转自：上海市市场监督管理局网站 肉制品监督抽检不合格产品信息 声明：以下信息仅指本次抽检标称的生产企业相关产品的生产日期/批号和所检项目 | 序 | 标称生产企业名称 | | 标称生产企业地址 | | 被抽样单位名 | 被抽样单位地 | | 食品名称 | 规格 | 商 | 生产 日期/ | 不合格项目║检验结果║标 | 分 | 备 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 号 | | | | | 称 | | | 型号 | | 标 | | 准值 | 类 | 注 | | | | | | | 址 | | | | | | 批号 | | | | | | 兰溪市方源食品 | | 浙江省金华市兰溪市兰江街道厚仁胡村 | | 上海市普陀区 | 上海市普陀区 | | 风干五花咸 计量 | | 腊 | 2025- | 过氧化值(以脂肪 | 肉 | | | 1 | 厂；委托商：上海 | | 凤凰路1号；委托商地址：上海市普陀 | | | 骊山路230号底 | | 肉（腌腊肉 | | ...

一次次调研踏遍高原大地，一步步足迹印刻基层一线，一件件提案回应民生期盼，一条条建议转化发展 实效…… 过去一年，全省广大政协委员胸怀"国之大者"，紧扣"省之要事"，建睿智之言、献务实之策。他们的履 职故事里，映照着生态保护的坚守、民生冷暖的牵挂、产业发展的期盼，生动诠释着"为国履职、为民 尽责"的初心，为青海经济社会高质量发展汇聚智慧与力量。 本报记者 余 晖 张晓英 春山在望，征程再启。委员们带着一年来的履职收获与深入思考，正怀着饱满的热情迎来省政协十三届 四次会议的召开，让我们走近部分委员，感受他们的履职心路。 让生态优势成为发展优势 "青海最大的价值在生态、最大的责任在生态、最大的潜力也在生态。"这是省政协委员尤鲁青常念叨的 话。作为深耕自然教育领域多年的引领者，履职四年来，"生态保护"与"绿色发展"始终是她履职的主 题。 从三江源国家公园的冰川湿地到祁连山的森林草原，从西宁的中小学校园到环湖地区的文旅企业，从社 区的科普讲堂到自然保护区的管护站，尤鲁青用脚步丈量生态保护的边界，用行动播撒生态文明的种 子。 "同学们，你们知道吗？每年春天，斑头雁会从南方越冬地飞回到青海湖繁衍后代。它们的迁徙之路， 就是 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving blue particles found in cooked shrimp purchased from Hema raises concerns about food safety, prompting a consumer to seek further testing despite the company's assurances regarding the product's safety [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - A consumer, Ms. Wang, discovered blue particles in a cooked shrimp and contacted Hema's customer service, which attributed the discoloration to factors related to the shrimp's farming environment, claiming it does not affect edibility [1]. - Ms. Wang has retained a sample of the shrimp for testing and Hema has promised to cover costs and follow up if any safety issues are detected [2]. Group 2: Expert Analysis - According to food safety expert Wang Silu, there are three potential reasons for the blue discoloration in cooked shrimp: 1. Related to hemocyanin, where copper ions may not fully detach during cooking, leading to the formation of blue shrimp proteins, which are generally safe to eat [4]. 2. Associated with algae, where high levels of blue-green algae consumed by the shrimp may leave residual blue color, which can be removed by rinsing [4]. 3. Linked to fluorescent bacterial contamination, which is rare and typically accompanied by foul odors and slime, indicating spoilage [4]. - Overall, the most likely cause of the blue color is the oxidation of hemocyanin, which does not pose a safety risk and does not significantly affect the shrimp's nutritional value [5].

Group 1 - The incident involving a blue shrimp purchased online has sparked significant discussion regarding the potential causes of this phenomenon, with various experts attributing it to environmental factors or feed-related issues [1][4][8] - Experts suggest that the blue coloration observed in the shrimp is likely due to a combination of factors, including the shrimp's natural blood color, stress conditions, and possible metabolic differences, rather than chemical contamination [4][7][9] - The occurrence of blue shrimp is not seen as a systemic issue but rather an isolated incident, indicating that it may be linked to specific environmental conditions or individual shrimp health [4][8][9] Group 2 - The importance of scientific communication and public education on food safety has been emphasized, with experts recommending that media and social platforms play a role in disseminating accurate information to counteract misinformation and public panic [11]

