Core Viewpoint - Beijing Yitang Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials, Inc. for alleged illegal acquisition and use of its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, claiming significant damage to its intellectual property and economic interests [4][7]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit has been accepted by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court and is currently in the pre-trial stage [2][4]. - The lawsuit amount is set at RMB 99.99 million (approximately 14.1 million USD) [5][6]. - The company requests the court to order the defendant to cease the use and disclosure of its technology secrets and to destroy any related materials [5][6]. Group 2: Company Position and Impact - The company emphasizes that this lawsuit is a legitimate action to protect its intellectual property rights and will not have a significant adverse impact on its operations [3][8]. - The company has a strong commitment to original research and development, and it is closely monitoring the lawsuit's progress [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the lawsuit filed by Yitang Co., a domestic semiconductor equipment manufacturer, against Applied Materials (AMAT) for allegedly misappropriating its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment [2][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Yitang Co. has filed a lawsuit in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court against AMAT for illegally obtaining and using its core technology secrets, which were disclosed in a patent application in China [2][6]. - The company is seeking a total compensation of 99.99 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses related to the infringement [2][5]. - The lawsuit aims to protect the intellectual property rights of innovators and maintain the company's legal rights without significantly impacting its operations [5]. Group 2: Technology and Market Position - Yitang Co. specializes in high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma technology, which is crucial for its semiconductor processing equipment, including dry stripping, dry etching, and surface treatment [5][6]. - The company claims to possess leading original technology capabilities in this field and has relevant trade secrets [5]. - Applied Materials, founded in 1967, is the second-largest semiconductor equipment supplier globally, with projected revenues exceeding $25 billion in 2024, following ASML [6].

Core Viewpoint - Yitang Co., Ltd. has accused Applied Materials of illegally obtaining and using its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, constituting a violation of trade secrets [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Action - Yitang Co., Ltd. is the plaintiff in a lawsuit seeking 99.99 million yuan in damages [2]. - The dispute arose after Applied Materials hired two employees from Yitang's subsidiary, Mattson Technology, Inc., who had signed confidentiality agreements regarding the core technology [2]. - Yitang claims that Applied Materials submitted a patent application to the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration, disclosing the disputed technology secrets [2][5]. Group 2: Company Background - Yitang Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, production, and sales of high-end semiconductor process equipment, with products including dry etching equipment and rapid thermal processing equipment [7]. - As of the end of 2024, Yitang's global installed base exceeds 4,800 units, and it holds the second-largest market share in dry etching and rapid thermal processing equipment according to Gartner [7]. - The company went public on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Sci-Tech Innovation Board on July 8, with a stock price of 22.88 yuan per share and a market capitalization of 67.62 billion yuan as of August 13 [7]. Group 3: Industry Context - Applied Materials is a leading global supplier of semiconductor and display equipment, holding over 22,000 patents and being the first international semiconductor equipment company to enter China [7]. - As of the report, Applied Materials has a market capitalization of approximately 151.23 billion USD [7]. Group 4: Management Changes - On July 26, Yitang announced adjustments to its senior management and core technical personnel, with specific changes to the roles of Subhash Deshmukh and Schubert S. Chu, who will continue to work at MTI [9]. - The company stated that these adjustments would not adversely affect its normal operations and daily business [9].

Core Viewpoint - Yitang Co., Ltd. (688729) has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials, Inc. for infringement of trade secrets, claiming damages of 99.99 million yuan [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Action Details - Yitang alleges that Applied Materials illegally obtained and used its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China [1][4]. - The lawsuit has been filed in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, and the case has been officially registered but has not yet gone to trial [1][6]. Group 2: Technology and Employment Issues - Yitang's key technology involves the use of high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma for wafer surface treatment, which is widely applied in its semiconductor processing equipment [4]. - Two employees, previously working at Yitang's subsidiary Mattson Technology, Inc., were recruited by Applied Materials and are alleged to have disclosed Yitang's trade secrets in a patent application submitted to the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration [4][6]. Group 3: Financial Impact and Company Position - Yitang is seeking a court order to stop Applied Materials from using its trade secrets and to compensate for economic losses, including punitive damages amounting to 99.99 million yuan [6]. - The company emphasizes its commitment to original research and development and the importance of intellectual property protection, stating that the lawsuit will not significantly impact its operations [6]. - Yitang reported revenues of 4.763 billion yuan, 3.931 billion yuan, and 4.633 billion yuan for the years 2022 to 2024, with a compound annual growth rate of 18.9% in net profit [6].

每经编辑｜金冥羽 8月13日盘后，国内 半导体 设备龙头屹唐股份(688729.SH)公告称，公司因认为应用材料公司非法获取并使用了公司的等离子体源及晶圆表面处理相关的核 心技术秘密，在中国境内以申请专利的方式披露了该技术秘密，且将该专利申请权据为己有，违反了《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》的规定，构成侵 犯商业秘密的违法行为，向北京知识产权法院提起诉讼，诉讼金额为人民币9999万元。公司表示，本次诉讼不会对公司经营方面产生重大不利影响，也不 会影响公司正常生产经营。最终实际影响将取决于法院生效判决结果。 屹唐股份在公告中称，利用高浓度、稳定均匀的等离子体进行晶圆表面处理是公司的关键技术之一，相关技术被广泛应用于公司的干法去胶、干法蚀刻、 表面处理及改性等半导体加工设备中。公司在该领域具备领先的原创性技术能力，并拥有相关技术秘密。被告应用材料公司招聘了曾在原告全资子公司 Mattson Technology, Inc.（以下简称"MTI公司"）工作的两名涉案员工。该两名员工了解公司关于等离子体的产生和处理方法的核心技术，熟悉和掌握相关 设备结构以及技术工艺。在MTI公司任职期间，该两员工均签署了保密协议，对包 ...

