最近，中国在世界贸易组织（WTO）上公开批评美国的行为，引发了广泛关注。中国为何在即将与美国高层会晤之际，依然毫不客气地指责对方呢？ 事情发生在瑞士日内瓦的WTO服务贸易理事会会议上。中国主动提出议题，讨论全球服务贸易的稳定与责任，并公开批评美国特朗普政府的单边主义政 策，指出其关税政策对全球服务贸易带来的严重影响。中国还呼吁美国遵守WTO规则。此时，特朗普曾在社交媒体上宣布，月底将在韩国庆州举行APEC峰 会时与中方会晤。因此，很多人不解，既然特朗普主动提议见面，为什么中国还在WTO上"掀桌"？ 而且，特朗普提到的会晤核心问题非常自私。他明确表示，希望解决的是美国大豆出口的问题，抱怨中国减少了大豆进口，导致美国农民遭受损失，甚至提 议用关税收入补贴农民。更具讽刺性的是，特朗普并没有提出要改变那些单边关税政策，反而把责任推给拜登政府，甚至说本来中国会购买几十亿美元的美 国农产品。显然，特朗普此行并不是为了真正解决贸易争端，而是想迫使中国为美国农业的困境买单。 与此同时，特朗普一方面想通过舆论施压，先行公布会晤消息，另一方面又没有明确确认具体细节，目的显然是想借助舆论造势，迫使中国让步。中国如果 在此时还保持沉 ...

9月12日，在2025年中国国际服务贸易交易会举办期间，由北京市"两区"办主办、全球化智库（CCG）承办的2025"北京'两区'建设与企业全球化论坛"（第 十二届中国企业全球化论坛）在北京举办。在以"数智时代新兴市场的战略机遇"为主题的圆桌对话环节，嘉宾围绕企业国际化、人工智能发展、新兴市场 开拓、本土化策略及共建共享等关键议题进行了深入研讨。 全球化智库（CCG）副主任、高级研究员刘宏(主持人) 中国企业走向国际化，常面临如何应对碎片化市场，以及如何采取"重起轻放"的策略应对挑战。基于中国体量、中国思路以及改变河山的勇气，企业需要 在新兴市场中探索适合当地的成长轨迹。 另外，在我们满怀激情、希望通过AI推动社会进步的同时，也应花些时间观察异国他乡的细微景象——路边的小草、当地的风土人情——这些都是生活 的一部分，也能为我们理解和融入当地市场提供启示。 鹰瞳科技合伙人、国际部总裁陈雪玲 鹰瞳科技(Airdoc)是全球第一家用"AI医疗"在港股上市的公司，十年前鹰瞳就十分看好人工智能与医疗领域的发展。 回顾十年出海历程，可总结为一个"核心铁三角"：第一，深度本土化；第二，创新商业模式；第三，与本地共建生态。 换 ...

Group 1 - Brazilian President Lula emphasized the importance of sovereignty, negotiation, and multilateralism during the 2025 second ministerial meeting [1] - Lula stated that Brazil is willing to negotiate on equal terms but will not accept being treated as a subordinate [1] - He called for necessary reforms in global governance multilateral institutions to resolve disputes within a rules-based framework [1] Group 2 - In response to the United States imposing punitive tariffs of up to 50% on Brazilian goods, Brazil plans to rely on multilateral rules and seek consensus through negotiations [1] - Lula reiterated that Brazil is a rule-of-law country with its own constitution and laws, and all entities operating in Brazil must comply with these regulations [1] - The U.S. tariffs, effective from August 6, have severely impacted several key export industries in Brazil [1] Group 3 - On August 13, President Lula signed an executive order to initiate the "Brazil Sovereignty Plan" to mitigate the economic impact of the tariffs [1] - Brazil formally requested consultations with the World Trade Organization (WTO) on August 6, arguing that the U.S. tariffs violate several fundamental rules, including the most-favored-nation treatment [1] - Brazil is seeking to formally initiate dispute resolution procedures in response to the U.S. tariff measures [1]

Core Viewpoint - The discussion emphasizes the increasing complexity and politicization of global supply chains, driven by geopolitical tensions, technological changes, and other challenges, necessitating a focus on supply chain resilience and stability [4][7]. Group 1: Current Situation - The structure of global industries and supply chains has become more complex and politicized due to factors such as great power strategic competition, geopolitical conflicts, technological changes, global pandemics, and climate change [4]. - Countries have implemented various national policies and trade measures aimed at enhancing the resilience and security of their supply chains [4]. Group 2: Types of Measures - **Unilateral and inward-looking measures**: Some countries impose trade and investment restrictions on specific foreign goods, provide subsidies to domestic industries, and conduct security reviews of their supply chains, which often violate multilateral rules and increase economic costs [5]. - **Regional and "small multilateral" arrangements**: Countries establish closer ties with a limited number of partners through bilateral or multilateral mechanisms, which can create new barriers for non-participants and lack clear rules [6]. - **Multilateral mechanisms for rule coordination**: Some nations attempt to use platforms like the WTO and G20 to promote trade openness and cooperation in supply chain resilience, although these initiatives often remain conceptual without binding agreements [6]. Group 3: Importance of Multilateralism - The need for responsible nations to engage in multilateral discussions is highlighted, as unilateral measures can lead to a cycle of trade distortions and further disruptions in global supply chains [7]. - Strengthening multilateral mechanisms and promoting rule-based arrangements for supply chain security and stability is seen as a constructive way forward [7]. Group 4: Suggestions for Moving Forward - A call for like-minded WTO members to take a proactive role in initiating informal working groups or "small multilateral" initiatives to enhance focus on supply chain issues [8]. - Suggested elements for a global arrangement include reforming WTO rules, opposing decoupling measures, clarifying conditions for supply chain stability measures, and establishing supply assurance obligations for dominant countries in key supply chains [9][10].