Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the content. Core Viewpoints of the Report In the first half of 2025, the number and scale of issued accounts - receivable asset - backed securities increased year - on - year. The actual financiers of these securities were still concentrated in construction central enterprises and their subsidiaries, with a significant head - effect. The average issuance scale of single products decreased compared to the previous year, the product term remained basically the same, the issuance interest rate dropped significantly, the credit rating of securities was mainly AAAsf, the overall credit risk of products remained at a low level, and the trading activity in the secondary market increased significantly [35]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Issuance Situation - In H1 2025, 50 accounts - receivable asset - securitized products were issued in the exchange market, with a total issuance scale of 63.73 billion yuan, a year - on - year increase of 16 in number and 40.49% in scale. The issuance scale of products with central enterprises and their subsidiaries as actual financiers was 58.566 billion yuan, accounting for 91.90%. Products with actual financiers in the construction industry had a scale of 59.549 billion yuan, accounting for 93.44%. The median interest rate of AAAsf - rated securities with a term of about 1 year was 2.18%, a year - on - year decrease of about 30BP [3][4]. - In terms of issuance venues, 45 products were issued on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, with an amount of 60.633 billion yuan (95.14% in amount), and 5 on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, with an amount of 3.097 billion yuan (4.86% in amount) [6]. - Regarding the distribution of original equity holders, the top five original equity holders were China Railway Capital Co., Ltd., China Railway Construction Asset Management Co., Ltd., China Railway Trust Co., Ltd., CCCC Commercial Factoring Co., Ltd., and Shenzhen Henghexin Commercial Factoring Co., Ltd., with issuance scale ratios of 35.87%, 20.45%, 14.30%, 4.63%, and 3.25% respectively. The total issuance scale of the top five was 50.026 billion yuan, accounting for 78.50%, and that of the top ten was 57.267 billion yuan, accounting for 89.86% [6]. - For actual financiers, the total issuance scale of the top ten was 62.761 billion yuan, accounting for 98.48%. The scale of central enterprises and their subsidiaries was 58.566 billion yuan, accounting for 91.90%, an increase of 8.21 percentage points year - on - year. The actual financiers were mainly concentrated in the construction industry, with a scale of 59.549 billion yuan, accounting for 93.44% [8]. - In terms of managers, the top five managers with the largest new management scale were CITIC Securities Co., Ltd., Ping An Securities Co., Ltd., Huaxi Securities Co., Ltd., Shanghai Guotai Junan Securities Asset Management Co., Ltd., and CITIC Construction Investment Securities Co., Ltd., with scale ratios of 19.12%, 15.68%, 14.30%, 8.65%, and 7.82% respectively. The total new management scale of the top five was 41.788 billion yuan, accounting for 65.57%, and that of the top ten was 56.349 billion yuan, accounting for 88.42% [12]. - Regarding product scale distribution, the highest single - product issuance scale was 4.032 billion yuan, and the lowest was 1 billion yuan. Products with a single - scale in the (5, 10] billion yuan range had the largest number of issuances (18), accounting for 22.34% of the total scale. The average single - product issuance scale was 1.275 billion yuan, a decrease of 0.06 billion yuan compared to the previous year [15]. - In terms of term distribution, the shortest term was 0.73 years, and the longest was 3 years. Products with a term in the (1, 3] years range had the largest number of issuances (34), accounting for 74.32% of the scale. The weighted average term was 2.03 years, basically the same as the previous year [16]. - For security level distribution, in H1 2025, AAAsf - rated securities accounted for 89.71%, AA + sf - rated securities accounted for 6.76%, and sub - grade securities accounted for 3.54% [17]. - Regarding the issuance interest rate, the median interest rate of AAAsf - rated securities with a term of about 1 year was 2.18%, a year - on - year decrease of about 30BP [19]. 