Core Viewpoint - The article commemorates the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War, highlighting the enduring spirit and historical significance of various educational institutions in China during wartime [1]. Group 1: Southwest Associated University - The Southwest Associated University, which existed for only eight years, produced eight "Two Bombs, One Satellite" contributors and two Nobel Prize winners, marking its legendary status in Chinese education history [3]. - The university's spirit is encapsulated in its motto "Resilience and Excellence," and its legacy is preserved through various cultural initiatives, including the establishment of a museum and themed performances [9][11]. - Students are inspired by the perseverance of their predecessors, who maintained optimism and a commitment to serving the country despite challenging circumstances [7]. Group 2: Nanjing University and the John Rabe Memorial - The John Rabe Memorial in Nanjing serves as a testament to the humanitarian efforts during the Nanjing Massacre, housing a list of 602 refugees saved by Rabe and his colleagues [12]. - The memorial has welcomed approximately 300,000 visitors and has utilized modern technology to share Rabe's story internationally, emphasizing the importance of peace [16]. Group 3: Chongqing University - Chongqing University features significant historical buildings, such as the "Stone House" which survived multiple bombings during the war, symbolizing resilience in the pursuit of knowledge [17]. - The university's cultural heritage is preserved through the renovated "Seven-Seven Anti-Japanese War Auditorium," which continues to serve as a cultural hub [24]. - The university's commitment to education during wartime is reflected in its ongoing initiatives to honor the sacrifices of past generations and inspire current students [22].

Core Viewpoint - Italian President Sergio Mattarella's visit to Brussels on October 20 serves as a significant declaration for Europe, emphasizing that Europe will not tolerate any retreat in the face of current challenges [1][3]. Group 1: External and Internal Challenges - Mattarella identifies two major crises facing Europe: external threats from ongoing conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine war and instability in the Middle East, and internal issues like rising populism and dissatisfaction with EU bureaucracy [5][6]. - He warns that the foundational principles of the EU—democracy, social progress, and people's freedom—are being eroded, reflecting deep concerns about both international and internal risks [6]. Group 2: Italy's Role in the EU - As one of the founding members of the EU, Italy's voice has diminished in recent years, particularly under the leadership of Germany and France. Mattarella's statements indicate a shift in Italy's role, aiming to reclaim its position and advocate for EU reforms [8][11]. - He stresses that Italy's fate is intertwined with that of Europe, calling for proactive leadership in addressing EU issues rather than remaining passive [11]. Group 3: Call for Unity and Reform - Mattarella's visit is not merely a personal statement but signifies Italy's transformation within the EU, urging for unity among member states to tackle multiple crises [13]. - He emphasizes the importance of parliamentary democracy, debate, and compromise over authoritarian efficiency, warning against actions that undermine national sovereignty and individual freedoms [13].

Core Viewpoint - A large-scale protest against Trump occurred on October 18, 2025, with approximately 7 million participants across the United States, marking the largest demonstration since his return to the White House [1][10][11]. Group 1: Protest Details - The "No King" protests were organized in over 50 states, with more than 2,700 events planned [3][10]. - Major cities like New York, Boston, and Chicago saw significant gatherings, with demonstrators holding signs such as "Nothing is more patriotic than protest" and "Resist fascism" [3][5]. - The protests were largely peaceful, with no arrests reported by police in major cities like New York and Washington [8]. Group 2: Public Sentiment - Protesters expressed anger towards Trump's administration for its treatment of illegal immigrants and the deployment of the National Guard in cities like Los Angeles [5][7]. - Many participants, including veterans and citizens, voiced concerns about the erosion of democracy and the militarization of urban areas [5][7]. - The protests reflected a broader sentiment of discontent with Trump's governance, with some participants comparing current events to historical instances of oppression [5][7]. Group 3: Political Context - The protests occurred during a federal government shutdown that had lasted 18 days, impacting various sectors and raising questions about the balance of power in the U.S. [1][11]. - Republican leaders attempted to frame the protests as a fringe movement, attributing the government shutdown to the influence of extreme left factions within the Democratic Party [11]. - Trump, while at his Mar-a-Lago estate, dismissed the protests, claiming that he expected very few participants [11].

