迈为股份表示，目前，公司正在与当地政府部门就获取新的项目用地事宜进行协商，待协商达成一致 后，公司将与政府部门重新签订相关协议并相应变更钙钛矿叠层项目的建设地点，后续公司将及时披露 进展情况。此外，本次签署《土地收回协议书》是公司与吴江经济技术开发区管理委员会协商一致的结 果，双方均不存在违反约定需要承担违约责任的情形；基于本次签署《土地收回协议书》的安排，公司 已取得的项目用地使用权将依法予以退还，同时，公司此前支付的土地出让金也将由原渠道或经由吴江 经济技术开发区财政和资产管理局安排退回给公司。除支付土地出让金外，公司累计已投入资金349.68 万元（包含土地相关税费324.35万元），上述费用由公司自身承担，本次交易不会对公司的财务状况和 经营成果产生其他不利影响。公司正积极与吴江当地政府部门协商新的用地，以便落实向不特定对象发 行可转换公司债券的项目用地。 北极星太阳能光伏网获悉，2025年12月31日，迈为股份发布公告称，公司与吴江经济技术开发区管理委 员会签署了《土地收回协议书》，约定就公司坐落在吴江经济技术开发区同津大道西侧、采字路南侧的 土地使用权进行有偿收回，面积约171,441.09平方米 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of multiple brokerage strategies is the expectation of a strong market opening in January, supported by liquidity factors and potential policy changes such as interest rate cuts [1][3] - The market environment in January is expected to be better than the previous two years, with a favorable liquidity and exchange rate situation, which may drive the continuation of the cross-year market trend [1][3] - Analysts suggest that the upcoming earnings forecasts will provide further guidance for market trends, indicating a potential expansion of the market's upward structure [1][3] Group 2 - The focus for institutional funds post-holiday is likely to be on consensus stocks that have adjusted, such as sectors like non-ferrous metals, overseas computing power, and semiconductors [2][4] - There is a preference for sectors with lower heat and concentrated holdings that are beginning to gain attention, such as chemicals, engineering machinery, power equipment, and new energy [2][4] - The spring market rally is anticipated to start gradually, with the potential for structural market trends to continue, although some volatility may occur in January [4][5] Group 3 - The strategies from various brokerages highlight the importance of monitoring policy expectations and industry trends, which could support the spring market rally [3][4] - The current market risk appetite remains high, providing room for high-elasticity technology themes to continue their upward trajectory [4][5] - Analysts emphasize the need for a cautious approach towards sectors that have previously shown weak fundamental support, as they may face adjustment risks [1][3]

证券研究报告 | 行业周报 gszqdatemark 2026 01 04 年 月 日 电力设备 -10% 6% 22% 38% 54% 70% 2025-01 2025-05 2025-08 2025-12 电力设备 沪深300 硅片电池价格持续走高，两部委发布 2026 年消费品以旧换新通知 光伏：硅片电池价格持续走高，组件涨价预期增强。据 InfoLink Consulting，延续 上周偏强的价格走势，硅片厂于上周四陆续上调报价，整体市场仍维持挺价基调。 从各尺寸表现来看，183N 硅片新一轮报价普遍上调至每片 1.40 元人民币，210RN 主流报价同步调整至每片 1.50 元人民币，210N 上周四起报价上移至每片 1.70 元 人民币，相较上周三以前出现明显抬升，且已有零星成交陆续释出。继上周各尺寸 报价持续上涨，本周一线电池厂家基本能达到每瓦 0.38 元以上价格，报价每瓦 0.39-0.40 元以上则有少量成交。近期头部组件企业普遍响应行业自律行为，陆续 上调组件报价。在涨价讯号逐步明确的背景下，分布式分销渠道率先出现成交上 行。组件端开始反映银价成本的抬升上调报价，在上周调涨 TOPCon ...

