新华社记者：近日，日本首相官邸一位负责安保政策的高官向媒体宣称，日本应该拥有核武器。此后， 日本防卫大臣称推进讨论"无核三原则"时不排除任何选项。上述言论引发日本国内各界人士和俄罗斯等 周边国家强烈批评。请问中方对此有何评论？ 林剑：中方对日本首相官邸高官、首相侧近公然宣称日本应该拥有核武器感到震惊。日本内阁官房长官 拒绝就此作出澄清，日本防卫大臣还就是否修改"无核三原则"宣称，"不排除任何选项"。联系到日本媒 体此前报道高市首相计划修改"无核三原则"，上述言论是对战后国际秩序和核不扩散体系的公然挑衅， 对地区和国际和平稳定的严重威胁，对日本宣称"走和平发展道路"的完全背离，绝非"个人行为"可以搪 塞敷衍，国际社会必须对此高度警惕和坚决反对。 林剑：美方随意扣押他国船只的行径严重违反国际法。中方一贯反对缺乏国际法依据、未经联合国安理 会授权的非法单边制裁，反对任何违反《联合国宪章》宗旨和原则、侵犯别国主权安全的行为，反对一 切单边霸凌行径。委内瑞拉有权利自主发展同其他国家的互利合作，相信国际社会理解和支持委内瑞拉 维护自身正当权益的立场。 总台中国之声记者：据报道，东盟特别外长会今天在马来西亚吉隆坡举行，会议 ...

新华社北京12月22日电（记者刘杨、袁睿）外交部发言人林剑22日表示，中方对日本首相官邸高 官、首相侧近公然宣称日本应该拥有核武器感到震惊。上述言论是对战后国际秩序和核不扩散体系的公 然挑衅，对地区和国际和平稳定的严重威胁，对日本宣称"走和平发展道路"的完全背离，绝非"个人行 为"可以搪塞敷衍，国际社会必须对此高度警惕和坚决反对。 当日例行记者会上，有记者问：近日，日本首相官邸一位负责安保政策的高官向媒体宣称，日本应 该拥有核武器。此后，日本防卫大臣称推进讨论"无核三原则"时不排除任何选项。上述言论引发日本国 内各界人士和俄罗斯等周边国家强烈批评。请问中方对此有何评论？ 林剑表示，中方对日本首相官邸高官、首相侧近公然宣称日本应该拥有核武器感到震惊。日本内阁 官房长官拒绝就此作出澄清，日本防卫大臣还就是否修改"无核三原则"宣称，"不排除任何选项"。联系 到日本媒体此前报道日本首相高市早苗计划修改"无核三原则"，上述言论是对战后国际秩序和核不扩散 体系的公然挑衅，对地区和国际和平稳定的严重威胁，对日本宣称"走和平发展道路"的完全背离，绝 非"个人行为"可以搪塞敷衍，国际社会必须对此高度警惕和坚决反对。 林剑指出， ...

中方再驳日方拥核表态：不要在错误道路上继续狂奔下去 中新网北京12月22日电 (记者 曾玥)中国外交部发言人林剑22日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：近日，日本首相官邸一位负责安保政策的高官向媒体宣称，日本应该拥有核武器。此后， 日本防卫大臣称推进讨论"无核三原则"时不排除任何选项。上述言论引发日本国内各界人士和俄罗斯等 周边国家强烈批评。请问中方对此有何评论？ 林剑：中方对日本首相官邸高官、首相侧近公然宣称日本应该拥有核武器感到震惊。日本内阁官房长官 拒绝就此作出澄清，日本防卫大臣还就是否修改"无核三原则"宣称，"不排除任何选项"。联系到日本媒 体此前报道高市首相计划修改"无核三原则"，上述言论是对战后国际秩序和核不扩散体系的公然挑衅， 对地区和国际和平稳定的严重威胁，对日本宣称"走和平发展道路"的完全背离，绝非"个人行为"可以搪 塞敷衍，国际社会必须对此高度警惕和坚决反对。 第一， 有关言论严重违背日方应履行的国际法义务。根据《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》和《日本投降 书》等具有国际法效力的文件，日本应"完全解除武装"，不得"维持能使其重新武装的产业"。日本作为 《不扩散核武器条约》无核武器国家，必须完全恪守不 ...

