"我刚才已经回答了有关的问题。"郭嘉昆重申，中方一贯按照相互尊重、和平共处、合作共赢的原则来 处理和推进中美关系，同时坚定维护自身的主权安全和发展利益，我们希望美方相向而行，共同推动中 美关系稳定、健康、可持续发展。 【环球时报-环球网报道 记者李萌】在8月26日外交部例行记者会上，有外媒记者提问，美国总统特朗 普称，美国在贸易方面对中国的影响力大于中国对美国的影响力。他称，飞机零部件是关键产品，华盛 顿必须应对北京对稀土的限制。中方对此有何评论？ ...

Core Point - The U.S. President Trump has exempted orange juice and certain aircraft parts from tariffs imposed on Brazil [1] Group 1 - The exemption of orange juice from tariffs may benefit the agricultural sector, particularly citrus producers in the U.S. [1] - The decision to exempt aircraft parts could positively impact the aerospace industry, facilitating smoother supply chains for manufacturers [1]

Group 1 - The European Union (EU) has approved a unified retaliation list against the U.S. totaling €93 billion, which will take effect if no satisfactory trade agreement is reached by August 1 [1][2] - The EU's retaliation measures include two previous rounds of tariffs, with the first round targeting U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs amounting to approximately €21 billion, and the second round responding to threats of a 30% tariff on EU goods, valued at around €72 billion [1][2] - Germany's shift towards a more confrontational stance against the U.S. reflects a broader change in the EU's negotiation strategy, indicating a readiness to escalate tensions if necessary [2][3] Group 2 - The EU is considering the use of a "counter-coercion tool," a mechanism that has never been formally activated, which would allow the EU to impose trade and investment restrictions on countries attempting to coerce member states [2] - Recent economic data shows that the Eurozone has shown resilience against the initial impacts of the trade war, with the July PMI rising to 51, indicating growth in manufacturing and services [5] - However, there are concerns about potential supply chain disruptions and the impact on the service sector, particularly in areas heavily reliant on U.S. exports [5]

Core Points - Indian Prime Minister Modi is set to visit the UK for two days starting on the 23rd, with a significant free trade agreement expected to be signed on the 24th [1][3] - This visit marks Modi's fourth trip to the UK since taking office [1] Group 1: Trade Agreement Details - The free trade agreement will allow 99% of Indian exports to the UK to enjoy zero tariffs, covering sectors such as jewelry, textiles, engineering products, leather, clothing, and processed foods [3] - In exchange, 90% of UK exports to India will receive phased tariff reductions, with immediate cuts for Scottish whisky tariffs from 150% to 75%, and further reductions to 40% over ten years [3] - Current tariffs on UK automobiles exceeding 100% will be reduced to 10% under a quota system [3] Group 2: Economic Significance - The agreement is seen as the most economically significant trade deal for the UK post-Brexit and marks India's first major free trade agreement outside Asia [3] - Analysts suggest that this agreement signifies the beginning of a long-term economic partnership between the two nations [3]

Group 1 - French President Macron rejected the unequal tariff agreement proposed by the U.S., emphasizing that France will use all means to respond to U.S. tariff measures, escalating the trade dispute between the two nations [1][3] - The U.S. has increased tariffs on French goods, including aircraft parts (15% tariff) and wine (25% tariff), claiming it is to correct trade imbalances, while France views this as unilateralism [1][3] - Macron advocates for a "zero tariff for zero tariff" agreement to achieve a fair and mutually beneficial trade relationship, indicating that if the U.S. maintains a 10% tariff, Europe will respond with equivalent measures [3][5] Group 2 - The EU plans to impose retaliatory tariffs on $95 billion worth of U.S. goods, covering various sectors such as civil aircraft, automobiles, medical devices, and agricultural products [3] - France is considering non-tariff measures, such as a digital services tax, to counter U.S. actions, with the French Minister of Economy and Finance stating that responses may include regulatory measures and targeted tax tools [3][5] - The trade dispute is seen as a continuation of historical tensions between the U.S. and France, with previous tariff actions dating back to 2019, and France's current firm stance exceeds U.S. expectations [3][5] Group 3 - The trade conflict has drawn criticism not only from France but also from other countries like Japan and India, which oppose the U.S. "reciprocal tariff" policy and have taken countermeasures [5] - U.S. wine retailers and importers have expressed opposition to the potential tariffs, arguing that they would harm American businesses and workers, while the National Retail Federation warns that tariffs will ultimately burden consumers [5] - France's luxury goods sector is less affected by U.S. tariffs due to support from the Chinese market, indicating a shift in reliance that diminishes the impact of U.S. tariff threats [5][7] Group 4 - Ongoing negotiations between the U.S. and France are tense, with the EU Commission President stating that the EU prioritizes negotiations but is prepared for retaliatory measures [7] - Macron's firm stance reflects France's determination to protect its interests, with the outcome of the trade dispute likely to have significant implications for global trade dynamics [7] - The International Monetary Fund warns that protectionist measures could slow global economic growth, urging all parties to resolve differences through dialogue [5][7]

Group 1 - The Indonesian Ministry of Economy has requested the United States to implement zero tariffs on its spices, cinnamon, coffee, and aircraft parts [1]

