Workflow
金融纠纷多元化解
icon
Search documents
以法护企,以商兴闽
Ren Min Wang· 2025-08-23 01:02
Group 1: Private Economy in Fujian - The private economy is a distinctive feature of Fujian, contributing nearly 70% of the province's GDP, 70.6% of tax revenue, over 70% of technological innovation results, over 80% of urban employment, and 94% of the number of enterprises by the end of 2024 [1] - The "Promotion Law of Private Economy" will take effect on May 20, 2025, marking a significant step in supporting the development of the private sector [1] Group 2: Intellectual Property Protection - Protecting intellectual property is essential for fostering innovation and new productive forces, as infringement can hinder corporate innovation [2] - A specific case involved a software company that faced a significant decline in business due to a competitor's software that closely resembled its own, leading to legal action [2][3] Group 3: Judicial Support for Innovation - Fujian courts are actively enhancing judicial protection for intellectual property, which is crucial for high-quality development, as demonstrated by various cases and initiatives [4] - In 2024, Fujian courts received 25,299 new intellectual property cases and concluded 25,512 cases, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 9.71% and 16.20%, respectively [5] Group 4: Financial Dispute Resolution - The establishment of the Fuzhou Digital Financial Enforcement Center has facilitated the resolution of financial disputes, significantly reducing potential debt escalation [6] - Since its inception, the center has handled 46,000 cases, successfully mediating disputes amounting to approximately 242 million yuan, with an average processing time of 36.55 days [7] Group 5: Collaborative Dispute Resolution - The collaborative dispute resolution model extends beyond financial issues, with centers established in various sectors, such as construction, to address civil disputes effectively [8] - The Fuzhou court has initiated a mediation alliance involving local business associations, achieving a mediation success rate of over 60% [11] Group 6: International Engagement and Legal Framework - Fujian courts are promoting high-level openness and international cooperation, including the establishment of international commercial courts and maritime courts [13] - The Supreme People's Court has issued guidelines to enhance judicial support for the private economy, focusing on regulating monopolistic practices and protecting the rights of private enterprises [13]
黑龙江:13项举措共促金融纠纷多元化解
Ren Min Wang· 2025-08-11 00:41
协议规定,合作三方要加强常态化信息交流,通过定期会商共同研究本地区金融领域矛盾纠纷案件 情况及审判态势,共同研究重大突发案事件的协同处置措施。要通过加强金融纠纷源头防控、压实金融 机构自行催收责任、强化调解组织第三方化解、完善人民法院司法保障,实现多层次矛盾预防化解,引 导金融机构、地方金融组织优先通过非诉讼方式解决争议。对于符合起诉条件但尚未正式起诉的金融领 域纠纷要加强诉调对接;对于申请诉前保全的案件,要实现诉前保全、调解、立案高效对接;对于案件 事实基本一致的案件,要集中批量审理,缩短办理周期,提升案件质效。 本报讯 (记者 赵丽丽 通讯员 任安昕)近日,黑龙江省高级人民法院与黑龙江省地方金融管理局、 中国人民银行黑龙江省分行联合印发《"金融司法﹢金融监管"共促金融领域矛盾纠纷化解合作协议》 (以下简称协议),以金融借款合同、信用卡等金融领域矛盾纠纷多元化解实效,服务保障金融高质量 发展。 来源:人民法院报 协议紧扣党中央、黑龙江省委关于金融工作重大决策部署和最高人民法院"二号司法建议",统筹金 融创新发展与金融风险防范,统筹司法政策与监管政策,通过13项举措协同防范化解金融风险、维护金 融安全。 此外 ...
