, reaching 102.5 billion yuan, growing at an average annual rate of 14.6% [5]. - The number of newly established foreign enterprises has increased to 8,098, with an average annual growth rate of 43.7%, significantly higher than the national average [5]. - The proportion of the four leading industries (tourism, modern services, high-tech industries, and tropical agriculture) in the economy has increased by 13.7 percentage points, now accounting for 67% of the province's GDP [6]. Group 2: Policy Design and Implementation - The policy design for the full closure operation includes a "zero tariff" policy for 74% of imported goods, an increase from 21%, and allows for tax-free circulation of goods within the island [8]. - Trade management measures will be more relaxed, with open arrangements for certain prohibited and restricted imports [8]. - A more efficient regulatory model will be implemented, focusing on low intervention and high efficiency for "zero tariff" goods [8]. Group 3: Future Directions and Open Measures - Future measures include expanding the range of "zero tariff" goods and enhancing the openness of service sectors such as tourism, education, and healthcare [9][10]. - The establishment of a transparent and predictable investment environment is crucial, with plans to further relax foreign investment restrictions and implement a commitment-based entry system [9]. - Financial policies will be adapted to support open development, including the establishment of a multi-functional free trade account system [10]. Group 4: Clarification of Misunderstandings - Hainan Free Trade Port is not considered "inside the border and outside the customs"; it remains under the supervision of the customs laws of the People's Republic of China, ensuring regulatory compliance [11].

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the "reciprocal tariffs" by the United States has led to significant dissatisfaction in Europe, particularly affecting exporters like those in Portugal [1][3] Group 1: Impact on European Exporters - The unilateral nature of the U.S. tariffs is seen as asymmetric and poses serious challenges for European exporters, including those from Portugal [1] - Portuguese automotive and machinery producers will face additional costs when entering the U.S. market, increasing their operational burdens [3] Group 2: Statistical Evidence - Portugal's exports to the U.S. saw a dramatic decline of 39.4% year-on-year in June, dropping from €55.7 million in June 2024 to €33.8 million [3] - In the second quarter, exports to the U.S. decreased by 13.9% year-on-year, falling from €141.9 million to €122.1 million [3] Group 3: Broader Trade Implications - The protectionist measures from the U.S. contradict the direction of global multilateral trade system development, which should be based on balanced interdependence and openness [3] - Portugal advocates for a more equitable and clearly defined international trade system as a proponent of multilateralism [3]