谢锋说，中美经贸关系本质是互利共赢，关税战、贸易战没有赢家。希望美方采取实际行动，与中方相 向而行，认真落实两国元首重要共识，践行相互尊重、和平共处、合作共赢三原则，增进共识、减少误 解、加强合作，推动中美关系巨轮沿着正确航向不断前行。 （文章来源：新华网） 中国驻美大使谢锋28日晚在华盛顿侨学界庆祝中华人民共和国成立76周年晚宴上致辞时表示，平等、尊 重和互惠才是妥善处理中美间问题的良方。 谢锋说，今年以来，中美关系经历了一些风浪。在两国元首的战略引领下，当前中美关系总体保持稳 定。事实表明，中美拥有广泛共同利益和广阔合作空间，完全可以相互成就、共同繁荣，造福两国、惠 及世界。作为两个大国，中美存在分歧在所难免，关键是要尊重彼此核心利益和重大关切，尊重彼此对 社会制度和发展道路的选择。 谢锋说，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。今年是台湾光复80周年，台湾回归中国是二战胜利成果和 战后国际秩序的重要组成部分。美方应尊重事实，停止散布"台湾地位未定"谬论。 ...

谢锋在致辞中表示，今年以来，中美关系经历了一些风浪。在两国元首的战略引领下，当前中美关系总 体保持稳定。事实表明，中美拥有广泛共同利益和广阔合作空间，完全可以相互成就、共同繁荣，造福 两国、惠及世界。作为两个大国，中美存在分歧在所难免，关键是要尊重彼此核心利益和重大关切，尊 重彼此对社会制度和发展道路的选择。台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。今年是台湾光复80周年，台 湾回归中国是二战胜利成果和战后国际秩序的重要组成部分。美方应尊重事实，停止散布"台湾地位未 定"谬论。中美经贸关系本质是互利共赢，关税战、贸易战没有赢家，平等、尊重和互惠才是妥处问题 的良方。希望美方采取实际行动，与中方相向而行，认真落实两国元首重要共识，践行相互尊重、和平 共处、合作共赢三原则，增进共识、减少误解、加强合作，推动中美关系巨轮沿着正确航向不断前行。 据中国驻美国大使馆网站消息，2025年9月28日，中国驻美国大使谢锋应邀出席华盛顿侨学界庆祝中华 人民共和国成立76周年晚宴。 ...

新华社日内瓦9月23日电（记者石松）在联合国人权理事会第60届会议期间，中国民间组织国际交流促 进会22日在瑞士日内瓦万国宫同中国少数民族对外交流协会、普遍权利组织等国内外机构合作举办"平 等、人权和包容性发展"主题边会。近百名中外人士齐聚一堂，深入探讨民间组织在完善全球人权治 理、推动包容性发展方面的作用和贡献。委内瑞拉、印度、西班牙等国代表、多国非政府组织负责人和 专家学者参会。 与会嘉宾从不同角度深入分享了尊重和保护人权的实践和思考。中国民间组织国际交流促进会代表以移 动手术车和远洋医疗船项目为例，介绍了中国社会组织推动国际民间合作、保障发展中国家民众健康权 的实践。普遍权利组织代表认为，将发展权置于国际议题中心对全球南方国家具有重要意义。中国少数 民族对外交流协会代表分享了社会组织在尊重和保障少数民族发展权方面的积极作为。香港九龙城区区 议员分享了中国香港地区尊重和保障人权的具体实践。瑞士国际人权和社会发展协会代表表示，全球治 理倡议为解决当前全球人权治理中的不对称问题提供了可行方案。中华职业教育社代表强调职业教育对 实现发展权的重要意义，并分享了相关工作经验。锡克教人权组织代表讲述了民间社会在促进包 ...

Group 1 - Michael Sandel's recent visit to China focused on discussions around ethics in artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, and reflections on meritocracy [2][3][11] - Sandel expressed concerns about the impact of AI on the humanities and emphasized the importance of human qualities such as critical thinking and moral reasoning that AI cannot replicate [6][8][19] - He highlighted the ethical implications of genetic enhancement technologies, arguing that they could undermine human dignity and lead to social inequality [13][14] Group 2 - The concept of meritocracy was discussed, with Sandel noting that even the best implementation of meritocracy can lead to societal division and a sense of entitlement among the successful [16][18] - Sandel pointed out that the perception of meritocracy in China differs from that in the West, with historical ties to political power distribution through systems like the imperial examination [21][22] - He emphasized the need for public discourse on the role of technology in society and the ethical considerations surrounding it, advocating for more inclusive discussions on what constitutes a good life [15][25]

Core Argument - The article discusses the limitations of the theory of equality, suggesting that equality is more of a "luxury" in wealthy and secure societies rather than a universally applicable policy goal [2] Group 1: Historical Context - The United States, despite being the wealthiest and most secure country, is the most unequal among OECD countries, raising questions about the "American exception" [2] - Historical examples of countries that tolerated inequality for wealth include Britain during the Industrial Revolution, China post-reform, and the Roman Empire [3][4] Group 2: Cultural and Structural Factors - The American social contract is based on the promise of future wealth rather than equality, supporting the "American Dream" [5] - Cultural roots in the U.S. hinder the establishment of a redistributive social contract, making it difficult to adopt a Nordic model of equality [6][12] Group 3: Unique American Model - The U.S. model of inequality is sustainable only as long as it maintains its global leadership; other countries cannot easily replicate this model without facing strategic competition [7][8][11] - The U.S. can tolerate inequality due to its technological leadership and global dominance, which provides legitimacy to its system [9][13] Group 4: Lessons for Other Countries - Other nations should not mimic the U.S. model of inequality; instead, they should seek a balance between growth, innovation, and manageable inequality to ensure social stability [10][15]