运用市场化调解机制,广州法院去年化解金融纠纷8.2万件
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-05-22 07:02
南都讯记者赵青通讯员陈然近日,广州市中级人民法院邀请10余家监管部门、金融机构、调解组织,围 绕广州法院服务保障广州金融高质量发展进行座谈。 据介绍,近年来,广州法院持续丰富解纷资源,推动金融纠纷多元化解,完善金融纠纷化解协同共治格 局出台《关于依法公正高效处理群体性证券纠纷的实施意见》等文件,与广东证监局、地方金融管理局 建立合作机制,持续拓宽商事金融纠纷多元共治"朋友圈"。去年成功化解8.2万件金融纠纷节省诉讼费 1.1亿元 推动证券纠纷多元化解走深走实加强与投服中心、交易所、登记中心、证监局、调解组织协作,建 立"示范判决+诉前测算+诉前调解+合并审理"四位一体证券解纷机制,在诉前阶段依职权调取交易数据 及委托测算,充分发挥示范诉讼对投资者的诉前预期管理效用,推动"审结一案,化解一片"。 2024年证券虚假陈述责任纠纷案件调撤率达72.18%,工作举措获评2024年全省法院综合提升审判质 效"十佳工作机制"。 将"失联修复"等技术引入金融纠纷化解流程,有效提升解纷效率。天河法院开发建设"天融"金融案件一 体化处理平台,推动金融机构、调解组织与法院线上全业务协调联动、有机衔接,实现小额金融纠纷诉 前批量化 ...
金融监管总局发布信访新规!下月起施行
Jin Rong Shi Bao· 2025-05-11 02:58
为落实新时代信访工作要求,进一步加强和改进信访工作,金融监管总局近日印发《信访工作办法》, 自2025年6月1日起施行。《信访工作办法》规定,构建各级系统和行业信访工作联席会议机制,充分发 挥调解、和解在金融纠纷多元化解中的积极作用,坚持依法分类处理信访诉求。 业内人士表示,《信访工作办法》发布实施将有利于推进金融监管总局系统信访工作法治化,进一步规 范受理办理程序,依法分类处理群众信访诉求,更好保护信访群众合法权益。 压紧压实金融机构化解矛盾纠纷的主体责任 具体来看,金融监管总局系统分级建立并领导系统和行业信访工作联席会议。各级信访工作联席会议负 责辖内金融领域信访工作的统筹协调、整体推进、督促落实,组织联合接访、协调处理重要信访问题, 指导下级信访工作联席会议工作。根据工作需要,国有金融机构可以建立本集团、本单位信访工作联席 会商机制,定期研究信访工作,协调处理重要信访事项。 《信访工作办法》明确了信访事项的提出和受理的相关事项。法人或者其他组织可以采用信息网络、书 信、电话、走访等形式,向金融监管总局系统反映情况,提出建议、意见或者投诉请求,有关机关、单 位应当依规依法处理。金融监管总局系统应当依据自身 ...
连云港中院召开金融审判工作新闻发布会并发布典型案例
Yang Zi Wan Bao Wang· 2025-05-09 12:10
Core Viewpoint - The financial court of Lianyungang has released its 2024 financial trial white paper, highlighting the city's judicial efforts in handling financial disputes and crimes, while also addressing the need for improved governance and collaboration in the financial sector [1][3]. Group 1: Financial Case Statistics - In 2024, Lianyungang courts received over 17,000 financial civil cases and concluded approximately 16,000 cases [3]. - The courts registered 33 new financial criminal cases and resolved 35 cases, alongside 9,914 new financial execution cases with 9,860 concluded [3]. Group 2: Judicial Focus and Strategies - The courts are focusing on multi-faceted dispute resolution methods, including pre-investigation waste, payment orders, and notarized debt documents to address financial disputes [3]. - There is a strong emphasis on punishing financial crimes such as fundraising fraud and credit card fraud, while also combating money laundering activities to maintain a stable financial market [3]. Group 3: Trends and Challenges - Overall, the number of financial disputes has decreased, but insurance disputes have risen significantly, indicating an imbalance in litigation among financial institutions [3]. - There is a notable increase in disputes related to personal housing loans and housing provident fund loans, with low compliance rates for civil financial dispute rulings and increased difficulty in handling guarantee and recovery cases [3]. Group 4: Future Directions - The courts plan to enhance specialized trial construction and strengthen financial collaborative governance to improve the resolution of financial disputes [4]. - Recommendations include increased supervision from regulatory bodies and industry associations, as well as improved internal management and risk disclosure by financial institutions [4].