党的二十届四中全会提出，完善社会治理体系，推进社会治理现代化。这是确保中国特色社会主义现代 化道路行稳致远的保障。新征程上，只有持续完善治理体系、提升治理能力，才能破解发展难题、抵御 风险挑战，为实现高质量发展与民族复兴伟业筑牢坚实根基。 从历史维度看，治理体系和治理能力现代化是持续推进中国式现代化的必然选择 中国特色社会主义制度和国家治理体系具有深厚的历史底蕴。中国古代社会形成了"天下为公""政在养 民"等国家治理理念，以及郡县制度、科举制度、监察制度等国家制度和治理体系。近代以来，面对民 族危亡，无数仁人志士奔走求索，探寻新的国家制度和国家治理体系。他们尝试过各种西方现代化方 案，但都因缺乏适配中国国情的有效治理支撑而功败垂成。中国共产党诞生后，将治理体系构建和治理 能力建设与现代化探索紧密结合，在我国革命、建设和改革每个历史时期，逐步构建起符合中国实际的 治理框架，擘画出贴近中国实际的现代化图景。从新民主主义革命时期革命根据地的治理实践，到社会 主义建设时期社会主义基本制度的确立、国家治理制度根基的奠定，再到改革开放后治理体制机制创新 的持续推进、治理体系的逐步完善、治理能力的逐次跃升，都为中国推进现代 ...

木立信的契约精神遇见全过程人民民主的制度实践，当郑板桥的枝叶情怀转化为"民有所呼、政有 所应"的治理机制，当张居正的战略智慧融入国内国际两个大局的系统战略布局，中华优秀传统文 化基因正在治理体系和治理能力现代化的进程中焕发新生。（作者单位：成都理工大学马克思主 义学院） 跟着总书记学典故·从历年新年贺词读懂中国编 者 按2024年思想周刊推出《跟着总书记学典故》 系列理论文章，阐释了习近平总书记在文化传承发展座谈会上列举的中华优秀传统文化中的诸多 重要元素，获得读者诸多好评。岁月流转，典韵常新。如今我们推出《跟着总书记学典故》第二 季，聚焦总书记历年发表的新年贺词中的典故，这些典故中蕴含着博大的中国文化，承载着深厚 的家国天下情怀。从这些典故中，我们能更清晰地读懂中国，更加感知其中薪火相传的力量。敬 请垂注。【释义】徙木立信：原意为通过徙木赏金在民众中树立诚信，现多强调公信力是政令施 行的根基，警示执政者必须言行一致、政通令行。枝叶总关情：形容关系到百姓生活的事没有小 事，就像树木的枝叶总与根脉相连，牵动人心。锐始者必图其终，成功者先计于始：凡勇于开创 事业者，必须思虑周全、谋定长远；成就功业之人，无不从起步 ...

Core Viewpoint - Since 2025, Guangyuan City in Sichuan Province has focused on breaking formalism and strengthening practical responsibility, supported by institutional innovation and brand activities, to effectively manage the 12345 government service hotline and promote modernization of governance systems and capabilities [1] Group 1: Political Commitment and Governance Responsibility - The city prioritizes public satisfaction as the highest standard, moving away from ineffective practices and ensuring that issues are resolved throughout the process [2] - The leadership has integrated hotline management into key performance assessments and established a collaborative work structure involving multiple levels of government and society [2] - The city aims to address deep-rooted issues in demand handling through a unified approach that combines problem orientation, goal orientation, and effect orientation [2] Group 2: Institutional Innovation and Efficient Governance - A comprehensive closed-loop management system has been established, including a monthly inter-departmental meeting to clarify responsibilities and address communication issues [3] - The city has implemented a responsibility mechanism where key issues are overseen by top leaders, ensuring accountability at all levels [3] - A strict "one-line handling" policy requires direct communication and verification with the involved parties to eliminate formalism [3] Group 3: Brand Activities and Public Engagement - The city has launched initiatives like "Business Look at Guangyuan's 'Top Leader' Hotline" to enhance immediate response and collaborative problem-solving [4] - The hotline platform integrates extensive service guidelines and knowledge bases, enabling rapid processing and proactive governance [4] - Media coverage of leaders' commitments has generated significant public engagement, with over 10 million total views and a satisfaction rate of 99.63% [4] Group 4: Reform and Innovation for Proactive Governance - The city is leveraging digital tools to enhance service quality, including a smart service platform that improves knowledge retrieval and inter-departmental collaboration [5] - A dedicated service area for businesses has been established, facilitating the resolution of enterprise-related issues and improving policy accessibility [5] - Data analysis from the hotline system is being used to identify and address community needs, providing valuable insights for decision-making [5]

