ESG的核心价值，在于推动企业实现经济效益与环境、社会效益的共赢。然而部分企业的"漂绿"行 为，不仅误导了消费者与投资者，也侵蚀了市场对可持续发展的信任根基。 证监会修订版《上市公司治理准则》自2026年1月1日起施行，要求主板公司年报同步披露ESG信 息，科创板、创业板可延后一年。这意味着2026年1月1日起，香港、内地将实施更严格的ESG强制披露 要求，主要涉及气候相关排放数据、绿色金融工具及公司治理等核心内容。随着强制披露时代的来临， ESG回归"实质行动"将成为大势。 多位市场人士表示，随着全球可持续发展进程加速演进，应对气候变化、保护生物多样性、促进社 会公平等议题的紧迫性持续提升，ESG也从共识走向深度实践。在这个过程中，中国企业ESG实践也逐 渐从"概念引入"迈入"深化落地"阶段，其生态体系日臻成熟。 2006年，深交所发布《上市公司社会责任指引》，首次倡导企业披露环保、劳工权益等非财务信 息，这为ESG相关实践奠定了基础。2008年，上交所推出《上市公司环境信息披露指引》，聚焦污染排 放、环保投入等环境议题，明确披露内容范围，但仍以"鼓励自愿"为主。 此后十多年间，香港联交所、证监会、生态环境 ...

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of mandatory ESG disclosure for A-share listed companies is approaching, with the first reports due in 2026, marking a shift from voluntary to compulsory disclosure [1][2]. Group 1: ESG Disclosure Requirements - Companies listed in key indices such as the Shanghai Stock Exchange 180 and the Sci-Tech Innovation Board must disclose their 2025 sustainability reports by April 30, 2026 [2]. - Currently, 95% of companies that will be subject to mandatory disclosure have already released sustainability or social responsibility reports, laying a solid foundation for the new system [2]. Group 2: Strategic Planning and Implementation - Increasingly, listed companies are proactively developing comprehensive ESG strategies, with many adopting three-year cycles for their ESG reports that encompass risk identification, strategy formulation, implementation, and accountability [2]. - 87% of companies that have disclosed ESG reports have established governance structures for sustainability, and 70% have conducted dual materiality assessments, indicating a robust governance framework [2]. Group 3: Market Impact and Benchmarking - Leading companies' ESG strategies set benchmarks for the market, facilitating a transition from voluntary to standardized disclosure practices [3]. - The ESG practices of major firms, which account for over 70% of A-share market capitalization, create a positive feedback loop of disclosure, rating, and financing, encouraging smaller companies to follow suit [3]. Group 4: Challenges and Support Mechanisms - Some companies, particularly in high-energy and complex supply chain industries, face challenges in ESG disclosure, often viewing it merely as a compliance task rather than a strategic priority [4]. - Market experts suggest targeted training and support mechanisms to help companies overcome disclosure challenges, including workshops and the provision of simplified templates [5][6]. Group 5: Addressing "Greenwashing" Risks - The risk of "greenwashing" poses a significant challenge to ESG disclosure, necessitating both technological solutions and punitive measures to enhance compliance [7]. - Recommendations include establishing a data monitoring platform to analyze ESG-related data and implementing strict penalties for non-compliance to deter misleading practices [7][8]. Group 6: Regulatory Framework and Standardization - There is a need for a unified regulatory framework for ESG ratings to address the current issues of multiple standards and low comparability [8]. - Regulatory bodies are encouraged to develop quality control standards for ESG ratings and ensure transparency and reliability in the rating process [8][9]. Group 7: Future Directions - The ongoing optimization of ESG disclosure systems and the introduction of specialized guidelines for various sectors will be crucial for enhancing the quality of disclosures [9]. - As mandatory disclosure systems are implemented, ESG investment products are expected to evolve towards greater sophistication, contributing to the sustainable development of capital markets [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issue of "greenwashing" in the context of Shede Distillery's ESG reports, highlighting the discrepancies between the company's public disclosures and the actual social and environmental impacts of its expansion projects [5][15][19]. Group 1: ESG Reporting and Transparency - Shede Distillery has been accused of "greenwashing" due to its selective disclosure in ESG reports, which fail to address significant issues such as land acquisition disputes arising from its expansion projects [5][7][19]. - The company's ESG reports from 2022 to 2024 have been criticized for only briefly mentioning community issues while focusing on positive achievements and data [8][15]. - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has raised concerns about Shede's declining capacity utilization rates and the significant gap between funding and project progress, questioning the rationale behind large investments amid declining revenues [13][14]. Group 2: Broader ESG Challenges - The article points out that the issue of selective transparency is not unique to Shede Distillery, as many manufacturing companies often highlight positive contributions to employment and community development while neglecting critical data on labor disputes and safety incidents [20]. - The article emphasizes that the social dimension of ESG reporting, particularly regarding labor rights and community relations, is often overlooked, leading to a disconnect between reported data and actual practices [19][20]. - Internationally, regulatory frameworks are evolving to address "greenwashing," with examples from Europe where strict penalties are imposed for misleading ESG claims, contrasting with the current state of ESG regulation in China [22][24]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - To mitigate the risk of "greenwashing," the article suggests that China should implement three key adjustments: clarify the regulatory nature of ESG reports, establish a unified set of indicators and auditing standards, and set minimum disclosure requirements for social dimensions, especially in sensitive areas like land acquisition and labor [25][26]. - The article argues that for ESG to transition from a public relations tool to a reliable market information source, it must be treated as a system rather than a mere concept, requiring transparency in risk disclosure [27][26].