2. Issuance Spread Statistical Analysis - Compared with the same - term Treasury bonds, in H1 2025, the average issuance spread of 1 - year accounts - receivable asset - backed securities narrowed slightly compared to the previous year, while that of 3 - year products widened [25]. - Compared with the same - term AAA - rated corporate bonds, in H1 2025, the average issuance spread of 1 - year AAAsf - rated accounts - receivable asset - backed securities increased slightly compared to the previous year, and that of 3 - year AAAsf - rated products widened [28]. - The average issuance interest rate of 1 - year AAAsf - rated accounts - receivable asset - backed securities issued in H1 2025 decreased by 31BP year - on - year [30]. 3. Filing Situation In H1 2025, 41 accounts - receivable asset - backed special plans were filed with the Asset Management Association of China, with a total scale of 50.756 billion yuan. Compared with the previous year, the number of filings decreased by 8, and the filing scale decreased by 25.00% [3][31]. 4. Secondary Market Trading Situation In H1 2025, accounts - receivable asset - backed securities had 2,241 transactions in the secondary market, a year - on - year increase of 82.20%. The total transaction scale was 65.546 billion yuan, a year - on - year increase of 38.13%. The transaction scale accounted for 13.15% of the total transaction scale of enterprise asset - backed securities in the same period, a year - on - year decrease of 2.85 percentage points, ranking second in terms of transaction scale [33]. 5. Analysis of Maturity Situation in H2 2025 It is estimated that 165 outstanding accounts - receivable asset - backed securities will mature in H2 2025, with a scale of 104.08 billion yuan, accounting for 33.66% of the total scale of all maturing enterprise asset - backed securities in H2 2025. From the perspective of original equity holders, China Railway Capital Co., Ltd. has 31 maturing accounts - receivable asset - backed securities, with a repayment scale of 35.678 billion yuan (34.28%); China Railway Trust Co., Ltd. has 15 maturing securities, with a repayment scale of 21.822 billion yuan (20.97%); China Railway Construction Commercial Factoring Co., Ltd. has 10 maturing securities, with a repayment scale of 11.662 billion yuan (11.21%) [34].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Recommended" rating for the company [2][5]. Core Viewpoints - The company reported a revenue of 19.35 billion yuan in the first half of 2025, a year-on-year increase of 0.6%. The net profit attributable to shareholders was 0.24 billion yuan, reflecting a significant year-on-year growth of 48.57% [5]. - The company is focusing on business expansion and cost control, which has positively impacted its net profit. However, the non-recurring gains have led to a decline in the net profit after deducting non-recurring items [5]. - The company has made significant improvements in its qualifications and capabilities in the inspection and testing certification field, covering various sectors such as construction, transportation, and environment [5]. - The company is actively planning an equity incentive program and has completed a share buyback, acquiring 6,124,910 shares at an average price of 16.36 yuan per share [5]. - The acquisition of 100% equity in Shanghai Investment Consulting Group is expected to enhance the company's consulting service capabilities and market reach [5]. Financial Forecasts - The company forecasts revenues of 41.52 billion yuan, 43.00 billion yuan, 45.00 billion yuan, and 48.00 billion yuan for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, and 2027 respectively, with corresponding revenue growth rates of 3.54%, 3.58%, 4.65%, and 6.67% [6][7]. - The net profit attributable to shareholders is projected to be 3.43 billion yuan, 3.58 billion yuan, 3.77 billion yuan, and 4.00 billion yuan for the same years, with growth rates of 8.49%, 4.36%, 5.43%, and 6.19% respectively [6][7]. - The report indicates a diluted EPS of 0.84 yuan, 0.87 yuan, 0.92 yuan, and 0.98 yuan for the years 2024 to 2027, with corresponding P/E ratios of 23.63, 22.64, 21.48, and 20.22 [6][7].