每经AI快讯，禾迈股份1月4日晚间发布公告称，截至2025年12月31日，公司通过上海证券交易所交易 系统以集中竞价交易方式回购公司股份18万股，占公司总股本的比例为0.15%，回购成交的最高价为 98.92元/股，最低价为93.63元/股，成交总金额约为1736万元。 每经头条（nbdtoutiao）——AI泡沫破灭？美股下跌20%？量子计算颠覆加密货币？金价涨破1万美元？ 2026年华尔街和科技圈十大预测来了 （记者 曾健辉） ...

- The report introduces a quantitative framework for market trend analysis, emphasizing the inherent attributes of assets and their lifecycle stages, categorized into five styles: external growth, quality growth, quality dividend, value dividend, and bankruptcy value[6][7][10] - The framework prioritizes asset comparison using metrics such as expected growth (gf), actual growth (g), profitability (ROE), high dividend (D), and bankruptcy value (PB/SIZE), each tailored to specific lifecycle stages[7][10] - The quantitative model has demonstrated strong historical performance, achieving an annualized return of 27.45% since 2009, with notable positive excess returns in most years, particularly post-2017[17][20][18] - The report recommends three dominant styles for January 2026: expected growth, actual growth, and profitability, supported by metrics like Δgf, Δg, and ΔROE, all showing expansion trends[15][33][29] - Expected growth strategy selects industries with the highest analyst forecasted growth rates, achieving significant excess returns since 2019. Recommended sectors for January 2026 include automotive sales, home appliances, tungsten, emerging financial services, and lithium[37][39][36] - Actual growth strategy focuses on industries with the highest Δg and related factors (sue, sur, jor), showing strong long-term excess returns. Recommended sectors for January 2026 include photovoltaic equipment, electronic chemicals, lithium battery chemicals, aerospace military, and home appliances[39][40][36] - Profitability strategy targets industries with high ROE and low PB-ROE valuation residuals, with notable excess returns from 2016 to 2020. Recommended sectors for January 2026 include agriculture, liquor, power distribution equipment, non-dairy beverages, and network connection/tower setup[42][43][36] - Quality dividend strategy uses DP+ROE scoring to select industries, with significant excess returns in 2016, 2017, and 2023. Recommended sectors for January 2026 include forestry/processing, boiler equipment, public transportation, fuel cells, and network connection/tower setup[45][46][36] - Value dividend strategy employs DP+BP scoring, achieving notable excess returns in 2009, 2017, and 2021-2023. Recommended sectors for January 2026 include security, daily chemicals, pet food, buses, and network connection/tower setup[48][50][36] - Bankruptcy value strategy selects industries with the lowest PB+SIZE scores, showing strong excess returns in 2015-2016 and 2021-2023. Recommended sectors for January 2026 include automotive sales, ceramics, cotton textiles, dyeing, and building decoration[52][53][36]

Core Viewpoint - Experts generally predict that consumer prices in 2026 will not experience significant inflation, instead showing a trend of "low and moderate recovery" with CPI expected to rise around 0.8% year-on-year, with a possibility of reaching 2.0% in a reasonable range [1] Group 1: CPI and Consumer Behavior - The CPI year-on-year growth rate has expanded, with November CPI rising by 0.7%, the highest since March 2024, driven mainly by an increase in food prices, particularly fresh vegetables which surged by 14.5% [3] - The core CPI, excluding food and energy, rose by 1.2% year-on-year, remaining above 1% for three consecutive months, indicating a recovery in consumer spending, with prices for household appliances and clothing increasing [3] Group 2: PPI and Industrial Prices - The Producer Price Index (PPI) increased by 0.1% month-on-month in November, marking two consecutive months of growth, suggesting a gradual recovery in production material prices [4] - Prices in sectors such as coal mining, photovoltaic equipment, and lithium-ion batteries are stabilizing, with emerging industries showing significant upward price trends, which may eventually affect downstream consumer prices [4] Group 3: Policy Impact on Prices - The "anti-involution" policies implemented this year have played a crucial role in stabilizing prices, with accelerated capacity governance in key industries leading to more regulated market competition and a noticeable reduction in price declines in sectors like new energy vehicles and photovoltaic equipment [5] - Continued policy efforts to expand domestic demand and promote consumption are expected to further support price recovery, mitigating risks of deflation or uncontrolled inflation [5]

