Workflow
全球博弈
icon
Search documents
中美达成实质性协议!欧洲掏500亿买气递投名状,全球博弈新棋局
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-29 09:58
现在全球格局里,最让人琢磨不透的不是大国之间吵得多凶,而是以前的"全球中心"欧洲,现在慌得跟 没头苍蝇似的。 你看冯德莱恩,高调说欧洲和美国是"价值观同盟",谢夫乔维奇还专门跑华盛顿,送上俩大礼,对美汽 车关税再砍10到20个百分点,再加三年多买500亿立方米美国液化天然气。 这不就是明摆着递投名状嘛,还有欧盟,主动把海上协同那套从欧洲弄到印太,每一步都透着"怕丢了 靠山"的慌劲儿。 10月26日,中美在马来西亚的会谈中,贝森特部长表示,美国不会再对中方加征100%的关税,达成了 这样实质性的协议后,中美之后的关系会朝着怎样的方向发展呢? 欧洲为啥陷入战略困局? 欧洲除了赶紧搞第19轮对俄制裁,封俄油俄气,就只能求美国送军火,自己呢,把压箱底的60多年前的 豹一坦克翻出来,结果保养太差,发动机打不着,炮也开不了,连一战时的马克沁机枪都拿出来了,乌 军直接当"破烂"退回去,你说丢人不丢人。 欧洲这焦虑,说到底就是"走惯了老路,不知道咋走新路"的悲剧,五百年霸权让它习惯了靠抢过日子、 靠抱大腿自保,现在让它当"二等玩家",根本接受不了,可自己又没能力独立发展。 一边拿中俄贸易当借口制裁中企,一边又因为中国管稀土放 ...
中美即将重返谈判桌!列出的三大问题,蕴含中美博弈的关键因素!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-20 17:00
Group 1 - The market is experiencing a split, with gold and silver prices soaring as a safe haven, while the stock market is declining, raising questions about which reflects the true economic fundamentals [1] - The semiconductor industry is critical, with a complex production process that can lead to significant losses if disrupted, highlighting the importance of rare earth elements in this supply chain [3][5] - China's recent actions regarding rare earth elements are seen as a strategic move in the ongoing global competition with the U.S., particularly as negotiations between the two countries are set to begin [3][7] Group 2 - Rare earth elements are essential for advanced technologies, including military applications, and their control is a significant leverage point in U.S.-China relations [7][9] - The rise in gold prices is attributed to fears of the Federal Reserve losing its independence and the potential for uncontrolled dollar issuance, which has historical implications for gold's value [10] - China's strategic use of its shipping capabilities and rare earth resources is aimed at gaining pricing power in physical assets, while the U.S. focuses on maintaining financial asset pricing power [12][14]
欧美抱团“去稀土”,中国优势还能守多久?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-30 01:37
Core Insights - The development of a rare earth-free neodymium-iron-boron alloy by Germany's VAC company signifies a strategic challenge to China's dominance in the rare earth market, as it offers comparable performance to traditional rare earth magnets [1][3] - The U.S. is actively pursuing "de-rare earth" initiatives, investing heavily in domestic research and development while imposing sanctions on Chinese rare earth companies to reduce reliance on China [1][3] - Europe is also taking steps to reduce its dependence on rare earths by forming the "European Critical Raw Materials Alliance" and exploring alternative materials, indicating a collective effort to regain control over supply chains [3][5] Industry Dynamics - The global rare earth supply is heavily concentrated, with China controlling over 70% of production and market share, making it a critical player in the industry [3][5] - The push for "de-rare earth" is not merely a technological endeavor but a strategic move to secure resource control and technological leadership, reflecting the competitive landscape between the U.S., Europe, and China [5][7] - Despite advancements in alternative materials, traditional rare earth magnets remain essential for high-end applications, suggesting that the transition to rare earth-free solutions will be gradual and complex [5][7] Future Outlook - The ongoing competition for rare earth resources and technology will significantly influence the global landscape of new energy, industry, and high-tech sectors in the coming years [5][7] - The balance between "de-rare earth" efforts and maintaining core advantages will determine which entities can secure leadership in high-end manufacturing and new energy [7] - The strategic implications of the rare earth market extend beyond simple supply chain management, representing a broader economic and technological rivalry that will intensify over time [7]
创金合信基金魏凤春:下半年全球资产配置的变化
Xin Lang Ji Jin· 2025-07-01 09:08
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that China's assets have a clear comparative advantage, primarily due to the manageable situation in the Middle East and the ongoing global restructuring of order, which has not yet disrupted existing pricing logic for global risk assets [1]. Market Trends and Asset Performance - In the first half of 2025, the market showed distinct trends, with significant appreciation in Chinese assets, particularly the North Star 50 index rising by 38.7% and the Hong Kong Hang Seng Index increasing by 21% [1]. - Safety remains a key consideration for many investors, as evidenced by a 24.7% increase in London gold prices and strong performance in bank stocks within the A-share market [2]. - Traditional industries like coal and real estate are experiencing declining returns, aligning with the broader trend of industrial transformation [2]. - Thematic investments in sectors such as robotics, innovative pharmaceuticals, and military technology reflect the evolution of dominant industries, driven by technological advancements rather than policy catalysts [2][4]. - The U.S. equity market is undergoing a complex head formation, with significant adjustments in tech stocks due to macroeconomic pressures, including high inflation and debt concerns [2][4]. External Variables Impacting the Market - A notable decrease in global risk premiums has been observed, attributed to the stabilization of geopolitical tensions and the emergence of a Nash equilibrium in U.S.-China negotiations [6]. - The U.S. debt pressure has eased, with the passage of legislation aimed at stabilizing the stablecoin market, which is expected to enhance demand for U.S. Treasury securities [7]. - The likelihood of Federal Reserve interest rate cuts has increased, although the Fed remains cautious due to inflation concerns stemming from trade tensions [8]. - Technology continues to be a focal point in global competition, particularly in the context of U.S.-China relations, with AI advancements being a critical area of investment interest [9]. Future Outlook - The trend of global asset reallocation remains unchanged, driven by persistent high U.S. interest rates and fiscal deficits, leading to a gradual outflow of capital from dollar-denominated assets [11]. - Tactical asset allocation will continue to focus on technology, with particular attention to advancements in autonomous driving and brain-computer interfaces, as well as expanding markets in China [11]. - Divergence in investor sentiment regarding gold is increasing, influenced by the rise of stablecoins and a potential easing of geopolitical tensions, which may diminish gold's traditional safe-haven appeal [12].