2025年12月13日，是第十二个南京大屠杀死难者国家公祭日。我们以国之名祭奠在侵华日军惨绝人寰的 屠杀中死难的30万同胞。南京城上空再度响起警报声，同时敲响的还有警惕日本军国主义死灰复燃的警 钟。我们隆重纪念这个日子，不是为了延续仇恨，而是为了照亮历史真相，守护来之不易的和平。 当年，日本军国主义以"存亡危机事态"为幌子，悍然发动侵华战争。日军攻陷南京后，实施了长达6周 的屠杀与暴行，制造了人类文明史上最黑暗的一页。30万生灵惨遭屠戮，秦淮河水赤溢，六朝古都沦为 人间炼狱。历史真相铁证如山，远东国际军事法庭和南京审判战犯军事法庭的判决早已将日军暴行钉在 历史的耻辱柱上。88年过去了，南京从昔日的断壁残垣上建起繁华都市，当年的幸存者逐渐逝去，但历 史记忆不容忘却。 审核 | 周扬 编辑 | 徐璐明 校对 | 于泽淼 缅怀逝者，铭记历史，同样重要的是警示现实。日本正在以战后前所未有的规模和力度加快强军扩武， 防卫费连续13年上涨，进攻性武器被大肆部署，基于和平宪法的"专守防卫"原则早已名存实亡。甚至， 日本领导人重拾"存亡危机事态"谬论，公然发表涉台错误言论。这种在军事扩张道路上的狂奔，很难不 让人联想到上世纪 ...

针对日本首相高市早苗在国会发表的涉台错误言论，近日，国际社会多方人士予以强烈批评。各方指出，此类表述无视历史与 事实，向外界释放不稳定信号，破坏地区和平与安全。 中网 狗闻 润 WWW.CHINANEWS.COM. FAT - CA 日本資和高市早苗的 涉台错误言论具有煽动性。 日本可能希望通过展示'强硬姿态' 提升自己在特朗普政府眼中的价值, ttp from 1 赵定一种非吊尼应的束哈。 日方的错误言论非常危险, 我认为日方应三思而后行。 网 狗万 提 WWW.CHINANEWS.COM.CN 刚果(布)议员 国达尔·穆斯· 我们反对日本首相发表的言论。 这是日本企图 复活军国主义的信号。 历史上,日军暴行给世界多国, 特别是亚洲国家带来了巨大灾难。 网 利用 短 WWW.CHINANEWS.COM.CN 巴西米纳斯吉拉斯天主教大学教授 4: HTT. TTE 我们现在看到,局势非常复杂而危险。 日本首相的错误言论 已经违反了国际法, 因为这是在干涉他国内政。 极端情况下的结果甚至会导致战争, 我们不能排除这种可能性。 网 利用键 WWW.CHINANEWS.COM 斯洛伐克总理前顾问 政治和媒体分析家 ...

高大伟认为这场危机"绝不能升级"。他强调，未来关键在于高市能否证明自己"配得上领袖的位置"，因 为"真正的领袖不是制造分裂，而是把人民和国家团结起来"。(完) 在谈及安全问题时，高大伟认为高市在核问题上的表态"完全不可接受"。他认为，当今世界需要共同应 对核扩散，如果日本出现任何支持核扩散的倾向，都将是一种"巨大的、悲剧性的讽刺"，因为"日本民 众自己曾是两枚核弹的受害者"。 高大伟强调，高市的言论唤起国际社会尤其是中国人对于过去惨痛历史的记忆。他指出，高市对历史持 有一种修正主义执念，她和日本社会的极右翼势力相勾连，试图忘却和漠视日本曾经的侵略史。"这样 下去，日本将面临重复军国主义覆辙的风险，而这种错误，会让世界面临着历史悲剧重演的风险"，他 说。 高大伟指出，二十世纪三十年代，日本军国主义达到顶峰，将东亚拖入了一场深重灾难。日本自身也经 历了"广岛和长崎的噩梦"。他援引德国和自己的国家法国为例，指出法德之所以能够在二战后实现和 解，是因为德国选择正视历史，"而日本出于某些原因，承认自己错误的过程与德国不同"。因此，高大 伟担忧，中日关系可能"再次陷入过去的风险"。 中新网12月11日电(张嘉豪)全球事务 ...