Group 1 - The "Spring Market" is gradually unfolding, with both internal and external environments showing positive changes, including favorable macroeconomic conditions and supportive policies [2][3] - The report suggests that the focus for investment should be on growth sectors, particularly those related to the "14th Five-Year Plan," which is expected to attract significant capital [3][4] - Key investment directions for January include AI industry chains, emerging industries, and cyclical price increases in industrial metals and chemicals [6][7] Group 2 - The report highlights specific companies as top investment picks, including North China Innovation (机械), Maiwei Co., Ltd. (机械), Wanhua Chemical (能源化工), Chipbond Technology (电子), Ping An Insurance (非银), Zijin Mining (煤炭有色钢铁), Giant Network (传媒互联网), AVIC High-Tech (军工), Sanhua Intelligent Control (电新), and Kaiter (北交所) [7][11] - North China Innovation is expected to benefit from increased domestic equipment adoption and the expansion of storage and AI chip production [14][20] - Maiwei Co., Ltd. is positioned to capitalize on the U.S. solar expansion due to a significant gap in battery production capacity [23][30] - Wanhua Chemical is projected to strengthen its market position in MDI and TDI, with expected price increases due to supply constraints [33][35] - Chipbond Technology is set to benefit from the growing demand for PCB and semiconductor equipment driven by AI [41][42] - Ping An Insurance is anticipated to maintain strong growth in new business value (NBV) and dividend yield, supported by its insurance operations [45][46] - Zijin Mining is expected to see price increases in gold and copper, with a clear growth path in production [49][50] - Giant Network's game "Supernatural Action Group" is expected to show significant potential for long-term growth and profitability [56][57] - AVIC High-Tech is positioned to benefit from the increasing demand for aerospace composite materials as the C919 enters mass production [58][59] - Sanhua Intelligent Control is expected to see growth from its involvement in Tesla's supply chain and the increasing demand for cooling solutions in data centers and energy storage [65][66] - Kaiter is projected to benefit from the automotive electronics sector and its expansion into robotics and liquid cooling markets [72][78]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of stocks categorized as "猛兽股" (beast stocks), focusing on those with a price increase of over 4 times within a year, and highlights the emergence of two distinct trading patterns: the traditional trend model and the volume accumulation model [1][2]. Group 1: Stock Selection Criteria - The selection formula for identifying beast stocks is based on a specific calculation involving the highest high and lowest low over a defined period [1]. - A total of 99 stocks were identified in the market, with 40 stocks filtered through an earnings pre-selection pool, although the specific list is not provided [2]. Group 2: Market Trends and Patterns - The current bull market has seen a significant increase in the volume accumulation model, with a ratio of approximately 6:4 compared to the traditional model [2]. - The volume accumulation model results in steeper price increase slopes and shorter time frames for achieving similar gains, with some stocks completing significant price movements in just days or weeks [2]. - The rise of quantitative trading is closely linked to the volume accumulation model, which emphasizes high-frequency trading and rapid turnover, previously dominated by speculative funds [2]. Group 3: Differences Between Trading Models - The traditional trend model is closely tied to earnings growth, while the volume accumulation model shows little correlation with earnings performance [2][5]. - Stocks selected under the traditional model are fundamentally different from those in the volume accumulation model, reflecting divergent views on the importance of fundamentals versus short-term market sentiment [4][5]. Group 4: Commonalities and Market Implications - Both trading models exhibit a common principle of minimal drawdowns during trends, with only a small fraction of the selected stocks experiencing significant pullbacks [5]. - The average drawdown for potential bull stocks in 2025 is lower than in previous years, theoretically making it easier to hold positions [5]. - The emergence of the volume accumulation model presents both challenges and opportunities for investors, suggesting a need for diversification in investment strategies [5].