Group 1 - The U.S. government revoked the U.S. visa of Brazilian Health Minister Padilha's family member as part of sanctions against Brazil [1][3] - Padilha described the visa revocation of his 10-year-old daughter as "astonishingly absurd" and an act of "diplomatic abuse" [1][3] - The actions taken by the Trump administration are seen as an attempt to assist former Brazilian President Bolsonaro in evading judicial sanctions related to a failed coup attempt in 2022 [3] Group 2 - Trump views Bolsonaro as a political ally and has criticized Brazil's judicial system since returning to the White House [3] - Brazilian President Lula has repeatedly stated that the independence of Brazil's judicial process cannot be interfered with or threatened [3] - Following the Supreme Court's ruling against Bolsonaro, U.S. Secretary of State Rubio indicated that the U.S. would respond accordingly, which Brazil's Foreign Ministry deemed an inappropriate threat [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the reflections on American society over the past 40 years, highlighting ongoing criticisms of social injustices and the nostalgia for better times, particularly emphasizing the current year's heightened discourse [1][2]. Group 1: Wilderness and Democracy - The wilderness is portrayed as a space of true democracy, where individuals from all walks of life can experience equality, as evidenced by the author's experiences in nature [23][50]. - The author emphasizes the importance of preserving natural heritage, suggesting that the wilderness represents a shared space that transcends social hierarchies [50]. Group 2: Healing Power of Wilderness - The concept of "wilderness therapy" is introduced, where the author finds solace and healing from the psychological impacts of reporting on violence and trauma through immersion in nature [20][51]. - The wilderness serves as a setting for personal reflection and emotional recovery, allowing individuals to escape the chaos of modern life [33][54]. Group 3: Parent-Child Relationships - The author shares experiences of hiking with his daughter, framing their journey as a significant bonding experience that marks a rite of passage for both [29][52]. - The shared challenges and adventures in the wilderness foster a unique connection between parent and child, highlighting the transformative nature of these experiences [30][52]. Group 4: Philosophical Insights - The article draws parallels between nature and spirituality, suggesting that the wilderness can provide a sense of humility and patience akin to religious experiences [53]. - The author posits that engaging with nature allows for self-reflection and personal growth, akin to practices like prayer or meditation [53][54].

Core Viewpoint - The essence of Lai Ching-te's administration is described as "false democracy, true dictatorship," which has been recognized by the world [1] Group 1: Political Context - The spokesperson from the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that there is only one China and Taiwan is part of it, asserting that 23 million Taiwanese are all part of the Chinese nation [1] - The spokesperson stated that differences in systems should not be an obstacle to unification, nor an excuse for division, framing the current struggle against "Taiwan independence" as a fight between unification and division, and justice versus evil [1] Group 2: Criticism of Lai Ching-te's Administration - Since Lai Ching-te's administration took office, it has allegedly suppressed political dissent within Taiwan, creating a "chilling effect" and engaging in what is termed "green terror" [1] - The administration is accused of stubbornly adhering to a "Taiwan independence" stance, provoking actions that aim to bind the Taiwanese people to the "Taiwan independence" agenda, which contradicts democratic principles [1]

資訊流動迅速，「媒體識讀」被認為是現代人不可或缺的基本素養。透過豐富的視野、柔韌適切的語言，紛擾中，媒體負起責任看見並傳播更清晰，也更立體的世界，而作為個體、人、公民，也可以做出判斷，建立自己可以被挑戰的核心價值觀，在日常中行動、思考資訊與真相的距離，在機制中透過各種方式交流、邁向理想的世界。 范琪斐（Chi Fey Fan）是一位資深媒體人、新聞評論員與自媒體創作者，擁有豐富的國際新聞採訪與媒體運作經驗。曾擔任 CNN擔任駐美特派記者，負責報導美國重大新聞事件。、台灣各大新聞平台的記者與主持人，專長於時事評論、國際新聞分析及媒體識讀教育。 她致力於提升公眾對新聞真實性的認識，並透過 YouTube、Podcast 等新媒體與觀眾交流，分享她對時事、民主價值及媒體影響力的觀察。以犀利且富有深度的視角，范琪斐希望幫助更多人培養獨立思考的能力，在資訊爆炸的時代辨識真相。 在燈光溫暖的錄影棚裡，我第一次與范姊面對面，心中有點緊張，也更多是敬仰。她看著眼前這位曾穿梭於白宮新聞室、如今在社群時代繼續堅守資訊戰場的記者，忍不住問：「范姐，中文媒體的自由度應該比中國高，但為什麼報導反而更讓人迷失呢？」 范琪斐沉穩地笑了笑： ...

Core Viewpoint - King Charles III emphasized the importance of democracy, diversity, rule of law, self-determination, and freedom as the values upheld by the Canadian government [1] Group 1 - Canada is facing unpredictable challenges and needs to maintain an open global trade system [1] - The King highlighted the importance of maintaining relationships with partners [1] - The visit was made at the invitation of Canadian Prime Minister Carney [1]

Group 1 - The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution in Germany has classified the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as a clear "far-right organization" [1] - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio commented on the situation, stating that there is "tyranny" in Germany [1] - The German Foreign Ministry responded by asserting that "this is democracy" [1]