Core Viewpoint - Ximai Food, known as "China's Oatmeal First Stock," has been flagged for non-compliance with microbial standards, following a previous incident of excessive mold levels in 2024, raising concerns about its product safety and quality control measures [1][7]. Group 1: Product Quality Issues - Ximai Food's "Middle-aged Nutritional Oatmeal" was found to have unacceptable total bacterial counts, exceeding the national food safety standards during a recent inspection of 2,136 samples, with 40 samples identified as non-compliant [2][4]. - The specific bacterial counts for the oatmeal samples were recorded as 34,000 CFU/g, 49,000 CFU/g, 18,000 CFU/g, 15,000 CFU/g, and 25,000 CFU/g, all surpassing the allowable limits [2][4]. - The company attributed the quality issues to improper management by a distributor, which has since terminated its partnership with Ximai [1][7]. Group 2: Historical Context and Recurrent Issues - This incident follows a previous case in late 2024 where another product, "High-Calcium Milk Oatmeal," was also flagged for excessive mold, with counts significantly exceeding the safety limit [7][8]. - Ximai has faced multiple quality control issues in the past, including a 2019 incident involving "Oatmeal Walnut Powder" due to mold contamination [8]. - The frequency of these quality problems coincides with Ximai's strategic push into the health market, which may undermine consumer trust and impact sales and partnerships [8]. Group 3: Regulatory and Market Implications - The National Market Supervision Administration indicated that such issues may stem from inadequate control over production and processing hygiene, as well as potential problems with packaging and storage conditions [4]. - As Ximai aims to establish a new growth trajectory focused on health products, the ongoing quality concerns could jeopardize its brand value, which is closely tied to food safety [8].

从取样到出结果仅需20分钟，合格名单当场公示，不合格产品立刻下架销毁、溯源追查！执法人员还化 身"科普达人"，手把手教大家辨别新鲜食材、查看餐具洁净度的小技巧，干货满满超实用。 截至目前，活动已覆盖1家农贸市场、4家商超、35家餐饮门店，完成食材抽检150余批次、餐饮具抽检 50余批次，整体合格率100%。接下来，塔城市市场监督管理局将持续加密抽检频次，紧盯节日消费重 点环节，用"零容忍"态度守住安全底线，让大家开开心心采购、安安心心过年，舌尖上的年味，必须安 全又美味！ 作者：塔城市市场监督管理局 袁新亮、蔡路阳 年味越来越足，年货采购、聚餐打卡模式已开启！为给大家的春节餐桌加足"安全buff"，塔城市市场监 督管理局"火力全开"，在全市农贸市场、商超、年夜饭餐厅等重点场所，开展春节前食品安全快速抽检 行动，用"快、准、严"为年味加上"安全锁" 本次抽检直击农贸市场、商超、热门餐厅、火锅店等"烟火气"聚集地，采用"你点我检+随机突袭"模 式，市民想测啥食材，现场就能送检！检测团队带着移动快检设备聚焦节日刚需：蔬菜水果重点查农 残，畜禽肉紧盯瘦肉精，食用油、煎炸油检测酸价和过氧化值，火锅底料筛查亚硝酸盐，餐饮 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent exposure of illegal pesticide practices highlights significant food safety risks in the agricultural sector, driven by profit motives and regulatory gaps [1][2] Group 1: Illegal Pesticide Practices - Farmers are using banned pesticides like Chlorpyrifos due to their effectiveness and low cost, despite knowing the legal implications [1] - Agricultural suppliers are engaging in covert sales of these toxic pesticides, utilizing methods such as repackaging and "familiar supply" to evade regulations [1] Group 2: Regulatory Challenges - The persistence of illegal pesticides indicates shortcomings in the implementation of policies and regulations at the grassroots level, with inadequate oversight in production and market access [1] - There are significant gaps in local regulatory enforcement, market sampling, and inter-regional information sharing, which facilitate the flow of banned pesticides into agricultural fields [1] Group 3: Proposed Solutions - A comprehensive prevention and control system is needed, emphasizing strict monitoring at the source, rigorous management throughout the process, and severe penalties for violations [2] - Authorities should enhance field inspections, upgrade sampling standards, and establish a unified national pesticide regulatory platform for better information sharing [2] - Increasing the costs of violations is essential to deter illegal practices and ensure food safety [2]