Core Insights - Investors are increasingly focused on the effectiveness of companies' ESG practices and the realization of "green value" [1] - There is a growing concern about companies exaggerating or misrepresenting their environmental claims, leading to the need for robust internal control processes [1] - Regulatory bodies are urged to establish standards for green and low-carbon practices, enforce penalties for "greenwashing," and strengthen information disclosure requirements [1] Group 1 - The topic of ESG and environmental protection has become a hot issue on investor relations platforms [1] - Investors are not only interested in the implementation of ESG concepts but also in the tangible outcomes of "green value" [1] - Experts recommend that companies be cautious of exaggeration, distortion, and false advertising regarding their environmental claims [1] Group 2 - There is a call for regulatory authorities to create standards related to green and low-carbon initiatives [1] - The need for oversight and penalties for "greenwashing" practices is emphasized [1] - Strengthening the constraints of information disclosure systems is considered essential [1]

Core Insights - The ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) evaluation system is reshaping corporate value, with the environmental dimension being central to "green value" [1] - Companies are increasingly focusing on environmental protection and carbon neutrality as key points for brand communication and product value enhancement [2][3] - There is a growing concern among investors regarding the authenticity of companies' ESG practices and the risk of "greenwashing" [1][6] Investor Concerns - Investors are showing heightened interest in companies' environmental protection efforts and ESG commitments, with numerous inquiries on platforms like Shanghai Stock Exchange's e-Interaction and Shenzhen Stock Exchange's Interactive Easy [2] - Specific questions raised by investors include inquiries about environmental investments, compliance with environmental assessments, and management of new pollutants [2] Corporate Initiatives - Companies like Anta Sports and Honor have set ambitious carbon neutrality goals, with Anta aiming for over 30% of sustainable products by 2024 and Honor targeting carbon neutrality in operations by 2040 [2][3] - Other companies, such as Master Kong, are launching environmentally friendly products and reducing packaging waste to lower carbon emissions [3] Greenwashing Risks - Experts warn about the dangers of "greenwashing," where companies may exaggerate or misrepresent their environmental efforts, potentially leading to reputational damage and legal risks [4][6] - The need for clear definitions and standards regarding carbon neutrality and environmental claims is emphasized, as current regulations are often vague [7] Regulatory Environment - There is a lack of specific policies against "greenwashing" in China, with existing regulations scattered across various laws [7] - Recent developments include the introduction of group standards for carbon neutrality labels, which aim to provide a unified benchmark for industries [7] Internal Governance - Companies are encouraged to strengthen internal governance structures to prevent "greenwashing," with some firms linking executive compensation to environmental performance [8] - Establishing a robust ESG management system and ensuring compliance with international disclosure standards are critical for companies [9]

Core Insights - The ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) evaluation system is reshaping corporate value, with the environmental dimension (E) being central to "green value" [1] - Companies are increasingly focusing on environmental protection and carbon neutrality as key points for brand communication and product value enhancement [1][2] - Investors are showing heightened interest in companies' ESG practices and the tangible outcomes of their "green value" initiatives [1][2] Investor Concerns - There has been a noticeable increase in investor inquiries regarding environmental protection and ESG on platforms like Shanghai Stock Exchange's e-Interaction and Shenzhen Stock Exchange's Interactive Easy [1][2] - Specific questions from investors include inquiries about companies' environmental investments, compliance with environmental assessments, and management of new pollutants [1][2] Corporate Initiatives - Companies like Anta Sports and Honor have set ambitious carbon neutrality goals, with Anta aiming for carbon neutrality by 2050 and Honor targeting the same for its value chain [1][2] - Anta has reported that over 30% of its products will be sustainable by 2024, with several products achieving carbon neutrality certification [1] - Other companies, such as Master Kong, are launching environmentally friendly products and reducing plastic use in packaging [2] Greenwashing Risks - Experts warn about the risks of "greenwashing," where companies may exaggerate or misrepresent their environmental efforts [2][3] - Specific examples include Apple removing carbon neutrality claims from its product marketing following legal scrutiny [2] Regulatory Environment - There is a lack of specific regulations against "greenwashing" in China, with existing laws focusing on truthful disclosure and advertising [5] - New standards for carbon neutrality and related concepts are being introduced to provide clearer guidelines for companies [5] Internal Governance - Companies are encouraged to strengthen their internal governance systems to prevent "greenwashing," with some linking executive compensation to environmental performance [6] - Establishing a robust ESG management framework and ensuring compliance with international disclosure standards are critical for companies [6][7] Information Disclosure - Clear, truthful, and verifiable environmental claims are essential for companies to avoid "greenwashing" accusations [7] - Companies should implement multi-dimensional control mechanisms, including management accountability and rigorous data management systems [7]

