Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that while geopolitical events can cause short-term market fluctuations, their long-term impact tends to diminish over time, suggesting that investors should maintain a calm perspective and focus on fundamental trends rather than short-term noise [3][4][7]. Market Reaction to Geopolitical Events - The market exhibits a learning ability, showing diminishing marginal effects in response to repeated geopolitical events. Compared to the market's reaction during the U.S.-China tariff conflict in April, the current market volatility is significantly reduced [4]. - Investors have developed stable expectations regarding U.S.-China negotiations due to multiple rounds of discussions throughout the year, which has lessened panic [4]. - The market has become familiar with Trump's negotiation tactics, which include applying pressure followed by signals of potential meetings, thereby reducing fear among investors [4]. Historical Analysis of Geopolitical Events - Historical data from JPMorgan indicates that major geopolitical events from 1940 to 2022 had a temporary negative impact on the S&P 500 index, with average returns lower in the month and three months following such events. However, returns tend to normalize after six months to a year [7]. - The Shanghai Composite Index also follows a similar pattern, suggesting that the noise created by geopolitical events is often smoothed out over time [9]. Long-term Market Drivers - The article highlights that short-term market fluctuations due to geopolitical shocks do not necessarily indicate a change in long-term trends. It is crucial to assess whether the core drivers of the market, such as macroeconomic fundamentals, industry evolution, and liquidity conditions, remain stable [13]. - Despite external uncertainties, the fundamental logic supporting equity asset performance has not changed. The current liquidity environment is supported by both domestic and international factors, including anticipated interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve [13]. Economic Indicators and Policy Support - Recent anti-involution measures have stabilized the PPI growth rate, which is closely linked to industrial profits. As these policies deepen, a recovery in PPI is expected to positively impact corporate earnings [17]. - Upcoming macro policy meetings are anticipated to yield supportive measures that will inject momentum into economic development [17]. - There is a positive trend in investment sentiment, as evidenced by the increase in new fund issuance, indicating growing investor confidence in the equity market [20]. Market Opportunities - Geopolitical shocks often lead to emotional overreactions in the market, creating opportunities to purchase quality assets at reasonable prices. Following the panic earlier in the year, valuable companies regained market recognition [22].

Group 1 - A-shares opened lower on September 17, with the China Securities Petrochemical Industry Index experiencing a slight decline of approximately 0.3% during trading, led by stocks such as Kingfa Sci & Tech, Tongcheng New Materials, Hangyang Co., and Juhua Co. [1] - The Petrochemical ETF (159731) followed the index adjustment, creating a low-position layout opportunity [1]. - According to Dongfang Securities, the industry is currently at a low point in PPI (Producer Price Index) decline, with industry profitability and PPI at a low recovery node [1]. Group 2 - In the context of "anti-involution," companies with supply clearance and high profitability elasticity are being highlighted, particularly those with enhanced dividend attractiveness [1]. - The chemical industry is seeing improvements in the supply-side structure, with significant profitability elasticity, potential declines in capital expenditure, and cash flow being directed towards dividends, thus increasing dividend attractiveness [1]. - The Petrochemical ETF (159731) and its linked funds (017855/017856) closely track the China Securities Petrochemical Industry Index, with the basic chemical industry accounting for 60.65% and the oil and petrochemical industry for 32.3% of the index [1]. Group 3 - The top ten weighted stocks in the index include Wanhua Chemical, China Petroleum, Sinopec, Salt Lake Potash, CNOOC, Juhua Co., Zangge Mining, Hualu Hengsheng, Baofeng Energy, and Hengli Petrochemical, collectively accounting for 55.63% of the index [1].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that confidence in Chinese assets is recovering, as evidenced by the strengthening of the RMB and the rise of the Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index [1][3] - The onshore and offshore RMB exchange rates have risen for three consecutive days, approaching the significant level of 7.15, despite the People's Bank of China setting the midpoint rate lower at 7.1188 [1] - The Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index has achieved five consecutive gains, reaching its highest level since March 20, indicating a significant improvement in overseas investor sentiment [3] Group 2 - Positive signals from improved China-U.S. relations and domestic policies aimed at supporting the AI sector are enhancing market sentiment [5] - There is a potential shift in the core logic of asset pricing in the Chinese market, with a focus on the recovery of the Producer Price Index (PPI) and the possibility of a transition in asset styles [5] - If policies aimed at improving corporate competition, such as "anti-involution," are effectively implemented, it could lead to a rise in inflation in the real economy, prompting a transition to a more favorable asset style [5] Group 3 - The direction of the RMB exchange rate is a key variable in the current asset revaluation, with strong export performance supporting the currency [6] - There is an expectation that if the U.S. dollar enters a depreciation cycle, foreign capital will likely increase its holdings of Chinese equity assets [6] - September is seen as a critical observation window, where a potential interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve could create favorable conditions for RMB appreciation [6]