据韩联社报道，韩国国家安保室室长魏圣洛20日表示，此前他于16至17日访问美国华盛顿期间，韩美双 方就明年起同步推进韩国核动力潜艇建造、铀浓缩、乏燃料后处理等旨在落实两国首脑会谈共识的各领 域磋商达成一致。 魏圣洛称，目前韩美合作整体进展顺利，美方亦将韩美同盟称为"模范同盟"。他表示，希望在这一积极 氛围下，加快推进后续措施。 在谈及核动力潜艇建造问题时，魏圣洛介绍，韩美双方已就依据美国《原子能法》第91条、以美国总统 权限批准军用核材料转移的问题达成共识，决定为此另行签署双边协议。此举旨在突破现行《韩美原子 能协定》中对军用核材料转移的限制，通过另行达成协议加以解决。该做法与澳大利亚在美英澳三边安 全伙伴关系（AUKUS）框架下推动引进核动力潜艇的方式较为相似。 针对韩美核潜艇合作，中国外交部发言人郭嘉昆此前表示，中方希望韩美双方切实履行核不扩散义务， 做促进地区和平稳定的事，而不是相反。 中国驻韩国大使戴兵也指出，当前半岛及地区局势依然复杂敏感，韩美核潜艇合作超越商业合作范畴， 更是事关全球核不扩散体系及半岛乃至地区稳定。希望韩方充分考虑各方关切，慎重处理相关事宜。 本文系观察者网独家稿件，未经授权，不得 ...

Group 1 - The Japanese government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, is facing backlash from various political parties and civil groups due to a government official's recent comments advocating for nuclear armament, which contradicts Japan's long-standing "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [1][2] - The official's remarks have sparked concerns about a potential shift in Japan's defense policy, as there are indications that the Kishida administration is considering revising its security strategy to abandon the principle of not possessing or introducing nuclear weapons [2][3] - The rise of right-wing sentiments in Japan is seen as a threat to the post-war international order, with fears that the government may accelerate militarization and challenge the existing nuclear non-proliferation framework [2][3] Group 2 - The historical context of Japan's pacifist stance is being undermined by the current government's rhetoric, which is perceived as a revival of militarism and a departure from international legal obligations [3] - There is a growing alarm among various political factions and civil organizations in Japan regarding the implications of abandoning the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," which could lead to increased military expansion and destabilization in the region [2][3] - The international community is urged to remain vigilant in response to Japan's potential shift towards nuclear armament, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities and adhere to its constitutional commitments [3]

Group 1 - The core point of the articles is the recent agreement between South Korea and the United States regarding trade and security, which includes significant investments and military cooperation [1][2] - The "Joint Fact Sheet" released by both countries outlines a framework for trade agreements, including South Korea's commitment to invest $150 billion in the U.S. shipbuilding sector and an additional $200 billion as part of a strategic investment memorandum [1] - The agreement also includes the U.S. approval for South Korea to build nuclear-powered submarines, with a commitment to closely cooperate on related issues such as fuel procurement [1] Group 2 - China has expressed concerns regarding the South Korea-U.S. nuclear submarine cooperation, emphasizing the need for South Korea to handle the situation cautiously due to its implications for global nuclear non-proliferation and regional stability [2] - The discussions also cover the modernization of the South Korea-U.S. security alliance, with South Korea planning to increase its defense spending to 3.5% of GDP and invest $25 billion in U.S. military equipment by 2030 [2]

Core Points - The AUKUS partnership's future remains uncertain, with the Biden administration conducting a comprehensive review that may impose stricter conditions on technology transfer and cost-sharing [1][4][6] - Recent assurances from U.S. Secretary of State Rubio indicate that the AUKUS agreement will continue, but adjustments to the agreement's content are likely to prioritize U.S. industrial and military interests [4][5][6] - Australia is investing approximately AUD 12 billion (around USD 8 billion) to develop a defense center in Perth, which is expected to support U.S. submarine maintenance and demonstrate Australia's commitment to the AUKUS project [5][6][10] Summary by Sections AUKUS Partnership Overview - The AUKUS partnership was established during the Biden administration, with ongoing scrutiny from the U.S. government regarding its alignment with "America First" policies [4][10] - The partnership involves the U.S. and U.K. providing nuclear submarine technology to Australia, with a total estimated cost of USD 245 billion for the entire program [10][11] U.S. Review and Adjustments - The U.S. Department of Defense is reviewing the AUKUS project to ensure it aligns with national interests, which may lead to a re-negotiation of terms rather than a complete cancellation [4][6][7] - Analysts suggest that the review may focus on enhancing protections for technology transfer and cost-sharing arrangements, reflecting a shift towards U.S. priorities [4][5][6] Australia's Commitment - Australia is actively seeking to strengthen its defense capabilities and has announced significant investments in infrastructure to support the AUKUS initiative [5][6] - The development of the Henderson defense precinct is expected to facilitate the construction of naval vessels and maintenance of submarines, aligning with U.S. strategic goals in the region [6][10] Strategic Implications - The AUKUS partnership is viewed as a critical component of deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region, with bipartisan support in the U.S. Congress [4][5][7] - Concerns have been raised regarding the potential for renegotiation of agreements and the implications for regional security dynamics, particularly in relation to China [11][12]

