对于高市的修宪图谋，中道改革联合（由立宪民主党和公明党组建的新党）的联合党首野田佳彦2日 称："我将坚持'无核三原则'，必须建设不再度引发战争、不被卷入战争的国家。" 隶属日本共产党的东京都北区议员山崎泰子3日发文批评称，若自民党赢得选举多数席位，将强行推进 军事大规模扩张、重新审视"无核三原则"并修改宪法。她呼吁道："是时候正视自民党的违宪政治路线 了，他们竟然容忍解禁集体自卫权的行为，我们必须采取以宪法为基础、守护和平与人权民生的政治立 场。" 中国国际问题研究院亚太所特聘研究员项昊宇3日告诉《环球时报》记者，高市此时重提修宪，意在为 其政治议程寻求突破口，虽然修宪本身属于日本内政范畴，但其外溢效应值得警惕，日本右翼势力可能 基于错误历史认知，借修宪之机突破战后国际秩序约束，冲击军事安全禁区，进而破坏地区和平稳定。 项昊宇说，无论日本选择何种路径，最终都将自行承担相应后果，"中国有信心、有能力维护自身安全 与地区稳定，不惧任何挑战"。 【环球时报报道 记者 徐可越 王辉】日本第51届众议院选举将于本月8日投计票。据《日本经济新闻》2 日报道，日本首相、自民党总裁高市早苗当日明确表达修改宪法、将自卫队写入条 ...

Core Viewpoint - The upcoming Japanese House of Representatives election on February 8, 2024, is critical for Prime Minister Sanna Takichi, who has threatened to resign if her ruling coalition fails to secure a majority. The election is marked by declining public support for her government and the emergence of a new party, the "Center Reform Coalition," which poses a challenge to the ruling alliance [1][2]. Group 1: Public Support and Political Scandals - Prime Minister Takichi's approval ratings have significantly dropped, with a 10% decrease to 57% according to the Mainichi Shimbun, and an 8-point decline to 67% as per the Nikkei [1][2]. - A majority of voters, approximately 41%, disapprove of Takichi's decision to dissolve the House of Representatives, indicating public dissatisfaction with her focus on party interests over citizen welfare [1]. - The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) has faced backlash due to a political funding scandal, with around 80% of respondents believing the party has not resolved issues related to "politics and money" [2]. Group 2: Election Dynamics and Party Strategies - The newly formed "Center Reform Coalition," comprising the Constitutional Democratic Party and Komeito, aims to challenge the ruling coalition by focusing on rational and realistic policies, contrasting with the conservative stance of Takichi's government [3][4]. - The LDP's campaign includes promises to enhance national defense, with plans to revise security documents and increase defense spending to over 2% of GDP, while the Japan Innovation Party supports even more aggressive defense policies [3]. - The LDP's support rate stands at 42%, which is not sufficient to guarantee a majority in the upcoming election, as historical data suggests that high cabinet approval ratings do not necessarily translate into party support [6][7]. Group 3: Voter Behavior and Election Outcomes - The election landscape shows that 40% of respondents support the ruling coalition, while 22.8% back the opposition, with a significant 34.9% undecided, indicating a competitive electoral environment [7]. - The Constitutional Democratic Party has gained traction among middle voters, increasing its seats from 99 to 148, while the LDP lost 56 seats, marking a significant shift in the political landscape [7]. - Takichi's strategy of threatening resignation in case of electoral failure is seen as an attempt to galvanize support for the LDP amidst rising competition from the opposition [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the protests from Hiroshima atomic bomb victim groups against Japanese Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide's administration regarding the reconsideration of Japan's "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and the implications for nuclear disarmament [1] Group 1: Government Actions and Reactions - Prime Minister Suga has indicated a willingness to reassess the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," which has raised concerns among atomic bomb survivors [1] - The Hiroshima atomic bomb victim group leader, Tomonori Kimimori, emphasized the need for Japan to adhere to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, criticizing Japan's reliance on the U.S. nuclear umbrella [1] - Following Suga's appointment, there have been actions contrary to nuclear disarmament, including statements from government officials suggesting Japan should possess nuclear weapons [1] Group 2: Public Sentiment and Concerns - Concerns have been voiced regarding the potential impact of the upcoming House of Representatives election on Japan's security policy, with fears that it may lead to significant changes [1] - A local resident expressed that visiting the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum influenced their perspective against advocating for nuclear weapons [1]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's intention to modify the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" poses a significant challenge to global nuclear non-proliferation and could lead to increased nuclear proliferation risks, undermining world peace [1][3]. Group 1: Japan's Nuclear Policy Shift - Japan's historical narrative has often portrayed itself as a "nuclear victim," neglecting its past as a "nuclear aggressor" during World War II, where it pursued atomic bomb research in competition with the US and UK [1]. - Recent statements from Japanese officials about potentially revising the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and considering nuclear submarines indicate a shift in Japan's security strategy, moving the nuclear option into public political discourse [1][2]. Group 2: Strategic Objectives Behind the Shift - The push for nuclear policy discussions aims to weaken post-war constraints and accumulate political capital for Japan's ambition to become a "military power" [2]. - By gauging public and international reactions to nuclear armament discussions, Japanese politicians are testing the boundaries of policy changes and preparing for future revisions [2]. - Japan seeks to enhance its autonomous deterrence capabilities and redefine its role within the US-Japan alliance, viewing nuclear armament as a means to reduce dependency on allies [2]. - The intention to strengthen military capabilities in the Taiwan Strait and East China Sea reflects Japan's strategy to exert pressure on neighboring countries and improve its position in regional power dynamics [2]. Group 3: Historical Context and Responsibilities - The "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" were established as a national policy reflecting Japan's remorse for wartime actions and its commitment to peace, rooted in the painful memories of Hiroshima and Nagasaki [3]. - Modifying these principles would undermine Japan's historical responsibilities and commitments to its neighbors, posing a serious threat to regional stability and peace [3]. - The international community must remain vigilant against Japan's potential return to nuclear armament and the resurgence of militarism, which could jeopardize the welfare of the region [3].

