《意见》共23条，涉及总体要求、投资者保护、市场参与人规范、司法行政协同及组织实施保障等方 面，旨在严格公正执法司法，保障资本市场改革发展。 高质量信息披露是注册制的重要基础。为让投资者放心投资，《意见》明确，监管部门要进一步加大对 欺诈发行和持续信息披露造假的日常监管与稽查处罚力度，从严从快查处各类造假行为，强化与司法机 关在信息共享、案件办理等方面的协作，推动强化行政、民事、刑事立体追责。 对于引领净化资本市场生态，《意见》提出，依法打击编传虚假信息、"维权黑产"、发行上市环节不正 当竞争等干扰市场正常运行、扰乱资本市场秩序的违法行为，形成风清气正的市场生态。对于通过编 传"小作文"等虚假信息扰乱市场秩序、损害他人权益的行为，受害人提起民事诉讼要求损害赔偿的，人 民法院依法予以支持；构成犯罪的，依法追究刑事责任。 《意见》还称，研究制定资本市场法律域外适用司法文件，为审理跨境证券期货纠纷案件统一裁判尺 度，平等保护境内外投资者合法权益。 15日，中国最高人民法院、证监会联合发布《关于严格公正执法司法服务保障资本市场高质量发展的指 导意见》(下称《意见》)。 其中明确，聚焦投资者权益保护，优化市场生态。《意 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the release of the "Guiding Opinions" by the Supreme People's Court and the China Securities Regulatory Commission, aimed at enhancing investor protection and ensuring the high-quality development of the capital market through judicial and administrative collaboration [1][2]. Group 1: Investor Rights Protection - The "Guiding Opinions" emphasize the need to strengthen investor protection awareness, ensuring investors' rights to information, participation in corporate governance, fair market participation, and reasonable returns [2][4]. - It proposes measures to enhance the quality of listed companies and to facilitate the resolution of securities disputes through representative litigation [2][6]. - The document outlines the importance of increasing the costs of illegal activities, such as fraud and financial disclosure violations, to deter such behaviors [2][5]. Group 2: Multi-level Capital Market Construction - The "Guiding Opinions" call for the regulation of securities, futures, and fund management institutions to prevent regulatory arbitrage and promote stable operations [2][3]. - It aims to improve the judicial rules of the multi-level capital market and support self-regulatory organizations in fulfilling their responsibilities [2][3]. Group 3: Judicial Rule Improvement - The document highlights the need for high-quality judicial execution to support the capital market's development, including clarifying existing judicial interpretations and establishing new ones where necessary [3][4]. - It emphasizes the importance of a "zero tolerance" approach to capital market violations, integrating criminal, civil, and administrative penalties [3][4]. Group 4: Judicial Regulatory Collaboration - The "Guiding Opinions" advocate for the establishment of a comprehensive judicial protection mechanism and the enhancement of multi-faceted dispute resolution mechanisms [3][4]. - It stresses the importance of information sharing and collaboration between judicial and regulatory bodies to improve investor protection [3][4].

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes its role in combating securities crimes and protecting investors' rights, highlighting collaboration with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) [1] - The focus will be on increasing the punishment for key areas of securities crimes to maintain market order and enhance the responsibilities of major stakeholders, including controlling shareholders and financial institutions [1] - The procuratorial authority aims to create a law-based market environment through effective case handling and comprehensive accountability [1] Group 2 - Efforts will be made to recover losses for investors through various means, including pursuing criminal proceeds and supporting representative litigation for securities disputes [2] - The implementation of a dual investigation approach will be adopted to uncover money laundering and other related crimes, encouraging involved parties to return stolen assets [2] - The procuratorial authority will enhance investor education and promote industry governance by analyzing new issues in securities issuance and trading, and by issuing legal recommendations [2]

二是规范审计委员会组织运作。其一，明确审计委员会组成。审计委员会由三名以上不在公司担任高级 管理人员的董事组成，其中独立董事应当过半数。其二，完善审计委员会议事规则。例如，每季度至少 召开一次会议，须有三分之二以上成员出席方可举行，实行一人一票，决议应当经审计委员会成员过半 数通过等。其三，明确审计委员会成员离任管理相关规定。除另有规定外，审计委员会成员辞职导致低 于法定最低人数或者欠缺担任召集人的会计专业人士的，在新成员就任前，原成员仍应依规履职。 三是强化"关键少数"责任和股东权利保障。其一，规范关联董事回避表决相关要求。在审议关联交易事 项时，关联董事应当回避表决，其表决权不计入表决权总数。其二，强化"双控人"质押行为规范。控股 股东、实际控制人质押公司股票的，应当维持公司控制权和生产经营稳定。其三，保障中小股东临时提 案权。将临时提案股东持股比例由3%降低至1%，同时规定公司不得提高临时提案股东的持股比例。 四是完善公司内部审计相关要求。其一，明确公司内部审计制度应当经董事会审议并对外披露。其二， 强化内部审计机构报告要求。内部审计机构发现公司重大问题或线索时，应当立即向审计委员会报告。 其三，明确内 ...

