根治"烂尾"的通报，要从根源上扭转视舆情为洪水猛兽的观念。通报不是"权宜之计"。发通报的目的不 是"让事快点过去"，而是"公布真相、回应关切、解决问题"。要将通报作为有效的沟通手段，把调查结 果及处理意见讲清楚，切切实实拿出解决办法，让通报成为密切联系群众、推动问题整改的契机。 根治"烂尾"的通报，需要建立刚性督办与公开反馈制度。通报里的措施谁来负责、进度如何、何时完 成、成效怎样，都要有人管，都应拉出来"晒晒"，形成内部监督、群众监督、舆论监督相结合的监督合 力。 舆论关注会转移，但问题不会消失；热搜会更新，但记忆不会抹去。只有当人民群众的期待"句句有回 应、事事有着落"，信任才会真正生根，公信力才能真正牢固。（新华社记者刘佳敏） 新华社北京1月28日电 岁末年初，一些地方和部门加大了过往一年舆情通报的发布。但记者调查发现， 有的地方在初期通报中往往表示要"严肃处理""深入调查"，但随着舆论热度下降，承诺的调查却不了了 之，成了"烂尾工程"。这类"烂尾"的通报，不仅无法回应公众期待，反而会蚕食群众信任、侵蚀公信 力。 "通报烂尾"的表现形式不尽相同。有的虎头蛇尾，待舆论关注减退，调查与处理结果却石沉大海；有 ...

新华社北京1月28日电 题：莫让"烂尾"的通报蚕食公信力 "烂尾"通报的滋生，究其根源是政绩观错位，群众观念淡薄。遇到公共事件，一些地方和干部第一 反应是应付舆情，而非应对问题；发通报是怕上级追责，而不是为回应群众关切。有的领导干部甚至抱 有侥幸心理，觉得"舆情一降温，监督即退场"。监督与问责未形成闭环，也在一定程度上助长了"通报 烂尾"。通报中的问题整改是否进行、效果究竟如何，往往缺少强有力的制度约束和监督问责，使得"重 表态、轻落实"几乎无需代价。 根治"烂尾"的通报，要从根源上扭转视舆情为洪水猛兽的观念。通报不是"权宜之计"。发通报的目 的不是"让事快点过去"，而是"公布真相、回应关切、解决问题"。要将通报作为有效的沟通手段，把调 查结果及处理意见讲清楚，切切实实拿出解决办法，让通报成为密切联系群众、推动问题整改的契机。 根治"烂尾"的通报，需要建立刚性督办与公开反馈制度。通报里的措施谁来负责、进度如何、何时 完成、成效怎样，都要有人管，都应拉出来"晒晒"，形成内部监督、群众监督、舆论监督相结合的监督 合力。 舆论关注会转移，但问题不会消失；热搜会更新，但记忆不会抹去。只有当人民群众的期待"句句 有回应 ...

Group 1 - The meeting emphasized the importance of adhering to the political direction and prioritizing social benefits in news reporting, ensuring content safety and correct guidance [1] - It highlighted the need to enhance the dissemination of the Party's innovative theories and to produce reports that combine professional accuracy with emotional resonance [1] - The integration of cutting-edge technologies, such as artificial intelligence, into news practices was stressed, along with the establishment of an evaluation system that incentivizes excellent content [1] Group 2 - The meeting reported on the winners of the 35th China News Awards from Hunan, the 2024 Hunan News Awards, the first "National Top Ten Journalists," and the top ten participants in the 12th "Good Journalists Tell Good Stories" event [2] - Five award representatives shared their experiences and insights during the meeting [2]

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the "most busy five-person group" highlights significant issues in the integrity of public procurement processes and raises concerns about the credibility of government oversight mechanisms [1][24]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A government procurement evaluation list was found to contain names directly copied from an online name database, leading to public outcry [2][24]. - The names "Zhang Jiwei, Lin Guorui, Lin Wenshu, Lin Yanan, and Jiang Yiyun" appeared in multiple official documents, prompting investigations [2][8]. Group 2: Official Responses - The Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau of Zhuxi County acknowledged the issue as a significant error and initiated an investigation [2][5]. - A situation report was released stating that the project bidding process has been terminated and that further investigations will be conducted [5][19]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The same names have appeared in various contexts over the past four years, including administrative penalties and competition entries, indicating a pattern of misuse [8][10]. - The incident has raised questions about the reliability of public processes, with calls for improved transparency and accountability in government operations [24].