Core Viewpoint - Japan's recent political discourse indicates a potential shift towards nuclear armament, challenging its post-war pacifist stance and raising concerns about regional security and global nuclear non-proliferation efforts [1][3]. Group 1: Japan's Military Aspirations - The right-wing factions in Japan are pushing for a re-evaluation of the post-war military constraints, aiming to accumulate political capital for amending the "Peace Constitution" and establishing Japan as a "military power" [2]. - Discussions surrounding nuclear policy are intended to weaken the post-war system's restrictions, indicating a desire for military expansion [2]. Group 2: Testing Policy Boundaries - Japanese politicians are using provocative statements about nuclear armament to gauge domestic and international reactions, assessing the feasibility and resistance to nuclear armament for future policy adjustments [2]. - This strategy serves as a means to prepare public opinion for potential policy changes regarding nuclear capabilities [2]. Group 3: Enhancing Deterrence and Alliance Dynamics - Japan views "self-reliant nuclear capabilities" as a way to reduce dependence on its alliance with the United States and to enhance its own deterrent power [2]. - There is a desire among Japanese right-wing factions to increase their role in nuclear discussions within the alliance, thereby improving their bargaining power in the nuclear deterrence framework [2]. Group 4: Strategic Pressure on Neighbors - Japan aims to strengthen its military deterrence capabilities in the Taiwan Strait, East China Sea, and surrounding areas to influence the strategic calculations and actions of neighboring countries [2]. - This approach seeks to position Japan more favorably within the regional power dynamics [2]. Group 5: Implications of Revising the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" - The potential modification of Japan's "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" poses a significant challenge to the global nuclear non-proliferation framework and could destabilize international peace [3]. - Upholding the integrity of these principles is seen as Japan's responsibility towards history, regional stability, and future generations [3].