Core Viewpoint - The global fashion industry is undergoing a significant regulatory revolution aimed at combating "greenwashing" practices, driven by increasing awareness of climate change and environmental protection [1][2][11]. Regulatory Developments - The European Union (EU) has been at the forefront of establishing new regulations for sustainable development in the fashion industry, focusing on unfair business practices and misleading environmental claims [2][11]. - Key legislative initiatives include the EU's "Sustainable and Circular Textiles Strategy" and the "Green Claims Directive," which aim to enforce strict rules on environmental claims and promote responsible business practices [3][11]. Enforcement Trends - The EU has intensified its enforcement actions against major fashion brands, imposing significant fines for violations related to misleading advertising and greenwashing [4][5]. - France has implemented strict laws prohibiting unsubstantiated "carbon neutrality" claims and has increased penalties for misleading environmental statements [5]. - Italy's regulatory focus has shifted towards addressing "moral bleaching" in supply chains, emphasizing labor rights alongside environmental concerns [6]. - The Netherlands adopts a more collaborative approach, encouraging companies to rectify misleading sustainability claims through dialogue rather than punitive measures [7]. U.S. Regulatory Landscape - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has established guidelines for environmental marketing claims, with recent enforcement actions against companies for false advertising related to sustainable products [8]. - Consumer lawsuits, such as the class action against H&M, highlight the ongoing issues of misleading sustainability claims in the fast fashion sector [8]. Industry Challenges - The fashion industry faces structural challenges, including a dramatic increase in clothing production and reliance on synthetic fibers, which complicate sustainability efforts [11][12]. - Greenwashing behaviors are primarily characterized by selective disclosure and performative environmental actions, undermining genuine sustainability efforts [11]. Future Directions - A comprehensive regulatory framework is needed to standardize terminology and establish clear sustainability criteria for fashion products [12]. - The industry must transition from passive compliance to proactive responsibility in sustainability, integrating environmental and social accountability into core business models [13][15]. - Achieving true sustainability requires a fundamental shift in the fashion industry's linear production model towards circularity and resource regeneration [13][15].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of Arc'teryx's fireworks event on its parent company Amer Sports and its major shareholder Anta Group, highlighting the failures in environmental governance and corporate governance that led to a significant drop in stock prices for both companies [2][4][5]. Summary by Sections Company Governance - The fireworks event caused a nearly 5% drop in Amer Sports' stock price and a 7.28% drop in Anta's stock price, resulting in a market value loss of nearly 10 billion [2]. - The incident reflects a disconnect between Amer Sports' brand image of sustainability and its actual practices, potentially affecting consumer purchasing intentions and leading to a significant decline in stock prices [4][5]. Financial Performance - Anta's financial performance is heavily reliant on Amer Sports, which has become a crucial profit driver since Anta acquired a 57.95% stake in Amer Sports for €4.6 billion in 2019 [5]. - In 2024, Anta reported a revenue of 70.83 billion, a year-on-year increase of 13.6%, and a net profit margin increase to 22% from 16.4% the previous year [5]. - However, excluding profits from Amer Sports, Anta's net profit attributable to shareholders was only 11.73 billion, a modest increase of 7.1% [5]. Consumer Trust - The fireworks incident has led to calls for boycotts and returns, undermining Amer Sports' market foundation in China, which is its largest growth engine [5][6]. - The event highlights a broader issue of governance gaps in international operations, as the lack of a unified crisis communication mechanism between regional teams and the parent company has eroded investor trust [6]. ESG and Greenwashing - The article discusses the concept of "greenwashing," where companies create a facade of environmental responsibility without genuine action [7][9]. - Despite Amer Sports' claims of assessing its environmental impact, the fireworks event suggests a failure to evaluate the environmental damage and public backlash adequately [10]. - Anta has made strides in ESG governance, achieving an MSCI ESG rating upgrade from "BB" to "A," but the recent incident raises questions about the effectiveness of these efforts [9][10]. Recommendations for Improvement - To regain consumer trust, companies must align their actions with their stated values, ensuring that environmental considerations are integrated into decision-making processes [11][12]. - Engaging with environmental NGOs, expanding ESG risk assessments, and fostering consumer dialogue are suggested strategies for improving governance and restoring trust [12].