董事会审计委员会议事规则 洛阳建龙微纳新材料股份有限公司 第三条 审计委员会成员由三名董事组成，为不在公司担任高级管理人员的董事， 其中独立董事两名，委员中至少有一名独立董事为会计专业人士（会计专业人士是指 具有高级职称或注册会计师资格的人士）。 第四条 审计委员会委员由董事长、二分之一以上独立董事或者全体董事的三分之 一以上提名，并由董事会选举产生。选举委员的提案获得通过后，新任委员在董事会 会议结束后立即就任。 第五条 审计委员会设召集人一名，由会计专业的独立董事担任，负责主持委员会 工作；召集人由董事会任免。 第六条 审计委员会任期与每一届董事会任期一致，委员任期届满，连选可以连任， 但独立董事连续任职不得超过六年。期间如有委员不再担任公司董事职务，自动失去 委员资格，并根据上述第三至第五条规定由董事会予以补选。 第七条 董事任期届满未及时改选，在改选出的董事就任前，原作为审计委员会委 员的董事仍应当依照法律、行政法规、部门规章、《公司章程》和本规则的规定履行 职务。 第一章 总则 第一条 为强化洛阳建龙微纳新材料股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）董事会决策 功能，做到事前审计、专业审计，确保董事会对经营 ...

Group 1 - The company held its 31st meeting of the 4th Board of Directors on June 12, 2025, with all 8 directors present, ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations [1][2] - The Board approved the nomination of non-independent directors for the 5th Board, including Mr. Wu Feizhou and nominees from the controlling shareholder Huachuang Yunxin [1][2] - The Board also approved the nomination of independent directors, including Ms. He Xiaoyan and Mr. Zhang Quanli, pending approval from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [2][3] Group 2 - The company plans to change its registered capital from 331.171437 million to 331.229052 million due to the conversion of convertible bonds, with a total issuance of 27.1 million yuan [3][4] - The Board proposed amendments to the Articles of Association and various governance documents to enhance corporate governance, including rules for shareholder meetings and board meetings [4][5] Group 3 - The Board approved revisions to multiple management systems, including external guarantees, external investments, related party transactions, and fundraising usage management [6][7][8] - The company will hold its second extraordinary general meeting of 2025 on June 30, 2025, to review the proposed resolutions [15][16]

董事会审计委员会实施细则 威海广泰空港设备股份有限公司 董事会审计委员会实施细则 第一章 总则 第一条 为强化董事会决策职能，做到事前审计、专业审计，确保董事会对经 理层的有效监督，完善公司治理结构，根据《公司法》、《证券法》、《上市公司 治理准则》、《深圳证券交易所股票上市规则》、《深圳证券交易所上市公司自律 监管指引第 1 号——主板上市公司规范运作》（以下简称"监管指引"）等法律法 规、规范性文件和《威海广泰空港设备股份有限公司章程》 （以下简称《公司章程》） 的有关规定，结合公司实际情况，制定本细则。 第二条 董事会审计委员会是董事会下设的专门工作机构，主要负责审核公 司财务信息及其披露、监督及评估内外部审计工作和内部控制，向董事会报告工作 并对董事会负责。 第二章 人员组成 第三条 审计委员会委员由 5 名不在公司担任高级管理人员的董事组成，其 中应至少包括 3 名独立董事，并且委员中至少有一名独立董事为专业会计人士。 第四条 审计委员会委员由董事长、二分之一以上独立董事或者全体董事的 三分之一提名，并由董事会选举产生。 第五条 审计委员会设召集人 1 名，由会计专业独立董事委员担任。召集人 由委员 ...

虽然仍有3名董事被判承担赔偿责任，但最高法两次再审判决的逻辑及董事最终承担的责任大小，性质 迥然不同。最高法第二次再审判决明确了董事责任的本质是因违反勤勉义务的过错赔偿责任，而非法定 或约定的连带清偿责任，并大幅降低或免除了董事应承担的赔偿金额。 相比之下，最高法的第二次判决结果更为合理。正如有学者指出的，在现代公司治理结构下，董事是受 股东的委派治理公司，股东拥有选派和罢免董事的权利，如果要求作为"下级"的董事去监督"上级"的股 东，就有点强人所难了。因此，董事未尽催缴义务所承担的责任应当与其义务的性质相适应，不能等同 于股东违反出资义务所应承担的责任，也不能将股东责任转嫁给董事，以董事的责任替代股东责任。最 高法的第二次判决以"过错责任"为要件重构了董事违反勤勉义务的归责逻辑，厘清了董事义务的性质和 责任范围，显然更为恰当。 虽然我国不是判例法国家，但最高法的裁判在类案中发挥着规范司法尺度、统一法律适用的作用，对下 级法院和实务具有重要参考意义。因此，最高检此番抗诉成功的意义重大，实现了对司法的及时纠错防 偏。若最高法2019年的判决不被纠正，其实质是让董事为股东的失信行为承担"兜底"责任，过度倾向保 护 ...

