当地时间9月15日，中美双方在西班牙马德里就有关经贸问题举行的会谈进入第二天。 来源：新华社客户端 ...

林剑：具体问题建议向主管部门询问。中方在中美经贸问题上的立场是一贯、明确的。 （文章来源：央视新闻客户端） 今天，外交部发言人林剑答记者问。有记者提问，美国总统特朗普在"真实社交"平台发帖称，希望中国 能将大豆订单增加3倍，这将是大幅削减中美贸易逆差的途径。中方对此有何评论？ ...

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the extension of the "truce period" for tariffs between the US and China by 90 days, as stated by US President Trump, who emphasizes the importance of dialogue to address trade imbalances and national economic security issues [1] - Trump highlighted his good relationship with Chinese leaders and indicated a wait-and-see approach regarding future developments in US-China relations [1] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has released information regarding the US-China Stockholm economic and trade talks, but specific details were not provided in the response [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government maintains a consistent and clear stance on U.S.-China trade issues, as indicated by the spokesperson's response to a question regarding President Trump's comments on increasing soybean orders to reduce the trade deficit [1]. Group 1 - The U.S. President expressed a desire for China to triple its soybean orders, suggesting this could significantly reduce the trade deficit between the two countries [1]. - The Chinese spokesperson recommended directing specific inquiries to the relevant authorities, indicating a formal approach to trade discussions [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government has refrained from commenting on the trade agreement expected between the United States and India, emphasizing its consistent and clear stance on Sino-U.S. trade issues [1] Group 1 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Guo Jia Kun, held a regular press conference on June 27, 2023 [1] - Guo stated that the trade agreement is a matter between the U.S. and India, and China will not comment on it [1] - The Chinese position on Sino-U.S. trade issues remains consistent and clear [1]

Core Points - The phone call between Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump on June 5 marks a significant adjustment in U.S. policy towards China after four and a half months of high-pressure tactics, indicating a shift towards dialogue to address major economic issues [2][3] - The dialogue reflects a growing predictability in U.S.-China relations, as both leaders seek to stabilize their interactions and address mutual concerns [2][3] - The recent Geneva economic talks laid the groundwork for this conversation, highlighting the importance of constructive engagement between the two nations [3] Group 1 - The timing of the call signifies a transition in Trump's approach, moving from aggressive pressure to a more conciliatory stance in light of ineffective previous strategies [2][3] - The U.S. has been exhibiting a dual approach of imposing sanctions while simultaneously seeking dialogue, which is characteristic of Trump's handling of trade issues [5][6] - The Chinese side emphasizes the need for the U.S. to adhere to agreements made, criticizing the U.S. for failing to uphold the consensus reached in Geneva [6][9] Group 2 - The internal dynamics within the Trump administration reveal conflicting views on how to engage with China, with some advisors advocating for a hardline stance that has proven counterproductive [7][8] - The call for mutual visits between the leaders is seen as a potential breakthrough in diplomatic relations, emphasizing the importance of stable interactions for both nations [11][14] - The overall sentiment from the Chinese perspective is that a stable and cooperative U.S.-China relationship is essential for addressing both domestic and global challenges [12][14]