推荐(维持) 事件 分析师：宝幼琛 S1050521110002 baoyc@cfsc.com.cn 联系人：谢孟津 S1050123110012 xiemj@cfsc.com.cn 行业相对表现 | 表现 | | 1M | 3M | 12M | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 计算机(申万) | | 10.1 | 19.5 | 83.8 | | 沪深 | 300 | 4.5 | 9.3 | 26.3 | 2025 年 08 月 19 日 研 优步（UBER.O）：业务与生态构筑协同效应 究 报 资料来源：Wind，华鑫证券研究 布 GLM-4.5V 多模态模型，昆仑万维 发 布 业 界 首 个 多 模 态 深 度 调 研 Agent》2025-08-18 2、《小马智行（PONY.O）：营收增 长领跑行业，Robotaxi 爆发+全球化 布局驱动财务拐点》2025-08-18 3、《计算机行业周报：GPT-5 正式 发布，谷歌 DeepMind 发布新一代通 用世界模型 Genie3》2025-08-14 2025 年 8 月 6 日优步发布 2025 年第二季度财报，营 ...

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that the ride-sharing platform is not liable for the loss of the pet dog during transport, placing primary responsibility on the actual carrier, while the plaintiff also bears some responsibility for the loss [1][3]. Group 1: Case Details - The plaintiff, Chen, used a ride-sharing platform to transport a pet dog from Beijing to Hebei, paying a fare of 198.1 yuan [2]. - The actual carrier, Hu, was involved in an accident that resulted in the loss of the dog during transport [2]. - Chen sought compensation from both Hu and the ride-sharing platform, claiming they should be jointly liable for the loss [2]. Group 2: Court's Ruling - The court determined that the ride-sharing platform merely provided intermediary services and had clearly stated in its user agreement that transporting pets alone is prohibited [3]. - The court found that Chen and Hu had formed a new transport agreement outside the platform's terms, thus the platform was not liable for the loss [3]. - Hu was deemed responsible for the loss of the dog as he failed to prove that the loss was due to a legally recognized exempting circumstance [3]. Group 3: Responsibilities and Liabilities - The court emphasized that both the carrier and the shipper share responsibility in cases of loss or damage during transport, with the carrier bearing strict liability unless exempted by law [4]. - The shipper, Chen, was found to have made a choice regarding the transport method that contributed to the loss, thus he also bears some responsibility [3][4]. - The court highlighted the importance of clear communication between the shipper and carrier regarding the pet's characteristics and transport conditions to avoid disputes [4][5]. Group 4: Valuation of Pets - In cases of loss or death of pets during transport, the carrier is responsible for compensating the pet's value, search costs, treatment fees, and related expenses [6]. - The valuation of the pet can be contentious; if not agreed upon, it should be determined based on market prices at the time of delivery [6]. - The platform, when acting as a non-vehicle carrier, must fulfill its obligations as stipulated in the transport contract with the shipper [6][7].

Group 1 - The scale of new employment forms, represented by delivery riders and ride-hailing drivers, is continuously expanding due to the acceleration of digital technology updates and the exploration of new business scenarios by platform companies since 2025 [1][6] - The latest data indicates that there are over 12 million ride-hailing delivery workers in China, with food delivery riders covering more than 2,000 county-level cities, making it a significant channel for job absorption [6] - In Yiyang, a delivery station plans to expand its workforce from 450 to over 500 riders due to rapid business growth, reflecting the increasing demand for delivery services in the county-level economy [4] Group 2 - The government has increased the number of pilot provinces for occupational injury protection for new employment forms to 17, and multiple platform companies are testing pension insurance for these workers [8] - Didi has recruited over 770,000 new drivers nationwide since April 2025, with significant recruitment in key regions such as Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang, and has allocated 1 billion yuan for driver subsidies and rights protection [9]