Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transition from expert-driven to data-driven research paradigms in soft science, emphasizing the importance of digital technologies in enhancing decision-making quality and efficiency through data analysis [1][2]. Group 1: Transition from Expert-Driven to Data-Driven Paradigm - The traditional expert-driven paradigm relies on literature review and theoretical analysis to formulate research hypotheses, while the data-driven paradigm focuses on analyzing large datasets to uncover underlying patterns and relationships [1]. - The shift to a data-driven approach faces challenges such as inertia from the expert-driven model and the need for collaboration among data methods, digital talent, and data resources [1][2]. Group 2: Pathways for Transition - The transition requires a dual-driven model that combines data analysis with expert knowledge to enhance research rigor and relevance [2]. - Establishing a consensus on data-driven approaches involves integrating data thinking into organizational strategies and fostering a culture that values data-driven insights [3]. Group 3: Building Research Capacity - Strengthening the research team is essential, focusing on developing data capabilities and attracting interdisciplinary talent with expertise in both data science and social sciences [3][4]. - A robust data management mechanism is necessary to support effective data utilization, including the creation of specialized databases and promoting data sharing across institutions [4]. Group 4: Innovation in Methods and Models - Accelerating the development of algorithms and intelligent analysis models is crucial for transforming research processes, integrating AI technologies to enhance quantitative and qualitative research [5]. - Promoting interdisciplinary methods and tools will help break down barriers between different fields, allowing for a more comprehensive approach to data analysis [5].

Group 1: IPO Withdrawals - Three companies withdrew their IPO applications during the week of June 16 to June 22, 2025, including one from the Shanghai Stock Exchange, one from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, and one from the Beijing Stock Exchange [1] - The companies that withdrew their applications are Qingdao Gulf Chemical Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Qingtian Solar Technology Co., Ltd., and Beijing Zhaoxin Information Technology Co., Ltd. [2] Group 2: Qingdao Gulf Chemical Co., Ltd. - Qingdao Gulf Chemical focuses on the research, production, and sales of chlor-alkali chemicals, organic chemical raw materials, high polymer new materials, and inorganic silicon products, with key products including PVC, polystyrene, and caustic soda [3] - The company experienced significant growth in performance due to a nearly 50% increase in product prices during the chemical industry upcycle before 2022, but is now facing potential declines in performance as prices revert to pre-cycle levels [4] - The company's total assets as of June 30, 2022, were approximately 1,332.11 million yuan, with a net profit of approximately 100.56 million yuan for the first half of 2022 [4] Group 3: Beijing Zhaoxin Information Technology Co., Ltd. - Beijing Zhaoxin specializes in Product Identity Management (PIDM) technology, offering IoT identification products, SaaS software, and digital solutions for various industries [5] - The company's revenue for 2022 was approximately 22.88 million yuan, which is significantly below the standards required for listing, leading to the withdrawal of its IPO application [6]

Group 1: Economic Indicators - The core viewpoint indicates that the economy remains resilient, with signs of improvement in core CPI stability and marginal PMI recovery due to ongoing "stabilization growth" measures [2] - In May, the CPI remained flat at -0.1%, while the PPI decreased from -2.7% to -3.3%. The manufacturing PMI increased from 49.0% to 49.5% [5][6] - New RMB loans in May amounted to 620 billion, an increase of 340 billion from the previous month, while M2 growth slowed to 7.9% [2][17][20] Group 2: CPI Analysis - The May CPI showed a month-on-month decrease of 0.2%, with a year-on-year decline of 0.1%. Core CPI remained stable with a year-on-year increase of 0.6% [5] - The decline in energy prices negatively impacted non-food items, but travel service prices saw a significant rebound, supporting the core CPI [5] Group 3: PPI Insights - The PPI's year-on-year decline of 3.3% was below market expectations, with traditional industry prices mostly declining while new momentum industries saw price increases [6] - Factors affecting PPI include falling international oil prices, seasonal declines in energy and raw material prices, and the impact of consumption and equipment renewal policies [6] Group 4: PMI Developments - The manufacturing PMI recorded 49.5%, indicating an improvement in economic sentiment, driven by tariff delays and proactive macro policies [9] - The production index rose to 50.7%, returning to the expansion zone, while the new orders index increased to 49.8% [9] Group 5: Fixed Asset Investment - Fixed asset investment growth in May decreased to 3.7%, with real estate investment continuing to decline significantly [13] - High-tech industry investments showed strong growth, particularly in information services and aerospace manufacturing [13] Group 6: Credit and M2 Analysis - In May, new credit issuance was 620 billion, reflecting a decrease in consumer loans and a recovery in corporate short-term loans [17] - M2 growth slowed to 7.9%, influenced by a decrease in deposit attractiveness and slower fiscal fund release [20]