Core Viewpoint - The widespread belief that fish heads and skins are highly toxic due to heavy metal accumulation is exaggerated and lacks scientific basis [2][4][13]. Group 1: Scientific Analysis of Heavy Metal Accumulation - Fish heads and skins do not inherently contain toxins; their safety depends on the source and environmental conditions [2][4]. - A study from 2013 indicated that fish heads had the highest mercury content compared to other parts, but the sample size was small and not representative [4]. - The mercury content in fish heads (0.36 mg/kg) is below the national safety limit of ≤0.5 mg/kg, indicating that consumption is safe [4]. Group 2: Regulatory and Safety Measures - The overall mercury levels in aquatic products in China are significantly below national standards, and regular inspections are conducted to ensure safety [6][10]. - Fish sold in reputable markets undergo strict testing for heavy metal content, ensuring compliance with safety regulations [6][10]. Group 3: Recommendations for Consumption - It is advisable to focus on the type of fish, their food chain position, and growth habits rather than solely on specific parts like heads and skins [8][9]. - The dietary guidelines suggest a balanced intake of fish, emphasizing the importance of variety to minimize exposure to potential contaminants [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The food safety rapid inspection conducted by the market supervision bureau in Zhidan County, Shaanxi Province, confirmed that all samples from the Ma Cha farmer's market met food safety standards, focusing on high-frequency consumer items like vegetables and pork [1][2]. Group 1: Inspection Process - The inspection targeted key safety indicators such as pesticide residues in vegetables and clenbuterol in pork [1]. - A professional inspection team was formed, and systematic pre-job training was conducted to ensure staff proficiency in various testing procedures and equipment [1]. Group 2: Community Engagement - The rapid inspection work not only improved the operational skills of the inspectors but also established a communication bridge with the community [1]. - The "you send, I test" service model was actively promoted to enhance public awareness and participation in food safety efforts [1]. Group 3: Future Plans - The Zhidan County market supervision bureau plans to continue strengthening personnel management and improving testing expertise [2]. - There is a focus on normalizing, standardizing, and enhancing the efficiency of food rapid testing to provide reliable technical support for public dietary safety [2].

Core Viewpoint - Big Pizza International Holdings Limited has submitted its IPO application to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, showcasing impressive revenue growth amidst a challenging restaurant industry, but faces significant operational challenges including declining profit margins and food safety issues [2][9]. Revenue and Profitability - In the first three quarters of 2025, Big Pizza achieved a revenue of 1.389 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 66.6% [2] - Despite revenue growth, net profit margins have declined from 5.04% in 2023 to 3.64% in 2024, with a slight recovery to 3.7% in 2025 [4] - The cost of raw materials has increased from 47.1% to 49.1% of revenue, while labor and rent combined exceed 33% [4] Food Safety Issues - Big Pizza has faced multiple food safety complaints, with at least five formal complaints registered in 2025 alone [3] - Complaints include serious health issues and inadequate responses from customer service, indicating weaknesses in the company's food safety management [3][5] - The company's rapid expansion has led to inconsistencies in quality control, particularly in lower-tier cities [3] Store Expansion and Profitability Challenges - The company has opened 387 stores across 127 cities, but faces structural bottlenecks in its single-store profitability model [2][6] - New stores often rely on low pricing strategies, resulting in lower gross margins compared to established locations [6] - Franchise operations contribute to lower overall quality, with franchise stores generating only 28% of revenue but having a gross margin of 32%, compared to 38% for self-operated stores [6] Market Position and Competition - Big Pizza's unique "unlimited self-service pizza" model has seen a decline in consumer interest, with average spending dropping from 70.9 yuan in 2023 to 62.8 yuan in Q3 2025 [7] - The company faces stiff competition from other brands that have more efficient operational models and better profit margins [7] - Big Pizza's attempts to innovate and diversify its offerings have not yielded significant results, with low contributions from new products and delivery services [7] Expansion Plans and Governance Issues - The company plans to open 610 to 790 new stores from 2026 to 2028, aiming for an annual growth rate of over 30% [8] - However, there are concerns about the feasibility of these plans due to a lack of clear strategies for supply chain optimization and franchisee training [8] - Governance issues are highlighted by the concentrated ownership structure, which may hinder effective decision-making and operational oversight [8] Public Perception and IPO Challenges - Recent marketing efforts have been criticized as superficial, leading to a decline in brand reputation [9] - The company may face scrutiny during the IPO process due to frequent food safety complaints and low profit margins, which could impact its valuation and market entry [9]