Core Insights - The article discusses the efforts of Guangyuan City in Sichuan Province to enhance governance and service delivery through innovative practices and reforms aimed at addressing formalism and promoting practical accountability [1][2]. Group 1: Governance and Accountability - The city emphasizes a people-centered approach, prioritizing "public satisfaction" as the highest standard and moving away from ineffective practices that focus on processes rather than outcomes [2]. - Political leadership is actively involved in hotline operations, integrating public demand handling into key performance assessments and establishing a collaborative governance framework [2][3]. - The city aims to resolve deep-rooted issues in demand handling, such as unclear responsibilities and inefficiencies, by promoting a unified approach that combines problem-solving, goal orientation, and effectiveness [2][3]. Group 2: Institutional Innovation - A comprehensive closed-loop management system has been established, including a monthly inter-departmental meeting to address key public demands and clarify responsibilities [3]. - The city has implemented a "first-hand responsibility" system, ensuring that senior leaders oversee critical issues and that the first department handling a case is accountable throughout the process [3]. - A strict "one-line handling" policy requires direct communication and on-site verification by responsible units, eliminating formalism in service delivery [3]. Group 3: Brand Activities and Public Engagement - The city launched initiatives like "Business Leaders Answer Hotlines" to address urgent public concerns, with leaders directly engaging with citizens to resolve issues [4]. - The hotline platform integrates extensive service guidelines and knowledge bases, enabling rapid response and proactive governance [4]. - Media coverage of these initiatives has generated significant public engagement, with over 10 million total views and a satisfaction rate of 99.63% from follow-up visits [4]. Group 4: Digital Empowerment and Community Involvement - The city is leveraging digital tools to enhance service quality, including the deployment of a large model for knowledge management and a system for reporting safety hazards [5]. - A dedicated service area for businesses has been established, providing tailored support and facilitating the resolution of enterprise-related issues [5]. - Data analysis from the hotline system is used to identify trends in public demands, informing decision-making and improving governance strategies [5].

Core Points - The meeting focused on studying and implementing the spirit of the 20th Central Committee's Fourth Plenary Session, emphasizing the importance of integrating this with the study of "Xi Jinping: The Governance of China, Volume V" [1][3] - The meeting highlighted the significant achievements and deployments from the 20th Central Committee, aiming to deepen reforms and modernize governance systems [3] Group 1 - The meeting was chaired by An Wei, who emphasized the need for city leaders to combine the study of the 20th Central Committee's spirit with practical applications [3] - An Wei outlined several focal areas for development, including high-quality growth, modern industrial systems, and enhancing urban competitiveness [4] - The importance of political responsibility and organizational leadership was stressed, along with the need for effective planning for the 14th and 15th Five-Year Plans [4] Group 2 - The meeting included contributions from various members of the theoretical study group, indicating a collaborative approach to learning and implementation [2][5] - An Wei called for a focus on green and low-carbon development, cultural confidence, and improving people's livelihoods as part of the city's strategic goals [4] - The necessity of achieving modern social governance and ensuring safety in urban development was also highlighted [4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes three main development lines during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period: the fourth industrial revolution led by AI, the construction of a new development pattern based on a new security framework, and the internal structural transformation of China [2][3][4]. - The first main line focuses on AI as a key driver of the fourth industrial revolution, with significant global attention and investment in AI technologies from major economies like the US and EU [3][4]. - The second main line addresses the need for a new development pattern in response to the changing global landscape and the strategic restructuring of economic globalization led by the US, which poses new challenges for China [4][5]. Group 2 - The third main line involves internal structural transformation, which includes three major tasks: adjusting demand structure, managing the relationship between emerging and traditional industries, and optimizing urban-rural structures [5][6]. - The adjustment of demand structure aims to enhance domestic consumption as a fundamental strategy to address overcapacity and economic downturns, requiring a long-term approach [5][8]. - The optimization of urban-rural structures necessitates significant breakthroughs in reducing disparities in social security and public services, particularly addressing the urbanization of approximately 300 million migrant workers [5][6]. Group 3 - Governance system reform is identified as the core to overcoming internal structural transformation challenges, emphasizing the need for government reform to modernize governance capabilities [6][7]. - The government should shift its focus from a rough assessment system based on industrialization and urbanization to a more refined management approach that prioritizes service industries and consumer welfare [7][8]. - Expanding domestic demand is crucial, with a focus on increasing consumption through income distribution reforms and innovative consumption scenarios, rather than relying solely on short-term stimulus [8][9]. Group 4 - The phenomenon of "involution" in industries like solar energy and electric vehicles has become a pressing issue, necessitating strategies to address overcapacity and avoid excessive competition [9][10]. - Differentiated strategies are required for managing overcapacity, with traditional industries facing potential shutdowns while new industries should be allowed to innovate and maintain competitive advantages [10][11]. - The government's "anti-involution" actions have transitioned from a slogan to a structured initiative, with regulatory measures being implemented to ensure fair competition and address the root causes of overcapacity [11][12].

Core Points - The meeting emphasized the importance of strengthening grassroots governance through Party leadership, aligning with Xi Jinping's directives on the matter [1][2] - The focus is on modernizing governance systems and capabilities, enhancing community services, and addressing public concerns effectively [2] Group 1 - The meeting highlighted the need to deepen understanding and responsibility regarding Party-led grassroots governance, aiming to enhance citizens' sense of happiness and security [1] - Key tasks include strengthening organizational foundations and improving the capabilities of local Party committees and community leaders [2] - The initiative includes targeted actions in specific areas such as large communities and urban-rural junctions to improve governance [2] Group 2 - The meeting called for the establishment of a robust leadership coordination mechanism to invigorate grassroots governance [2] - Emphasis was placed on professionalizing social work in key areas and enhancing the participation of community organizations in governance [2] - The goal is to create a collaborative governance model by utilizing various community roles such as grid workers and mediators [2]