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving Arc'teryx's fireworks display has significantly impacted its parent company Amer Sports and its major shareholder Anta Group, leading to a notable decline in stock prices and market value, raising concerns about environmental governance and corporate responsibility [1][2][3]. Group 1: Financial Impact - Amer Sports' stock price dropped approximately 5% following the incident, while Anta Group's stock fell by as much as 7.28%, resulting in a market value loss of nearly 10 billion yuan [1]. - Anta's financial performance is heavily reliant on Amer Sports, which has become a crucial profit driver for the group, contributing significantly to its overall revenue and profit margins [4][3]. - In 2024, Anta reported a revenue of 70.83 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 13.6%, with a net profit margin rising to 22% from 16.4% the previous year [4]. Group 2: Brand Trust and Consumer Sentiment - The fireworks incident has led to a collapse of consumer trust, as Arc'teryx has long been perceived as a premium outdoor brand committed to sustainability, and this event contradicts its core values [2][5]. - Social media backlash has prompted calls for boycotts and returns, threatening Arc'teryx's market position in China, which is a key growth engine for Amer Sports [4][5]. - The incident highlights a disconnect between the brand's proclaimed values and its actions, potentially undermining consumer loyalty and the high-price model [4][11]. Group 3: Governance and ESG Concerns - The incident reveals significant governance gaps in the international operations of the company, particularly in crisis communication and internal management [5][6]. - There is a lack of consistent messaging and accountability between the brand's domestic and international teams, which can erode investor confidence [5][6]. - The concept of "greenwashing" is raised, indicating that the company's marketing efforts may not align with actual environmental practices, leading to skepticism about its sustainability claims [6][7]. Group 4: Recommendations for Recovery - To regain consumer and investor trust, the company should engage with environmental NGOs, enhance ESG risk assessments, and actively seek consumer feedback [9][10]. - Transparency and alignment of actions with stated values are crucial for rebuilding trust, as consumers increasingly prioritize brands that reflect their own values [11][10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the role of Sustainable Linked Bonds (SLB) in promoting the transformation of high-carbon enterprises in China, emphasizing that the true value of SLBs lies in their ability to enforce substantial transformation commitments through institutional design rather than merely expanding financing scale [1][6]. Group 1: Institutional Logic of Core Elements - The effectiveness of SLBs depends on the institutional design of five core elements: Key Performance Indicators (KPI), Sustainability Performance Targets (SPT), bond characteristics, information disclosure and reporting, and third-party verification [2]. - These elements are interrelated; for instance, if KPIs lack direct correlation with carbon reduction, subsequent target setting and constraints will lose focus [2]. Group 2: International Practices as Reference - International markets provide valuable insights for the evolution of SLBs, with examples such as Enel's phased design and Schneider Electric's inclusion of social issues in performance assessments [3]. - Compared to international practices, China's SLB design remains relatively simplistic, particularly in terms of constraint clauses and target aggressiveness, indicating a need for market-oriented incentives and international benchmarking [3]. Group 3: Progress and Issues in China's Market - China's SLB market has developed a diverse indicator system covering various areas, and most enterprises provide historical performance data for comparability [4]. - However, issues persist, such as KPIs not being closely linked to carbon emission targets and the need for enhanced flexibility and constraint in bond characteristics [4]. Group 4: Case Analysis and Common Issues - The "22 Tianan Coal Industry MTN002 (Sustainable Linked)" bond serves as a case study, showing reasonable KPI and SPT settings, but with room for improvement in direct correlation with carbon emission indicators [5]. - This case illustrates that while SLBs can incentivize enterprises to fulfill transformation commitments, there are still areas for enhancement in terms of penalty clauses and overall effectiveness [5]. Group 5: Optimization Paths and Policy Implications - The article proposes four optimization strategies to address the "five-dimensional mismatch": establishing unified performance target standards, introducing phased goals and dynamic adjustment mechanisms, enhancing mandatory information disclosure, and promoting the marketization of third-party verification [7]. - By addressing these shortcomings, SLBs can evolve from mere financing innovations to key institutional tools for driving low-carbon transformation and implementing the "dual carbon" strategy [7].