Group 1 - The core idea of the article emphasizes the importance of reforming the global governance system and enhancing global governance capabilities, particularly in the context of China's four major initiatives proposed by President Xi Jinping [1] - The establishment of a sovereign state system and the arrival of a comprehensive international relations era represent significant progress in post-war international relations, allowing most nations to express their will and strength [2][3] - The article highlights the need for a democratic, equitable, inclusive, and just global governance system, reflecting on the historical context of international relations and the necessity for reform [2][3] Group 2 - The relationship between global governance and national governance is crucial, as poor domestic governance limits a country's willingness and ability to engage in global governance [4] - The article calls for a re-evaluation of democracy, suggesting that new meanings should be assigned to democracy that promote genuine multilateralism and improve domestic governance quality [5] - Establishing institutional communication mechanisms between global governance and national governance is essential to ensure they do not conflict with each other [5] Group 3 - Incremental improvements in the global governance system are necessary, particularly from emerging countries like China, which supports the UN's core role in international affairs [6] - The article points out that structural issues in the global governance system are becoming increasingly apparent, indicating that mere incremental improvements may not suffice [6] Group 4 - Structural contradictions in global governance arise from the separation of internal and external politics, affecting countries' ability to participate in global governance [7] - The shift towards a multipolar world and the need for a more democratic and equitable governance structure are highlighted as ongoing challenges [7][8] - The article discusses the importance of incorporating various actors, such as multinational corporations and social organizations, into the global governance framework [8] Group 5 - The relationship between planning and action in global governance is emphasized, with a focus on the need for effective execution of global governance initiatives [9] - The article suggests that planning can mitigate the negative impacts of domestic political polarization on international commitments and cooperation [9]

（来源：团结报） 转自：团结报 □ 张继超 全面抗战的爆发，使闻一多等学院派知识分子的处境发生了根本性变化。在从北京到昆明的大转移中， 闻一多参加了历时两个多月、横跨湘黔滇三省共三千余里的步行团。有人问他："闻先生，你大可照学 校的规定坐车、乘船，舒舒服服地到昆明，何必受这个罪呢？"闻一多很严肃地说："国难期间，走几千 里路算不了受罪。"这次长途跋涉留给闻一多的印象极为深刻，沿途的所见加深了他对旧中国的认识。 人民的贫困、文化的落后、道旁的罂粟，还有不断出现在眼前如《石壕吏》中所描写的抓壮丁场景，都 让他感到心痛。闻一多开始反思：回国后一直在各大城市教书，过的是假洋鬼子的生活。虽然是一个中 国人，而对于中国社会及人民生活，知道得很少，这真是醉生梦死呀！ 1943年春，蒋介石的《中国之命运》一书公开发售。在书中，蒋介石公开宣扬专制主义，这让闻一多无 法接受。面对严酷的现实，闻一多毅然抛弃文化救国的幻想。他写信给学生臧克家说：从青岛时代起， 经过十余年故纸堆中的生活，我有了把握，看清了我们这民族，这文化的病症，我敢于开方了。和许多 爱国知识分子一样，闻一多从对现实的不满和反省中走上新的道路，诗人、学者开始转变了。 ...

转自：法治日报 现、立法本意的彰显，不仅是"法解释的谩天昧地之策"，而且是对法治的威胁。 媒体传播异常发达， 司法者根本不可能防止"声音泄露"与"声音隔离"。司法的公开化乃至透明化，使其过程与结论概莫能外 地接受国民的审视。望文生义、断章取义地适用刑法条文作出的裁判，必然败给国民基于正义的直觉与 朴素的法感形成的结论。国民对司法的影响力远远超出了刑法学对司法的影响力，这是不争的事实。如 何实现刑法理论与司法实践的理性认同、良性互动，值得澄思渺虑，需要砥砺前行。 公众参与简易便 捷，人文社会科学领域的专业结论，无一例外会面临国民的审视。真正的法律人，应当创造出"一种与 一般的外行人并且事实上与许多法律人的看法相遥远的关于法律的基本看法"（波斯纳语），做到这一 点需要智慧与胆识。刑法学需要尊重国民的真实意愿、表达国民的正义诉求、符合国民的规范意识。就 此而言，刑法学是"践行民主"的。但刑法学中一般化的最优解决方案，不是取决于赞成票的多少，而是 有赖于说服力的强弱。罪刑法定、责任主义，大体上是"脱离民主"的。在法治与民主的紧张关系中，如 何不让棘手案件制造恶法，不让疑难案件破坏法治，值得潜精研思，需要守正不阿。 互 ...

