Group 1 - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released the "Intellectual Property Procuratorial Work White Paper (2024)", emphasizing the legal protection of key core technologies [1] - The focus is on new generation information technology, artificial intelligence, high-end equipment, biomedicine, and integrated circuits, highlighting the judicial protection of intellectual property in high-tech and emerging industries [1] - In 2024, national procuratorial agencies accepted and reviewed 163 cases of commercial secret infringement involving 385 individuals, with a year-on-year increase of 12.4% in case numbers [1] Group 2 - The Supreme Procuratorate has guided regions such as Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Guangdong in handling significant cases related to artificial intelligence, chip manufacturing, and power batteries, which have a major impact in innovation-intensive fields [1]

Group 1 - A·Raymond Company was awarded a patent for a "connector" on March 25, 2009, and recently filed a complaint against a Suzhou automotive technology company for patent infringement [1] - The Suzhou market regulatory authority determined that the accused company had engaged in manufacturing, selling, and promising to sell infringing products, leading to an administrative decision to cease these activities [1] - The case has been recognized as one of the top ten typical cases of patent administrative protection in China, included in the 2024 white paper on the status of intellectual property protection [1] Group 2 - In the past year, the Suzhou Intellectual Property Protection Center handled 55 cases of patent infringement disputes, indicating a strengthened enforcement effort [2] - The center has established a collaborative mechanism with various departments to enhance the efficiency of handling infringement cases, including the introduction of a "patent administrative adjudication technical investigator" system [2] - The average processing time for patent infringement cases was reduced to 1.4 months, a 53.3% decrease from the legal time limit, due to optimized administrative adjudication processes [2]

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has launched a special enforcement action titled "Guarding Intellectual Property Rights" in 2024, focusing on combating trademark, patent, and geographical indication infringements that affect consumer rights and the business environment [1] Group 1: Enforcement Actions - SAMR has identified ten typical cases of intellectual property infringement, including trademark violations, counterfeiting of famous brands, and online sales of counterfeit goods [1] - A significant case involved Chengdu XGIMI Technology Co., Ltd. where the "XGIMI" trademark was infringed by Jiangxi Caiying Technology Co., Ltd., leading to a coordinated enforcement action across nine provinces, resulting in penalties exceeding 5 million yuan [2][3] - In another case, a live-streaming platform was used to sell counterfeit "Huawei" phones, leading to the dismantling of assembly sites and the arrest of 11 individuals, with the total sales amounting to 16.408 million yuan [4][5] Group 2: Case Details - The investigation into Jiangxi Caiying revealed that the company controlled ten others and sold infringing products through 25 online stores, resulting in a total penalty of 5.0721 million yuan [3] - In Shanghai, a joint operation uncovered 18 tons of counterfeit frozen poultry and over 1,500 fake packages, with a total involved amount of over 5.2 million yuan [6][7] - A counterfeit watch production site in Guangdong was discovered, producing over 3,470 fake Rolex watches, with the total value of the counterfeit goods reaching approximately 116.9465 million yuan [8][9]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the role of the Jiaozhou People's Court in enhancing intellectual property protection to foster innovation and economic development, aligning with the mission of cultivating new productive forces in 2024 [1]. Group 1: Intellectual Property Case Statistics - In 2024, the Jiaozhou Court accepted 693 intellectual property cases and concluded 651, marking a 19% increase year-on-year [2]. - Among these, civil cases accounted for 690, with a year-on-year growth of 19.79% [2]. - Cases involving trademark and copyright infringement totaled 650, representing a 19.27% increase and comprising 93.79% of the total cases [2]. Group 2: Innovative Judicial Models - The Jiaozhou Court has introduced an innovative "demonstration judgment + case mediation" model, effectively managing batch cases and promoting pre-litigation resolutions [3]. - In the "Nanf Battery" case, mediation was organized among multiple defendants, balancing the rights of the brand owner and the operational difficulties faced by small retailers [3]. Group 3: Case Resolution Efficiency - The court achieved a case withdrawal rate of 91.09% for intellectual property cases in 2024, with some case processing times reduced by one-third [4]. - A "three-in-one" trial mechanism was implemented, integrating criminal, administrative, and civil judges to enhance the efficiency and specialization of intellectual property case handling [4]. Group 4: Comprehensive Protection Mechanisms - The Jiaozhou Court has strengthened collaboration with various departments to establish a comprehensive intellectual property protection mechanism, promoting a coordinated approach among administrative, judicial, and industry associations [5]. - Initiatives include the establishment of "intellectual property protection service stations" and proactive engagement with businesses to address their intellectual property needs [5]. Group 5: Public Awareness and Education - The court has conducted extensive public awareness campaigns, including outreach to over 2,000 retail businesses to enhance understanding of intellectual property rights [6][7]. - Various educational activities, such as court observation and public lectures, have been organized to foster a culture of intellectual property protection [7]. Group 6: Case Examples and Legal Precedents - Case 1: A media outlet was ordered to pay 3,000 yuan for unauthorized reproduction of a comic, clarifying the boundaries of copyright infringement and fair use [8][9][10]. - Case 2: A company was ordered to cease using the trademark "Yuan Shi Mu Yu" and pay 6,000 yuan for trademark infringement, highlighting the legal distinctions between fair use and infringement in e-commerce [12][13][14]. - Case 3: A seller was ordered to stop using "Zhoushan White Pomfret" in product titles and pay 5,000 yuan for misleading consumers regarding product origin, emphasizing the importance of geographical indication protection [16][17][18].