一、董事会会议召开情况 ）董事会于 2025 大位数据科技（广东）集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司" 年 6 月 3 日以书面、电话、微信及电子邮件的方式向公司第九届董事会全体董事发 出召开公司第九届董事会第四十二次（临时）会议的通知。会议于 2025 年 6 月 6 日在公司会议室以现场和通讯相结合的方式召开。本次会议应到董事 5 名，实到董 事 5 名（其中：以通讯表决方式出席的董事 3 名），董事长张微女士主持会议，公 司高级管理人员列席了会议。会议的召开符合《公司法》 《公司章程》和公司《董 事会议事规则》的有关规定。 证券代码：600589 证券简称：大位科技 公告编号：2025-055 大位数据科技（广东）集团股份有限公司 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈 述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 二、董事会会议审议情况 单及授予数量的议案》； 鉴于初始确定的首次授予激励对象中，1 名核查对象作为激励对象，在登记为 内幕信息知情人后至公司首次公开披露《大位数据科技（广东）集团股份有限公司 》（以下简称"本次激励计划" ）前存在买卖公 司股票的 ...

Overall Requirements - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of improving the modern enterprise system with Chinese characteristics as a crucial part of the socialist system, guided by Xi Jinping's thought and the principles of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [2][3] Group 1: Objectives and Goals - The main goal is to establish a modern enterprise system suitable for China's national conditions within approximately five years, enhancing corporate governance, market-oriented operational mechanisms, and management levels [4] - By 2035, the modern enterprise system is expected to be more refined, with improved international competitiveness of enterprises, laying a solid foundation for building world-class companies [4] Group 2: Strengthening Party Leadership - The system for party leadership in state-owned enterprises will be improved, clarifying the boundaries for party committees in discussing major issues and enhancing the quality and efficiency of preliminary research [6] - Non-public enterprises will be guided and supervised to comply with laws and regulations, promoting healthy development through improved communication and collaboration between party organizations and management [6] Group 3: Improving Corporate Governance Structure - The enterprise property rights structure will be refined, ensuring clear ownership and efficient operational mechanisms, particularly for state-owned enterprises [7] - The governance of state-owned enterprises will be enhanced, establishing a transparent and accountable governance mechanism with defined roles for the board of directors and management [7][8] - Private enterprises will be encouraged to adopt various organizational forms and improve internal governance rules, ensuring alignment between articles of association and investment agreements [8] Group 4: Enhancing Scientific Management Levels - Enterprises will be guided to develop strategic plans that align with the new development pattern, enhancing resource allocation capabilities [10] - Internal management systems will be strengthened, promoting independent internal control and legal institutions to improve management efficiency [10] - Risk management mechanisms will be established to prevent domestic and international investment risks, particularly for state-owned enterprises [10] Group 5: Fostering Innovation - Enterprises will be encouraged to establish new research and development institutions and enhance collaboration for innovation [12] - A high-efficiency allocation mechanism for innovation elements will be developed, facilitating talent flow between enterprises and research institutions [12] - Incentive mechanisms focused on innovation will be established, promoting long-term value creation and empowering project teams [13] Group 6: Corporate Social Responsibility and Culture - A system for fulfilling corporate social responsibility will be developed, integrating social responsibility into all aspects of business operations [14] - The income distribution system will be improved, ensuring reasonable salary growth and performance evaluation for senior management [14] - Excellent corporate culture will be cultivated, promoting values such as integrity and innovation within enterprise management practices [14] Group 7: Optimizing Regulatory and Service Systems - A comprehensive regulatory system for enterprises will be established, enhancing cross-departmental joint regulation and improving the predictability of regulatory policies [15] - The state-owned asset supervision system will be refined, focusing on capital management and guiding state-owned enterprises to emphasize long-term value [15] - A service system for enterprises will be improved, facilitating market access and support policies for business operations [16] Group 8: Implementation Measures - Local governments and departments are urged to implement these opinions effectively, recognizing the significance of improving the modern enterprise system for high-quality development [17] - Relevant laws and regulations will be improved to support enterprises in operating legally and managing effectively [17]