证券代码：601965 股票简称：中国汽研 编号：临2025-032 中国汽车工程研究院股份有限公司 第五届监事会第十六次会议决议公告 本公司监事会及监事会全体成员保证公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导 性陈述或者重大遗漏，对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 中国汽车工程研究院股份有限公司（以下简称"中国汽研"或"公司"）第 五届监事会第十六次会议于 2025 年 6 月 19 日在重庆以现场加通讯表决方式召开。 会议通知于 2025 年 6 月 13 日以电子邮件方式送达公司监事。会议由监事会主席 游丹主持，监事应到 5 人，实到 5 人。会议符合《公司法》和《公司章程》的规 定，会议程序及表决结果合法有效。会议形成决议如下： 以 5 票赞成，0 票弃权，0 票反对，审议通过了《关于限制性股票激励计划 （第三期）第一个解锁期部分解锁的议案》。 经核查，截至 2025 年 6 月 13 日，公司限制性股票激励计划（第三期）授予 的 5 名激励对象解锁资格合法有效，满足《中国汽研限制性股票激励计划（第三 期） （草案）》和《中国汽研限制性股票激励计划考核管理办法》中第一个解锁期 对应的解锁条件。公 ...

Group 1 - The State Intellectual Property Office of China granted a patent titled "A Risk Identification and Response Method Based on Target Detection and Edge-Cloud Collaboration" to three subsidiaries of China Metallurgical Group Corporation [1] - China Metallurgical Huati Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. was established in 2004, located in Ma'anshan City, with a registered capital of 8.23258663 billion RMB, and has participated in 5,000 bidding projects [1] - China Metallurgical Huati Nanjing Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. was established in 2006, located in Nanjing City, with a registered capital of 800 million RMB, and has participated in 2,754 bidding projects [1] Group 2 - China Metallurgical Huati Nanjing Electrical Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. was established in 2007, located in Nanjing City, with a registered capital of 50 million RMB, and has participated in 269 bidding projects [2] - The three companies collectively hold a significant number of patents, with China Metallurgical Huati Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. having 3,152 patents, China Metallurgical Huati Nanjing Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. having 2,303 patents, and China Metallurgical Huati Nanjing Electrical Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. having 224 patents [1][2]

Group 1: Xibu Mining - The company has hedged about 50% of its external raw material purchases [1] - Major shareholder's quality assets have been injected into the listed company [1] - Annual capital expenditure is approximately 3 billion, with the Yulong Copper Phase III construction capital expenditure around 5 billion [1] - The company has not yet initiated share buybacks or equity incentive plans [1] - Strategic goals include strengthening the mining main business and refining the smelting industry, while actively expanding resource reserves and improving process levels [1] - The Yulong Copper Mine is a porphyry copper mine with good exploration potential in the deep edge [1] - The major shareholder's holding decisions are based on confidence in long-term development prospects and market environment considerations [1] Group 2: Salt Lake Co. - The company has established a potash fertilizer production capacity system of 5 million tons per year, with subsidiaries responsible for 4 million tons and 1 million tons respectively [2] - Potash fertilizer market demand is expected to remain stable with an upward trend, and international potash prices have significantly increased [2] - Chinese enterprises are accelerating overseas potash fertilizer industry layout to ensure long-term stable supply [2] - The company has mastered full-category potassium chloride processing technology, with core production lines for potassium chloride and lithium carbonate capacity being released [2] - A new 40,000 tons per year lithium salt integrated project is progressing, utilizing advanced technology to increase lithium recovery by 25%, reduce freshwater consumption by 47.4%, and decrease overall energy consumption by 50.6% [2] - The company is exploring diversified shareholder return methods to ensure continuity and stability in profit distribution policies [2] - Through refined management, optimized channels, and reduced labor costs, the company is further lowering production costs [2] - China Minmetals is assisting the company in achieving central enterprise status and enhancing core competitiveness [2] - The company is closely aligning with China's salt lake "three-step" development strategy to build a globally influential salt lake industry cluster [2] Group 3: Zhongji Renjian - The company is implementing an intelligent emergency equipment testing industrial park project in Yanqing District, Beijing, with an investment not exceeding 581.19 million [3] - The company emphasizes market value management by enhancing operational efficiency, profitability, and core competitiveness [3] - The workforce consists of 690 employees, with 65.94% in technical positions and 86.52% holding a bachelor's degree or higher [3] - The company plans strategic investments in fields such as new energy vehicle certification testing and is expanding in regions like the Greater Bay Area, Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle, and southeastern Henan [3] Group 4: Asset Management Overview - Shangyin Fund, established in 2013, has an asset management scale of 226.466 billion, ranking 33rd out of 210 [3] - The scale of non-monetary public funds is 166.735 billion, ranking 30th out of 210 [3] - The fund manages 102 public funds, ranking 69th out of 210, with 20 fund managers, ranking 67th out of 210 [3] - The best-performing public fund product in the past year is Shangyin Medical Health Mixed A, with a latest net value of 0.75 and a growth of 24.87% in the past year [3] - The latest public fund product raised is Shangyin National Certificate Free Cash Flow Index A, which is an index-type stock fund, with a subscription period from June 4, 2025, to June 24, 2025 [3]