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the given content Core Viewpoints of the Report - In 2025, convertible bonds performed excellently, with equity characteristics contributing the main revenue. The convertible bond market's performance was the third - highest in terms of revenue since 2010 and the best since 2021. The contribution ratio of the underlying stocks and valuation to the rise and fall was about 7:4, similar to 2021. Compared with mainstream stock indices, the convertible bond index showed the property of "attack when the market rises and defend when the market falls", with Sharpe ratio and Calmar ratio second only to micro - cap stocks [2][6]. - In 2025, the supply of convertible bonds was in the ascendant. Over 230 billion yuan of convertible bonds were delisted, reaching the highest scale since 2018, with banks having the largest delisting scale. The primary market issuance process accelerated in the second half of the year, but the issuance of large - scale convertible bonds remained cautious. Listed companies were more inclined to issue private placements [2]. - In 2025, the demand for convertible bonds was differentiated, and the ETF share reached a new high. The logic of the "fixed - income asset shortage" continued, and the demand structure of institutions for convertible bonds changed significantly. The direct holding scale of convertible bonds by institutions such as insurance and annuities was at a historically low level, while the holding scale of convertible bonds by funds, especially ETFs, reached a historical high [2]. - In 2025, the game of convertible bond terms was characterized by "high return and high risk". The probabilities of downward revision and non - call of convertible bonds were at historically low levels, but the number of times of triggering call/downward revision was relatively high since 2019, indicating an increase in the intensity of the game. The odds of the downward revision game were at a historical high, with photovoltaic convertible bonds and near - maturity convertible bonds being the highlights of the whole year. The profit - loss ratio of the call game deteriorated compared with the previous year but was still at a historical high [2]. - In 2025, the risks of convertible bonds were better than expected, and the impact of ratings decreased. Only Zhongzhuangzhuan 2 in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets triggered the substantial default risk, and the risk performance was better than investors' expectations. Although there were still many convertible bonds with rating adjustments, the impact on pricing was significantly weakened, and the market was generally "desensitized" to ratings [2]. Summary According to the Directory 2025, How Did the Convertible Bond Market Perform? 2021 - 2025: The Best - Performing Year Since 2021, with Equity Income as the Main Contributor - Vertically, the convertible bond holding experience in 2025 could rank among the top four years since 2010. As of December 30, 2025, the CSI Convertible Bond Index closed at 491.83 points, up 18.6% from the end of 2024. It was the third - highest revenue - earning year since 2010 and the best since 2021. The maximum drawdown was about 6%, the annualized volatility was less than 10%, and the Sharpe ratio was 1.92, the Calmar ratio was 3.01, achieving high returns with low drawdown and medium - low volatility [6]. - In terms of revenue decomposition, the contribution ratio of the underlying stocks and valuation to the rise and fall in 2025 was about 7:4. The change in the underlying stocks contributed 14 percentage points to the index return, and the change in valuation contributed about 8 percentage points, similar to 2021 [9]. - Horizontally, the return performance of the convertible bond index was slightly weaker, but the cost - performance was prominent. Compared with the stock indices in the same period, its return was only stronger than that of the Shanghai Composite Index, Juchao Large - cap Index, and Guozheng Value Index, but significantly weaker than that of the micro - cap and ChiNext Index. However, in terms of Sharpe ratio and Calmar ratio, it was only slightly weaker than the Wind Micro - cap Index, showing the property of "attack when the market rises and defend when the market falls" [13]. The Convertible Bond Market Rose Volatility Throughout the Year, and the Year - End Increase Converged - **First stage (Early 2025 - March 2025)**: Driven by the spring rally and supported by AI + robot innovation and low initial valuations, the convertible bond market had a dual - wheel - driven market of valuation and the underlying stocks, with a maximum index increase of 6.15% by the end of February. Low - price convertible bonds performed strongly, and the concern about credit risk events was reversed [19]. - **Second stage (March 2025 - Early April 2025)**: After the Two Sessions, the spring rally ended, and the market returned to the trading of annual report expectations. Market