近日，一段抗议美国暴力移民执法的影像被投影到洛杉矶市拘留中心的外墙上。影像中，一名美国移民 与海关执法局（ICE）执法人员手拿美国国旗，开枪射击脚边滚动播放的"我们的'自由''安全''民主''人 性'"等字幕。 一个月内，美国联邦政府执法人员在针对移民的行动中相继开枪打死两名美国公民。1月7日，ICE执法 人员抓捕非法移民时，连开多枪打死美国公民蕾恩·妮科尔·古德。1月24日，在距离古德死亡现场约2公 里的地方，ICE执法人员开枪打死美国籍男子亚历克斯·普雷蒂。接连两起街头斩杀事件引发全美范围的 大规模抗议，反对暴力执法。 来源 | 新华社 洛杉矶街头现惊心投影！美国移民执法者手拿星条旗向"民主"开枪。 ...

一个月内，美国联邦政府执法人员在针对移民的行动中相继开枪打死两名美国公民。1月7日，ICE执法 人员抓捕非法移民时，连开多枪打死美国公民蕾恩·妮科尔·古德。1月24日，在距离古德死亡现场约2公 里的地方，ICE执法人员开枪打死美国籍男子亚历克斯·普雷蒂。接连两起街头斩杀事件引发全美范围的 大规模抗议，反对暴力执法。 近日，一段抗议美国暴力移民执法的影像被投影到洛杉矶市拘留中心的外墙上。影像中，一名美国移民 与海关执法局（ICE）执法人员手拿美国国旗，开枪射击脚边滚动播放的"我们的'自由''安全''民主''人 性'"等字幕。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the U.S. government's decision to support Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez as a more manageable leader compared to Nicolás Maduro, amid escalating tensions and military actions in Venezuela [1][3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Government's Strategy - U.S. officials have identified Delcy Rodríguez as a suitable candidate to replace Maduro, primarily due to her management of Venezuela's crucial oil industry, which has impressed Trump administration officials [7][8]. - The U.S. military conducted a pre-dawn raid in Caracas, capturing Maduro and his wife, which reflects the administration's commitment to military threats against the Maduro regime [5][21]. - Trump has expressed intentions to "control" Venezuela and reclaim U.S. oil interests, marking a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy towards Venezuela [11][12]. Group 2: Delcy Rodríguez's Profile - Rodríguez, who has a background in economic problem-solving, has been credited with stabilizing Venezuela's economy and gradually increasing oil production despite severe U.S. sanctions [16][18]. - She has built alliances with Venezuela's economic elite and foreign investors, positioning herself as a moderate technocrat in contrast to Maduro's more aggressive security officials [18][19]. - Despite her technical approach, Rodríguez has not condemned the oppressive tactics used to maintain Maduro's regime, indicating potential challenges in her governance [18][19]. Group 3: Political Dynamics - The U.S. relationship with Rodríguez's interim government will depend on her adherence to American interests, with the possibility of further military action if she fails to comply [11][15]. - The decision to support Rodríguez over María Corina Machado, a Nobel Peace Prize winner, highlights the complexities of U.S. foreign policy, as Machado has been a vocal critic of Maduro and has sought U.S. support for her political ambitions [12][22][23]. - Machado's recent statements indicate her readiness to lead Venezuela, but Trump has expressed skepticism about her ability to garner sufficient support within the country [23][24].

