影片进行到三十分钟左右时，珠仁收到那张匿名纸条，剧情才轻微转动（此前主要通过对话透露些许背景）；到一小时左右，观众才逐渐意识到她隐藏的 秘密——那场未被直接呈现、却始终回荡在整个影片中的性侵犯事件。我们不是在观看事件，而是在与她一同经历余震。 在韩国本土电影票房大幅缩水、国际影响力下降（只有朴赞郁执导的《无可奈何》在苦苦支撑）的 2025 年，一部体量不大的独立电影意外走入世界观众 的视野： 尹佳恩的《世界的主人》在多伦多国际电影节、平遥国际电影展引发热烈的讨论后回到韩国市场，也成功跨过了损益平衡点。12 月，女性影人组织将年 度"女性电影人奖"颁给导演尹佳恩，称这部片为韩国电影留下了值得长久铭记的瞬间。 影片的故事并不复杂：18 岁女生李珠仁（Lee Jooin）在全校参与"反对性暴力犯罪者出狱"联署时，独自选择不签名，随后收到神秘纸条，由此牵出关于 创伤、孤独与重新感受世界的故事。 要理解《世界的主人》为什么会成功，我们不妨把它放回韩国电影最重要的类型之一——社会问题电影（Social Problem Films，特指以社会议题与不公正 现象为核心主题的类型影片）。这是韩国在近二十年间与现实高度共振的一种 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of reading as a pathway to growth and understanding, encouraging readers to engage in discussions about the themes presented in selected books [2][3][6]. Summary by Sections Book Recommendation - The featured book is "The Fallacy of Social Justice" by Thomas Sowell, which critiques widely held beliefs about equality and social justice [8][30]. Key Themes from the Book - The book argues that "opportunity equality" does not equate to "result equality," highlighting that even in equal opportunity conditions, outcomes are influenced by diverse factors such as environment, history, and culture [11][12]. - It discusses how different groups may excel in various fields, suggesting that perceived inequalities are often a reflection of historical and cultural contexts rather than discrimination [15][17]. - The author critiques the notion of comparing different professions or educational paths as if they are equivalent, pointing out that such comparisons can lead to misleading conclusions about equality [19][20]. - The book also explores the roots of inequality, suggesting that factors such as family background and early childhood experiences significantly impact future success [21][22]. - It highlights the role of honesty and trust within societies as critical components of economic development, noting that these traits are not evenly distributed across different cultures [24][25]. - Finally, it questions the true nature of equality that society should strive for, advocating for a focus on opportunity rather than enforced equality of outcomes [26][28].

Group 1 - The concept of "equality of opportunity" is often mistaken for "equality of outcome," which can lead to sacrificing true fairness and efficiency [3][10][15] - Historical, cultural, geographical, and environmental factors contribute to the inherent inequalities observed in various industries and sectors [4][5][12] - Different groups may excel in different fields, and this diversity should not be viewed as a disadvantage but rather as a reflection of varied strengths and skills [6][7][11] Group 2 - The representation of different groups in specific industries often reflects their historical and cultural backgrounds rather than systemic discrimination [5][9][14] - The pursuit of equal representation in fields like technology may overlook the differences in educational choices and career paths between genders [8][9][10] - The concept of "mutual inequality" suggests that while some groups may lag in certain areas, they may thrive in others, highlighting the complexity of human achievement [6][7][16]

Core Argument - The article discusses the misconception that higher taxes on the wealthy will automatically lead to increased tax revenue and social equity, emphasizing that individuals are not passive entities and will react to such policies [1][3][17] Taxation and Wealth Redistribution - The idea of taxing the wealthy to redistribute wealth is appealing, but its feasibility depends on how much the wealthy can evade such taxes [5][6] - Historical examples show that when tax rates increase, wealthy individuals often find ways to avoid taxes, leading to unexpected outcomes [7][8] Economic Behavior and Policy Impact - Economic principles indicate that individuals will change their behavior in response to government policies, such as tax increases or price controls, which can lead to shortages and unintended consequences [10][11] - The minimum wage laws can lead to higher unemployment rates among young and unskilled workers, contradicting the intended benefits of such policies [12] Income Mobility and Misinterpretation of Data - Income statistics can be misleading as they often do not account for the dynamic nature of income levels over time, with many individuals moving between different income brackets throughout their lives [13][14][15] - The perception of poverty is often relative, and many individuals classified as poor still possess amenities that indicate a higher standard of living than in the past [16] Policy Considerations - Effective policy-making must acknowledge human agency and the potential for individuals to respond in ways that undermine the intended goals of such policies [17]

阿马蒂亚·森的名字 "Amartya" 是印度诗人泰戈尔所取，他是森外祖父的挚友。泰戈尔当时不想起一 个寻常的婴儿名字，最后他选了这个词，梵语中意为 "不朽" 或 "永生"。阿马蒂亚·森今年 91 岁，在 我们时代最有影响力的思想家之列。一些人觉得其人生高度和思想成就，足以配得上泰戈尔的祝 福。 许多经济学家喜欢解释和预测现实，但森被看作是经济学和哲学交汇的思想家。他关注现实应该是 什么样，人们应该追求什么，人们如何确定自己应该追求什么，政策如何影响一个人的生活机会， 如何实现社会正义等等。 四个故事中的阿马蒂亚·森，以及他对今天的启示。 文丨 曾梦龙 编辑丨钱杨 1943 年，9 岁的森发现，可能有十万饥饿的农民涌入自己所在的小镇。饥民不放过任何能吃的东 西；许多人饿到精神失常；母亲为了活下去也不管嚎啕大哭的孩子，独自吞下食物。他们正前往加 尔各答，因为听说那里在赈灾。事实上，这是谣言。加尔各答尸横遍野。这场灾难后被称为孟加拉 大饥荒，死亡人数达两三百万人。 几个月后，森看见一个浑身鲜血、不停哀叫的男人走进他家大门。男人叫卡德尔·米亚（Kader Mia），靠打零工维生。为了养活孩子，他冒险来到社区找活干， ...