Group 1 - The Qingdao Intermediate People's Court reported a total of 6,726 intellectual property cases concluded in 2024, with a focus on enhancing judicial protection for innovation [1][3] - The court received 6,981 intellectual property cases, with a notable increase in patent cases by 8.47% [1][3] - Over 56.7% of intellectual property disputes were resolved through non-litigation mediation, indicating a shift towards alternative dispute resolution methods [2] Group 2 - The court established a "Blue Storm" execution brand to improve the efficiency of property disposal and transfer in intellectual property cases, with 127 cases executed and over 11 million yuan recovered [3] - The court aims to strengthen judicial protection in key areas and enhance the effectiveness of intellectual property dispute resolution mechanisms [3] Group 3 - The court highlighted ten typical intellectual property cases for 2024, showcasing significant rulings in various sectors, including gaming, agriculture, and technology [4][5] - Notable cases include the first copyright infringement case involving a game software editor and a significant ruling against a home appliance review blogger for commercial defamation [2][21] Group 4 - The court's rulings reflect a commitment to punitive damages for malicious infringement, as seen in the case involving the "Dabeinong" trademark, where damages of 20 million yuan were awarded [5][6] - The court's decisions emphasize the importance of protecting intellectual property rights and fostering a fair competitive environment in various industries [6][24]

这是记者24日从2024年北京知识产权保护状况新闻发布会上获悉的。 中新网北京4月25日电 (记者 陈杭)截至2024年12月，北京市有效发明专利量66.3490万件，同比增长15.52%；有效商标 注册量323.2万件，同比增长4.98%；全市每万人口高价值发明专利拥有量159.81件，稳居全国第一。 2024年，北京市专利授权量19.9702万件，其中发明专利授权量11.9635万件；全市商标注册量23.7367万件；PCT申请 量1.2088万件；全市著作权登记量129.6782万件；植物新品种申请量962件，授权量361件。世界知识产权组织发布的 《2024年全球创新指数》中，北京排名全球科技集群第三，较2023年上升一位。 知识产权行政执法方面，北京市市场监管系统办理全市各类知识产权案件立案828件，结案813件。北京市知识产权局 受理专利代理举报案件49件，作出专利代理行政处罚10件。北京市区两级知识产权部门办理专利侵权纠纷行政裁决案 件51件。北京市文化市场综合执法总队开展执法检查10.5万余件次，办结案件2698起。 北京市版权局监测到网络侵权链接量共计286.2万条，发起维权232.2万次， ...

新华社北京4月29日电（记者 赵文君）市场监管总局29日表示，今年将进一步建立完善"反侵权假 冒政企协作机制"，组织开展"政企面对面"活动，指导企业提升品牌维权能力。 当日，市场监管总局召开新闻发布会，通报2024年知识产权执法情况，发布2024年知识产权执法十 大典型案件。 市场监管总局表示，今年市场监管部门将加强指导，督促落实自律公约，推动电商平台采取更加切 实有效的措施保护知识产权。 市场监管总局市场稽查专员嵇小灵介绍，市场监管总局去年开展了"守护知识产权"专项执法行动， 民生商品、外商投资、商标品牌、地理标志、申请代理、新兴产业六个方面是执法重点领域。 记者了解到，专项执法行动针对电子产品、家用电器等重点民生商品，严厉打击商标侵权、假冒专 利行为，提升消费品质，保障消费者权益，全年共查办民生商品领域侵权案件2.9万件。 严肃查处恶意抢注中小微企业商标、店面招牌商标侵权等行为，加强老字号品牌保护，查办涉及民 营企业商标品牌案件1.2万件，涉案金额2.7亿元，移送刑事案件393件。 此外，维护地理标志声誉与品牌价值，查办地理标志侵权假冒案件1407件，涉案金额980余万元， 移送刑事案件89件。加强对专精 ...