Core Viewpoint - The book "The Spirit Level" argues that income inequality significantly impacts social quality in wealthy countries, suggesting that more equal societies tend to be healthier, happier, and more trusting [2][5]. Group 1: Key Findings from "The Spirit Level" - The book presents numerous scatter plots linking the Gini coefficient of income inequality with various indicators such as health, crime, education, and trust across over 20 developed countries, with the U.S. often at the extreme of inequality [5]. - It became a focal point in public policy discussions, with leftist parties using it to advocate for redistribution and welfare expansion, while some conservative think tanks criticized its methodology [5][6]. Group 2: Critiques and Limitations - Over a decade later, the book is seen as a product of its time, with critiques highlighting its exaggeration of the correlation between inequality and social outcomes, and its failure to consider the structural and geopolitical conditions that allow for equality [6][9]. - The methodology has been criticized for relying heavily on cross-national correlations to draw causal conclusions, with cultural and historical factors potentially influencing the observed outcomes [7]. Group 3: The Nordic Model - Supporters often cite Nordic countries as examples of how equality leads to prosperity and happiness, but this overlooks the historical and structural factors that contribute to their success, such as social homogeneity and resource wealth [8][9]. - The notion that equality can be achieved universally is challenged, as wealth creation is a prerequisite for meaningful equality, making it more of a luxury available to a select few [9][10]. Group 4: Security and Global Context - The security provided by the U.S. has allowed many OECD countries to invest in social welfare rather than defense, which is a critical factor often ignored in discussions about equality [10][11]. - The prosperity and equality seen in developed nations are largely built on the American-led world order, suggesting that these conditions are not easily replicable elsewhere [11][12]. Group 5: Policy Implications - Governments often use equality as a slogan in response to crises rather than as a core policy goal, indicating a lack of commitment to making equality a measurable objective [12][13]. - The book highlights that extreme inequality has social costs, but the leap from correlation to causation and the generalization from a small sample of developed countries face significant challenges [13][14].

Group 1 - Columbia University has reached an agreement with the federal government to pay over $200 million in settlement fees to end multiple federal investigations and restore federal research funding [1][2] - The settlement includes a payment of $210 million to resolve an investigation initiated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [2] - The agreement allows Columbia to maintain autonomy in hiring, admissions, and academic decisions while implementing reforms to address federal concerns [2][3] Group 2 - The U.S. State Department has initiated an investigation into Harvard University regarding its eligibility to continue as a sponsor for the exchange visitor program [4] - Harvard University condemned the investigation as a retaliatory measure by the government, asserting it will continue to support international scholars and students [4][5] - The Trump administration has previously demanded significant reforms from Harvard, including changes to its management structure and admissions policies, which Harvard has resisted [6][7] Group 3 - The Trump administration has been pressuring several top universities to adjust their policies, particularly targeting perceived anti-Semitism and affirmative action in admissions [6][7] - Over $2 billion in federal funding has been frozen for various prestigious universities, including Cornell, Northwestern, Brown, and Princeton, due to non-compliance with the administration's demands [7]

Group 1 - The core message emphasizes that the recent developments are a significant victory for everyone, aiming to achieve equality [1] Group 2 - The statement reflects a strong political sentiment, indicating a shift towards policies that promote equal opportunities [1]

Group 1 - The U.S. House of Representatives' "China Task Force" is investigating Harvard University for its collaborations with Chinese military-related institutions in dual-use technologies such as microelectronics, artificial intelligence, and quantum science [1] - Republican lawmakers, led by Chairman Mulvaney, have sent a 14-page letter to Harvard's president demanding internal documents and communications regarding the university's foreign partnerships, threatening to revoke its tax-exempt status if improper disclosures are found [1] - The investigation is part of a broader scrutiny of Harvard's operations, which has included inquiries into its handling of anti-Semitism and alleged collusion on tuition with other Ivy League schools [1] Group 2 - The U.S. government has been systematically targeting major universities for alleged violations of civil rights laws, resulting in significant federal funding cuts, including $400 million from Columbia University and nearly $1 billion from Cornell University [2] - The escalation of scrutiny towards Harvard reflects a political strategy by the U.S. government and Congress to establish boundaries regarding university operations and their connections with China, aiming to reshape higher education culture and demonize cultural exchanges with China [2]

Core Points - The seventh National Self-Reliance Model and Advanced Individuals in Assisting the Disabled Award Ceremony was held in Beijing, recognizing 200 "National Self-Reliance Models," 200 "Advanced Collectives in Disabled Persons' Work," and 60 "Advanced Individuals in Disabled Persons' Work" [1][4] - The selection of self-reliance models continues to focus on grassroots and frontline workers, with an average age of 43.28 years for the seven awardees from Hubei [2] Group 1: National Self-Reliance Models - Seven individuals from Hubei were recognized as National Self-Reliance Models, including a university teacher, a media editor, and a cooperative chairman, showcasing diverse contributions to society [3][4] - The awardees include individuals with disabilities who have excelled in various fields such as education, entrepreneurship, and community service, demonstrating resilience and innovation [2][3] Group 2: Advanced Collectives and Individuals - Seven collectives were awarded as Advanced Collectives in Disabled Persons' Work, including local disabled persons' federations and a public service center [3] - Two individuals were recognized as Advanced Individuals in Disabled Persons' Work, highlighting their significant contributions in healthcare and community leadership [4] Group 3: Broader Context - The event aims to showcase the achievements in the development of the disabled persons' cause in China, promoting values of equality, integration, and sharing [4] - The initiative is part of a broader effort by the State Council's Disabled Persons' Work Committee and other organizations to inspire self-esteem and self-reliance among the 85 million disabled individuals in the country [4]