Core Viewpoint - The event celebrated the 80th anniversary of the Jiusan Society, featuring the launch of a series of books and a documentary aimed at promoting patriotism, democracy, and scientific spirit, while also serving as a platform for historical education and consensus building [1][2]. Group 1: Event Overview - The launch event took place on December 15, with a warm atmosphere marked by applause and the unveiling of new books and a documentary titled "Heart and River" [1][2]. - The series of books and the documentary were initiated to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the Jiusan Society, aiming to create a lively educational platform for the "Five Histories" [1]. Group 2: Contributions and Perspectives - The president of Xueyuan Publishing House highlighted the historical significance of the books, describing them as a systematic presentation of historical materials and a political textbook that helps readers understand the Jiusan Society's alignment with the Communist Party of China [2]. - The documentary director emphasized the importance of balancing historical accuracy with narrative expression, aiming to showcase the political stance of the Jiusan Society and its commitment to national development through technology [2]. Group 3: Future Directions - An expert representative discussed the roles of researchers in studying and passing on the society's history, advocating for innovative methods to engage younger members and ensure the history resonates deeply [3]. - The vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference stressed that the release of the books and documentary is just the beginning, urging for their effective use in promoting the society's development and integrating them with ongoing educational initiatives [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article commemorates the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War, highlighting the enduring spirit and historical significance of various educational institutions in China during wartime [1]. Group 1: Southwest Associated University - The Southwest Associated University, which existed for only eight years, produced eight "Two Bombs, One Satellite" contributors and two Nobel Prize winners, marking its legendary status in Chinese education history [3]. - The university's spirit is encapsulated in its motto "Resilience and Excellence," and its legacy is preserved through various cultural initiatives, including the establishment of a museum and themed performances [9][11]. - Students are inspired by the perseverance of their predecessors, who maintained optimism and a commitment to serving the country despite challenging circumstances [7]. Group 2: Nanjing University and the John Rabe Memorial - The John Rabe Memorial in Nanjing serves as a testament to the humanitarian efforts during the Nanjing Massacre, housing a list of 602 refugees saved by Rabe and his colleagues [12]. - The memorial has welcomed approximately 300,000 visitors and has utilized modern technology to share Rabe's story internationally, emphasizing the importance of peace [16]. Group 3: Chongqing University - Chongqing University features significant historical buildings, such as the "Stone House" which survived multiple bombings during the war, symbolizing resilience in the pursuit of knowledge [17]. - The university's cultural heritage is preserved through the renovated "Seven-Seven Anti-Japanese War Auditorium," which continues to serve as a cultural hub [24]. - The university's commitment to education during wartime is reflected in its ongoing initiatives to honor the sacrifices of past generations and inspire current students [22].

Core Viewpoint - Italian President Sergio Mattarella's visit to Brussels on October 20 serves as a significant declaration for Europe, emphasizing that Europe will not tolerate any retreat in the face of current challenges [1][3]. Group 1: External and Internal Challenges - Mattarella identifies two major crises facing Europe: external threats from ongoing conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine war and instability in the Middle East, and internal issues like rising populism and dissatisfaction with EU bureaucracy [5][6]. - He warns that the foundational principles of the EU—democracy, social progress, and people's freedom—are being eroded, reflecting deep concerns about both international and internal risks [6]. Group 2: Italy's Role in the EU - As one of the founding members of the EU, Italy's voice has diminished in recent years, particularly under the leadership of Germany and France. Mattarella's statements indicate a shift in Italy's role, aiming to reclaim its position and advocate for EU reforms [8][11]. - He stresses that Italy's fate is intertwined with that of Europe, calling for proactive leadership in addressing EU issues rather than remaining passive [11]. Group 3: Call for Unity and Reform - Mattarella's visit is not merely a personal statement but signifies Italy's transformation within the EU, urging for unity among member states to tackle multiple crises [13]. - He emphasizes the importance of parliamentary democracy, debate, and compromise over authoritarian efficiency, warning against actions that undermine national sovereignty and individual freedoms [13].

Core Viewpoint - A large-scale protest against Trump occurred on October 18, 2025, with approximately 7 million participants across the United States, marking the largest demonstration since his return to the White House [1][10][11]. Group 1: Protest Details - The "No King" protests were organized in over 50 states, with more than 2,700 events planned [3][10]. - Major cities like New York, Boston, and Chicago saw significant gatherings, with demonstrators holding signs such as "Nothing is more patriotic than protest" and "Resist fascism" [3][5]. - The protests were largely peaceful, with no arrests reported by police in major cities like New York and Washington [8]. Group 2: Public Sentiment - Protesters expressed anger towards Trump's administration for its treatment of illegal immigrants and the deployment of the National Guard in cities like Los Angeles [5][7]. - Many participants, including veterans and citizens, voiced concerns about the erosion of democracy and the militarization of urban areas [5][7]. - The protests reflected a broader sentiment of discontent with Trump's governance, with some participants comparing current events to historical instances of oppression [5][7]. Group 3: Political Context - The protests occurred during a federal government shutdown that had lasted 18 days, impacting various sectors and raising questions about the balance of power in the U.S. [1][11]. - Republican leaders attempted to frame the protests as a fringe movement, attributing the government shutdown to the influence of extreme left factions within the Democratic Party [11]. - Trump, while at his Mar-a-Lago estate, dismissed the protests, claiming that he expected very few participants [11].