21世纪经济报道记者 郭聪聪 北京报道 在资本市场发展的进程中，投资者权益保护始终是维护市场公平正义的重要基石。2025年5月15日全国 投资者保护宣传日当天，北京金融法院发布10起投资者保护典型案例，其中三起案例聚焦资管行业与信 息披露领域的核心争议，通过司法实践明晰责任边界、统一裁判尺度。 这三起案例分别指向资管产品管理人未履行勤勉义务、上市公司信息披露"失守"、实控人操纵关联交易 未披露等典型问题。北京金融法院通过这一系列案例，以司法裁判倒逼市场主体归位尽责，筑牢投资者 权益保护防线，为推动资本市场规范健康发展提供了有力的法治支撑。 资管管理人未尽"勤勉义务"被判担责40%，法院确立"六步审查法" 2017年，某投资者认购某基金公司管理的契约型基金产品，投资100万元。因投资标的公司违约，基金 未能兑付。投资者认为，基金公司未充分履行尽职调查义务，既未核实标的公司合作协议的实际履行情 况，也未发现标的公司应收账款质押存在在先登记冲突，导致其无法优先受偿，遂将基金公司诉至法 院，要求赔偿全部本金及利息损失。 法院指出，本案中，尽管上市公司实际控制人存在刻意隐瞒关联关系、掩盖关联交易的行为，但根据证 券法第 ...

最高法、证监会发布《关于严格公正执法司法 服务保障资本市场高质量发展的指导意见》提出，便利 投资者依法维护自身合法权益。大力开展证券审判信息化建设，积极应用人民法院在线服务等平台，为 投资者维权提供在线立案、举证、调解、庭审等服务，便利投资者诉讼维权。探索推广人民法院投资者 司法保护综合平台的应用，便利投资者及时了解诉讼进程并行使相关诉讼权利。引导使用表格化、要素 式民事起诉状、答辩状示范文本，提高解纷质效。研究制定示范判决工作指引，提升"示范判决+平行 案件处理"机制的规范化水平。依法支持相关市场机构与个人运用先行赔付、行政执法当事人承诺等制 度工具及时向投资者进行赔偿。优化代表人诉讼运行机制，便利投资者通过集约化方式解决证券纠纷矛 盾。畅通先行赔付主体通过诉讼程序向其他责任人追偿渠道，提升相关主体先行赔付的意愿。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of judicial and administrative collaboration to support the high-quality development of the capital market, highlighting the need for improved investor protection and regulatory frameworks [3][4]. Group 1: Overall Requirements - The guiding ideology is based on Xi Jinping's thoughts, focusing on the implementation of the 20th National Congress decisions regarding financial and capital market construction [4]. - The goal is to enhance the collaborative role of judicial adjudication and securities regulation, improving the judicial protection mechanism and regulatory capabilities [4][5]. Group 2: Investor Protection - There is a strong focus on protecting investor rights, particularly for small and medium investors, ensuring their rights to information, participation in governance, and fair market participation [5][8]. - The article calls for the establishment of a robust judicial environment for long-term investments, promoting a healthy market ecosystem [8][9]. Group 3: Judicial Rule Improvement - The need for continuous improvement of judicial rules to adapt to changing market conditions is highlighted, including the development of judicial interpretations for insider trading and market manipulation [6][10]. - The article stresses the importance of high-quality adjudication in enhancing the capital market's development [6][10]. Group 4: Regulatory Collaboration - The establishment of a multi-faceted dispute resolution mechanism is proposed to facilitate non-litigation methods for resolving securities disputes [21][22]. - Strengthening information sharing and collaboration between judicial and regulatory bodies is emphasized to enhance risk prevention and response capabilities [23][24]. Group 5: Market Participant Regulation - The article outlines the need for strict regulation of securities, futures, and fund management institutions to ensure their stable operation and protect investor interests [15][16]. - It emphasizes the importance of adhering to appropriate management responsibilities and ensuring compliance with legal standards in financial transactions [15][16]. Group 6: Enhancing Judicial and Regulatory Capacity - The article calls for strengthening the training and professional development of financial judges and regulatory personnel to improve their understanding of financial markets and legal frameworks [26]. - It highlights the importance of maintaining a clean and accountable judicial and regulatory environment to ensure fair enforcement of laws [26].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the release of ten typical cases of diversified resolution of securities disputes by the Shanghai Financial Court and the China Securities Investor Services Center, aimed at protecting the rights of small and medium investors and promoting high-quality development of the capital market [4]. Group 1: Typical Cases and Their Significance - The ten cases highlight the importance of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms, emphasizing collaboration among courts, investor protection agencies, and mediation organizations to efficiently resolve collective disputes [4]. - The first case of special representative litigation in China showcases the court's commitment to holding companies accountable for securities fraud, resulting in a compensation of 285 million yuan for 7,195 eligible investors [7][8]. - The first case of a shareholder derivative lawsuit initiated by an investor protection agency demonstrates the effectiveness of holding key stakeholders accountable, leading to full compensation for the company’s losses [12]. Group 2: Innovative Resolution Mechanisms - The introduction of a comprehensive pre-litigation mediation commitment mechanism by the Shanghai Financial Court has significantly improved the efficiency of resolving disputes involving large private enterprises, achieving a 92% settlement rate [18]. - The use of a "demonstration judgment + professional mediation + judicial confirmation" mechanism in resolving disputes involving state-owned enterprises has resulted in a 98% settlement rate, showcasing the effectiveness of collaborative approaches [21]. - The integration of digital tools in resolving disputes involving delisted companies has led to an 85% resolution rate, balancing investor protection with the operational stability of companies [30]. Group 3: Cross-Regional Collaboration - The cross-regional collaboration in resolving disputes involving companies listed on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board has set a precedent for using demonstration mediation mechanisms, resulting in all 23 cases being resolved without entering litigation [23]. - The successful resolution of securities market manipulation disputes in the New Third Board through a dual-track mediation approach has established clear compensation rules and enhanced investor confidence [33].