Market Overview - Major US stock indices closed higher, with the Dow Jones up 0.11%, S&P 500 up 0.47%, and Nasdaq up 0.94%, marking new closing highs for S&P 500 and Nasdaq [1] - Chinese concept stocks mostly rose, with the Nasdaq China Golden Dragon Index up 0.87%, and notable gains for companies like Li Auto (over 6%), Bilibili (over 5%), and NIO (over 4%) [1] - European markets showed mixed results, with the Stoxx Europe 50 up 0.94% and the UK FTSE 100 down 0.07% [1] Commodity Market - WTI crude oil futures rose by 0.97% to $63.3 per barrel, while Brent crude oil futures increased by 0.67% to $67.44 per barrel [2] - COMEX gold futures increased by 0.90% to $3719 per ounce, and silver futures rose by 0.84% to $43.19 per ounce [2] Emerging Markets - Emerging market ETFs saw inflows for the fifth consecutive week, with a total of $2.17 billion flowing into these funds, bringing year-to-date inflows to $19.8 billion [7] - China led the inflows with $653.9 million, while Argentina experienced the largest outflow of $699,000 [7] International Relations and Economic Policies - The US and China reached a basic framework consensus to address the TikTok issue and reduce investment barriers, promoting economic cooperation [4] - The US Energy Secretary suggested expanding strategic uranium reserves to reduce reliance on Russian supplies and boost confidence in the long-term prospects of nuclear power [9]

Core Viewpoint - The situation in the Middle East has escalated significantly due to military actions by Israel and the U.S. against Iran's nuclear facilities, with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) indicating that Iran could resume uranium enrichment within "months" despite the damage [1][3]. Group 1: Iran's Nuclear Program - IAEA Director General Grossi's assessment suggests that some Iranian nuclear facilities remain operational, and there is uncertainty regarding the potential secret relocation of high-enriched uranium stocks [3][4]. - Iran's parliament has voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, effectively closing off transparency regarding its nuclear program [3][6]. - The Iranian government appears to leverage the "nuclear uncertainty" to gain strategic advantage, despite suffering damage to its facilities [3][6]. Group 2: U.S. and Israel's Military Actions - The military actions by the U.S. and Israel are questioned in terms of their effectiveness, with claims that they have set back Iran's nuclear program "decades" being viewed as politically motivated rather than based on reliable intelligence [4][6]. - The actions taken by the U.S. and Israel may provide Iran with justification for retaliatory measures, complicating the geopolitical landscape [4][6]. Group 3: Regional and Global Implications - The current situation reflects a broader reconfiguration of power in the Middle East, with nuclear capabilities becoming a key bargaining chip among regional players [6][8]. - The failure of international oversight mechanisms, such as the IAEA, raises concerns about nuclear non-proliferation and the potential for increased regional tensions [6][8]. - The escalation of conflict over nuclear issues could have far-reaching consequences for global supply chains, financial markets, and strategic alignments, with major powers unable to effectively mediate the situation [8].

Group 1 - The article warns that the risk of Iran developing nuclear weapons is increasing despite claims of military victories by the U.S. and Israel, which may lead Iran to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) [2][4] - The military actions taken by the U.S. and Israel have set a dangerous precedent, potentially igniting a nuclear arms race in the Middle East [2][3] - Iran's nuclear ambitions remain intact, with its stockpile of highly enriched uranium and advanced centrifuge components still unaccounted for, despite targeted actions against its nuclear scientists [2][4] Group 2 - The possibility of Iran exiting the NPT is high, which could trigger a chain reaction in the Middle East and increase the likelihood of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons [4] - Saudi Arabia has indicated it would seek nuclear weapons if Iran openly or covertly develops them, highlighting the regional implications of Iran's potential nuclearization [4] - The article emphasizes the need for European countries to take responsibility in restoring the nuclear non-proliferation regime, advocating for a unified stance against Israel's actions that undermine global nuclear non-proliferation efforts [5]