Core Viewpoint - The event in Shenzhen's Futian District focuses on enhancing high-quality intellectual property protection to accelerate the development of new productive forces, with participation from various stakeholders including experts, enterprises, and industry associations [1][3]. Group 1: Intellectual Property Protection Initiatives - The Futian District aims to establish a higher-level intellectual property protection system, aligning with the strategic vision of "CBD + urban innovation zone," leading to significant growth in strategic emerging industries [3]. - In 2024, the added value of strategic emerging industries in Futian District is projected to reach 118.7 billion yuan, with a growth rate of 12.7%, surpassing the city's average growth rate by 2.7 percentage points [3]. - The district has seen the formation of three trillion-level and five hundred-billion-level industrial clusters, with 60 specialized "little giant" enterprises, marking a 7.6-fold increase over three years [3]. Group 2: Knowledge Property Financing and Services - A new model for intellectual property pledge financing has been recognized as a national-level typical case, achieving a cumulative registration amount of 23.17 billion yuan and issuing eight intellectual property securitization products totaling 1.487 billion yuan [3]. - Futian District has established 114 intellectual property service points within its 78 square kilometers, providing quick rights protection services for enterprises and innovators facing issues related to patents, trademarks, copyrights, and unfair competition [4][5]. Group 3: Dispute Resolution Mechanisms - The district has developed a comprehensive dispute resolution framework, including the first national-level rapid rights protection pilot, enhancing the efficiency of intellectual property dispute resolution [4][5]. - The establishment of the first "Judicial and Arbitration Collaborative Protection Center" in the country and the alignment of arbitration rules with international standards highlight the district's commitment to improving dispute resolution mechanisms [5]. - The district's courts and procuratorates have centralized jurisdiction over foreign-related intellectual property cases, providing specialized guidance for local enterprises venturing abroad [5]. Group 4: Future Development Plans - Futian District plans to strengthen its service capabilities to support national strategies and high-level opening-up, aiming to create an integrated, collaborative, and efficient intellectual property dispute resolution service system [10]. - The district seeks to optimize the legal business environment, establishing itself as a trusted destination for domestic and international intellectual property dispute resolution, contributing to Shenzhen's goal of becoming a globally influential industrial and technological innovation center [10].

每经记者 石雨昕 每经编辑 廖丹 4月29日，市场监管总局召开专题新闻发布会，通报2024年知识产权执法情况。 2024年，全国市场监管部门积极行动，共查办商标、专利等领域违法案件4.4万件，涉案金额达到11.29亿元，并将1311件案件移送至司法机关处理。这些举 措切实有力地保护了权利人和消费者的合法权益，也让创新环境和营商环境得到了进一步优化。 此外，市场监管总局充分发挥统筹协调作用，组织江西、广东等9省（区、市）查办"极米坚果"商标侵权案件，成功查获违法经营额1.28亿元；还组织查办 了压片糖果企业利用商标宣称医疗保健功效欺骗消费者系列案件，截至目前，已经立案查处违法生产企业23家，并追踪溯源到上游违法企业和个人主体共计 36个。 发布会现场 图片来源：每经记者 石雨昕 摄 持续深入开展"守护知识产权"专项执法行动 党的二十大报告着重强调了加强知识产权法治保障的重要性，党的二十届三中全会也明确提出要加强产权执法司法保护。市场监管总局市场稽查专员嵇小灵 表示，2024年市场监管总局在推进知识产权执法工作中，主要从开展专项执法行动、狠抓大案要案、推进制度建设、深化国际交流合作、加大新闻宣传力度 等重点方向发 ...

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) announced the enforcement of intellectual property rights in 2024, highlighting significant cases of trademark infringement involving major brands such as "XGIMI," "LEGO," and "Huawei" [1]. Group 1: Enforcement Actions - A two-year special enforcement action plan titled "Guarding Intellectual Property Rights" was launched, with significant cases reported across nine provinces [1]. - The XGIMI trademark infringement case involved over 30 enterprises across nine provinces, with a total illegal business amounting to 128 million yuan [1][2]. - The Anhui Provincial Market Regulation Bureau reported a case involving 200 million yuan related to counterfeit clothing [1]. - A major trademark infringement case in Chongqing involved an amount as high as 300 million yuan [1]. Group 2: Specific Cases - The case against Jiangxi Caiying Technology Co., Ltd. for infringing on the "XGIMI" trademark involved extensive collaboration among regulatory bodies from multiple provinces [2][3]. - The Beijing Market Regulation Bureau addressed a case involving Beijing Youyou Education Consulting Co., Ltd. for infringing on the "LEGO" trademark [4]. - The Hebei Province's Xingtai City Market Regulation Bureau dealt with a case of infringement on the "Huawei" trademark [5]. - The Shanghai Market Regulation Bureau investigated Shanghai Jixu Food Co., Ltd. and others for infringing on the "Liuhe" trademark [5]. - The Zhejiang Province's Wenzhou City Market Regulation Bureau handled a case involving Wenzhou Zunxiang Technology Co., Ltd. for selling goods infringing on trademark rights [5]. - The Hubei Province's Xiangyang City Market Regulation Bureau addressed a case involving a gang producing and selling trademark-infringing "special supply liquor" [7]. - The Guangdong Province's Jieyang City Market Regulation Bureau investigated Wang Mouyi for producing counterfeit watches bearing "ROLEX," "RADO," and "FOSSIL" trademarks [8]. - The Chongqing Province's Youyang Tujia and Miao Autonomous County Market Regulation Bureau, in collaboration with the police, dealt with a case involving sales of goods infringing on "LV" trademarks [9]. - The Sichuan Province's Luzhou City Market Regulation Bureau addressed a case involving Luzhou Brothers Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. for infringing on the "Brothers Decoration" trademark [10].