Core Viewpoint - Major commercial banks, including Citic Bank, have raised the risk ratings of their fund distribution products to better protect investors' rights, with Citic Bank's adjustment being the largest in the industry to date [1][3]. Group 1: Citic Bank's Actions - Citic Bank announced an increase in the risk ratings of 158 asset management products, effective from May 12, 2025, marking the highest number of products adjusted in a single batch [2][3]. - The risk ratings of several funds were raised, with some products moving from PR3 (medium risk) to PR4 (higher risk), and one product being upgraded from PR2 (lower risk) to PR4 [3]. - The adjustments are in response to regulatory requirements aimed at enhancing investor suitability management and protecting investor rights [2][3]. Group 2: Industry Trends - Other banks, such as China Construction Bank and Minsheng Bank, have also raised risk ratings for their fund distribution products earlier this year, indicating a broader trend in the banking industry [4][5]. - Minsheng Bank adjusted the risk rating of a specific fund to "medium risk" on January 10, 2025, while China Construction Bank made similar adjustments to 21 funds in February 2025 [4].

■桂小笋 首先，监管部门可进一步强化规则执行力度，对于未按时披露年报等信息披露违规行为，严格按照相关法律法规进行惩 处，绝不姑息。 根据相关规定，若上市公司未在法定期限内披露年度报告，且在公司股票停牌两个月内仍未披露，将被实施退市风险警 示。在这个过程中，监管部门可进一步加强对上市公司的日常监管，建立动态监管高频交易数据机制，对异常交易行为实施实 时监控与预警，防止中小股东利益受损。 其次，公司要提升自身治理水平，完善治理结构，建立健全内部监督机制，确保决策的科学性和公正性。 5月7日，恒立实业发展集团股份有限公司、福建紫天传媒科技股份有限公司等5家上市公司发布公告称，因未按规定期限 披露定期报告，中国证监会决定对公司进行立案。 事实上，上市公司未如期披露定期报告可能基于多种原因。有些公司因未聘请审计机构或临时更换审计机构导致无法出具 年报；有些公司则是在年报编制及审计过程中，涉及财务信息等相关重要事项未能完成核实查证程序，需与相关方进行多轮协 调沟通，导致定期报告逾期。但无论是哪种原因，都反映出这些公司在内部治理、财务管理以及与审计机构合作等方面存在缺 陷和不足。而这也可能导致投资者无法获取准确信息，影响信 ...