人和人的资质不一样，境界不一样，因此认识和角度也不一样。 有人强调任正非的胸怀、格局，有人在意任正非的战略、谋略，有人关心任正非的家庭、经历，有人执迷任正非的方法论…… 当然这些都有道理，但为什么真正学懂任正非的老板寥寥无几呢？ 关键还是"心法"，不管你学谁，都一定要注意这个人最核心、最本质的东西。 老方说学习任正非，要注意两个核心关键词——公平、平等！ 华为成功，在很大程度上在于分钱分得好，在分钱这件大事上没有犯错误，任正非确实做到了不让奋斗者吃亏。 对员工来说，老板能够赏罚分明，大家多劳多得，奖勤罚懒，谁贡献大谁升职加薪，这是合理的，员工不怕吃苦受累，就怕付出没有回报。 如果这点上做不好，那无论是嘘寒问暖还是学什么管理办法都不顶用。 己所不欲勿施于人，你去买东西也不想被坑吧，那你在卖东西的时候就不能让客户吃亏。你坚持这样的原则，你其实也吃不了亏。 无论大生意还是小买卖，磨好豆腐给客户最好的产品和服务都必须遵循正确的价值观。 公平的背后是平等，对所有人一视同仁。天地不仁以万物为刍狗，圣人不仁以百姓为刍狗，众生平等。 但问题在于人们都喜欢以自我为中心，喜欢分三六九等，把自己摆在高人一等的位置，自命不凡，自视甚 ...

首先你想一想：俞敏洪"南极信"为啥能引发一场偌大的风波？ 主要还是因为有大量的员工对自己的老板不满，他们与其说是吐槽俞敏洪，不如说是吐槽自己的老板和公司，这可以视为一种职场情绪的宣泄。 为什么不满呢？ 我用10年时间，从任正非这里最后读出来的也这两个字。 我一开始学任正非，注意的是他的管理方法，后了组织、文化理念，等到了现在，我猛然意识到任正非"道"的核心可能就是"公平"而已。 当然，世上没有绝对的公平，有差异才有生态。而且老板眼里的公平跟员工眼里的公平很难达成一致，彼此的立场和角度不一样。 有次我跟某管理专家谈这点的时候，他就反驳说华为是学IBM等西方公司，西方的管理理念是"不平等最大化"，有能力的人上不封顶，比如要拿万亿薪酬的 马斯克就是这样，而能力、贡献不够的人就自然拿得少。 而且华为公司也强调在报酬与待遇上，坚定不移向优秀员工倾斜，以拉开差距克服熵增，激活组织，任正非又怎么是以公平为追求呢？ 我说"不公平"也是通往公平的必须。 灰度可以理解为矛盾的平衡和统一。 就因为老板跟员工之间的差距，有差距就有矛盾，在很多员工看来，凭什么我辛辛苦苦打工，老板就能锦衣玉食，游山玩水？ 员工也想去南极看企鹅，也想四处 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed hope that the EU will adhere to market economy principles and provide a fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory business environment for all companies, including Chinese enterprises, in response to the EU's decision to eliminate the tax exemption for small packages, primarily targeting inexpensive Chinese goods [1]. Group 1 - The EU member states have agreed to cancel the tax exemption policy for small packages, which is aimed at addressing the influx of low-cost Chinese products into the EU market [1]. - The spokesperson emphasized the importance of a fair and transparent business environment for all countries' enterprises, including those from China [1].

Core Points - The 16th United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) was held in Geneva, with participation from 170 member countries, marking a historical record for UN trade meetings [1] - The conference focused on reforming the global system to achieve fairer, more predictable, and inclusive development, culminating in the adoption of the Geneva Consensus document [1][2] - The conference addressed various global challenges, including economic stagnation, inequality, and the need for a more inclusive global economy [1][2] Trade and Investment - Countries reaffirmed the importance of a rules-based, open, transparent, and fair multilateral trading system, recognizing quality service trade as a new frontier for development [3] - Discussions included the decline and uneven distribution of global investment flows, with a focus on investment facilitation measures and policies to lower capital costs [3] - Qatar confirmed it will host the 9th World Investment Forum in 2026, aiming to expand solutions and partnerships for sustainable investment [5] Digital Economy and Debt - The conference highlighted the opportunities and gaps created by technological advancements in the digital economy, with calls for support to developing countries in skills, infrastructure, and frameworks [3] - Member states agreed to establish a borrower forum to enhance collective capacity and share experiences in global debt discussions [3] Support for Vulnerable Economies - Member countries committed to increasing support for the least developed countries and providing targeted assistance to small island developing states facing climate disasters and rising transport costs [3] - Continued efforts in trade facilitation and transit corridor development for landlocked developing countries were also pledged [3] UNCTAD's Role - The conference reinforced UNCTAD's role in promoting international cooperation and sustainable development, with a renewed mission and clear roadmap for the coming years [4] - The conference included over 40 high-level meetings and discussions on various topics, emphasizing the need for collaboration to drive development [2][4]

