Group 1 - The Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell emphasized the importance of protecting democracy and academic freedom during his speech at Princeton University's graduation ceremony, directly responding to recent policies from the Trump administration that target higher education [3][4] - Powell described American universities as "critical national assets" and highlighted their role in scientific innovation and economic vitality, urging graduates to actively defend democratic values [3][4] - The ongoing conflict between Powell and Trump has escalated, with Trump criticizing Powell for slow interest rate cuts and suggesting potential legal actions to remove him, despite the Supreme Court ruling that the president cannot unilaterally dismiss the Fed chairman [4] Group 2 - The Federal Reserve is currently maintaining interest rates due to uncertainties surrounding Trump's tariff policies, with Chicago Fed President Charles Evans indicating that any policy adjustments are unlikely until trade war impacts become clearer [4] - Powell's speech is seen as a declaration of defense for institutional integrity, revealing a dual crisis facing the U.S. financial and academic systems: interference in central bank independence threatens monetary policy credibility, while suppression of higher education could undermine national innovation [4]

2025.05. 23 本文字数：1333，阅读时长大约2.5分钟 作者 | 第一财 经 孙卓 当地时间周四（5月22日），美国国土安全部部长诺姆（Kristi Noem）宣布，美国政府将终止哈佛 大学的国际学生和交流访问者项目（SEVP）认证。这意味着，哈佛大学将无法再招收外国学生，现 有数千留学生必须在转学和离开美国之间选择。 根据最新数据， 目前哈佛共有约6800名国际学生，占总学生人数的27%。 针对国土安全部的声明，哈佛大学称此举"违法"，并表示正在努力为学生提供指导。 "我们全力致力于维护哈佛大学接待国际学生和学者的能力，他们来自140多个国家和地区，为哈佛 大学乃至整个国家做出了巨大的贡献。"哈佛大学媒体关系总监牛顿（Jason Newton）表示，"我 们正在迅速行动，为哈佛社区成员提供指导和支持。这一报复性行动可能对哈佛社区和我们的国家造 成严重损害，并损害哈佛大学的学术和研究使命。" 弦外之音 在过去一个月以来，特朗普政府对哈佛的行动不断升级，他们从该校撤回的联邦资金总额已接近30 亿美元。哈佛大学已就此提起诉讼，预计国土安全部本周的最新行动很快会引发第二次法律挑战。 在宣布取消哈佛录取国 ...

Core Points - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced the termination of Harvard University's SEVP certification, affecting approximately 6,800 international students who make up 27% of the total student body [1][2] - Harvard University has labeled the government's action as "illegal" and is working to provide guidance to its students, emphasizing the contributions of international students to the university and the nation [2] - The Trump administration has been escalating actions against Harvard, with nearly $30 billion in federal funding withdrawn, and Harvard is expected to challenge this latest action legally [2][3] Group 1 - The termination of SEVP certification means Harvard cannot enroll foreign students, forcing current international students to choose between transferring or leaving the U.S. [1][2] - Harvard's media relations director stated that the government's actions could severely damage the university's academic and research mission [2] - The government has warned other universities that they could face similar consequences as Harvard if they do not ensure a safe learning environment free from discrimination [2][3] Group 2 - The government cited Harvard's failure to provide detailed records of foreign students, including any misconduct, as the reason for the SEVP certification revocation [3] - A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's attempt to terminate the legal status of international students, indicating potential legal challenges ahead [3] - The Trump administration has targeted Harvard and six other universities for punitive funding cuts, with Harvard facing the most significant impact, including threats to freeze $2.2 billion in long-term funding [4] Group 3 - The Trump administration's actions are seen as part of a broader anti-elite agenda, targeting prestigious universities that often support values opposed by the administration [5] - The administration has criticized Harvard for hiring prominent Democrats in teaching and leadership roles, reflecting a desire for reform in private colleges and schools across the U.S. [5]