Group 1 - The company Southeast Network Frame (SZ 002135) held its 25th meeting of the 8th board of directors on August 19, 2025, to discuss the proposal for establishing a foreign exchange derivative trading management system [2] - For the year 2024, the company's revenue composition is as follows: construction industry accounts for 69.78%, chemical fiber industry for 27.79%, others for 1.79%, and photovoltaic industry for 0.64% [2]

Group 1: Core Insights - The report emphasizes the significant profit contribution of state-owned enterprises in the construction and mineral resources sector, indicating a potential for value reassessment [5] - Key recommendations include companies with high resource contribution and untapped performance potential, such as China Metallurgical Group A (PB 0.64X) and China Metallurgical Group H (PB 0.41X) [5] - Other highlighted companies include China Railway Group A (PB 0.46X) and China Railway Group H (PB 0.30X, 25E dividend yield 4.9%), which have abundant copper and molybdenum resources [5] Group 2: Industry Performance - The report notes that the construction and mineral resources sector is poised for a reassessment of value, driven by the performance potential of untapped resources [5] - The analysis suggests that companies involved in gold business, like Shanghai Construction Group (PB 0.69X), may benefit from rising gold prices [5] - The report indicates that the overall performance of the construction and mineral resources sector is critical for the broader economic landscape, highlighting its importance in the investment strategy [5]

Core Viewpoint - The ISM reported that the July non-manufacturing PMI in the U.S. was 50.1, indicating a slowdown in the service sector and falling below expectations [1] Economic Indicators - The July non-manufacturing PMI decreased from 50.8 in the previous month to 50.1, reflecting a near stagnation in the service economy [1] - Employment index fell to 46.4, marking the fourth contraction in five months and reaching one of the lowest levels since the pandemic [1] - Input cost index rose to the highest level since October 2022, indicating increasing inflationary pressures [1] Market Reaction - Following the release of the ISM data, all three major U.S. stock indices closed lower, with the Dow Jones down 0.14%, Nasdaq down 0.65%, and S&P 500 down 0.49% [1] Industry Insights - Comments from the ISM highlighted concerns over tariffs and uncertainty affecting procurement planning in the accommodation and food services sector, leading to delays in the next fiscal year's purchasing plans [1] - The construction industry noted that trade uncertainties are causing clients to reassess project feasibility, resulting in delays or cancellations [1] - Steve Miller, chairman of the ISM Services Business Survey Committee, indicated that tariffs are driving up payment prices, potentially fueling inflation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal implications and responsibilities in labor and service relationships, highlighting the differences in liability and compensation in cases of injury during work, particularly in informal labor arrangements [12][13]. Group 1: Labor and Service Relationships - Labor relationships are governed by strict regulations under labor laws, while service relationships are more flexible and based on civil agreements, suitable for temporary or non-core work [1][12]. - Service relationships often lack formal contracts, leading to potential disputes over responsibilities and compensation in case of injuries [13]. Group 2: Case Studies - Case 1: A caregiver at a nursing home was awarded compensation after slipping on a wet floor, with the nursing home held 90% responsible due to inadequate safety measures [2][3]. - Case 2: A demolition worker fell from a ladder and was found 70% responsible for his injuries due to lack of safety equipment, while the employer was held 30% responsible for not providing safety measures [5][7]. - Case 3: An online food delivery rider sustained injuries during delivery and was awarded compensation, with the platform company held 50% responsible for not ensuring adequate safety measures [9][10]. Group 3: Legal Responsibilities - Both parties in a service relationship have a duty of care regarding safety, with the service provider expected to ensure a safe working environment and the labor provider responsible for their own safety [3][7]. - The court emphasizes the importance of written agreements in service relationships to clarify responsibilities and reduce disputes [13].

Group 1 - The cement industry will be included in the national carbon market by 2025, with a focus on supporting decarbonization and green development in the construction sector as carbon peak deadlines approach [1] - Currently, less than 1% of buildings globally achieve net-zero carbon emissions in daily use, and this percentage decreases when considering the embedded emissions from building materials [2][3] - The affordability of green buildings remains a significant challenge for both developed and emerging economies, compounded by gaps in capacity building, knowledge, and skills [1][3] Group 2 - The global stock of zero-carbon buildings is below 1%, with new buildings achieving a zero-carbon rate of about 5% over the past 5 to 10 years, indicating a need for substantial improvement [2] - The construction sector is responsible for 50% to 75% of urban greenhouse gas emissions, necessitating multiple pathways for emission reduction, including investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency [5][6] - To meet the International Energy Agency's (IEA) 2050 net-zero target, the speed of energy efficiency improvements in the building sector must increase by 2 to 3 times [5] Group 3 - The upfront costs of retrofitting and constructing net-zero and resilient buildings are high, which deters investment due to perceived risks and low returns [2][4] - Innovative financing models, such as green bonds and energy performance contracts, are essential to address the financing challenges in green building projects [7][8] - The global investment required to achieve net-zero and resilient building goals is estimated at $1.7 trillion annually over the next five years, with private capital playing a crucial role [7][8] Group 4 - Key technologies for driving green low-carbon buildings include building passports and smart home systems, which track energy consumption and incentivize behavioral changes [9][10] - The WRI is focusing on energy-efficient retrofitting in urban renewal in China, promoting regional energy-saving technologies and financial support models [10]