新党"中道改革联合"主张坚持无核三原则,推行务实的外交与防卫政策。日媒披露,高市正企图在修订 《国家安全保障战略》等"安保三文件"时,修改无核三原则中的不引进核武器原则,引发日本国内强烈担 忧。"中道改革联合"的这一主张,直指高市政权引发最大争议的"爆点"。 日本首相高市早苗23日宣布解散众议院,定于2月8日举行大选。高市表示,若自民党与日本维新会组成的 执政联盟未赢得过半数议席,她将辞去首相职务。分析人士认为,高市这场"豪赌"的主要目的是想借当前 较高支持率重新成为多数派执政党,彻底摆脱在野党在国会的掣肘。表面来看,高市的胜算很大,但立宪民 主党与公明党组建新党"中道改革联合"投入选战,无疑会搅乱既有格局,为选举带来很大变数。 主笔 赵世峰 在野党针锋相对 23日原本是日本国会例会开幕的日子。按照惯例,国会例会的一项重要议程是在4月1日新财年开始前审 议并通过预算案。高市此时解散众议院,审议预算案的正常程序将被大幅拖延,给日本政治和民生带来不 确定性,引发在野党和部分媒体批评,指责其"只顾党派私利、滥用解散权"。就连极右翼的参政党干事长 安藤裕也表示,"此时解散(众议院)极为罕见,政府无视预算与经济风险的做 ...

有日本方面消息称，日本政府企图在修订"安保三文件"时，对"无核三原则"中不运进核武器的原则进行 修改。此举引发日本各界强烈担忧。日本长崎市议会和广岛市议会分别于本月8日和9日通过意见书，要 求日本政府坚持"无核三原则"。 据央视新闻消息，日本执政党自民党21日公布众议院选举竞选承诺，其中包括修订"安保三文件"、放宽 武器出口限制、修改宪法等内容。 自民党公布的竞选承诺围绕经济、地方、外交与安全保障、社会保障、修改宪法5个方面展开。在外交 与安全保障方面，包括修订《国家安全保障战略》在内的"安保三文件"、取消对武器出口的5种类型限 制、设立国家情报局和对外情报机关等。 日本首相高市早苗19日在记者会上宣布，将于23日解散众议院，2月8日举行众议院选举。 ...

日本首相高市早苗19日在记者会上宣布，将于23日解散众议院，2月8日举行众议院选举。（央视新闻） 自民党公布的竞选承诺围绕经济、地方、外交与安全保障、社会保障、修改宪法5个方面展开。在外交 与安全保障方面，包括修订《国家安全保障战略》在内的"安保三文件"、取消对武器出口的5种类型限 制、设立国家情报局和对外情报机关等。 有日本方面消息称，日本政府企图在修订"安保三文件"时，对"无核三原则"中不运进核武器的原则进行 修改。此举引发日本各界强烈担忧。日本长崎市议会和广岛市议会分别于本月8日和9日通过意见书，要 求日本政府坚持"无核三原则"。 日本执政党自民党1月21日公布众议院选举竞选承诺，其中包括修订"安保三文件"、放宽武器出口限 制、修改宪法等内容。 ...

Group 1 - The ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) of Japan announced its campaign promises for the upcoming House of Representatives election, focusing on five areas: economy, local issues, foreign and security policy, social security, and constitutional amendments [1] - In the area of foreign and security policy, the LDP's commitments include revising the "three security documents," easing restrictions on weapon exports, establishing a national intelligence agency, and an external intelligence organization [1] - Reports indicate that the Japanese government aims to amend the "three non-nuclear principles," particularly the principle prohibiting the introduction of nuclear weapons, which has raised significant concerns among various sectors in Japan [1] Group 2 - Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi announced the dissolution of the House of Representatives on January 23, with elections scheduled for February 8 [2]

Group 1 - Local residents in Niigata Prefecture are strongly opposed to Tokyo Electric Power Company's (TEPCO) plan to restart aging nuclear power plants, citing safety concerns due to the company's history of scandals and management issues [1][2] - Concerns were raised about the uncertainty surrounding the operation of the No. 6 reactor, with a member of a local civic group stating that TEPCO's assurances were not definitive, indicating a 99% certainty but leaving 1% unclear [1] - Residents express distrust in TEPCO's ability to manage nuclear safety, referencing the Fukushima disaster and questioning why the company is allowed to continue operations despite its past failures [1] Group 2 - There is significant public concern regarding the Japanese government's attempts to amend the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," which include not possessing, producing, or allowing nuclear weapons [3] - Local civic group members emphasize the historical context of nuclear weapon use in Japan, arguing that the government should take clear responsibility for nuclear issues and maintain its commitment to the non-nuclear stance [3] - The proposal to potentially possess nuclear weapons has raised serious doubts among residents, who firmly believe that Japan must adhere to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [3]