记者2月24日从最高人民检察院获悉，2025年1月至11月，全国检察机关共办理知识产权刑事检察案 件18803件，民事检察案件1165件，行政检察案件1516件，公益诉讼检察案件542件，合计22026件。 检察机关加强高新技术领域知识产权保护，依法惩治侵犯商业秘密犯罪，最高检指导各地办理了一 批涉信息技术、人工智能、生物医药、新能源等领域案件。2025年1月至11月，全国检察机关受理审查 起诉侵犯商业秘密犯罪103件232人，起诉143人。其中，最高检指导上海检察机关办理的尊湃侵犯华为 海思芯片技术商业秘密案涉及国产芯片技术，涉案金额3.17亿元。上海检察机关以侵犯商业秘密罪提起 公诉，14名被告人均被判处刑罚。 据统计，2025年1月至11月，检察机关共起诉涉及文创产品侵犯知识产权犯罪案件64件，其中包括 涉及"哪吒"案件20件、涉及"泡泡玛特"案件13件。浙江东阳检察机关办理的一起侵犯著作权犯罪案件 中，被告人搭建非法影视网站，向公众播放盗版《哪吒之魔童闹海》《封神第二部：战火西岐》等电影 牟利，涉及盗版电影13万余部，检察机关以侵犯著作权罪提起公诉，被告人被判处有期徒刑并处罚金。 （记者 刘硕） 与此 ...

记者从最高人民检察院了解到，2025年，检察机关持续加强原始创新、关键核心技术司法保护，办理了一批具有典型意义的案例，有力服务新质生产力发 展。 2025年前11个月，检察机关共受理审查起诉侵犯商业秘密犯罪232人，数量较前两年呈上升趋势。例如，广受关注的尊湃侵犯华为海思芯片技术商业秘密 案，涉及国产芯片技术，涉案金额3.17亿元。上海检察机关以侵犯商业秘密罪提起公诉，14名被告人均被判处刑罚。 2025年检察机关聚焦新一代信息技术、人工智能、高端装备、生物制造、新能源、新材料等新兴产业、未来产业，持续加强原始创新、关键核心技术司法保 护，依法惩治侵犯核心技术犯罪，从严打击商业间谍犯罪。 最高检相关部门负责人介绍，当前，我国技术外流呈现多维度风险加剧特征，检察机关依法适用刑法第219条，关于侵犯商业秘密罪定罪量刑的条款，守护 国家科技安全和经济安全。最高检指导各级检察机关在加大刑事打击力度外，强化民事行政诉讼监督，对确有错误的案件依法提出抗诉或者再审检察建议， 促进法律适用标准统一。 ...

记者从最高人民检察院了解到，2025年，检察机关持续加强原始创新、关键核心技术司法保护，办理了 一批具有典型意义的案例，有力服务新质生产力发展。 2025年前11个月，检察机关共受理审查起诉侵犯商业秘密犯罪232人，数量较前两年呈上升趋势。例 如，广受关注的尊湃侵犯华为海思芯片技术商业秘密案，涉及国产芯片技术，涉案金额3.17亿元。上海 检察机关以侵犯商业秘密罪提起公诉，14名被告人均被判处刑罚。 最高检相关部门负责人介绍，当前，我国技术外流呈现多维度风险加剧特征，检察机关依法适用刑法第 219条，关于侵犯商业秘密罪定罪量刑的条款，守护国家科技安全和经济安全。最高检指导各级检察机 关在加大刑事打击力度外，强化民事行政诉讼监督，对确有错误的案件依法提出抗诉或者再审检察建 议，促进法律适用标准统一。 2025年检察机关聚焦新一代信息技术、人工智能、高端装备、生物制造、新能源、新材料等新兴产业、 未来产业，持续加强原始创新、关键核心技术司法保护，依法惩治侵犯核心技术犯罪，从严打击商业间 谍犯罪。 ...

例如，尊湃侵犯华为海思芯片技术商业秘密案涉及国产芯片技术，涉案金额3.17亿，社会各界高度关注。上海检察机关以侵犯商 业秘密罪提起公诉，14名被告人均被判处刑罚。 "检察机关依法从严打击商业间谍犯罪。"刘太宗强调，当前，我国技术外流呈现多维度风险加剧特征，检察机关依法适用刑法 第219条之一，守护国家科技安全和经济安全。 例如，浙江检察机关办理的张某为境外非法提供商业秘密案，被告人张某系国内某著名半导体企业员工，离职后违反保密约 定，接受境外组织委托非法泄露原单位商业秘密，经检察机关依法提起公诉，被判处有期徒刑并处罚金。 多地办理首起侵犯服务商标案 21世纪经济报道记者王峰北京报道 2月24日，最高人民检察院知识产权检察厅副厅长刘太宗做客最高检厅长访谈。 近年来，许多文创产品火爆文化市场，然而，侵权盗版问题困扰着产业发展。此外，新质生产力发展也需要专利、商业秘密等 知识产权保护。 刘太宗介绍了春节档热映电影、泡泡玛特等知名IP被盗版案件的办理情况，以及检察机关聚焦新一代信息技术、人工智能、高 端装备、生物制造、新能源、新材料等新兴产业、未来产业，持续加强原始创新、关键核心技术司法保护的情况。 从严打击商业间谍 ...