Group 1 - In May, Guangdong Province had the highest number of newly registered business entities, totaling 270,167, a decrease of 52,000 from the previous month [2] - The top ten provinces for new business registrations included Hubei, Henan, Zhejiang, Shandong, Jiangsu, Hunan, Hebei, Fujian, and Sichuan [2][3] - Overall, the top ten provinces accounted for over 60% of the national new business registrations [3] Group 2 - Hubei Province recorded the fastest year-on-year growth in new business registrations at 8.33%, although this was a significant drop from the previous month's 26.10% [5] - Only six provinces experienced positive year-on-year growth in May, with the top ten growth rankings including Hubei, Hunan, Liaoning, Beijing, Shaanxi, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, Guangxi, and Zhejiang [5] Group 3 - The retail sector had the highest number of new business registrations in May, with 191,800 new entities, representing a year-on-year growth of 17.19% [7] - Other sectors with significant new registrations included wholesale, business services, technology promotion and application services, software and information technology services, construction and decoration, cultural arts, agriculture, professional technical services, and real estate [7] - The technology promotion and application services sector saw the fastest growth at 25.83% year-on-year [7] Group 4 - In May, the capital market financing demand decreased, with a total of 260 financing events and a total financing scale of 20.578 billion [9] - The manufacturing sector had the highest financing scale at 11.752 billion, accounting for 57.11% of the total [9] - The electricity, gas, and water production and supply sector received 3.217 billion, making up 15.63% of the total financing [9] Group 5 - In terms of regional financing, economically developed southeastern coastal provinces led in financing scale [10] - Jiangsu had 44 financing events with a total scale of 3.693 billion, while Shanghai achieved a financing scale of 3.042 billion [11] - The financing rounds showed that public offerings accounted for 24.22% of the total financing, with D-round financing at 21.59% and A-round financing at 14.26% [11]

Company Formation - A new company named Qijie Zhitong (Shandong) Project Management Co., Ltd. has been established with a registered capital of 5 million RMB [1] - The legal representative of the company is Peng Yu, and it is wholly owned by Yunzhi Tong Cross-Border E-Commerce (Shandong) Co., Ltd. [1] Shareholding Structure - Yunzhi Tong Cross-Border E-Commerce (Shandong) Co., Ltd. holds 100% of the shares in Qijie Zhitong [2] Business Scope - The business scope of Qijie Zhitong includes general project management services, government procurement agency services, landscaping engineering construction, earthwork construction, information technology consulting services, and various other consulting and management services [2] - The company is also involved in licensed activities such as various engineering construction activities, residential interior decoration, construction project supervision, and engineering cost consulting [2] Company Registration Details - The company is registered in Qingdao, Shandong Province, with a business duration until June 12, 2025, and no fixed term thereafter [2] - The registration authority is the Market Supervision Administration of Qingdao City, Huangdao District [2]

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the restructuring of the board of directors at Suzhou Electrical Appliance Research Institute Co., Ltd. (referred to as "the company"), with the current chairman Hu Chun voluntarily stepping down to facilitate a transition to a professional management team, marking a significant step in modern corporate governance [2][3] - The new board consists of 9 members, including 6 non-independent directors and 3 independent directors, with the new chairman to be elected after the board's restructuring is officially completed [2] - The company has introduced a fee reduction policy for certain electrical testing projects, aligning with the regulatory requirements to promote industrial optimization and upgrade actions [2] Group 2 - The company maintains a leading position in the core testing field of high and low voltage electrical appliances in China, with a forward-looking layout in emerging business areas such as new energy equipment lifecycle testing and energy storage system validation [3] - The transition in governance structure reflects the company's substantial progress in modern governance, with Hu Chun's exit from the board indicating his recognition of modern governance methods and confidence in market-oriented operational mechanisms [3] - The company is expected to seize new development opportunities in the context of building a new energy system and achieving carbon neutrality goals, supported by its stable governance structure, clear strategic planning, and accumulated technical strength [3]

Group 1 - The candidate Zhao Yichao declares independence and compliance with relevant laws and regulations for the position of independent director at Suzhou Electrical Appliance Research Institute Co., Ltd [1][6] - The candidate confirms no conflicts of interest with the company or its major shareholders [1][5] - The candidate has undergone qualification review and training as required by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [1][3] Group 2 - The candidate possesses the necessary experience and knowledge related to the operation of listed companies [3][4] - The candidate has not been subject to any disqualifications or penalties that would prevent them from serving as an independent director [5][6] - The candidate commits to fulfilling their responsibilities diligently and independently during their tenure [6][7]