近期，欧洲舆论注意到，同为二战策源地与战败国，日本与德国在历史认知与态度上形成了鲜明反差。德国致力于铭记昔日战争罪责，努力弥补对他国造成 的历史创伤，与地区国家推进欧洲一体化进程。日本则在右翼力量裹挟下，刻意回避和模糊战争罪行，企图切割历史责任，尤其是近期日本首相高市早苗发 表涉台错误言论且拒绝悔改。一些欧洲媒体和分析人士认为，这会对亚洲地区的稳定造成负面影响，应该引发地区国家和国际社会高度警惕。 0:00 2015年，时任德国总理默克尔访问日本时，向时任日本首相安倍晋三强调正视历史"是实现战后和解的前提"。当时欧洲媒体就此评论："默克尔给安倍晋三 上了历史课"。而现任日本首相高市早苗自诩"安倍路线"继承者，其在历史认知上的"黑历史"早就被欧洲媒体和学者所知。 英国《独立报》近期在报道中提到，高市曾与纳粹支持者、"日本国家社会主义工人党"头目山田一成合影。波兰"防务24"网站认为，高市曾多次参拜供奉二 战甲级战犯的靖国神社，质疑反省侵略历史的"村山谈话"，其历史修正主义倾向会损害日本在西方国家眼中的信誉。 一些欧洲媒体和分析人士也认为，高市的一系列言行会影响地区和平稳定，值得国际社会警惕。德国《世界报》刊文称 ...

一些欧洲媒体和分析人士也认为，高市的一系列言行会影响地区和平稳定，值得国际社会警惕。德国《世界报》刊文称，高 市否认侵略、美化战争的错误史观，代表的是"一个跌回旧秩序的日本"。斯洛伐克中欧亚洲研究所学者罗伯特·万塞尔撰文指出， 高市"对日本战争历史持修正主义立场"，模糊日本发动"侵略战争"的历史，这会对亚洲地区的稳定造成负面影响。 2015年，时任德国总理默克尔访问日本时，向时任日本首相安倍晋三强调正视历史"是实现战后和解的前提"。当时欧洲媒体 就此评论："默克尔给安倍晋三上了历史课"。而现任日本首相高市早苗自诩"安倍路线"继承者，其在历史认知上的"黑历史"早就被 欧洲媒体和学者所知。英国《独立报》近期在报道中提到，高市曾与纳粹支持者、"日本国家社会主义工人党"头目山田一成合 影。波兰"防务24"网站认为，高市曾多次参拜供奉二战甲级战犯的靖国神社，质疑反省侵略历史的"村山谈话"，其历史修正主义 倾向会损害日本在西方国家眼中的信誉。 央视网消息：欧洲舆论注意到，同为二战策源地与战败国，日本与德国在历史认知与态度上形成了鲜明反差。德国致力于铭 记昔日战争罪责，努力弥补对他国造成的历史创伤，与地区国家推进欧洲一体化 ...

日本借台湾问题生事，谋求成为军事大国，严重冲击《联合国宪章》《波茨坦公告》等确立的战后国际 秩序，冲击东亚安全，加剧地区安全困境。《联合国宪章》规定的"集体自卫权"是为维护国际社会集体 安全、防止法西斯势力复活而创设的权利。战后东亚安全的关键安排之一就是基于战后国际秩序确立日 本走和平主义路线，限制日本行使集体自卫权。而对二战侵略历史并未深刻反省的日本藐视国际法义 务，擅自以内阁决议的形式解禁集体自卫权，大幅调整安保政策，加速扩增防卫预算，放宽武器出口限 制，图谋放弃"无核三原则"，谋求发展进攻性武器，在强军扩武的错误道路上越走越远。高市政权蓄意 打破日本自卫队淡化军事色彩的惯例，拟恢复"大佐"等部分旧日本军队的军阶用语，意图复活军国主 义。日方的做法升高地区冲突风险，成为破坏地区和平稳定的重大风险源。 台湾问题不是日本可以随意摆弄的"战略筹码"，更不能成为日本用以对外军事扩张的借口。历史上，日 本军国主义多次以所谓"存亡危机"和"紧急自卫"为谎言发动对外侵略战争，包括1931年对中国发起的九 一八事变和1941年对美国发起的袭击珍珠港事件。如今，高市政权执念历史修正主义，抛弃战败历史教 训，重拾军国主义扩张 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's recent remarks regarding Taiwan may indicate a potential military intervention, which has raised concerns about Japan's diplomatic relations with China [1][2]. Group 1: Political Context - The influence of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) is declining, with no majority in both houses of the Diet, leading to Prime Minister Kishida's attempts to solidify support among conservative factions [1]. - The coalition between the LDP and Komeito has weakened, with Komeito exiting due to disagreements over political funding reforms, resulting in a more right-leaning government [2]. Group 2: Historical Perspective - Historically, Japanese Prime Ministers have avoided discussing the possibility of war, reflecting a national memory of past conflicts, which is now being challenged by Kishida's administration [3]. - The 1995 Murayama Statement acknowledged Japan's colonial history and expressed remorse, a sentiment that remains significant among the Japanese populace [3][4]. Group 3: Public Sentiment and Future Implications - There is a strong desire among the Japanese public for peace and stable relations with China, contrasting with the current government's aggressive stance [4]. - The potential for political instability is heightened as Kishida prioritizes short-term gains to appease conservative supporters, risking long-term consequences for Japan's political landscape [4].

