Workflow
公平与效率
icon
Search documents
【有本好书送给你】当我们在谈论公平时,我们究竟在谈论什么?
重阳投资· 2025-09-10 07:33
重阳说 查理·芒格先生有一句广为流传的话:"我这一生当中,未曾见过不读书就智慧满满的人。没有。一个都没 有。沃伦(巴菲特)的阅读量之大可能会让你感到吃惊。我和他一样。我的孩子们打趣我说,我就是一 本长着两条腿的书。" 熟悉重阳的朋友们一定知道,阅读,一直是我们非常推崇的成长路径。 现在,我们希望和你一起,把阅读这件事坚持下去。 每一期会有一个交流主题,希望你通过留言与我们互动。 我们精选优质好书,根据留言质量不定量送出。 世界莽莽,时间荒荒,阅读生出思考的力量,愿你感受到自己的思想有厚度且有方向,四通八达,尽情 徜徉。 提示:本公众号所发布的内容仅供参考,不构成任何投资建议和销售要约。如您对重阳产品感兴趣,欢 迎 扫码 咨询。 【好书】第301期:《社会正义谬误》 [美]托马斯·索维尔 著 李钧鹏 郑龙 译 中信出版集团 推荐人 营销编辑 张月 2025年8月 互动话题: 结合本书,请就"什么是真正的公平和正义"谈谈你的看法。 留言时间:2024年9月10 日 - 2025年 9月17日 (鼓励原创,只要你的内容足够优秀,期期选中也有可能哦) 筛选及书籍(单本)寄送:2025年9月18日后 (选中会收到提交寄 ...
今年养老金调整重点向中低收入群体倾斜
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-07-10 14:16
Core Viewpoint - The adjustment of pension benefits is crucial for ensuring the basic living standards of retired individuals, reflecting the government's commitment to social welfare and economic development [1][2]. Group 1: Pension Adjustment Mechanism - The national adjustment ratio for pensions this year is set at 2%, aligning with the increase in urban residents' Consumer Price Index (CPI) and average monthly wages, effectively supporting retirees' basic living needs [2]. - The adjustment method combines fixed amount increases, linkage adjustments based on individual contributions, and targeted increases for specific groups, ensuring a fair and efficient distribution of benefits [2][3]. - Fixed adjustments provide equal increases for all retirees in a region, while linkage adjustments vary based on individual contribution years and pension levels, promoting long-term contributions [2][3]. Group 2: Impact on Income Distribution - The pension adjustment policy favors lower-income retirees, resulting in a higher actual adjustment ratio for those with lower pension levels, thus addressing income inequality [3]. - The adjustment strategy aims to balance fairness and efficiency, encouraging longer and higher contributions while ensuring basic living standards for lower-income groups [3]. - The adjustment policy is integral to the government's broader goals of enhancing social welfare and promoting common prosperity, impacting both retirees and current contributors [3].
贸易战虽然赢了,但还是要发展内需啊!
集思录· 2025-05-14 13:51
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current state of China's economy, highlighting the challenges in stimulating domestic demand and the impact of external factors such as tariffs and inflation in the U.S. [1] Group 1: Economic Conditions - China's export decline and the unchanged inflation expectations in the U.S. indicate a persistent economic challenge for both countries [1] - Recent policies aimed at stimulating domestic demand, such as interest rate cuts, have been implemented, but their effectiveness is yet to be seen [1] Group 2: Domestic Demand Issues - The traditional methods of boosting domestic demand have proven ineffective, suggesting a need for new strategies [2] - The low proportion of disposable income relative to GDP raises concerns about consumer spending, as previous consumption was driven by real estate price bubbles [4] - The lack of long-term security and insufficient social welfare contribute to a culture of forced savings among the population, limiting consumption [13] Group 3: Structural Economic Challenges - The debate over whether to rely on market mechanisms or planned economy approaches for resource allocation is crucial, as current planning efforts may lead to inefficiencies [8] - The suggestion to cut ineffective infrastructure projects and redirect funds to social security systems raises concerns about potential short-term economic slowdown and increased unemployment [12] Group 4: Housing Market and Consumption - Stimulating the housing market is viewed as a significant way to boost consumption, as home purchases represent a major expenditure for consumers [9] - The financial burden of housing loans on new homeowners indicates a trend of high leverage in consumer spending [10] Group 5: Future Outlook - The need to cultivate a large middle class with high-income jobs is emphasized as essential for sustaining domestic demand [18] - The article questions whether the perceived stagnation in domestic demand is due to a misinterpretation of what constitutes consumption, particularly in light of significant government investment in infrastructure and housing [19]