Core Viewpoint - Brazil's unexpected strong response to the 50% tariffs imposed by the Trump administration reflects a strategic approach rooted in historical lessons learned from China's past negotiations with the U.S. [1][2] Group 1: Brazil's Trade Strategy - President Lula emphasized two principles for trade negotiations with the U.S.: "firmness" in resisting tariff pressures and "caution" in protecting national interests [1][2]. - Brazil's approach contrasts sharply with Japan and the EU, which opted for compromise in the face of U.S. tariff threats, positioning Brazil as a more assertive player [1][2]. Group 2: Historical Context and Lessons - Lula's confidence is derived from historical experiences, particularly China's strong stance during tariff negotiations with the U.S., which ultimately led to a more favorable outcome for China [2]. - The lesson learned is that showing weakness invites further pressure, while a strong stance can lead to negotiations [2]. Group 3: Trade Deficits and Countermeasures - Brazil has a significant trade deficit with the U.S., importing $40.4 billion worth of goods while exporting only $15 billion, which provides leverage for retaliatory measures [4]. - Potential countermeasures could include imposing a 50% tariff on U.S. soybeans, reflecting Brazil's ability to respond effectively to U.S. tariffs [4]. Group 4: Impact on U.S. Stakeholders - The U.S. agricultural sector may face increased costs, with warnings that Brazilian countermeasures could raise U.S. soybean meal prices by 15%, impacting livestock producers [6]. - Historical precedents show that previous compromises by other nations led to further U.S. tariff escalations, highlighting the risks of a non-confrontational approach [6]. Group 5: Support from BRICS and Global Implications - Brazil's firm stance has garnered support from BRICS nations, which collectively oppose unilateral tariffs and advocate for a multilateral trade system [7]. - Lula's declaration of needing equal partners rather than a "world police" reflects a broader sentiment among developing nations regarding trade equity [7][8]. Group 6: U.S. Internal Divisions - The U.S. government is experiencing internal divisions regarding how to respond to Brazil's countermeasures, with some officials concerned about the electoral implications of escalating tensions [7]. - Brazil's agricultural sector remains confident in its food reserves and alternative markets, reducing the impact of potential U.S. sanctions [7].

Group 1 - The U.S. has extended the "reciprocal tariffs" delay by 90 days, pushing the implementation date from July 9 to August 1, while announcing tariffs ranging from 25% to 40% on imports from 14 countries [1] - The EU is one of the economies most at risk from U.S. tariffs, with potential tariffs on EU goods possibly soaring to 50% if no agreement is reached by August 1 [3] - Japan's GDP could decline by 0.8% in 2025 and 1.9% in 2029 if subjected to a 25% tariff, with significant impacts on its aircraft parts and construction machinery industries [6][8] Group 2 - Canada has made significant concessions in trade negotiations with the U.S., including the cancellation of a digital services tax to reach a comprehensive trade arrangement [4][5] - Southeast Asian countries, particularly Malaysia and Thailand, expressed frustration over the U.S. tariff letters, feeling that their efforts to negotiate trade agreements were undermined [11][12] - The potential impact of U.S. tariffs on India includes mixed effects, with certain sectors like pharmaceuticals possibly gaining leverage, while broader export categories may face challenges [10]

Group 1 - Japan's actual GDP is estimated to decrease by 0.2% with a 10% reciprocal tariff and by 0.4% if the tariff increases to 25% [2][5] - The export value of Japan in 2024 is projected to be 107.0879 trillion yen, with exports to the US amounting to 21.2947 trillion yen, representing about 20% of total exports [2] - The total export value of aircraft parts, including those exported to the US, is 307.9 billion yen, with 76.5% of this amount going to the US [4] Group 2 - The export ratio of construction and mining machinery to the US exceeds 50%, with Komatsu's sales in North America accounting for 30% of its total sales [5] - The machine tool and metal processing machinery export ratio to the US is 23.4%, with US orders making up about 20% of total orders for Japanese manufacturers [5] - The Japan Economic Federation expressed concerns that the new tariff rates would have a significant impact on Japanese companies' investment strategies and profitability [5] Group 3 - The Imperial Credit Corporation predicted a 5% increase in domestic bankruptcies in Japan for the fiscal year 2025, reaching 10,574 cases, if tariffs rise to 24% [6] - The chief researcher at the Imperial Credit Corporation indicated that if tariffs increase to 25%, the number of bankrupt companies is likely to rise further [6]

Group 1 - The imposition of a 10% reciprocal tariff and tariffs on the automotive industry is estimated to reduce Japan's real GDP by 0.2%, while an increase to 25% would expand the GDP decline to 0.4% [1][3] - Japan's exports to the United States account for approximately 20% of its total exports, with significant products affected by the potential 25% tariffs, including aircraft parts and construction machinery [1][2] - The construction machinery sector, particularly companies like Komatsu, has over 50% of its exports directed to the U.S., indicating a substantial impact from increased tariffs [2] Group 2 - The total export value of aircraft parts from Japan is 307.9 billion yen, with 76.5% of this amount going to the U.S., highlighting the vulnerability of this sector to tariff increases [1] - Major Japanese manufacturers in the metal processing machinery sector, such as DMG Mori and Makino Milling Machine, are planning to pass on tariff costs to customers as additional fees, reflecting the broader industry strategy to mitigate financial impacts [2] - The Japan Economic Federation (Keidanren) has expressed significant concern regarding the potential impact of increased tariffs on corporate investment strategies and profitability, indicating a widespread sentiment of crisis among Japanese businesses [2]