Group 1 - The article criticizes Japanese Prime Minister Kishi's remarks linking Taiwan's situation to Japan's survival crisis, suggesting that such statements are erroneous and exacerbate existing issues [2][3]. - It emphasizes that there is only one China and that Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, supported by international legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [2][3]. - The article argues that Kishi's selective interpretation of historical documents, particularly favoring the San Francisco Peace Treaty, reveals a deliberate attempt to undermine the One China principle and promote militaristic expansion [3]. Group 2 - The article warns Japan against persisting on a misguided path, stating that such actions will lead to inevitable losses, reflecting both historical lessons and current realities [4]. - It highlights Kishi's militaristic ambitions, including increased defense spending and potential changes to Japan's nuclear policy, which signal a dangerous shift in Japan's military posture [3]. - The article calls for Japan to acknowledge historical truths and adhere to the principles established in the four political documents between China and Japan, urging a halt to provocations regarding Taiwan [3].

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan reflect a deep-rooted historical revisionism and a misjudgment of current international political realities, indicating Japan's intentions to militarily intervene in the Taiwan Strait [1][2]. Historical Context - Japan's occupation of Taiwan began in 1895 through an unequal treaty, and subsequent international agreements, such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, established the legal basis for Taiwan's return to China after World War II [1]. - The San Francisco Peace Treaty, cited by Kishi, is criticized for being an illegal document that disregards the established international legal framework regarding Taiwan's sovereignty [2]. Implications of Military Rhetoric - Kishi's assertion that "Japan is back" raises concerns about a resurgence of militarism in Japan, especially in light of historical atrocities committed during its colonial rule over Taiwan [3]. - The historical context of Japan's colonial rule is marked by severe human rights violations and exploitation of Taiwanese resources, which serves as a reminder of the potential dangers of militaristic rhetoric in contemporary politics [3]. Taiwan's Status - Taiwan is emphasized as a core interest of China, with a strong commitment from the Chinese government to counter any foreign interference or attempts to disrupt national unity [4]. - Japan is urged to reflect on its historical responsibilities and to refrain from provocative actions regarding Taiwan to avoid repeating past mistakes [4].

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan have drawn significant criticism from various sectors, highlighting the potential dangers of Japan's right-wing movements and their implications for regional stability [1][2][3]. Group 1: Political Context - Takaichi's comments in the Diet signal a dangerous shift in Japan's political stance, suggesting a willingness to intervene militarily in Taiwan issues, which China has condemned as crossing a red line [1]. - The remarks are seen as part of a broader trend among Japanese right-wing factions aiming to break free from Japan's pacifist constitution and revive militaristic sentiments [1][3]. Group 2: Historical Background - Takaichi has a history of extreme right-wing actions, including questioning Japan's acknowledgment of its wartime actions and advocating for a revisionist narrative regarding Japan's colonial past [2]. - Her political career is marked by controversial actions, such as visiting the Yasukuni Shrine and denying historical atrocities like the Nanjing Massacre [2][3]. Group 3: Military Developments - Japan's Defense Minister recently announced plans to deploy medium-range air defense missiles in the Ryukyu Islands, which are strategically close to Taiwan, indicating a military buildup in the region [4]. - The Japanese Self-Defense Forces have developed operational plans for potential conflicts in the Taiwan Strait, revealing a clear military strategy that aligns with Takaichi's rhetoric [4][5]. Group 4: Regional Implications - The rhetoric surrounding "Taiwan's situation" is viewed as a pretext for Japan's right-wing factions to expand military capabilities and move away from post-war defense principles [5]. - Japan's increasing military budget and discussions around revising its nuclear policies have raised alarms both domestically and internationally, suggesting a shift towards more aggressive military posturing [5].