酝酿这场暴雨的是特朗普政府。今年1月以来，特朗普政府对多所美国顶尖大学发出威胁，称如果这些 学校不调整政策，将面临削减资金的后果。特朗普政府的主要要求包括打击"校园内的反犹主义"，以及 废除大学内向少数族裔倾斜的多元化举措。 "战火"烧到哈佛是在3月底。今年3月31日，美国教育部、卫生与公众服务部以及美国总务管理局宣布， 将对哈佛大学近90亿美元的联邦合同及拨款进行审查，以确保其履行了"民权责任"。 看到校长艾伦·加伯发出的公开信时，正在哈佛大学就读的中国留学生李思瀚感觉振奋了不少。此前， 受特朗普政府威胁要削减大学资金、撤销国际学生签证等消息影响，哈佛大学校内人心惶惶，尤其是像 李思瀚一样的国际生更是深感不安，不知何时就会突然被要求中断学业。 "任何政府——无论哪个政党执政——都不应规定私立大学可以教授什么课程、可以招收和聘用哪些学 生，以及可以从事哪些研究和探究领域。"4月14日，加伯在公开信中严词拒绝了特朗普政府向哈佛大学 提出的整改要求，称哈佛"不会牺牲其独立性，不会放弃宪法赋予的权利"。 这封公开信在哈佛校内获得了广泛支持。"很明显的感受是，这一次学校内比较团结。"李思瀚对新京报 记者说，"哈佛校内 ...

Core Viewpoint - The departure of Matthias Doepke from Northwestern University highlights the growing concerns among academics regarding the current academic environment in the U.S., particularly under the Trump administration's policies that have increasingly targeted international students and scholars [4][9][18]. Group 1: Academic Environment - Doepke expressed that the academic atmosphere in the U.S. has shifted significantly, with a decline in the welcoming nature towards international students and scholars compared to when he first arrived [8][24]. - The tightening of policies under the Trump administration has led to reduced research funding and stricter scrutiny of international students and faculty, resulting in visa revocations and deportations [9][10][17]. - The uncertainty surrounding visa statuses has created a climate of fear among international scholars, making it difficult for them to pursue academic careers in the U.S. [22][31]. Group 2: Personal Experience and Decision - Doepke, who has lived in the U.S. for over 30 years and became a citizen in 2014, decided to leave due to the current environment not being conducive for raising a family and pursuing research [5][3]. - He has taken a position at the London School of Economics (LSE) and has expressed that many scholars are contemplating leaving the U.S., although practical challenges make it difficult for them to do so quickly [12][30]. - The decision to leave was influenced by a combination of factors, including concerns about the safety of his family and the overall academic culture shifting towards a less supportive environment for scientific exploration [11][16][21]. Group 3: Future Implications - The trend of scholars leaving the U.S. could lead to a significant loss of talent, as many may choose to pursue opportunities in Canada, Europe, or other regions with more favorable academic environments [31][34]. - Doepke noted that the current situation may deter future generations of international students from pursuing their studies in the U.S., as the opportunities that once existed are diminishing [24][25]. - The potential rise of other countries, such as China, as new centers for research and development could reshape the global academic landscape if the U.S. continues to lose its appeal [29].

当地时间5月2日，美国总统特朗普在社交平台发声，宣称将取消哈佛大学的免税资格，直言"这是他们应得的"。这一言论并非空穴来风，而是特朗普政府与 哈佛大学近期激烈冲突的延续，背后折射出诸多复杂的因素，其影响也在持续发酵。 事情的导火索要追溯到2025年4月11日，特朗普政府官员向哈佛大学致信，提出一系列颇为强硬的要求。 他们希望学校进行"有意义的治理改革与重组"，具体包括削弱学生和教职员工在校务中的权力；摒弃现有的一些招生和招聘理念，实施基于能力的招聘和录 取政策，停止一切基于种族、肤色和国籍等因素的优待；改革国际学生的招生流程，避免录取所谓敌视美国价值观和制度的学生，诸如支持恐怖主义或反犹 主义的学生；甚至要求关闭所有与 "多元化、公平与包容" 政策相关的项目。 面对特朗普政府近乎"干涉内政"的要求，哈佛校方在4月14日果断拒绝，哈佛大学校长艾伦・M・加伯在向全校人员发出的公开信中坚定表示，"不会牺牲其 独立性，不会放弃宪法赋予的权利"，明确指出联邦政府无权对私立大学的教学内容、招生和人事政策以及研究内容指手画脚。 几小时后，美国政府迅速采取报复措施，宣布冻结给哈佛的 22 亿美元拨款和 6000 万美元项目合 ...