Group 1: Key Signals from the September Politburo Meeting - The meeting emphasized "people" and "fairness," indicating a focus on equitable development and high-level openness[1] - Core directives include "effective market and proactive government" and "strengthening bottom-line thinking" to ensure economic stability[1] - The meeting highlighted the importance of "tailored development" to address local conditions and avoid redundant construction[1] Group 2: Main Lines of the 15th Five-Year Plan - High-quality development, institutional reform, and industrial upgrading are identified as the three main lines of the new plan[3] - The 15th Five-Year Plan serves as a critical midpoint for assessing progress towards the 2035 modernization goals[3] - To achieve the 2035 goals, an average annual economic growth rate of approximately 4.4% is required during the 15th and 16th Five-Year Plan periods[3][25] Group 3: Focus Areas for Industrial Development - The plan will likely continue to support "emerging pillar industries" and "new quality productivity" as key areas for growth[5][39] - Specific industries mentioned include artificial intelligence, marine economy, and low-altitude economy, which are expected to receive significant attention[6][5] - The emphasis on service consumption and technology consumption indicates a shift towards more sustainable economic drivers[5][42]

用户想要的永远是公平、公平，还是他妈公平。用户炒的不是 “币安人生”、不是 “客服小何”，而是在这些 CA 之下，那一点点聚沙成塔的公平、机会和共识。Yi He (@heyibinance):来！一起修仙啊！https://t.co/e0RRdJLVOY ...

Binance Platform & User Expectations - Binance users prioritize fairness over guaranteed profits [1] - Users desire equitable opportunities within the Binance ecosystem [1] Binance Initiatives & Opportunities - Binance Alpha VC projects now offer equal buying opportunities [1] - BNBChain meme liquidity events empower skilled individuals, not just insiders [1] - Binance Wallet's new model allows retail investors to potentially earn significant returns [1] Fairness & Dynamic Change - Absolute fairness is unattainable, but relative fairness is possible [1] - Relative fairness provides opportunities for skilled individuals to compete and advance [1] - Improvements may be attributed to the bull market, but Binance's actions suggest genuine change [1]

Project Overview - Lighter's rules are fair to everyone [1] - No one has any advantage, including KOLs [1] - Everyone is treated equally [1] Market Value - Lighter's off-exchange points are already at 80 USD per point [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recruitment event by Pang Donglai has sparked discussions about fairness in employment practices, highlighting the company's commitment to equitable opportunities for various social groups [2][3][4]. Group 1: Recruitment Dynamics - Pang Donglai's recent recruitment attracted 132,000 registrations, with 83,000 applications submitted, leading to 2,988 candidates being interviewed for 900 positions, indicating intense competition [1]. - The company has introduced training programs for applicants, with "real questions" starting at 8.9 yuan and interview training priced at 260 yuan for 1.5 hours, claiming an 80% pass rate [1]. Group 2: Fairness in Employment - The company emphasizes fairness as a core value, reserving 200 positions for veterans and 20 for ex-offenders, showcasing a commitment to providing opportunities for marginalized groups [2]. - The recruitment process utilizes technology to ensure fairness, such as automatic screening to avoid bias and cultural assessments to match values, which reflects a structured approach to hiring [2][3]. Group 3: Challenges and Critiques - Despite efforts to promote fairness, the recruitment process has faced criticism for perceived inequities, such as the requirement for a bachelor's degree for cleaning positions, which some view as educational discrimination [3][4]. - The disparity between the number of applicants and available positions raises questions about the fairness of the selection process, as success may depend on speed and internet access rather than qualifications [3][4]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The expectations placed on Pang Donglai to address broader societal issues of fairness may be unrealistic, as the company can only provide limited opportunities compared to the scale of the problem [4]. - True employment fairness requires systemic changes across education, vocational training, corporate hiring practices, and social security systems, which extend beyond the capabilities of a single company [4].

Group 1 - Ecological environment law enforcement is crucial for protecting natural resources and promoting green development, yet issues such as inadequate performance and non-standard enforcement hinder effective ecological governance [1] - To enhance law enforcement, a three-pronged mechanism of "responsibility implementation, supervision strengthening, and strict assessment" is proposed, emphasizing proactive engagement from enforcement personnel [1] - The establishment of a dynamic monitoring network for pollution sources using a "smart environmental protection" platform is recommended to ensure real-time oversight of key polluting enterprises and sensitive ecological areas [1] Group 2 - Standardizing ecological environment law enforcement is essential for maintaining public trust and protecting corporate rights, necessitating the creation of a standardized enforcement system [2] - The refinement of the "Ecological Environment Administrative Penalty Discretionary Power Benchmark" is suggested to clarify punishment gradients for different violations, reducing human intervention [2] - Promoting fairness in law enforcement requires dual efforts from both enforcement and corporate entities, including training for enforcement personnel and encouraging companies to invest in environmental protection technologies [2]