sentiment cooled down, and the convertible bond valuation peaked and declined. The intensification of Sino - US trade disputes led to a stock market correction on the first trading day after the Tomb - Sweeping Festival, and the CSI Convertible Bond Index fell 4.05%, with the automotive, communication, and computer industries leading the decline [19]. - **Third stage (Early April 2025 - Mid - June 2025)**: After the market correction on April 7, state funds such as Central Huijin entered the market, providing liquidity support. The Sino - US tariff issue was in a "tug - of - war", and the market expectation improved. The valuations of the overseas and export sectors rebounded, but concerns about the ratings of the photovoltaic and other sectors with weak performance emerged [20]. - **Fourth stage (End of June 2025 - End of August 2025)**: After the release of all rating results at the end of June, institutional funds increased their allocation of convertible bonds, and the convertible bond ETF share increased significantly. The anti - involution policy in the photovoltaic industry was implemented, and the photovoltaic convertible bonds rebounded. The A - share market was booming, driving the convertible bond market to its main uptrend. The convertible bond price and valuation reached new highs, and the market capacity decreased [20]. - **Fifth stage (End of August 2025 - Present)**: At the end of August, institutions' profit - taking demand led to a decline in the convertible bond market. The positions of insurance and annuity institutions in convertible bonds decreased significantly. The supply of convertible bonds improved in September, but it was difficult to offset the shrinkage caused by conversion. The convertible bond valuation stabilized and rebounded after the adjustment at the end of August and reached a high level again in December [21][22]. In 2025, the Supply of the Convertible Bond Market was in the Ascendant The Market Capacity Declined to Around 500 Billion Yuan, and the Delisting Scale Reached a Historical High - In 2025, the number of delisted convertible bonds reached a historical high, and the market capacity decreased rapidly. By December 30, 2025, a total of 163 convertible bonds were delisted, with a total delisting scale of over 230 billion yuan, the peak since 2018. The banking industry had the largest delisting scale of 101.323 billion yuan, followed by non - ferrous metals, basic chemicals, and power equipment and new energy [23]. The Primary Issuance Had Mixed Results, with Small - Ticket Issuance Accelerating and Large - Ticket Issuance Still Difficult - The good aspect was that the primary market issuance process accelerated in the second half of 2025. In the fourth quarter of 2025, the average time from the announcement of the convertible bond plan to listing was about 320 days, the lowest since 2023 [25]. - The regulatory authorities were still relatively cautious about the issuance of medium - and large - scale convertible bonds. As of now, no convertible bonds with a scale of over 2 billion yuan announced in 2025 have been listed, while 8 convertible bonds with a scale of less than 2 billion yuan have been listed [28]. Subjectively, the Trend of Listed Companies Preferring Private Placements was More Prominent - The ratio of the number of convertible bond plans to private placement plans has been declining sharply since the refinancing new regulations in 2023. In 2025, 53 listed companies announced private placement plans, while only 9 announced convertible bond plans, with a ratio of 16.98%, far lower than the average level before 2023 [29]. In 2025, the Demand for Convertible Bonds was Differentiated, and the ETF Share Reached a New High - In 2025, the logic of the "fixed - income asset shortage" continued, but the demand structure of institutions for convertible bonds changed significantly. As of November 2025, the direct holding of convertible bonds by insurance and annuity institutions was at a historically low level since 2021, while the holding of convertible bonds by funds, especially ETFs, reached a historical high [32]. In 2025, the Game of Convertible Bond Terms was Characterized by "High Return and High Risk" The Overall Probability of Downward Revision and Non - call of Convertible Bonds in 2025 was at a Historical Low - In 2025, it was a "big year" for call, and the call probability increased. There were 131 call announcements and 149 non - call announcements, and the call: non - call ratio was 88%, the highest since 2020. - The intensity of the downward revision of convertible bonds in 2025 was second only to 2024, but the downward revision probability decreased. There were 68 downward revision proposal announcements and 510 non - downward revision announcements, and the downward revision: non - downward revision ratio was 13%, at a historically low level [36]. Downward Revision: There were Odds, and Photovoltaic Convertible Bonds and Near - Maturity Convertible Bonds were the