Group 1 - The conference on "International Zero Carbon Cities and Villages and Zero Carbon Building" was held in Beijing, focusing on urban renewal, energy-saving mechanisms, policy support, and financial empowerment in the context of carbon neutrality [1] - Roxana Slavcheva from WRI highlighted that building energy efficiency is one of the most cost-effective strategies for emission reduction, with a potential 83% reduction in global building sector carbon emissions by 2050 if best practices are widely adopted [1] - Despite progress in Europe, globally less than 1% of existing buildings can achieve zero carbon emissions, facing challenges such as high initial costs and low perceived investment returns [1] Group 2 - The building industry is urged to invest in energy efficiency and renewable energy to meet the International Energy Agency's net-zero carbon goals, while also promoting low-carbon concrete and other alternative products [2] - WRI's research indicates that by adopting existing low-carbon technologies, Chinese cities could reduce nearly 48% of carbon emissions by 2030, with almost half of this potential coming from the building sector [2] - The transition to low-carbon buildings requires collaboration between public and private sectors to innovate financial tools, reduce investment risks, and support the widespread implementation of low-carbon technologies [2] Group 3 - WRI emphasizes that building energy efficiency is a key focus area, and integrating green low-carbon strategies into urbanization is crucial for achieving China's dual carbon goals and enhancing urban climate resilience [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Guangdong High Court has released a white paper on securities false statement infringement cases, highlighting efforts to combat financial fraud and protect investor rights, thereby supporting the high-quality development of the capital market [1]. Group 1: Case Statistics and Trends - From 2022 to 2024, the Guangdong courts concluded 17,515 securities false statement liability disputes, with a 34.7% year-on-year decrease in new first-instance cases in 2024, totaling 111 companies involved [2]. - The majority of the companies sued were in manufacturing (64), followed by information technology (17) and construction (7) [2]. - Of the cases judged, 65 companies were involved, with 52 facing administrative penalties and 7 under criminal proceedings [2]. Group 2: Judicial Innovations and Mechanisms - The Guangdong courts have established a digital litigation service platform and introduced guidelines for a demonstration judgment mechanism in financial trials [2]. - A comprehensive dispute resolution scheme has been implemented, combining non-litigation methods, pre-trial mediation, and parallel case hearings [2][4]. Group 3: Investor Protection and Market Integrity - The white paper emphasizes the importance of protecting investors, particularly small and medium-sized investors, as essential for promoting high-quality capital market development [4]. - The courts have collaborated with regulatory bodies to strengthen accountability across administrative, civil, and criminal dimensions, aiming to deter illegal activities in the capital market [4]. Group 4: Case Example of Violation - A notable case involved a shareholder violating a lock-up commitment after a divorce, leading to a lawsuit where the company sought to recover approximately 51 million yuan from the shareholder for unauthorized stock sales [5]. - The Guangdong High Court ruled that the shareholder must pay 596.4 thousand yuan in profits from the illegal sale, establishing a precedent for calculating illegal gains based on stock price movements [6][8].

Economic Growth - The Central Financial Committee emphasized the need to deepen the construction of a unified national market and regulate "involution" competition among enterprises[3] - President Xi Jinping highlighted the importance of guiding enterprises to improve product quality and promoting the orderly exit of backward production capacity[3] - The State Council issued a notice to enhance employment support policies, including expanding special loans and increasing unemployment insurance return ratios[3] Infrastructure and Industry Policies - The China Cement Association released guidelines to promote "anti-involution" and "stable growth" in the cement industry, with many industries issuing production reduction notices[4] - A collective production cut of 30% was announced by leading photovoltaic glass companies to alleviate "involution" competition[4] - Some steel mills have received notices for production reduction and emission limits[4] Consumer Policies - Shanghai optimized the environment for outbound tax refunds, and Taobao launched a 50 billion RMB subsidy for consumer vouchers to stimulate consumption[4][16] - The initiative by Taobao is expected to benefit more small and medium-sized businesses and stimulate greater consumption[16] Financial Regulation - Recent financial regulatory policies focus on optimizing capital market mechanisms and exploring the development of RMB stablecoins in Shanghai and Hong Kong[19] - The government aims to guide insurance companies towards long-term stable investments[19] Trade Policies - The U.S. has lifted certain trade restrictions on China, including the requirement for government licenses for major chip design software suppliers[5][22] - The U.S. plans to implement new tariffs ranging from 10% to 70% on countries without trade agreements starting August 1[6][25] Overseas Macro Policies - The U.S. Federal Reserve members largely expect another interest rate cut later this year, with the "Big Beautiful Act" extending tax cuts set to expire in 2025, potentially increasing the fiscal deficit by 3 to 4 trillion USD over the next decade[6][25] - The U.S. Treasury plans to increase its cash reserves significantly, from approximately 313 billion USD to 500 billion USD by the end of July[27]