Core Viewpoint - The recent discovery of fake names used in various government procurement announcements and public lists has raised significant concerns about the integrity of public information and the processes involved in these announcements [1][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A list titled "10000 Chinese Common Names" from Baidu Wenku was found to be frequently used in government procurement announcements, award lists, and public information, leading to public outcry over the use of "fake names" [1]. - Hangzhou Normal University acknowledged that staff had fabricated names for a public welfare project, using names from the internet instead of actual beneficiaries, resulting in a lack of authenticity in the published lists [2][3]. Group 2: Financial Details - The project in question had a total funding of 4.5 million yuan (approximately 0.65 million USD), aimed at supporting left-behind children through various educational initiatives [2]. - The actual expenditures included 1.5 million yuan for library resources, 933,990 yuan for course development, and 100,536 yuan for learning supplies, among other allocations [2]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The issue of name duplication extends beyond Hangzhou Normal University, with similar instances reported in procurement announcements from other government bodies, indicating a systemic problem [3][5]. - The integrity of public procurement processes is crucial, as the selection of evaluation experts must be random and transparent to ensure fairness and compliance [4]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest that to combat the issue of fake names, there should be enhanced transparency in the entire process of public information disclosure, particularly in critical stages and operational details [5][6]. - There is a call for both self-examination by government departments and top-down supervision to identify whether these issues are isolated incidents or indicative of a broader systemic failure [6].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the "most busy five" names raises serious concerns about the credibility of public procedures and the effectiveness of oversight, highlighting potential issues with the authenticity and fairness of related documents and results [1][18]. Group 1: Government Procurement Incident - A government procurement evaluation list was found to contain names directly copied from an online database, leading to public outcry and questioning of the integrity of the procurement process [1]. - The names "Zhang Jiwei, Lin Guorui, Lin Wenshu, Lin Yanan, Jiang Yiyun" appeared in multiple official documents across various regions, indicating a systemic issue [1]. - The Hubei Shiyan government procurement announcement on December 3 revealed that these names matched the first five entries from a popular online name database, raising suspicions about the legitimacy of the evaluation process [1]. Group 2: Response and Investigation - On December 4, the local housing and urban-rural development bureau acknowledged the issue as a significant error and initiated an investigation, attributing the problem to both the agency's oversight and the mistakes of the contracted company [3][5]. - A joint investigation team was formed to address the situation, and the procurement process for the project was terminated [5]. Group 3: Broader Implications - Similar issues were reported in other competitions, such as the "Hua Xia Cup" calligraphy competition, where many winners' names also matched those from the same online name database, raising further concerns about the integrity of such events [7][8]. - The organizers of the calligraphy competition faced allegations of fraud regarding entry fees, and the competition's official account was subsequently deleted [8]. - The investigation into the "most busy five" names revealed that many names in administrative penalty lists also followed a similar pattern, often resembling those of well-known public figures, indicating a troubling trend in administrative practices [10][12]. Group 4: Public Trust and Accountability - The incident has sparked widespread public skepticism regarding the credibility of government processes and the need for transparent and accountable systems to prevent such occurrences in the future [18]. - Calls for improved mechanisms to ensure the authenticity of public records and decisions have emerged, emphasizing the importance of maintaining public trust and social order [18].

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve must maintain its credibility on inflation while balancing various objectives [1] Summary by Relevant Categories Federal Reserve's Position - The Federal Reserve, represented by Schmied, emphasizes the importance of credibility in managing inflation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The founder of Pang Dong Lai, Yu Dong Lai, publicly supported the restaurant chain Xi Bei amidst a controversy regarding the transparency of pre-made dishes, which has sparked significant public debate and scrutiny [1][4]. Group 1: Background of the Controversy - The dispute between Luo Yonghao and Xi Bei centers on the issue of consumer rights regarding the use of pre-made dishes, with accusations of misleading marketing practices [4][7]. - Yu Dong Lai's support for Xi Bei is seen as controversial, especially given the ongoing public backlash against the restaurant for its alleged lack of transparency [4][9]. Group 2: Yu Dong Lai's Perspective - Yu Dong Lai believes that the supply chain and food safety standards of Xi Bei and Hai Di Lao are superior to the industry average, thus justifying his support [4][10]. - His views are rooted in the stringent quality control practices of Pang Dong Lai, which emphasize food safety and traceability [4][10]. Group 3: Public Reaction and Implications - The public's focus is primarily on the need for transparency regarding the use of pre-made dishes, rather than the safety of such dishes themselves [7][11]. - Some consumers perceive Yu Dong Lai's comments as an attempt to deflect criticism from Xi Bei, leading to skepticism about his motivations [9][12]. Group 4: Broader Implications for Pang Dong Lai - Yu Dong Lai's previous support for controversial figures has raised concerns about the potential erosion of Pang Dong Lai's credibility and public trust [10][12]. - The distinction between Pang Dong Lai's retail expertise and the regulatory issues in the restaurant industry highlights a potential misalignment in Yu Dong Lai's judgments [11][12]. Group 5: Future Considerations - The need for Yu Dong Lai to articulate a more nuanced perspective that respects consumer rights while acknowledging the complexities of the food industry is emphasized [12]. - The ongoing scrutiny of his public endorsements suggests that any misstep could significantly impact Pang Dong Lai's established reputation for quality and trustworthiness [12].

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve Governor Waller expressed willingness to accept the position of Federal Reserve Chair if offered by the President, emphasizing the importance of market trust in the role [1] Group 1 - The Federal Reserve Chair must possess market credibility to effectively manage inflation expectations [1] - A lack of credibility could lead to a surge in inflation expectations, which poses risks to economic stability [1]