证券代码：300996 证券简称：普联软件 公告编号：2025-054 普联软件股份有限公司 经董事长提名，董事会选举职工代表董事李科兵先生为审计委员会委员，与 独立董事石贵泉先生、任迎春女士共同组成公司第四届董事会审计委员会，任期 自本次董事会审议通过之日起至第四届董事会届满之日止，具体调整情况如下： 调整前：石贵泉先生（独立董事，主任委员）、任迎春女士（独立董事）、 李守强先生（董事）； 调整后：石贵泉先生（独立董事，主任委员）、任迎春女士（独立董事）、 李科兵先生（职工代表董事）。 普联软件股份有限公司董事会 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚 假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 普联软件股份有限公司（以下简称公司）于 2025 年 5 月 26 日召开第四届董 事会第二十四次会议，审议通过了《关于调整第四届董事会审计委员会委员的议 案》，现将具体情况公告如下。 根据《公司法》《上市公司独立董事管理办法》及《公司章程》的相关规定， 审计委员会成员应当为不在公司担任高级管理人员的董事，其中独立董事应当过 半数，董事会成员中的职工代表董事可以成为审计委员会委员。鉴于近期董事会 成 ...

Core Points - Amazon shareholders rejected a proposal to separate the roles of CEO and board chair, with approximately 82% voting against it [1][4] - The proposal aimed to align Amazon's leadership structure with the majority of S&P 500 companies, which typically separate these roles for better corporate governance [2][3] - The number of shareholder proposals for separating CEO and board chair roles has increased significantly, with a 113% rise among Russell 3000 companies in the first half of 2023, marking the highest level in a decade [3] Company Position - Amazon maintains that the current leadership structure allows the board to determine the most suitable leadership for the company based on its specific circumstances [4][5] - The separation of roles was implemented in 2021 after careful consideration of Amazon's leadership needs, and the board believes that retaining flexibility in leadership structure better serves shareholders [5]

证券代码：603341 证券简称：龙旗科技 公告编号：2025-060 上海龙旗科技股份有限公司 关于拟变更第四届董事会独立董事 及调整董事会专门委员会成员的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 为进一步完善上海龙旗科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）的公司治理 结构，结合公司拟发行境外上市外资股（H 股）并在香港联合交易所有限公司（以 下简称"香港联交所"）主板挂牌上市的需要，公司拟按照《香港联合交易所有 限公司证券上市规则》的规定更换一名通常居于香港的独立董事。公司于 2025 年 5 月 21 日召开第四届董事会第六次会议，审议通过了《关于变更第四届董事 会独立董事并确定其津贴的议案》 《关于调整公司董事会专门委员会成员的议案》， 公司拟变更第四届董事会独立董事及调整董事会专门委员会成员。现将具体情况 公告如下： 康至军先生在担任公司独立董事期间勤勉尽责，为公司规范运作和健康发展 发挥了积极作用。公司董事会对康至军先生在任期间所做的贡献表示衷心感谢！ 二、关于补选独立董事的情况 为保证公司董事会及各专门委 ...

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI's governance structure is unique not only in the AI sector but also among large corporations, raising concerns about its alignment with its original mission of developing safe AI technologies for the benefit of humanity [1][6]. Group 1: Evolution of OpenAI's Governance Structure - OpenAI was founded in 2015 as a non-profit organization with a mission to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI) benefits all of humanity, emphasizing a commitment to public welfare over shareholder profit [2]. - In 2019, OpenAI transitioned to a hybrid structure by establishing OpenAI LP, a "limited profit" subsidiary, to attract necessary funding while maintaining a mission-first approach [3][4]. - The non-profit organization retains ultimate control over OpenAI LP, with profit caps in place to ensure that excess profits are redirected to furthering the non-profit's mission [4]. Group 2: Recent Developments and Controversies - In 2023, OpenAI's leadership, particularly Sam Altman, began considering a restructuring that would eliminate the non-profit's oversight, potentially transforming OpenAI into a fully profit-driven entity [5][6]. - This proposed change has faced significant backlash from legal scholars and AI experts, who argue that it contradicts OpenAI's foundational mission and could lead to prioritizing investor interests over public welfare [6][8]. - On May 5, 2023, OpenAI announced that control would remain with a non-profit organization, but the specifics of how public interests will be represented in daily operations remain unclear [7][9]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Implications - The governance model of OpenAI raises questions about the effectiveness of the current legal framework in overseeing non-profit organizations, particularly in balancing profit motives with public interest [8][12]. - Critics highlight that the proposed structure lacks essential governance safeguards, such as profit limitations for investors, which could undermine the organization's commitment to its original mission [10][11]. - The ongoing debate around OpenAI's governance reflects broader challenges in corporate governance in the AI era, particularly the need for legal structures that can adapt to rapid technological advancements [12].