Core Viewpoint - The introduction of the "Jinhua Two-Headed Black Pig Industry Development Promotion Regulations" aims to enhance the development of the Jinhua Two-Headed Black Pig, also known as the "Chinese Panda Pig," which is essential for producing authentic Jinhua ham, a product with a 1700-year history [1][3][5]. Group 1: Industry Growth Projections - By 2024, the number of breeding sows and market pigs for the Jinhua Two-Headed Black Pig is projected to reach 8,253 and 90,300 respectively, representing year-on-year increases of 33% and 35.4% [3]. - The total industrial output value of the Jinhua Two-Headed Black Pig is expected to exceed 1 billion yuan [3]. - Jinhua ham production is anticipated to reach 4 million pieces, with an industrial output value of 2.3 billion yuan, reflecting year-on-year growth of 14.3% and 15% respectively [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Framework - The regulations consist of 6 chapters and 28 articles, focusing on the protection, inheritance, and institutional development of the industry [5]. - Key provisions include establishing geographical indication protection mechanisms for the Jinhua Two-Headed Black Pig and Jinhua ham, guiding operators in the traditional production process, and standardizing the use of geographical indications [5]. - The regulations also aim to improve the breeding system by combining live breeding and genetic material preservation, and establishing a genetic resource bank for the Jinhua Two-Headed Black Pig [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issues surrounding the use of the geographical indication for Bian embroidery, emphasizing the need for regulatory oversight to protect this traditional craft and its market integrity [1][2][3] Group 1: Issues Identified - Bian embroidery, a traditional Han Chinese embroidery craft, has faced significant market chaos, including counterfeiting and improper use of geographical indications, threatening its heritage status [1] - Investigations revealed that some merchants without the right to use the geographical indication were using forged marks, while others with rights were still using outdated indications, undermining the brand value and healthy development of the industry [2] Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Longting District Procuratorate issued recommendations to relevant departments to enhance regulatory responsibilities and address the illegal use of geographical indications by merchants [2] - Following the recommendations, authorities conducted a comprehensive market inspection, confiscated counterfeit products, and issued rectification notices to merchants using invalid geographical indications [2] Group 3: Long-term Solutions - The Longting District Procuratorate identified that the issues with Bian embroidery's geographical indication were not isolated and reported the situation to the Kaifeng City Procuratorate [3] - A meeting was organized to discuss the protection of Bian embroidery's geographical indication, leading to a six-month special rectification initiative to standardize the authorization of its use [3]

Group 1 - A cultural tourism company in Hangzhou was fined 500,000 yuan for false advertising regarding its Longjing tea, claiming it was from the core production area when it was actually sourced from a different region [2] - The company voluntarily ceased operations and cooperated with the investigation, which contributed to a reduced penalty under local regulations, despite the negative publicity from its actions [2] - The Hangzhou Market Supervision Administration issued a series of administrative enforcement cases related to the protection of the West Lake Longjing geographical indication [2][6] Group 2 - A family farm was fined 100,000 yuan for infringing on the trademark rights of "West Lake Longjing" by using unauthorized packaging to sell its tea [3] - The farm had purchased packaging materials online and sold tea under the "West Lake Longjing" label without permission, leading to a significant amount of sales [3] - Another tea company was found to have multiple unauthorized packaging materials for various Longjing tea brands, which also constituted a violation of trademark laws [4][5]