格隆汇8月13日丨屹唐股份(688729.SH)公布，公司认为应用材料公司（APPLIEDMATERIALS,INC.） （简称"应用材料公司"、"被告"）非法获取并使用了公司的等离子体源及晶圆表面处理相关的核心技术 秘密，并在中国境内以申请专利的方式披露了该技术秘密，且将该专利申请权据为己有，违反了《中华 人民共和国反不正当竞争法》的规定，构成侵犯商业秘密的违法行为，对公司的知识产权和经济利益造 成严重的损害。公司就该事项向北京知识产权法院提起诉讼，于近日收到法院出具的《民事案件受理及 举证通知书》等相关材料，案号为（2025）京73民初908号。截至本公告披露日，该案件已立案，尚未 开庭审理。诉讼金额为人民币9,999万元。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Yitang Co., Ltd. (屹唐股份) has accused Applied Materials, Inc. of illegally obtaining and using its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, which has caused significant damage to its intellectual property and economic interests [1] Legal Action - The company has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, claiming damages amounting to 99.99 million yuan [1] - The court has issued a notice of case acceptance and evidence submission, and the case has been officially registered, although it has not yet gone to trial [1]

Core Viewpoint - Yitang Semiconductor Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials for illegally obtaining and using its trade secrets, claiming damages of 99.99 million yuan [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Action - The lawsuit was filed in Beijing Intellectual Property Court, with a claim amount of 99.99 million yuan [1]. - Yitang Semiconductor alleges that Applied Materials has violated the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China by disclosing and claiming ownership of its trade secrets through a patent application [4]. - The company has made six requests in the lawsuit, including a demand for Applied Materials to cease using the trade secrets and to compensate for economic losses with punitive damages [4]. Group 2: Technology and Expertise - Yitang Semiconductor's key technology involves the use of high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma for wafer surface treatment, which is critical for its semiconductor processing equipment [1]. - The two employees involved in the case had previously worked for Yitang's wholly-owned subsidiary, Mattson Technology, Inc., and had signed confidentiality agreements regarding the trade secrets [1][4]. - Evidence suggests that after being hired by Applied Materials, these employees submitted a patent application that disclosed Yitang's trade secrets [1]. Group 3: Company Position and Impact - Yitang Semiconductor emphasizes its commitment to original research and development and the importance of protecting intellectual property [4]. - The company asserts that the lawsuit is a legitimate measure to protect its rights and maintain fair market competition, stating it will not significantly impact its operations [4][5]. - The actual impact of the lawsuit on the company's profits cannot be determined until the court reaches a final judgment [5].

Group 1 - The company, Yitang Co., Ltd. (688729.SH), has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials, Inc. for allegedly illegally obtaining and using its core technology related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment [1] - The lawsuit claims that Applied Materials disclosed the trade secrets by applying for patents in China and wrongfully claimed the patent rights, violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China [1] - The lawsuit has been accepted by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, with a case number of (2025) Jing 73 Min Chu 908, and the claimed amount is RMB 99.99 million [1] Group 2 - As of the date of the announcement, the case has been filed but has not yet gone to trial [1]

Core Viewpoint - The increasing number of intellectual property and trade secret infringement disputes between large tech companies and their former employees has raised concerns in the venture capital community, impacting investment strategies and risk assessments [2][3][11]. Group 1: Recent Legal Cases - On July 28, a Shanghai court sentenced 14 former employees of Zunpai Communications Technology for infringing Huawei's trade secrets, resulting in a total fine of 13.5 million [2]. - JD.com reported that it has substantial evidence of intellectual property infringement against Jiushi Intelligent Technology, whose founding team previously worked in JD's autonomous vehicle division [2][6]. - CATL filed a lawsuit against Xiamen Haichen Energy Technology for unfair competition, highlighting the trend of former employees using proprietary technology from their previous employers [2][5]. Group 2: Impact on Venture Capital - Venture capital firms have become increasingly cautious, recognizing that lawsuits for intellectual property infringement can significantly affect the future prospects of startups and increase investment risks [3][11]. - Jiushi Intelligent recently completed a $300 million Series B funding round, and any legal issues could delay product launches, directly impacting business development and investor returns [3][11]. - Venture capitalists are enhancing their due diligence processes to assess potential conflicts between the technology developed by former employees and their previous employers' patents [3][11]. Group 3: Causes of Disputes - Many disputes arise because former employees inadvertently use research results obtained during their tenure at large tech companies, believing they have the right to do so [4][8]. - The lack of clear agreements regarding the ownership of research results often leads to misunderstandings and legal conflicts [4][8]. - The trend of former employees leveraging proprietary technology to gain competitive advantages in new ventures has intensified the scrutiny from their former employers [8][10]. Group 4: Recommendations for Resolution - Effective communication and preemptive agreements regarding the use of intellectual property are essential to mitigate disputes [4][10]. - Companies should implement comprehensive non-compete agreements and ensure they are enforced to prevent potential infringements [9][10]. - Venture capital firms are advised to include specific clauses in investment agreements to protect their interests in case of intellectual property violations by startup founders [13][14].