Core Insights - Huawei ranks second among global communication companies, highlighting its significant position and development potential in the industry [1][3][6] Investment and Industry Position - The ranking is based on the industry influence and investment scale of holding companies, rather than just market share of core businesses [3][4] - Huawei's strategy focuses on investment and collaboration in emerging technologies like chips, cloud computing, and 5G equipment, positioning itself as a leader in network infrastructure [3][4] Supply Chain and Technology Development - Huawei has established a resilient supply chain for chips, aided by collaboration with multiple suppliers in China, despite facing challenges from U.S. sanctions [4][6] - The company adopts an open cooperation model, contrasting with competitors like Apple and Samsung, which follow a closed innovation approach [4][6] Future Potential and Innovation - Huawei's investment holding structure may evolve into a dual role of technology driver and capital engine, aiming for stable revenue and new market opportunities [6][7] - The company is actively pursuing breakthroughs in core technologies, although it still faces significant challenges in achieving complete autonomy in certain areas [6][9] Market Dynamics and Performance - Despite a declining share of overseas revenue, Huawei maintains a strong position in the domestic market, indicating a solid foundation for future growth [9][10] - The company controls approximately 30% of core technology resources in the industry, reflecting its strategic positioning and potential for future advancements [12]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a comprehensive commercial secret protection system integrating self-protection, administrative protection, and judicial protection is essential for maintaining fair market competition and safeguarding corporate innovation [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal and Regulatory Developments - The Shanghai Third Intermediate People's Court ruled on a case involving the infringement of Huawei's HiSilicon chip technology commercial secrets, sentencing 14 former employees to prison and imposing a total fine of 13.5 million yuan [1]. - The State Administration for Market Regulation has intensified enforcement against commercial secret violations, handling 143 cases in 2024, demonstrating a strong corrective action against market disorder [2]. - The release of the draft regulations on commercial secret protection by the State Administration for Market Regulation indicates ongoing efforts to strengthen the legal framework [3]. Group 2: Importance of Commercial Secret Protection - Commercial secrets are crucial for companies' market competition, and businesses must act as the first line of defense in protecting these secrets through personnel management, technological innovation, and confidentiality education [2]. - The protection of commercial secrets is not merely a corporate issue but a public concern that affects the business environment, innovation ecosystem, and development security [1][3]. Group 3: Collaborative Efforts and Innovations - The establishment of the Smart Manufacturing Commercial Secret Protection Alliance in the Yangtze River Delta demonstrates collaborative efforts among government departments, associations, and enterprises for cross-regional protection of commercial secrets [3]. - Innovative protection models, such as the "blockchain evidence + commercial secret insurance" approach in Tianjin, are being explored to enhance commercial secret protection [3]. - The creation of nearly 30,000 commercial secret protection service stations nationwide reflects the ongoing efforts to build a robust protection network [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the strategic value of technology-driven entrepreneurs in the context of global technological competition and innovation-driven development in China, highlighting their role as key integrators of technology, talent, capital, and market [1][2]. Group 1: Definition and Characteristics of Technology-driven Entrepreneurs - Technology-driven entrepreneurs are defined as individuals with high scientific literacy and exceptional innovation and entrepreneurship capabilities, able to transform cutting-edge technological achievements into real productive forces and create commercial value [3][4]. - Their core DNA consists of a dual spiral of scientific spirit and business thinking, combining long-term research dedication with the ability to convert technology into market value [4][12]. Group 2: Strategic Value Needs of Technology-driven Entrepreneurs - There is an urgent need for technology-driven entrepreneurs to possess three strategic value capabilities: 1. The ability to break through technological barriers and achieve original innovation, as exemplified by Huawei's "Nanniwan Plan" during chip supply challenges [6]. 2. The capacity for industrial integration, facilitating collaboration across the entire supply chain, as demonstrated by BYD's vertical integration model [7][8]. 3. The ability to engage in global competition, enhancing international competitiveness through technological influence and commercial impact, as shown by DJI's dominance in the consumer drone market [9][10]. Group 3: Common Traits of Technology-driven Entrepreneurs - Successful technology-driven entrepreneurs share six common traits: 1. A strong belief in technology as a core driving force, with a commitment to continuous R&D investment [14]. 2. A vision to change the world through technology, aiming for significant societal impact [14]. 3. Long-term perseverance, demonstrating resilience and problem-solving capabilities in the face of challenges [15][16]. 4. A keen sensitivity to market demands, identifying gaps and providing technological solutions [17]. 5. An ability to endure entrepreneurial risks, viewing failures as necessary costs for technological iteration [18]. 6. A commitment to open learning and iterative improvement, integrating various resources for collaborative innovation [19]. Group 4: Generational Differences Among Technology-driven Entrepreneurs - There are notable generational differences between older and younger technology-driven entrepreneurs: 1. Older entrepreneurs, like Ren Zhengfei and Liu Qingfeng, are market-driven innovators who built foundational industries during a period of technological scarcity, focusing on comprehensive industry chain construction [20]. 2. Younger entrepreneurs, such as Wang Tao and Wang Xingxing, are technology-driven innovators who leverage existing technological advancements to create new market opportunities, often entering global competition directly [20]. 3. In terms of core capabilities, older entrepreneurs rely on long-term vertical integration for technological breakthroughs, while younger entrepreneurs excel in modular innovation and rapid product iteration [21][22]. 4. Market strategies differ, with older entrepreneurs employing gradual market penetration and younger entrepreneurs favoring rapid global expansion through technological advantages [23][24]. 5. Resource acquisition approaches vary, with older entrepreneurs depending on policy support and younger entrepreneurs benefiting from decentralized resource networks [25]. 6. Leadership styles contrast, with older entrepreneurs being authoritative and multifaceted leaders, while younger entrepreneurs adopt a more specialized and open leadership approach [26]. Group 5: Implications for Future Development - The differences between older and younger technology-driven entrepreneurs reflect the evolution of opportunities, technological development stages, and global competition dynamics, indicating a dialectical unity of inheritance and evolution [28]. - The article suggests that private enterprises are crucial for nurturing technology-driven entrepreneurs, while state-owned enterprises need to explore systematic and clear pathways for cultivating their own technology-driven leaders [28].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Junyi Digital (301172.SZ), clarified on the investor interaction platform that it is not an agent or distributor of Hisilicon chips [1] Group 1 - The company is not involved in the distribution of Hisilicon chips, which may impact its market positioning and partnerships [1]