Highlights of the Whole Year - In terms of odds, the return performance of the convertible bond downward revision game in 2025 was at a relatively high level in history. The average return after a downward revision proposal was 2.02%, the best since 2023, and the average return after an actual downward revision was 0.63%, at a relatively high level since 2019 [41]. - In terms of influencing factors, the downward revision probability of near - maturity convertible bonds was significantly higher. The downward revision probability was highly correlated with the remaining term, showing obvious monotonicity. The new energy industry had the most downward revisions, and although some convertible bonds did not succeed in conversion by the end of 2025, they achieved good returns, and the downward revision increased the possibility of future call [42]. Call: The Profit - Loss Ratio of the Game Deteriorated Compared with the Previous Year but was Still at a Historical High - In 2025, the call game fluctuated greatly, and the non - call return was higher than the historical average. The average return on the first day after the non - call announcement of convertible bonds was 2.29%, higher than the historical average since 2019. The average return on the first day after the call announcement was - 2.54%, and the profit - loss ratio was about 0.9, which deteriorated significantly compared with 2024 but was still at a historical high [48]. In 2025, the Risks of Convertible Bonds were Better than Expected, and the Impact of Ratings Decreased - In 2025, there were no serious default events in the convertible bond market, which was significantly better than investors' expectations. Although Zhongzhuangzhuan 2 triggered default risk in the fourth quarter, its underlying stock had been ST before the restructuring, and its convertible bond rating had also fallen below the investment grade [48]. - In terms of ratings, although there were still many convertible bonds with rating adjustments, the impact on pricing decreased significantly. By December 30, 2025, 42 convertible bonds had their ratings downgraded and 40 were put on the rating watch list. However, the average decline of convertible bonds on the first trading day after the rating downgrade was only 0.01%, indicating that the market was generally "desensitized" to rating changes and the pricing was smoother [51].

Investment Rating - The report assigns an "Accumulate" rating for the photovoltaic equipment industry [1]. Core Insights - The low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites and space computing are expected to drive long-term demand in the photovoltaic industry, with equipment companies likely to benefit first [2]. - The report highlights that as LEO satellites enter a phase of intensive launches and the commercialization of space computing becomes evident, there will be a significant increase in demand for new photovoltaic technologies [4]. Summary by Sections Investment Recommendations - The report suggests that core equipment manufacturers are expected to benefit from the increasing demand driven by LEO satellites and space computing. Recommended stocks include Maiwei Co., Ltd., Jiejia Weichuang, Jing Shan Light Machine, and Laplace, with Di'er Laser identified as a beneficiary [4]. Market Dynamics - Elon Musk's plan to deploy 100GW of solar AI satellites annually is a key driver for space photovoltaic demand. The ability to harness solar energy in space offers longer generation times and higher stability and availability of energy [4]. - The report notes that the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) has regulations that allow for a maximum of about 60,000 satellites in LEO, with Starlink having applied for 42,000. This rapid expansion of satellite constellations is expected to increase demand for solar wings, battery cells, deployable array structures, and power management systems [4]. Technological Developments - The current main technology for space photovoltaics is gallium arsenide, with multi-junction gallium arsenide cells achieving a production efficiency of 30%. However, the complexity and cost constraints limit its scalability for LEO constellations [4]. - In the short to medium term, silicon-based P-type HJT technology is expected to penetrate low Earth orbit missions due to its lightweight potential and ongoing advancements in radiation resistance [4]. - Long-term prospects for perovskite tandem cells are promising due to their high efficiency and flexible film advantages, provided that breakthroughs in packaging lifespan and large-area consistency are achieved [4]. Industry Collaboration - The commercialization of the space photovoltaic industry is accelerating, with companies actively exploring opportunities in the space economy. For instance, Junda Co. and Shangyi Optoelectronics have signed a strategic cooperation agreement to integrate resources and collaborate on the application of perovskite battery technology in space energy [4].