Core Insights - Midea Group and Huawei have signed a strategic cooperation agreement to leverage their strengths in technology and information communication across various key areas, including enterprise management, AIGC, ICT infrastructure, green low-carbon initiatives, cloud business, product development, and internationalization [2][3] - The collaboration in the AIGC field focuses on "technology empowerment + scenario implementation," with the establishment of a special working group to research AI applications in smart homes and smart manufacturing, addressing challenges in multimodal AI algorithm optimization, edge computing, and AI security [2] - In the smart factory sector, Midea will utilize its self-developed visual large model algorithm platform in conjunction with Huawei's Ascend AI visual inspection technology to enhance production efficiency and product quality stability [2] Smart Home and Ecosystem Development - Midea will collaborate with Huawei's HiSilicon and open-source HarmonyOS to create integrated smart home appliance solutions, enhancing product innovation and user experience [3] - The partnership aims to deepen the smart home ecosystem through cross-brand device collaboration and scenario linkage, creating HarmonyOS smart selection products for a smoother user experience [3] - The cooperation also includes interconnectivity among "people," "vehicles," and "homes," digital energy temperature control products, and the digital transformation of medical imaging equipment [3] Strategic Significance - The signing of the strategic cooperation agreement marks a new phase in the collaboration between Midea and Huawei, aiming to continuously deepen technological synergy and scenario innovation [3] - Midea's Chairman Fang Hongbo emphasized the importance of connectivity and computing technology in their core areas, including smart homes, smart factories, smart buildings, and smart hospitals [3] - Huawei's Supervisory Board Chairman Guo Ping highlighted the exploration of new paths for the integration of technology and industry, setting new benchmarks for industry development and enhancing user product and service experiences [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a recent chip trading scam involving an ABC scheme, where multiple fraudsters create a false sense of demand and supply to deceive victims into transferring funds or goods [3][9][10]. Group 1: Scam Description - In June and July, individuals in an industry group sought a specific Microchip, which had a long lead time and a high price of 5000 yuan per unit [5]. - Shortly after, a third person claimed to have the sought-after chip, but when approached by a concerned member, they reacted defensively and blocked the individual [7][10]. - This scheme is characterized as an ABC scam, where fraudsters pose as both buyers and sellers to create a false trading environment, ultimately leading victims to invest money without any real transaction [9][10]. Group 2: Financial Implications - For instance, if a transaction involves 500 units of the high-priced chip, the total amount could reach 2.5 million yuan, with a typical deposit of 30% amounting to 750,000 yuan [11]. - Once the payment is made, victims often find that the promised goods do not exist, leading to significant financial losses [11]. Group 3: Other Similar Scams - The article also discusses another common scam known as the "White Dove" scheme, where a fraudster impersonates a legitimate company to deceive multiple parties in a transaction [13][15]. - This scheme involves the fraudster obtaining a company's information and using it to create fake contracts, ultimately leading to financial losses for all parties involved [15][16]. Group 4: Prevention Tips - To avoid falling victim to such scams, it is advised to be cautious of unusually low or high prices and to verify the legitimacy of transactions by checking the consistency of payment accounts and company information [19][21]. - It is crucial to ensure that all parties involved in a transaction are transparent and that there is a clear flow of goods and payments without third-party interference [19][21].